FanGraphs Power Rankings: May 3–9
After three weeks of these rankings and plenty of feedback — both positive and constructive — I’ve decided to change the way pitching factors into overall team quality. I had been using FIP to assess pitching performance, but using only peripherals undervalued some teams who were actually quite good at preventing runs and overvalued other teams who couldn’t keep runs off the board despite good pitching fundamentals. So instead of using straight park- and league-adjusted FIP as the pitching metric, I’ll be using a straight 50/50 split of FIP and RA9- beginning this week. This gives us a way to evaluate a team’s pitching staff with a blend of actual run prevention (including teams who may or may not benefit from good defense) and pitching talent. This 50/50 composite is shown below as SP- and RP-. The rest of the factors remain the same — offense is represented by wRC+ and combined with the two pitching factors to create an overall team quality metric. Then a team’s expected win-loss record (“luck”) is factored in to produce a power ranking.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Sox | 19-13 | -3 | 110 | 72 | 95 | 170 ↘ | 68.9% | 1 |
| Red Sox | 22-13 | 1 | 115 | 88 | 90 | 162 ↘ | 62.8% | -1 |
There’s a new team on top of the rankings this week. Despite losing Luis Robert for months on Sunday, the White Sox rose to the highest spot in the rankings after allowing just five total runs to score last week. Their starting rotation has been the best in baseball by a wide margin — the runs allowed by Lucas Giolito on Sunday were the first a White Sox starter had allowed in a week. There are certainly some concerns about their outfield, with two of their young stars now out for extended periods of time.
The Red Sox beat up on the Tigers and Orioles last week, scoring 49 runs in six games. Their offense continues to impress, with a huge bounce back season from J.D. Martinez and fantastic performances by Xander Bogaerts and Rafael Devers. They do have some holes on their roster, particularly in the outfield, but they’re out to prove that their disappointing season in 2020 was just a fluke.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Padres | 19-16 | -1 | 92 | 84 | 82 | 139 ⏹ | 90.7% | 2 |
| Yankees | 18-16 | -1 | 102 | 86 | 76 | 160 ↗ | 84.7% | 3 |
| Astros | 18-16 | -3 | 114 | 99 | 105 | 129 ↗ | 62.9% | -1 |
| Cardinals | 21-14 | 1 | 97 | 100 | 91 | 117 ↗ | 44.9% | 0 |
The Cardinals have played 14 of their last 17 games at home and have gone a major league-best 13-4 during that stretch. They’ve launched themselves into first place in the NL Central with the best record in the National League. Nolan Arenado’s bat has started to come alive after a slow start to his time in St. Louis.
Despite plenty of concerns with their pitching staff, including eight pitchers currently on the Injured List, the Astros’ offense looks plenty capable of carrying the team to the top of the AL West. Yordan Alvarez collected five multi-hit games this week, including a pair of home runs off Gerrit Cole on Wednesday and another dinger on Saturday. The knee issues he dealt with last year seem to be completely resolved and he’s showing the league just how potent his bat is when he’s healthy.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 18-17 | -3 | 111 | 78 | 116 | 139 ↘ | 94.7% | -4 |
| Mets | 16-13 | 2 | 96 | 82 | 80 | 140 ↘ | 86.9% | 4 |
| Giants | 20-14 | 0 | 102 | 79 | 117 | 114 ↗ | 21.0% | 2 |
| Athletics | 21-15 | 4 | 103 | 102 | 99 | 122 ↗ | 51.3% | -2 |
The Dodgers have fallen far from their initial perch atop these rankings. They won one game last week and have won just five games in their last 20. Five of those losses have come in extra innings and a number of others have been given away by the bullpen. On Saturday, they built a 13-0 lead over the Angels through the fifth inning but their relief corps allowed 11 runs to score in two innings to make the game much closer than it needed to be. Their offense has been okay considering the injuries they’ve sustained and their starting rotation has been solid, but they really need to figure out the issues they’re having closing out games.
