FanGraphs Power Rankings: Opening Day 2026 (No. 19–30)

Welcome back, baseball! Opening Day is almost upon us and with it comes new hopes and dreams for each team. The aspirations for the best teams in the league are more lofty than those of the clubs building for the future, but anything can happen over the course of the long regular season. Over the next two days, I’ll lay out what the best- and worst-case scenario might look like for every team in 2026. Today, I’ll cover the teams projected to finish under .500 in 2026, with those forecast for a .500 or better record to follow tomorrow.
Our power rankings use a modified Elo rating system. If you’re familiar with chess rankings or FiveThirtyEight’s defunct sports section, you’ll know that Elo is an elegant ranking format that measures teams’ relative strength and is very reactive to recent performance. For these Opening Day rankings, I’ve pulled the Depth Charts projections and calculated an implied Elo ranking for each team. First up are the full rankings presented in a sortable table. Below that, I’ve grouped the teams we’re covering today into tiers, with comments on each club. The delta column in the table below shows the change in ranking from the pre-spring training run of the power rankings in February.
| Rank | Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Rays | 80-82 | 1497 | 29.8% | 19.9 | 19.0 | 4 |
| 20 | Padres | 80-82 | 1496 | 21.6% | 25.7 | 14.9 | -1 |
| 21 | Athletics | 79-83 | 1493 | 23.9% | 25.7 | 11.6 | 1 |
| 22 | Twins | 78-84 | 1492 | 23.8% | 22.0 | 14.8 | -2 |
| 23 | Reds | 77-85 | 1488 | 13.7% | 19.1 | 15.7 | -2 |
| 24 | Guardians | 75-87 | 1483 | 13.2% | 21.9 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 25 | Cardinals | 75-87 | 1483 | 8.6% | 22.0 | 9.8 | 1 |
| 26 | Marlins | 75-87 | 1480 | 6.3% | 17.4 | 13.6 | -1 |
| 27 | Angels | 72-90 | 1474 | 5.0% | 16.4 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 28 | Nationals | 68-94 | 1460 | 0.7% | 17.0 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 29 | White Sox | 67-95 | 1458 | 1.0% | 16.1 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 30 | Rockies | 65-97 | 1450 | 0.1% | 14.8 | 7.8 | 0 |
…
| Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rays | 80-82 | 1497 | 29.8% | 19.9 | 19.0 |
| Padres | 80-82 | 1496 | 21.6% | 25.7 | 14.9 |
The Rays are in the middle of a roster reset after missing out on the playoffs in each of the last two years. Fresh off a star performance for the Dominican Republic in the World Baseball Classic, Junior Caminero looks set to truly establish himself as a superstar. Shane McClanahan is finally healthy, too, even if his stuff has looked a little diminished this spring. With their perpetual — and fairly successful — commitment to wringing every last bit of value out of their roster, it would be foolish to completely count out the Rays this season. Even so, considering the strength of the other four teams in the AL East, as well as the other AL wild card contenders, it feels unlikely that Tampa Bay will return to the postseason in 2026.
After a fairly quiet offseason, the Padres made a flurry of moves as spring training was getting underway, bringing in Nick Castellanos, Ty France, Walker Buehler, Griffin Canning, and Germán Márquez to fill out the depth of their roster. None of those veterans profiles as an impact player at this stage of his career, but each of them provides San Diego with the necessary bodies to backfill all the roster turnover that its win-now moves in recent years have created. Maybe the Padres will get lucky and one of them will turn back time for a season. Even with all that added depth, though, the success or failure of the Friars’ season will come down to how their stars perform. Best case, Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado, and Mason Miller guide the team to another 90 wins and a third straight postseason appearance. Worst case, the addition of those vets still doesn’t provide enough depth if one or more of their stars falter.
| Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athletics | 79-83 | 1493 | 23.9% | 25.7 | 11.6 |
| Reds | 77-85 | 1488 | 13.7% | 19.1 | 15.7 |
| Guardians | 75-87 | 1483 | 13.2% | 21.9 | 12.9 |
| Marlins | 75-87 | 1480 | 6.3% | 17.4 | 13.6 |
The Athletics have quickly established a potent young core of position players. Led by reigning Rookie of the Year Nick Kurtz and bolstered by the extremely hitter friendly Sutter Health Park in West Sacramento, the A’s could very well finish among the leaders in runs scored this year. Their pitching staff, however, is the problem. Their home ballpark certainly doesn’t help, but the organization has also struggled to develop the kinds of mid-rotation arms that it seemed to produce in endless supply during its last contention window half a decade ago. Prospects Gage Jump and Jaime Arnold offer some hope in that regard, though both are a year or two away from making an impact in the big leagues. It’s entirely possible the A’s outslug their opponents en route to a surprising playoff appearance, but it sure feels like they are waiting for their forthcoming move to Las Vegas to announce themselves as true contenders.
