Five Lessons From the Wild Non-Tender Deadline

The non-tender deadline isn’t a date everyone circles on the calendar expecting big moves and excitement, but it does force teams into decisions on a handful of players and causes some movement as well as a handful of new free agents. Last night’s non-tender deadline was more active than most. As Jeff Passan noted, there were 40 non-tenders after a combined 46 over the previous two years. It was busy, and a few productive players were not offered contracts despite expectations for fairly reasonable salaries. There are some big conclusions to reach about the state of the game as well as some small ones based on last night. Here’s what we learned.

Teams Aren’t Paying for a Return to Form

Among the biggest non-tenders in terms of past production and expected salary were players who struggled for various reasons in 2019. Formerly injured pitchers in the process of returning from injury or needing time to return from injury like Taijuan Walker, Jimmy Nelson, and Aaron Sanchez were all non-tendered despite expected salaries in the $4 million to $6 million range. Previous successful players with rough years like Kevin Gausman, Blake Treinen, and Travis Shaw were all let go despite prior track records of success. In the cases of Gausman and Treinen, an expected salary of close to $10 million likely played a role, though it isn’t necessarily clear that the decisions wouldn’t have been the same even if a few million dollars had been shaved off the cost. Steven Souza Jr. has decent projections for next season, but he did poorly in 2018 and didn’t play at all last season. For the most part, teams weren’t willing to roll the dice on bounce-back campaigns.

Anybody Can Play Second Base

While this year’s free agent market wasn’t flush with good second base options, it is deep in role players. Not including Mike Moustakas, who will try to show with the Reds that anybody can play second base, there were eight free agent second basemen projected for between one and two wins next season. We saw the entire American League pass up a similar player in Jonathan Villar before he was claimed by the Marlins and eventually a trade was worked out.

Likewise Cesar Hernandez, with an $11 million price tag, was let go by the contending Phillies. Hernandez jumps to the top of available second baseman along with free agent Brian Dozier, but Asdrubal Cabrera, Howie Kendrick, and Eric Sogard are all coming off seasons as good or better than the former Phillies second baseman while Jason Kipnis, Starlin Castro, Wilmer Flores, and last year’s non-tender Jonathan Schoop not all that far behind.

In addition to those players, middle infielders José Peraza, who put up 2.6 WAR in 2018, Tim Beckham, who was good in 2017 and put up an average hitting line last year, and Addison Russell, who was good enough that the Cubs were willing to overlook his domestic violence suspension and even gave him a contract to make up for money lost during that suspension, were all non-tendered as well. It’s not a good time to be a second baseman looking for a job, though it also isn’t a good time to be looking for a second baseman who is expected to provide better than average production.

Many Players Are Going to Find Themselves in Better Situations

While players losing some guaranteed salaries isn’t necessarily a good thing for them, keep in mind that tendering a contract at this stage only guarantees one-sixth of their salary if they are cut early in spring training or one-quarter of their salary if cut by the end of it. If a player without a guaranteed contract wasn’t going to make the team, making him a free agent is a far better situation, as it allows them to choose a destination with the greatest odds of sticking on a major league roster. Jesus Aguilar, claimed by the Marlins, is going to have many more opportunities to earn a higher future salary with Miami than he was going to have with the Rays. Shaw is going to end up in a situation that is likely better for him, and Maikel Franco is going to to get a fresh start.

Of all the players non-tendered, only four (Hernandez, Kevin Pillar, Gausman, and Russell) put up at least 0.5 WAR in 2019 and are projected to do so again next year. A vast majority of the players non-tendered are your proverbial replacement-level players. They aren’t being non-tendered because their salary is too high, they are being non-tendered because their team doesn’t believe in them. For Hernandez, Pillar, Gausman, and Treinen, they are essentially hitting free agency a year early.

We shouldn’t bemoan players waiting too long to hit free agency and then get upset when it happens earlier. The total expected arbitration salaries for the top-30 players non-tendered is around $117 million, and the same players might end up recouping half of that in free agency. This amounts to maybe 1% of total MLB salaries. There might be a lot of problems with current Collective Bargaining Agreement and the arbitration process, but the non-tender process isn’t one of them.

Arbitration Still Doesn’t Track With Actual On-Field Value

C.J. Cron, Franco, and Domingo Santana might have decent power, but issues between them with walks, strikeouts, and defense make them replacement-level players. Despite those deficiencies, the trio was set to receive around $6 million each in arbitration. It’s not unreasonable for their own teams to see them as replacement-level in 2020, though some other club might see something more like a one-win player and pay them closer to their expected arbitration salary. Similarly, Treinen had a bad year in 2019, but he recorded 16 saves, and his previous 38-save season meant a high salary in arbitration regardless of his actual great performance in 2018 and poor performance in 2019.

