Get Ready for Some Historically Bad Postseason Offense

David Richard-Imagn Images

Summer is nearly over. The Premier League is back in business and the NFL is close behind. Kids are going back to school. The other day, I opened a window and it didn’t feel like sticking my face in a pizza oven.

That means it’s time for me to look at the Cleveland Guardians’ lineup and wonder what the heck they’re doing in the playoff race. But rather than do a deep dive on whoever this year’s load-bearing Tyler Naquin or Owen Miller is, I want to take a step back and look at this issue from a historical perspective.

Because this year, the Guardians aren’t the only team with playoff aspirations and a lineup full of question marks.

Another recurring theme of my analysis is concern trolling about the Brewers’ offense in the playoffs. Every year, they develop a slew of pitchers and play great fundamental baseball en route to winning oodles of regular season games. And every October, the lack of real thumpers in the lineup comes back to bite them. Against tougher postseason competition, they can’t string together as many singles and walks, the offensive fire hose kinks up, and instead of a torrent of runs, they have to make do with a dribble.

A week or two ago, I was looking at the offensive stats for various National League contenders and reached an alarming conclusion. In 2021, when I got too hyped about the Brewers’ pitching staff, picked them to win the World Series, and got embarrassed, their offense was poor: a 92 wRC+ and 4.56 runs scored per game. Those figures ranked 11th and sixth, respectively, in the NL.

It was a great pitching staff, undone by a poor offense. In the interest of painting the full picture, the word I used at the time wasn’t “poor.” It was a compound word that combined an offensive euphemism for the byproduct of digestion with an offensive euphemism for the orifice from which said byproduct is extruded. I’ll let you put the pieces together from there.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

In 2024, the Brewers were 11th in the majors in wRC+. Last year, they were ninth. This year, they’re fourth. But their wRC+ figure has stayed more or less the same: 105 in 2024, 107 in 2025, 105 this year.

Maybe Jake Bauers’ late-in-life offensive breakout and Jackson Chourio’s maturation have actually resulted in a Brewers offense that is not best described by that scatological portmanteau. Or maybe, in 2026 every offense can be so characterized:

The Mediocre Offenses of Baseball
Team R/G R/G+ wRC+ Playoff Odds
CHC 5.23 117.1 114.0 99.2
WSN 5.23 116.9 106.2 0.0
LAD 4.98 111.5 110.5 100.0
MIL 4.96 111.0 104.8 100.0
PIT 4.93 110.3 101.6 1.7
CHW 4.73 105.8 103.8 65.7
COL 4.73 105.8 90.7 0.0
ATL 4.69 104.8 98.4 99.3
MIN 4.61 103.2 104.0 23.5
PHI 4.55 101.8 93.9 94.6
HOU 4.55 101.7 103.6 42.5
ARI 4.53 101.3 96.9 30.1
BOS 4.53 101.2 102.7 98.7
TBR 4.51 100.9 106.0 100.0
DET 4.49 100.4 101.4 3.1
NYY 4.45 99.6 100.2 100.0
BAL 4.45 99.5 102.3 10.5
STL 4.43 99.1 95.5 3.2
MIA 4.36 97.4 100.8 4.9
ATH 4.35 97.3 93.8 0.0
SDP 4.29 95.9 99.4 67.1
KCR 4.24 94.9 97.2 0.0
NYM 4.17 93.2 94.6 0.0
LAA 4.08 91.3 93.4 0.0
CIN 4.07 91.0 90.0 0.0
SFG 4.03 90.1 97.1 0.0
TEX 4.03 90.1 101.7 49.5
CLE 4.02 90.0 93.5 51.3
SEA 3.95 88.4 100.7 38.6
TOR 3.95 88.3 92.4 16.6
Stats Current as of August 24

Actually, I take it back. The Cubs’ offense is legitimately good. But that’s it.