The Reds’ hopes to return to the playoffs after their unexpected postseason appearance last year took a hit when Hunter Greene was sidelined for three to four months with bone chips in his elbow. Thankfully, Cincinnati has a bunch of young pitchers who could step up and fill in during Greene’s absence — left-handers Andrew Abbott and Nick Lodolo are coming off strong 2025 campaigns, and the trio of Chase Burns, Rhett Lowder, and Brandon Williamson all made the Opening Day roster, too — but the loss of the team’s ace slims its margin for error considerably. The Reds’ path to a competitive summer will also depend on getting bounce-back performances at the plate from Elly De La Cruz and Matt McLain, as well as a strong rookie campaign from first baseman Sal Stewart, who ranks 34th on our preseason Top 100 Prospects list. If the lineup doesn’t produce, no amount of elite pitching will help Cincinnati make it to October.
It took an incredible September run — and a historic collapse by the Tigers — for the Guardians to hit their best-case scenario last year. It might be a stretch to think Cleveland will pull it off again, but this team has made a habit of outperforming its underlying peripherals over the last few years. A successful division-title defense will require another MVP-caliber season from José Ramírez, breakouts from guys like Kyle Manzardo, Bo Naylor, and Joey Cantillo, and promising debuts from top prospects Chase DeLauter and Travis Bazzana. That’s a lot of things that need to go right for the Guards to reach their ceiling, which means it isn’t hard to imagine what their worst-case scenario might look like either.
Late last season, the Marlins were playing like one of the best teams in the National League. That gave us a glimpse of what their best-case scenario could look like this year. The offense has some intriguing pieces to build around in Jakob Marsee, Kyle Stowers (whose season will be delayed because of a hamstring injury), and Owen Caissie, and right-handed starting pitcher Eury Pérez looks poised to supplant Sandy Alcantara as their ace. Most likely, though, the Marlins aren’t ready for primetime yet. Their lineup has neither the depth nor the star power to threaten opposing pitchers, putting the pressure on their own staff to be as close to flawless as possible. Still, the Marlins have their share of talented pitchers in their major league rotation — Alcantara, Pérez, post-hype sleeper Max Meyer, veteran Chris Paddack, and supreme strike-thrower Janson Junk — and two others in the high minors, top prospects Thomas White and Robby Snelling. It’s possible that those pitchers could pitch well enough for this team to sneak its way into the postseason. But, as was also the case with Miami’s other recent postseason berths in 2020 and 2023, such an outcome would be unexpected.
| Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twins | 78-84 | 1492 | 23.8% | 22.0 | 14.8 |
| Cardinals | 75-87 | 1483 | 8.6% | 22.0 | 9.8 |
The Twins took a few steps toward their worst-case scenario last month, when Pablo López went down with a season-ending elbow injury. You might have been able to squint and see how Minnesota could have made a surprise playoff run with López leading the pitching staff, but now the team seems a bit directionless. Sure, there’s still talent on the roster, but it feels like the organization needs a full reset after its dramatic sell-off last summer and significant transition in the front office this winter. Instead of entering the season as a postseason long shot, the Twins might be simply hoping for positive development from the youngsters already on the big league roster and the prospects in the high minors.
