Former Draft Flops: From Zeros to Heroes
We all like to think that the first round of the amateur draft is a can’t miss event, but more often than not picks in the first round have a fairly high failure – or at least disappointment – rate. A year ago, two such examples would have included Pittsburgh’s Neil Walker and Toronto’s David Purcey. In the past few months, though, both players have shown that they just might provide some value to the organizations that drafted them – albeit a few years later than projected.
Purcey was taken 16th overall in the 2004 draft and Toronto passed on the likes of Philip Hughes, Gio Gonzalez, Huston Street, Yovani Gallardo, and Dustin Pedroia. The Jays gave the hard-throwing lefty out of the University of Oklahoma $1.6 million to sign as a 22-year-old pitcher that was expected to move fairly quickly. However, Purcey hit a wall in double-A. His inconsistent command led to too many base runners via the walk and the hit. He was also known as a one-pitch pitcher who had little desire to improve his secondary pitches, which allowed even minor league hitters to time and jump all over his above-average heater.
The real break for Purcey came with the move to the bullpen at the beginning of 2010 – a move that had been talked about pretty much since he entered pro ball. He’s now all but abandoned his change-up and favors his fastball about 80% of the time, while mixing in the occasional slider and curveball to keep MLB hitters on their toes. Purcey has seen his fastball command improve significantly and has a positive pitch type value on his heater for the first time in the Majors (over parts of three seasons). He’s still an extreme flyball pitcher but his line-drive rate is down noticeably and batters are hitting just .169 against him (.200 BABIP). His 21 games at the MLB level in 2010 is obviously a small sample size but the 28-year-old hurler has finally started to move in the right direction to carve out a respectable MLB career as a reliever.
Walker was also taken in the 2004 draft – 11th overall out of a Pennsylvania high school, making him a marketing agent’s dream for the Pirates organization. Jered Weaver, Billy Butler and Stephen Drew were taken in the draft right after him. Unfortunately, Walker’s career was dealt a blow when the former catcher had to move out from behind the dish to third base when his defense failed to develop. Although he hit double-digit homers four times in his minor-league career, Walker lacked the prototypical power for third base and he seemed to wilt under the pressure of his new position by posting a .694 OPS at triple-A in 2008. He began to make improvements, though, when the organization switched him to a super-utility role where he played all over the diamond. His OPS jumped to .791 in ’09 and then to .951 in 2010 (43 games).
Called up to Pittsburgh in late May, Walker has continued his hot hitting. He currently has a triple-slash line of .302/.342/.453 in 225 at-bats while playing mostly second base. Walker is showing good pop for a second baseman with an ISO rate of .151. On the down side, his defense has been pretty mediocre, according to UZR, which has him at -7.2 at the keystone. The rating is due mostly to poor range, which is not surprising for a former-catcher-turned-third-baseman-turned-second-baseman. If Walker keeps hitting as well as he has (although it would be nice to see an improvement on the 5.3% walk rate), Pittsburgh may be willing to live with the defensive deficiencies. If not, though, Walker could end up back in a utility role.
It’s fairly clearly that neither Purcey nor Walker will ever perform well enough to justify their former draft slot but both players have MLB value. It’s also impressive that, in both cases, their original organizations held onto them long enough to reap some benefits. Perhaps both Purcey and Walker are examples that organizations now realize how much money they can save by developing and holding onto their own prospects.
Marc Hulet has been writing at FanGraphs since 2008. His work focuses on prospects and fantasy. Follow him on Twitter @marchulet.
While I tend to value advanced metrics more than most, I can say unequivocally that Walker’s defense has been a lot better than his UZR shows. While he will never be confused with Roberto Alomar, in his first half-year at the position, he has been a very encouraging surprise for us Pirate fans. He turns the double-play very well (especially for someone with so little experience at the position), he has very good range out into the outfield on pop-ups, and, makes the routine play nearly every time (I can only remember one error on an easy play). I think there is some truth to his range being an issue, but not a glaring weakness or to the point where he would get moved off the position. In all honesty, he has been really good at handling 2B, again, for only 100 or so games.
On the batting front, he has a pretty high BABIP right now, but that is largely driven by the fact that he is squaring up the ball very often, leading me to believe (haven’t checked in a little while) that his LD% is pretty high. He is a pure doubles-hitter, gap to gap, and uses the whole field. I also think, with time, that he will eventually (if not next year) hit 20-25 homeruns as well, but that is just as likely to be 15-20. Coming from the 2B position, that is above-average.