R/G+ is each team’s runs per game stated as a percentage of this year’s major league average of 4.47. I didn’t normalize for park factors, which is why the Rockies are so high on this list, but you get the picture.

The defining feature of the 2026 regular season is the morass of mediocrity in the playoff race. It doesn’t look like we’re headed toward a collision of 105-win teams in the playoffs, like we had in the 2018 ALCS or the 2021 NL Wild Card Game. But we’ve got a pretty good chance of this being the first full season since 2017 with no 100-loss teams, either. As a result, about three quarters of the league is just mediocre. Heading into Tuesday’s games, our projected standings had the White Sox as the only team in either the AL Central or AL West to finish above .500.

Now, if I were the commissioner of this league, and I’d spent the past year banging the competitive balance drum so I could recreate the 2004-05 NHL lockout from first principles, I might feel foolish right about now. Good thing I’m not the commissioner. But I digress.

In recent years, there’s been a near-perfect correlation between having a good offense and making the playoffs. Last year, 10 of the 12 playoff teams were among the top 12 in team wRC+. The two exceptions were the Reds, whose team picture is in the dictionary under “backed into the playoffs,” and the Guardians, whom I’ve already mentioned. In 2024, it was nine playoff teams in the top 13, plus the Diamondbacks, who missed the postseason on a tiebreaker. In 2023, it was 10 playoff teams in the top 12 in wRC+ again.

There’s obviously enormous variation among the top-10 offenses, and many teams on that list could reasonably be described as pitching-first. But the short version is this: If you want to make the playoffs, you either need to finish in the top 10 or 12 in the league in wRC+ or play in the AL Central.

That’s less true this year. As I write this, seven of the 12 teams that currently inhabit a playoff position are in the top 12 in wRC+. The other five are all below the median, including the Phillies and Guardians, who are in the bottom seven.

A few of the best offenses in the league are saddled with pitching staffs, especially bullpens, that have played them out of contention. (Imagine telling a Pirates fan in April that they’d end up scoring almost five runs a game and have 1.7% playoff odds in the last week of August.)

Mostly, it seems like everyone except the Cubs, who are scoring 5.23 runs per game with a 114 wRC+, is stuck on the proverbial treadmill of mediocrity this year.

But some teams are more mediocre than others. The Guardians are currently (i.e., before Tuesday’s games) scoring 4.02 runs per game with a 51.3% chance of making the postseason. They’re on track to be the lowest-scoring playoff team since… last year’s Guardians, actually. They were the first team since the 2015 Cardinals to make the playoffs while scoring fewer than 4.0 runs per game.

That’s a provocative fun fact, but it gets better. Here’s the big league average in runs scored per team game, every year since the first World Series:

As you can see, the mid-2010s were a pretty low-scoring time in modern baseball history. Over time, the ball changes, the mound changes, the strike zone changes. We have steroids, the DH, and Babe Ruth. You have to adjust for era. And for a little under 50 years of baseball history, you have to adjust for league:

When the AL and NL had different DH rules (1973 to 2019, plus 2021), it was tough for an NL team to put up an above-average wRC+. There were 655 distinct seasons by NL teams during the split-DH rule era; only 138 of those teams put up a wRC+ of 100 or better. Only 47 posted a wRC+ of 105 or better, and only 12 got to 110. But the AL and NL had a unified DH rule from 1901 to 1972, and again in 2020 and from 2022 onward. In those seasons, you can make an apples-to-apples comparison of team offense using wRC+. In fact, let’s do that:

Playoff Teams with the Worst wRC+ in Unified DH Seasons
Season Team wRC+ R/G MLB Average R/G
1969 NYM 86.0 3.90 4.07
2025 CLE 86.1 3.97 4.45
2020 CIN 86.7 4.05 4.65
2020 MIL 89.9 4.12 4.65
2020 CLE 90.2 4.13 4.65
1959 LAD 90.2 4.52 4.38
1944 SLB 90.3 4.44 3.57
1914 BSN 90.5 4.16 2.50
1965 LAD 91.4 3.75 3.99
1906 CHW 91.7 3.68 3.62

Here we have a few teams with incredible front-end pitching talent (the Miracle Mets and the two Koufax-Drysdale Dodger teams), some Dead Ball-Era teams, four seasons played among ongoing worldwide calamity, and last year’s Guardians. (For the record: I have no idea what’s up with the 1914 Braves; they played 49 home games at the South End Grounds and 27 at Fenway Park, which could accommodate bigger crowds. Maybe that screwed with the park adjustment.)