The Mets have had all sorts of issues scoring runs but they’ve been buoyed by a pitching staff that has been one of the best in baseball. The issues Jacob deGrom has dealt with over the last week have been concerning — back tightness held him out of a scheduled start early last week and he was just placed on the injured list after exiting his start on Sunday with side tightness. Losing him for any amount of time would be a blow, but Marcus Stroman, Taijuan Walker, and David Peterson have all pitched excellently and Carlos Carrasco should be back from the Injured List by June.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland | 18-14 | 0 | 86 | 98 | 83 | 100 ↗ | 33.1% | 8 |
| Rays | 19-17 | 1 | 97 | 89 | 100 | 119 ↘ | 25.4% | 2 |
| Blue Jays | 17-16 | -2 | 99 | 114 | 88 | 106 ↗ | 44.8% | -4 |
| Marlins | 15-18 | -4 | 91 | 90 | 88 | 117 ↗ | 0.9% | 6 |
| Rangers | 18-18 | 0 | 104 | 110 | 95 | 111 ↗ | 1.3% | 8 |
| Brewers | 19-16 | 2 | 85 | 85 | 99 | 93 ↗ | 55.6% | -1 |
Cleveland continued their ascent through these rankings with a four-game sweep of the Royals and a series win against the Reds last week. Their offense has finally started scoring runs consistently and this new composite model of pitching evaluation really likes their bullpen now. Their relief corps has the widest gap between their ERA and their FIP in the majors.
The Brewers have been a constant source of conversation in the comments over the last few weeks. Their record indicates that they’ve played well this year but the underlying quality of the team has been lacking as these rankings have shown. They scored just 21 runs in six games last week and that really underscores their issues. Their excellent rotation can only carry them so far and now serious injury issues are piling up. They managed to squeak out a win against the Marlins on Sunday but face the Cardinals and Braves at home this week.
It’s a bit surprising to see the Rangers rise so high but they’ve put together a string of series wins against the Red Sox, Twins, and Mariners. During this stretch, their pitching staff has allowed just 3.1 runs per game and their offense has been surprisingly potent.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angels | 15-18 | 1 | 111 | 108 | 116 | 100 ↘ | 34.1% | -7 |
| Mariners | 18-17 | 2 | 91 | 123 | 89 | 73 ↘ | 1.3% | -2 |
| Braves | 17-17 | 1 | 100 | 122 | 104 | 79 ↗ | 38.6% | 8 |
| Phillies | 18-17 | 1 | 88 | 91 | 114 | 68 ↘ | 22.5% | 2 |
| Reds | 15-16 | 0 | 101 | 103 | 121 | 87 ↘ | 15.7% | -3 |
| Twins | 12-20 | -4 | 107 | 99 | 124 | 93 ↘ | 20.0% | -1 |
| Cubs | 17-17 | 1 | 95 | 129 | 96 | 67 ↗ | 16.2% | 5 |
| Orioles | 15-19 | 0 | 89 | 109 | 94 | 72 ↗ | 0.0% | 1 |
The Angels released Albert Pujols in an attempt to resuscitate their spiraling season but their issues aren’t on the offensive side of their roster. They’ve been able to score runs with or without Pujols in the lineup. Their real problem is their team defense and the negative effects it has had on their pitching staff and their ability to prevent runs from scoring. They’ve allowed the most runs in the majors and none of the new additions to their pitching staff appear to be working out.
The Braves have shot up the standings after a sweep of the Nationals and a series win against the Phillies last week. They’ve continued to be plagued by an inconsistent pitching staff, allowing just six runs in three games in Washington but then allowing 12 in their first game against the Phillies. Their wild walk-off win in extra innings on Saturday is the kind of momentum-building win they needed as they look to take advantage of a lethargic NL East.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royals | 16-17 | 3 | 92 | 107 | 112 | 62 ↘ | 9.3% | -12 |
| Pirates | 14-19 | 1 | 84 | 112 | 90 | 72 ⏹ | 0.3% | 0 |
| Nationals | 13-17 | 0 | 91 | 117 | 92 | 69 ↗ | 10.6% | -3 |
| Diamondbacks | 15-19 | 0 | 97 | 111 | 122 | 60 ↘ | 1.4% | -11 |
| Rockies | 12-22 | -3 | 78 | 110 | 110 | 39 ↘ | 0.0% | 0 |
| Tigers | 10-24 | 1 | 77 | 104 | 145 | 24 ↗ | 0.0% | 0 |
Oh, how the mighty have fallen. The Royals have lost eight straight games and have fallen from having the best record in the AL to below .500 in just a week’s time. They managed to score just 21 times in those eight losses. Salvador Perez and Carlos Santana have been the two lone consistent contributors but they really need to figure out what’s wrong with Jorge Soler and Hunter Dozier. Those two sluggers were supposed to be key contributors in their lineup but they’ve been totally disappointing so far this year.