Teams Trying Not to Win is Still an Issue

While Villar and Pillar certainly have flaws, they would have made the Orioles and Giants better in 2020 had their teams held on to them. Although their expected salaries were in the eight-figure range, that’s not an unreasonable cost, even for the Marlins on Villar and likely some other team with Pillar. The Giants and Orioles just made themselves worse in order to pocket $10 million. Having the two players might not change their spot in the standings at year’s end, but those two players aren’t blocking anyone, and they might have netted prospects at the trade deadline.

Tanking isn’t about draft position, it’s about saving money. Tanking or rebuilding or whatever you might call it isn’t necessarily the root of baseball’s issues, but non-competitive baseball is a big problem, and two teams just made themselves worse solely to save some money.

We hoped you liked reading Five Lessons From the Wild Non-Tender Deadline by Craig Edwards!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

newest oldest most voted
sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

I agree with the part about Treinen, Pillar, Gausman, and Hernandez essentially hitting free agency a year early, and that teams should want them. But I would also add that in addition to teams not wanting to pay for homers in arbitration, teams don’t want to pay for steal-driven arbitration numbers, which is what happened to Villar. Honestly I think it’s borderline crazy that Villar got past Cleveland, or that the Reds didn’t try to work out a deal instead of paying Mike Moustakas to play out of position, but beyond that I understand that teams are freaked out about a guy who has periods where he’s unplayable because of errors and where his offensive value is variable. Even though I disagree with it, I understand what happened there. And as far as Pillar goes, I don’t think we credibly accuse the Giants of not trying to win, given that they took on his salary last year.

gettwobrute79
Member
gettwobrute79

Teams shouldn’t be freaked out by Villar. Maybe he’s error prone and has some offensive ups and downs, but the salary is a pittance compared to the value he’s put up in three of the last four seasons.
You’re dead on about Cleveland and Cincinnati passing him being a head scratcher. Also with the Yanks/Red Sox/White Sox too as they have issues at second (thinking the Yanks play him at second and shift Torres to short in this scenario). Frankly, he’d help many teams in the AL looking to contend.

TJ177
Member
TJ177

What issues do the Yankees have at second? Lemahieu was only playing 1b at the end because Voit was a lesser option than Encarnacion or Urshela. They let Didi walk because they had too many guys. DJL at 2b and Gleyber at SS is pretty nice

gettwobrute79
Member
gettwobrute79

D’oh completely forgot about DJ!

sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

The Red Sox and Cubs are obvious choices except that they are suddenly trying to cut costs, which make no sense to me but that’s where we’re at. The D-Backs also kind of fit that description as well, where they should be interested but they weren’t. The White Sox have Nick Madrigal waiting in the wings, so I understand that one at least.

gettwobrute79
Member
gettwobrute79

I think Villar is a good bridge for Madrigal since he’s not quite ready yet; effective, cheap, not long-term.

sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

I don’t know if he’s ready or not, but he’ll probably be up as soon as he passes some service milestone. He was in AAA for over 100 PAs last year and while he wasn’t great he was an above average hitter there.

gettwobrute79
Member
gettwobrute79

He might be up then, sure. But adding a good player like Villar eases the urge to call up Madrigal when he hits said milestone. They could spread themselves thin and get a cheap and crappy placeholder, and call Madrigal up. But that assumes lots of risks: will Madrigal prove at AAA that he’s ready? Will he hit and contribute when he gets the call? What if he gets hurt?
Getting Villar negates a lot of those risks and adds a good regular in the bargain. Trying to thread the needle and time everything perfectly with prospects getting called up and contributing immediately is a fool’s errand. Get good players, let it play out, and then adjust.

JV19
Member
JV19

Personally, I wanted them to try Cesar Hernandez. If he could get his BB% closer to his career average, he’d be a great addition.

Dave T
Member
Dave T

The salaries are obviously part of it, but I think that the roster spot is also a significant consideration for teams like the Giants and Orioles.

In one sense, any player with only a year of team control on the rosters of those teams is “blocking someone” because they can instead look for upside in players with long-term control through avenues like the Rule 5 Draft. Particularly given the success that the Dodgers had in finding players such as Max Muncy and Chris Taylor while Zaidi was there, I see the logic in him trying to find players like that rather than hoping that some interesting prospect return is available for Pillar at the trade deadline.