He needs to improve his BB rate (although his eye is pretty good, which confuses me) to move that OBP up around .360-.370, if I am correct in my assumption that his AVG will end up being around .290 as the standard. With his SLG% around .460, he could be OPSing in the low-to-mid .800s, which would really help the Bucs.
Good article, man. I appreciate the writing on the Bucs, as this site is one of the only ones that does it with any consistency.
Well done…
“[…][M]ore often than not picks in the first round have a fairly high failure – or at least disappointment – rate. A year ago, [one example would have been] Pittsburgh’s Neil Walker[…]”
Neil Walker is in his age-24 season. He only repeated one level (AAA in 08-09) and was an above-average offensive performer in 2007 and 2009 (the years sandwiching his lackluster 2008 AAA campaign).
If anything, even before 2010, Walker’s was a fairly typical course for a legitimate prospect out of high school:
2004: Rookie
2005: A
2006: Advanced A
2007: AA
2008: AAA
2009: AAA
(Yes, I’m ignoring a week here or there getting a taste of the next level.)
Walker wasn’t ‘above average’ offensively in any year besides the current one. That is why he was included in this article.
His OBP has historically been really bad, his power numbers have never been any good, and he hasn’t even hit for that high of an average.
Expectations from Bucco enthusiasts were at an all-time low for Walker going into this season. The author is right to include him in this piece, in my eyes.
Again ignoring the brief tastes of the next level each year, he had wRC+ in ’06 of 104 (pretty much average for his level), in ’07 of 125 (substantially above average, though, not exactly a monster year) and in ’09 of 117 (again, the very definition of “above average”, though not world-beating).
As for his BB%, yes, it’s been all over the place, but it did bust into double figures in ’07; he can do better than his current career ML 6.0% figure (and likely will with more exposure to ML pitching and umpiring). His last three years at his primary level, he’s posted ISOs of .176, .172 and .216 — never gonna be confused with Dan Uggla, but more than acceptable at second (only five ML teams currently get ISOs of more than .172 from their 2B).
As for the averages… hey, =you= try to post an eyepopping BA when your BABIP is .267 (’08) or .279 (’09). His averages when not hitting in such awful luck the previous seasons (BABIPs of .326 in ’06 and .322 in ’07) were just fine in league and age context.
I would have thought you were going to mention Romero…
Purcey’s been alright, but he’s nothing special and even becoming a MR is a bit of a disappointment. He hasn’t been good this season despite his low ERA, and as an extreme FB pitcher he’s lucky he hasn’t given up many HR’s. That’ll change once he pitches more than 20 innings.
I know he wasn’t a 1st round pick, but Andres Torres is a good example of a guy who suddenly got it, but also of bad coaching and bad advice throughout his career. By all accounts he is a great athlete who is extremely strong, but coaches kept trying to make him in to a slap hitter in the likes of Vince Coleman and Brett Butler. Once he started trying to drive the ball he improved dramatically and since Will Clark started working with him in late June he’s seen a huge power surge (7 dingerz in July, 4 previous). I think a lot of 1st round busts are just as much a result of the organization as they are of the player, if not heavily weighted towards the organization.
I agree with a lot of what you say. But when you are talking about first rounders, you envision greatness. If the player doesn’t fit your vision, disappointment sets in.
Neil Walker never played 2nd base UNTIL he got to the majors. That he’s been even close to adequate is a plus for him, and dare I say the Pirates for taking a chance that it could work. By all accounts, Walker has been an extremely hard worker; the Pirates should take advantage of that and pair him with a good infield coach. “Average” major leaguer seems attainable here, no?
I agree with Andrew. Walker’s defense has actually been pretty respectable. He’s not going to win any Gold Gloves, but his double play turns are good and he does a great job getting into the outfield to take away bloopers. His east-west range needs a lot of improvement, particularly going to his right toward left field, but he hasn’t been bad. Hopefully, Billy Maz will help him out in spring training next year.
Thanks, Marc. Now Purcey goes out and gives up a bunch of runs TT
Not to be THAT guy but just thought I’d point out…
“It’s fairly clearly that neither Purcey nor…”
Should be “fairly clear”, or “..seen fairly clearly”
“The Jays gave the hard-throwing lefty out of the University of Oklahoma $1.6 million to sign as a 22-year-old pitcher that was expected to move fairly quickly.”
This is kind of nit-picky, but it’s officially Oklahoma University (OU).
Actually, according to its website it’s “The University of Oklahoma (OU).” Why they switch the acronym, I don’t know.
Hello, i think that i saw you visited my web site thus i came to “return the favor”.I’m trying to find things to enhance my web site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!