For years in which the AL and NL had the same DH rule, I used the major league average as the baseline for R/G+. For all other seasons (1973-2019 and 2021), I used the AL or NL average.

The four worst R/G+ marks by playoff teams all came in 2020, which is the shortest major league season on record and also featured the largest playoff field. That’s to be expected, I suppose. The 1981 Astros, who played the odd strike-induced split-season playoff format, are also among the leaders. So let’s set a 140-game minimum to weed out the outliers:

Playoff Teams with the Worst R/G+
Season Team R/G R/G+ G Runs wRC+ League R/G Unified DH Rule League
2023 MIA 4.11 89.1 162 666 93.2 4.62 Yes NL
2025 CLE 3.97 89.2 162 643 86.1 4.45 Yes AL
1973 NYM 3.78 91.0 161 608 85.2 4.15 No NL
1996 LAD 4.34 92.6 162 703 90.6 4.68 No NL
1985 KCR 4.24 93.1 162 687 92.9 4.56 No AL
2016 NYM 4.14 93.3 162 671 98.8 4.44 No NL
2007 ARI 4.40 93.4 162 712 82.1 4.71 No NL
1966 LAD 3.74 93.7 162 606 96.6 3.99 Yes NL
1965 LAD 3.75 94.1 162 608 91.4 3.99 Yes NL
2006 SDP 4.51 94.7 162 731 98.8 4.76 No NL

Again, we have multiple Koufax-Drysdale Dodgers teams and a Tom SeaverJerry Koosman Mets team. I’m inclined to loop the 2016 Mets, who had the Four Horsemen or the Second Generation K or whatever you want to call it, in among those teams with great pitching staffs. So too the 1985 Royals, who had three top-five Cy Young finishers in Bret Saberhagen, Dan Quisenberry, and Charlie Leibrandt. The 1996 Dodgers and 2006 Padres were forgettable teams that played in extreme pitchers’ parks; if I had adjusted for park factors, they’d probably be lower on the list.

But the 1973 Mets, even with their bonkers pitching staff, won only 82 games, the lowest total of any World Series participant in a 162-game season. The 2007 Diamondbacks were the top seed in the NL playoff bracket despite a -20 run differential. And the 2023 Marlins snuck into the playoffs at 84-78, with a Pythagorean record of 75-87. (Many thanks to Tanner Scott, who posted a 2.31 ERA in about a thousand high-leverage relief innings that year.)

Again: Either great pitchers, park factor flukes, or the worst playoff teams in recent memory.

Or 2026 in the American League. Right now, the Blue Jays and Mariners both have double-digit playoff odds, and would come in below the 2023 Marlins in R/G+. The Guardians and Rangers, both of whom are a coin flip to make the playoffs, would come in under the 1973 Mets to make the historical top three.

And while this is mostly the fault of the AL — in the league of offenses that invite the offensive description I mentioned earlier, the team with one bat is king — the Padres are 67.1% to make the playoffs, with a wRC+ of 99.4 and a R/G+ of 95.9. That would place them 21st from the bottom historically, if you eliminate sub-140-game seasons.

We’re now in year five of the 12-team playoff format, and in that time, the only constant has been a new narrative to gripe about every year. First, the top seeds had it too hard and the bye was a fatal hindrance. Then the top seeds had it too easy. Now the Dodgers are apparently going to win every year, so why bother with the pretense of having a playoff at all?