Following them down the rankings are the Diamondbacks, losers of six straight. They were one of the biggest risers last week; now they’re one of the biggest fallers. Things aren’t completely doom and gloom for Arizona yet. Madison Bumgarner has been lights out over his last four starts and youngsters Carson Kelly, Pavin Smith, and Josh Rojas are putting together encouraging seasons. A bad bullpen isn’t the worst problem for a team like the Diamondbacks to have. It’s one of the reasons they’ve swung so far back and forth in these rankings, but they’re still trying to figure out which players can be counted on during their next contending cycle.
| Rank | Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White Sox | 19-13 | -3 | 110 | 72 | 95 | 170 | 68.9% | 1 |
| 2 | Red Sox | 22-13 | 1 | 115 | 88 | 90 | 162 | 62.8% | -1 |
| 3 | Padres | 19-16 | -1 | 92 | 84 | 82 | 139 | 90.7% | 2 |
| 4 | Yankees | 18-16 | -1 | 102 | 86 | 76 | 160 | 84.7% | 3 |
| 5 | Astros | 18-16 | -3 | 114 | 99 | 105 | 129 | 62.9% | -1 |
| 6 | Cardinals | 21-14 | 1 | 97 | 100 | 91 | 117 | 44.9% | 0 |
| 7 | Dodgers | 18-17 | -3 | 111 | 78 | 116 | 139 | 94.7% | -4 |
| 8 | Mets | 16-13 | 2 | 96 | 82 | 80 | 140 | 86.9% | 4 |
| 9 | Giants | 20-14 | 0 | 102 | 79 | 117 | 114 | 21.0% | 2 |
| 10 | Athletics | 21-15 | 4 | 103 | 102 | 99 | 122 | 51.3% | -2 |
| 11 | Cleveland | 18-14 | 0 | 86 | 98 | 83 | 100 | 33.1% | 8 |
| 12 | Rays | 19-17 | 1 | 97 | 89 | 100 | 119 | 25.4% | 2 |
| 13 | Blue Jays | 17-16 | -2 | 99 | 114 | 88 | 106 | 44.8% | -4 |
| 14 | Marlins | 15-18 | -4 | 91 | 90 | 88 | 117 | 0.9% | 6 |
| 15 | Rangers | 18-18 | 0 | 104 | 110 | 95 | 111 | 1.3% | 8 |
| 16 | Brewers | 19-16 | 2 | 85 | 85 | 99 | 93 | 55.6% | -1 |
| 17 | Angels | 15-18 | 1 | 111 | 108 | 116 | 100 | 34.1% | -7 |
| 18 | Mariners | 18-17 | 2 | 91 | 123 | 89 | 73 | 1.3% | -2 |
| 19 | Braves | 17-17 | 1 | 100 | 122 | 104 | 79 | 38.6% | 8 |
| 20 | Phillies | 18-17 | 1 | 88 | 91 | 114 | 68 | 22.5% | 2 |
| 21 | Reds | 15-16 | 0 | 101 | 103 | 121 | 87 | 15.7% | -3 |
| 22 | Twins | 12-20 | -4 | 107 | 99 | 124 | 93 | 20.0% | -1 |
| 23 | Cubs | 17-17 | 1 | 95 | 129 | 96 | 67 | 16.2% | 5 |
| 24 | Orioles | 15-19 | 0 | 89 | 109 | 94 | 72 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 25 | Royals | 16-17 | 3 | 92 | 107 | 112 | 62 | 9.3% | -12 |
| 26 | Pirates | 14-19 | 1 | 84 | 112 | 90 | 72 | 0.3% | 0 |
| 27 | Nationals | 13-17 | 0 | 91 | 117 | 92 | 69 | 10.6% | -3 |
| 28 | Diamondbacks | 15-19 | 0 | 97 | 111 | 122 | 60 | 1.4% | -11 |
| 29 | Rockies | 12-22 | -3 | 78 | 110 | 110 | 39 | 0.0% | 0 |
| 30 | Tigers | 10-24 | 1 | 77 | 104 | 145 | 24 | 0.0% | 0 |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Stroman and Walker have pitched excellently not so much Peterson, whose traditional and advanced metrics mostly matchup well so far this season. The bullpen has been fantastic though with Barnes being the only weak link.