The Cardinals have already torn off the Band-Aid this winter, trading away Nolan Arenado, Sonny Gray, Willson Contreras, and Brendan Donovan as they stripped their big league roster down to the bones. There really isn’t much left to sell off this summer. That makes their best- and worst-case scenarios pretty easy to parse out. Ideally, they’d like to see a promising debut from JJ Wetherholt, any sign of life from Jordan Walker and Nolan Gorman, and continued development from Masyn Winn and Matthew Liberatore. Steps backwards from any of those core pieces would likely push the timeline for their rebuild even further into the future.
| Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angels | 72-90 | 1474 | 5.0% | 16.4 | 13.1 |
| Nationals | 68-94 | 1460 | 0.7% | 17.0 | 8.6 |
| White Sox | 67-95 | 1458 | 1.0% | 16.1 | 11.5 |
The best-case scenario for the Angels has already taken some small hits this spring. Grayson Rodriguez has been dealing with a dead arm these last few weeks — a bigger concern thanks to his lengthy injury history — and reclamation project Alek Manoah has a 9.39 ERA in 15 1/3 innings this spring while walking nearly as many batters as he’s struck out. He has been dealing with a fingernail blister and may begin the season on the IL; if not, he’ll start the season in Triple-A, as he did not make the team’s five-man rotation coming out of camp. Los Angeles was counting on both of them regaining some measure of their previous production to bolster its starting rotation this year. More encouragingly, back in center field, Mike Trout is feeling healthier and running harder than he has since he tore his meniscus in 2024. Even if the Halos get a fully healthy season out of Trout, they probably don’t have enough talent on their roster to make an unexpected postseason push. It might be weird to say, but the worst-case scenario for this team might be a season in which it wins 80 games, misses the playoffs anyway, and delays its seemingly inevitable rebuild by another year.
It was a little odd to see the Nationals option Dylan Crews, Harry Ford, and Josiah Gray to the minor leagues to start the season. After trading away MacKenzie Gore this offseason, Washington’s timeline to break out of its current rebuild was pushed back by a few years. That trio of youngsters should be an important part of the team’s future, and I’m not sure any of them has anything left to prove in Triple-A. The true success or failure of this year should be measured by how many steps forward James Wood takes. He’s the budding superstar the Nats need to build around, and things might start to look particularly dire if he stumbles in his third big league season.
The White Sox improved by 19 wins last year, but they’re still a few years away from completing their current rebuild. They’ve got a quartet of pitching prospects — Noah Schultz, Hagen Smith, Tanner McDougal, and David Sandlin — pushing their way toward the majors this year, and a historically young group of catchers to help guide them. Understandably, Chicago’s prospect pipeline is going to warrant the most attention for the organization this year, but the major league roster does have some notable players for fans to follow on the South Side. It’ll be fascinating to see if Munetaka Murakami can adjust to MLB pitching quickly and if Colson Montgomery can continue his development and sock a lot more home runs in 2026.
| Team | Projected Record | Implied ELO | Playoff Odds | Projected Batter WAR | Projected Pitcher WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockies | 65-97 | 1450 | 0.1% | 14.8 | 7.8 |
It’s not hard to imagine what the worst-case scenario would look like for the Rockies; they endured it just last year. You could argue they’ve been stuck in it for the past seven years. After hiring Paul DePodesta to run the front office, any hint of organizational improvement would be a good sign that things are heading in the right direction. That might not materialize in a bunch of wins at the major league level, but as long as Colorado is working on developing its youngsters, investing in its R&D infrastructure, and prioritizing the future, it would mark a significant departure from how this team has been run in the recent past. It would probably be too much to envision a miraculous run to the playoffs — our playoff odds give the Rockies just a 0.1% shot of playing in October — but bounce-back seasons from shortstop Ezequiel Tovar and center fielder Brenton Doyle, as well as continued development from catcher Hunter Goodman and outfielder Mickey Moniak, would be great to see.
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
The Wite Sox historic stable of catchers is likely to shrink a little. They just signed Reese McGuire to a major league contract. Even with Teel starting on the IL, this probably means they are done with Korey Lee who is out of options.
On paper he should be the guy they keep to platoon with Teel, but he can’t hit either left handed or right handed pitching and the guy with a 55 fielding / 70 arm grade is nowhere to be found.
It’s hard to roster a guy with negative defensive value and a career wRC+ of 54. I think he’s going to get claimed by about 5 different teams before someone finally can outright him and he rebuilds in the minors.
I will take the over on the Padres and the under on Cardinals. The future is grim for the Padres and it is bright for the Cardinals. I just don’t think we will see too much of either future this year.