I try not to overreact to a single year’s worth of information. Only a fool would try to rewrite the rules every offseason to try to solve last year’s problems, when each campaign brings up a new and unpredictable series of events. So I’m not drawing any sweeping conclusions or suggesting any structural changes.

Nevertheless, this is a lot of competitive balance. Actually, I think I stepped in some competitive balance just now. Someone find me a stick so I can scrape it off my shoe.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
millvillemeltdownMember since 2026
23 days ago

lemme guess: the compound word was “poop from a butt.” i’ll take my prize money by mail.

beanbongMember
23 days ago

would it not be shitass?

Anonymous Member #46Member since 2020
23 days ago
Reply to  beanbong

That feels like the start to a Shakespearean musing.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
23 days ago

Shartspearean

millvillemeltdownMember since 2026
23 days ago
Reply to  beanbong

it would absolutely be.
i am being extremely facetious; my answer is neither a compound word nor composed of offensive euphemisms. the only criterion it matches is the definition.
*edited for a silly grammar error

Last edited 23 days ago by millvillemeltdown
Johnnie TMember since 2024
23 days ago

I know this is not the main point of this article, but it also inadvertantly points out that there are too many teams in the playoffs. When near .500 teams have a shot at making the playoffs and winning the World Series… well, that is too many teams.

beanbongMember
23 days ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

I don’t think anyone in the upcoming CBA negotiations has any incentive to reduce the playoff field, so no chance it happens but I’m coming around to the idea of setting a minimum winning percentage to qualify for the playoffs. Somewhere in the neighborhood of .520-.530% would make sense. If a 6 seed doesn’t hit that threshold, the 3 seed would get a bye into the DS, and if the 5th and 6th seed come up short, there’s no wildcard series and the 4 plays the 1 and 3 plays the 2 in the DS. In the AL this year (using the current standings with a .520% standard), there’d be no wildcard series and the Rays would get the Red Sox in the ALDS and the Yankees would play the White Sox in the other ALDS

eandyMember since 2023
23 days ago
Reply to  beanbong

I get the thinking behind a winning percentage threshold in theory. I don’t like the idea of a dynamic postseason. Comparisons year over year would be so janky.

beanbongMember
23 days ago
Reply to  eandy

There’s been more changes to the playoff tournament over the last ~30 years than there was for nearly the first century of professional baseball, and almost certainly more expansion to come over the next decade.

Scotty GMember since 2020
23 days ago
Reply to  beanbong

I like the idea in concept, and I agree there are too many teams in the postseason, but not inviting the Midwest (i.e., the entire AL Central) to the postseason is probably not the solution to any real or perceived problems facing the league.

beanbongMember
23 days ago
Reply to  Scotty G

This year is mostly an anomaly for the AL Central. Even with a cutoff around .525, 1-2 teams rise above the muck enough to clear that bar over the last 5 seasons (3 in 2024). This year, we’d still see Milwaukee and at least one Chicago team in the playoffs, the AL West would be the real loser in this scenario.

Also, I’m not sold on the idea that a playoff tournament that resembles the Electoral College is the best idea either.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
23 days ago
Reply to  beanbong

When they add two teams Id like to see the re-alignment be just and East and West division. The 2 division winners get in and the rest are wild cards.

That’d mostly solve it.

MyBloodyBallantineMember since 2020
23 days ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

Agreed. Instead of adding a 3rd wild card, MLB should have just made the previous wild card Game a best of 3. In that format, winning your division matters and the wild card teams still have the disadvantage of having to survive a best of 3. I really don’t like how in the current format being the 3rd best division winner just gets you a wild card spot.

I would also reseed after the wild card series to avoid a situation like the 107 win Giants matching up with the 105 win Dodgers in the Division Series.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
23 days ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

Clearly, we need to do this battle-royale style. Every month or so, the worst X teams are sent home to have a long think about what they’ve done. By September, you’re down to like 8 teams. You then have a tournament style playoff or something for the hunk of metal.