I think if you consider Peterson a 4th starter that will eventually get displaced by Syndergaard and Carrasco, he’s fit his role well. a 3.15 xFIP for someone that will be your sixth starter is pretty nice. He’s just miscast as a guy you want 7 quality innings from every 5th day.
I’m more of an expected e.r.a guy and it hasn’t been pretty there his first two years though the walks are down a little from last year and the K’s are up so those are good signs.
hey finally a power rankings without the Dodgers in the top two
Using a blend of FIP and RA9 is defensible, at least if we think that team-level FIP predicts run prevention as well as run prevention predicts run prevention. Is there any evidence that is the case?
I guess another way of putting it is: We know that individual FIP predicts future run prevention better because it isolates pitching performance. So if you take a pitcher and put a different defense behind him, FIP is way better at predicting the new performance. It also reduces the outliers from defense–a really bad or good defensive night can throw your numbers way off if we’re talking about 150-200 innings total. But in terms of predicting run prevention as a team, does that still hold? The defense should be the same from night to night, and we’re talking about roughly 1450 innings over the course of a season instead of 150-200.
Some teams have figured out how to outperform FIP. The Dodgers over the last four seasons have maintained a pitching BABIP of .276 because of their ability to induce weak contact and to some degree defensive shifting. In turn their ERA has been .30 points lower than their FIP.
FWIW– here are teams that had 4 consecutive years of .275 (+.003)
2010-2013 Rays .276=>.286 (+.010)
2009-2012 Mariners .280=>.303 (+.023)
2002-2005 Dodgers .279=>.302 (+.023)
1997-2000 Dodgers .282=>.286 (+.005)
1992-1995 Orioles .278=>.305 (+.027)
1991-1994 White Sox .273=>.301 (+.028)
1991-1994 Giants .277=>.289 (+.012)
1991-1994 Nationals .273=>.294 (+.021)
1990-1993 White Sox .271=>.279 (+.008)
1990-1993 Astros .279=>.302 (+.023)
1990-1993 Expos .271=>.281 (+.010)
1990-1993 Giants .278=>.280 (+.002)
The average is +0.016 and maybe the Dodgers are a case of the team “figuring something out”, but their 2021 numbers to date put them behind the 1990-1993 Giants (who’d go on to average a .289 BABIP in their next 10 seasons).
It may have looked like those Giants figured something out, but with 20/20 hindsight, doesn’t appear to be the case.
Next best on that list is the 1997-2000 Dodgers, who only went up .005 the next year. But, over the following 10 seasons they average .291.
Did the 1990-1993 White Sox figure something out in their four year run? Well, over their next 10 seasons they also averaged .291
Next is a tie; the Expos reverted to a .293 BABIP over 10 years and the recent analytical Rays? Only have 7 years of future data for them and they’re doing better than the rest so far at 0.287, but I guess maybe we’ll see if they figured it out first.
*5th season is 2021, so still in progress.
The way I think about it is RA9 is FIP + defense.
If you are looking to see which pitcher is overall “better” and figuring out which FA you should sign or who to give awards to, you probably want FIP. If you are looking to predict the future success of a team based on its pitching staff, RA9 is probably better because those pitchers are going to keep playing with those fielders.
See, this is how I think of it too. RA9 is FIP + defense. Or rather, xwOBA+ defense, but we still don’t know much of xwOBACON is pitcher controlled or not, so it might not replace FIP in terms of future predictions.
So if you’re looking for how good a team’s run prevention is, I would think you would just use RA9. Using FIP in any capacity indicates that you’re not trusting the defensive performance being repeatable. Is that a good assumption? I don’t really think so because it’s the same guys out there every night. But maybe there’s something I’m missing.