I think the Cardinals know this too. The top four players in their opening day lineup look great, and after that the roster is a bunch of maybes at best. This is year is seeing if any of their 7-10 post-prospects have any possibility for improvement or can take on bigger roles. Gorman, Walker, Scott, Pages, Crooks, McGreevy, Fitts, Leahy…
Yep – I wouldn’t bet on the current projection of adding 3-4 WAR, year on year, from Gorman and Walker.
Pads are very stars and scrubs…but I like their rotation more than the projection and I think their bullpen will steal some games.
I’m also not a buyer on the over for the Cardinals. That rotation is beyond dicey, both in terms of performance and durability concerns. They have probably 3 4/5 starters who pitch to contact, a converted reliever, and injury magnet Dustin May. There are some interesting arms down in AAA, but I think there’s a decent chance the pitching gets really, really ugly at some point this summer as guys wear down/get injured/perform poorly.
Cardinals AAA depth is better than most teams so in injury/underperformance scenarios they mostly just have a ceiling of mediocre and a floor of also mediocre
I agree there is some depth in the minors and guys with intrigue, but I think the reasonable floor is lower than mediocre. Most projections I’ve seen rank this rotation in the 25th-30th range.
I think I’d take the over on their pitching projections since the vast majority historically end up rosier on injury history guys playing time than reality dictates. That lends itself to deep staffs often overperforming while comparatively strong ones like the Braves underperform. I’d then take the under on guys like Gorman/Walker.
I’d be willing to bet the pitching staff overperforms expectations while guys like Gorman and Walker are toast leading to a general wash on steps forward/backwards
I think that the 75 win season seems reasonable as a prediction because they won 78 games last year, and they got a bit worse. But their Pythagorean theorem was 74 wins and their BaseRuns was 73, and that seems like it was a whole lot closer to their true talent level.
I also think that there is a surprising amount of danger in relying in a rotation where you have 8 or 9 projected 1.5 win starters on your roster or in AAA. Sure, if they get hurt there’s another one with equivalent talent coming up. But they all have such a small margin for error that you can wind up with something approaching a replacement-level rotation in a hurry.
This is sort of what happened in Baltimore in 2025, where they thought surely they couldn’t go wrong with having all of the following players filling out their last 3 rotation spots:
Cade Povich (20 starts, 1.4 fWAR)
Charlie Morton (17 starts, 0.3 fWAR)
Tomoyuki Sugano (30 starts, 0.1 fWAR)
Brandon Young (12 starts. -0.1 fWAR)
Zach Eflin (14 starts, -0.3 fWAR)
Kyle Gibson (4 starts, -0.6 fWAR).
They figured they couldn’t possibly go wrong, that they had enough depth to withstand anything. Except most of them were bad. Turns out only one of them was a competent MLB starter, although which one (Povich, Sugano) depends a on your opinion of a pitcher’s ability to control BABIP.
It has the possibility to be much worse in St Louis this year. That was the Orioles’ plan for 3 of their rotation spots, since they also had a reliable #4 (Dean Kremer) and high-upside guys who either had serious issues with injury (Bradish) or consistency (Rogers). The Cardinals have a whole bunch of those #5, 1.5 WAR starter types with May, Liberatore, McGreevy, Pallante, Fitts, and Dobbins, plus relief conversion Kyle Leahy and two guys who stopped throwing strikes with Mathews and Hence.
They could say that there’s no way it could go wrong with that many interchangeable pitchers but that’s what the Orioles said last year and they were only relying on them for part of the rotation!
Eury Pérez is not a lefty-handed pitcher. Nice writeup, though.
Conceivably, the best thing for the Angels would be Trout finding the fountain of youth and the Angels finding a trading partner that is desperate enough and buys into it enough to let the Angels off the hook for a large portion of the remaining 4/~$150m.
However, the Angels would probably still just hold onto him.
I doubt that unloading Trout’s salary would help the Angels much, even if they could find a partner and Trout agreed to waive his no-trade. This isn’t a team whose budget hampers them in putting a supporting cast around their best talent; they don’t look like they have much high-ceiling talent on the major league roster or that much on the farm either.
I am pretty sure the Angels’ budget is based off Moreno’s whims more than any rational plan. If he likes the idea of adding a player then there is a budget for it. And the cost of most other things is kept to a minimum.