Call me, Manfred. I got a lot of great ideas.

murraygd13Member since 2019
22 days ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

Too much money in it for them to ever go back to less playoff teams. More postseason games is more postseason TV and money to be made.

Go to 2 divisions East and a West. Top team in each division gets a bye to the division series. The number 2 and 3 teams in each division play a 3 game series at the number 2 seed. Winner goes on to play the Division winner in a true division series to crown the East/West playoff winner. The winners have each other in a championship series.

Expand each league so there are 32 teams with 8 in each division.

Athletics Fan Surrounded by GuardiansMember since 2025
23 days ago

>>I have no idea what’s up with the 1914 Braves
Presumably, this is why they were famously the Miracle Braves.

maguroMember since 2016
23 days ago

Scoring 4.2 runs a game in a 2.5 run per game league with a 90 wRC+ really is miraculous.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
23 days ago
Reply to  maguro

That’s a typo — 1914 AL was 3.66 R/G, NL was 3.84 R/G.

Something’s screwy with ’14 and ’15. Might have something to do with the FL being included/not included?

Last edited 23 days ago by Fun-Hating Dork
MikeSMember since 2020
23 days ago

According to Fangraphs “on pace’ leaderboards, there are going to be 97 MLB players who hit 20+ HR this year. The only Guardian on that list is Jo Adell, who hit 16 of his 20 HR so far while playing for the Angels.

DavidMember since 2020
23 days ago
Reply to  MikeS

As I watched Tristan Peters homer in his 4th straight game in the back half of the White Sox lineup last night I was thinking, he’d honestly be one of the Guardians best hitters.

Left of Centerfield
23 days ago
Reply to  MikeS

Yet they have more homeruns than the Brewers and the same as the Blue Jays.

Anyway, there were moments where I though DeLauter and/or Angel Martinez would be the first Guardian OFer since Michael Brantley in 2014 to hit 20 or more home runs. Alas, it was not meant to be…

thaaldermanMember since 2024
23 days ago

Big missed opportunity to use one of the greatest nicknames ever for the 1906 White Sox: the Hitless Wonders.

Very un-Baumann like

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
23 days ago

Ive always thought that, in the extremes, a good offense is the better choice. You cant hold teams to less than zero.

I dont know how to math it, but I wonder if you could go match up by match up and have a hypothetical “here’s how good X team’s pitching needs to be vs Y team’s offense to make up for their poor hitting”.

maximus74Member since 2025
23 days ago

Sounds like a Mathemadage article to see if “good pitching beats good hitting” holds up

NATS FanMember since 2018
23 days ago

I will care about this when a losing team wins the World series. Until then, I’ll be glad a format exists that helps small market teams play some meaningful games in September.

NATS FanMember since 2018
23 days ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Also in a year with a guy throwing 30 100+ pitches a game and many other guys nearly so, what do you expect?

GammaDraconisMember since 2020
23 days ago

There’s a selection effect in comparing past playoff teams with mid-season R/G values. Whichever team makes it out of the melee to claim the last WC spot, or the AL West title, will likely have a higher R/G at the end of the season than they do now, just by dint of winning enough games to claim the title.

GammaDraconisMember since 2020
23 days ago

<delete duplicate>

Last edited 23 days ago by GammaDraconis
Shirtless George Brett
23 days ago

The 2026 Nationals season is going to have to be studied in a lab or something. Leading the world in runs scored and yet 10 games under .500.

How bad would they be with like a league avg (or worse) offence?

PC1970Member since 2024
22 days ago

Them & The Tigers-

Top 10 in both pitching AND hitting WAR.
Top 5 SP ERA.
3rd best run differential in the AL, 7th best in MLB.

9 games under .500.

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
22 days ago
Reply to  PC1970

You conveniently left out the bullpen statistics….