You’re still ignoring that pitchers do have some control over the quality of contact they give up irregardless of the quality of their defense. The myth that all pitchers have a true talent level around .300 BABIP was debunked several years ago!
As such, while FIP is a better predictor (although still far from perfect) of future performance; RA9, xwOBA against, and even ERA are better analyzers of past performance and are more important for things like pitching awards, what we’re measuring here, and calculating Pitcher WAR (where bWAR is much superior to fWAR).
Except we’re not looking to predict anything! We’re only trying to analyze how good the talent level is based on the past results.
FIP by itself is NOT very good at doing that, since it ignores the fact that pitchers do have some control over the quality of balls in play.
In case anyone is wondering, the Tigers no longer have the worst pitching fWAR in MLB. That honor belongs to the Nationals, and the Cubs are just one spot ahead. The Tigers have moved all the way up to 28th. They’re still last in both team UZR and wRC+, though.
How about their offensive players have a combined -1.6 WAR so far this season. There’s only been 4 teams since 2000 with negative WAR seasons (3 of the 4 oddly enough were the Detroit Tigers).
The Tigers have had some phenomenally bad teams over the years, and this is one of them. They’ve gone 10-24 so far with a -68 run differential, which is pretty bad; that prorates out to about 48 wins and a -323 run differential. Amazingly, that would be only the third-worst Tigers team this century; the 2019 Tigers won 47 games with a -333 run differential, and the 2003 Tigers team won 43 games with a -337 run differential.
The Tigers century so far can be summed up with “the beginning and the end were terrible, but the middle was awesome.”
The rotation is legit, but the 2021 White Sox offense has REGRESSION flashing all over the screen in bold red text. Right now they are somehow simultaneously 5th in O-Swing% and 27th in Z-Swing%, which shouldn’t even be possible. They’re 24th in xSLG and average exit velocity, 26th in barrels per plate appearance, and 28th in HRs.
This core has never been particularly disciplined, but last year when they were a well above average offense, they at least swung a lot in the strike zone and hit the ball hard when they did make contact. Obviously losing Eloy Jimenez and now Luis Robert hurts the hard hit stats, but the offense without them looks like a major liability that would probably cost them the division if they didn’t play in the AL Central.
I’m not sure that regressions work the same on a team-wide basis as they do for individual players. CHW’s offence was projected to be pretty good even without Eloy; as of today, all of the players in their best lineup this year (Anderson, Robert, Moncada, Abreu, Mercedes, Eaton, Grandal, Vaughn, Madrigal) have above-average career wRC+ marks. They aren’t hitting for near as much power as last year, but we might also expect them to regress in that regard as the weather warms even with the loss of Robert. I don’t think it’s true at all that what was a top-5 offense last year that projected as a top-5 offense this year is going to regress because it’s living up to expectations in different ways.
I feel like equally weighting the value of a teams bullpen and the value of their starting rotation isn’t a very accurate way to calculate the overall quality metric.
Also NL teams have a wRC+ that is six points lower on average than those in the AL because of the lack of a DH, so it isn’t very fair to compare them without removing pitchers.
I agree, but I don’t think he’s actually told us how he’s weighing the numbers. He could very well be weighing the starting rotations more than the bullpens for all we know.
Something is still not quite adding up though. For example look at the Cardinals and the Giants. Despite the Giants having a substantially lower overall FIP-, ERA-, and RA/9, and a higher wRC+ the team quality metric somehow favors the Cardinals.
Despite the pitching performance and 18-14 record, when I think of Cleveland’s team my mind immediately goes to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_f8l2RRKko
If the Astros can get their Bullpen sorted out they will be the best team in baseball. That’s a big if, though.
Re: Cleveland’s bullpen I definitely think there’s something to read into with the FIP variance but the two highest leverage guys, Clase and Karinchak, aren’t driving this at all. It is mostly due to Shaw Quantrill, and Stephan. While Shaw has been used frequently, Quantrill is and especially Stephan are not a huge part of the pen. The early signs with Sandlin make it seem like this will continue to be the strength of the team. The 4th and 5th starters are a much bigger concern in my opinion with this team.
🍓 Rate my young sexy pussy - http://photo062985.us17.club