He is motivated by two contradictory impulses. He hates paying people, potentially on ideological grounds as much as business grounds. And he loves owning a team and the prestige of knowing baseball players (especially the famous ones) and having them play for him. It’s a super weird situation where the owner spends an appropriate amount on player payroll in the aggregate and is also one of cheapest owners in MLB.
Pretty standard form of cheapskate mentality for an ultra-rich guy, actually. Million wise, hundred-million foolish.
I don’t think there’s any situation where somebody takes on all of that contract.
Would I love to have 2 months of a resurgent Mike Trout in the midst of a healthy miracle of a 6 win season for a pennant push even if it cost $10 – 15M? Of course. Would I be willing to pay him $37M a year through 2030 at this point? Not on your life.
Now, if the Angels offered to eat half of it, I might be intrigued.
I mean, it doesn’t really make sense for them to offload the contract. They have one non-Trout FA commitment for next year (Kikuchi) and nothing after that. Neto is the most notable player in Arbitration and is on $4.15M this year in his first arb year. He’s the only guy in the next few years who looks like he may hit significant numbers in arb or get an extension.
Without eating nearly all of the contract (or taking on a team’s dicey contract), they’re not going to get significant value back in terms of prospects. Even then, it’s questionable just how much they’d get.
What young players on the Twins? They have zero rookies, and as usual, are going with terrible veterans over possible upside.
Well, there’s Keaschall and, uh… they are now ranked appropriately?
Well, they have a lot of young post-prospect guys on the active roster who could conceivably improve (Brooks Lee, Luke Keaschall, Austin Martin, Mick Abel, Taj Bradley, Simeon Woods Richardson), in addition to post-prospect guys in AAA or on the IL who will undoubtedly see time this year (Zebby Matthews, David Festa, Alan Roden). I realize these guys aren’t technically rookies, but they’re each 26 years old or younger with 4+ remaining years of team control. Even Royce Lewis is only 26, although he is a FA in 2029.
I like the young pitchers and as a Twins fan have hope for the rotation, both who is there now and who is waiting in the wings in AAA. But in general I am unenthused by the current lineup and think the team won’t hit or play defense well enough to get to the projection of 78 wins.
I’ve been down on Abel, but he’s been really good this spring. Taj Bradley as well. If they stay in it, it’ll be because all their young pitchers stay healthy and take big steps forward.
I like the young pitchers, but Larnach and Outman on the roster? Bell? Arcia? I was a huge Lee guy, but I’ve lost confidence. Hope to be wrong. I do like Keaschell! They are also likely to have mendez and Culpeper in AA, again.
They have a bunch of interesting dudes who are young and young-adjacent like Keaschall, Abel, Bradley, SWR, etc. Their top two position prospects are blocked by two guys who still may be something and Buxton. They have a pretty weird roster right now; it’s like a 60% rebuild or something.
I can get the frustration though. Josh Bell is the baseball equivalent of a shrug. I’m not sure Royce Lewis is capable of being healthy and good at the same time. Brooks Lee exists.
Would love to see Ben Clemens’ analysis on the various axes of team cohesion for the rebuilding teams like he did for the Red Sox, Mets, and Brewers! Especially the Nats, Twins, and these don’t count as rebuilding but the reds and rays.
The analysis on all of those teams would be scathing on the coherence axis.
Except maybe the Rays, since a lot of people don’t want to look foolish by criticizing a team that then goes on to beat expectations. But just in terms of the criteria outlined in the piece it wouldn’t score well (they would however score *very* well on liquidity and optionality)
On the Nationals, Gray has a flexor strain and is now on the 60-day IL. If this injury is serious, his career may be in jeopardy.
Crews is a mess mentally right now. It may be that he’s not MLB star caliber or, worse, not even MLB replacement level caliber, though he does several other things (defense, SB’s, baserunning) that would probably compensate for his poor hitting.
Ford may be a service time manipulation thing or indirect punishment for playing in the WBC and missing weeks of camp.
With those 3 or not, it’s going to be a long, hard slog of a season for us Nationals fans. Like in 2008-09, I might spend more time watching and listening to the minor league games to see how the prospects, the only source of hope right now for the franchise, are faring.
I have decent confidence in Ford because of the WBC. None in Ruiz. This season will have some light if Ford and Millas get most of the catching innings.