Giancarlo Stanton Is More Than a Slugger

As I sit here in the winter meetings media room, there’s a press conference taking place in front of me, with Giancarlo Stanton being officially introduced as a member of the New York Yankees. If you’re a Yankees fan, you love it, and if you’re a fan of anyone else, you don’t, but one thing every fan understands is that this gives the Yankees something extraordinary. Your mind goes directly to one place: The Yankees lineup is about to feature both Stanton and Aaron Judge, and Stanton and Judge are amazing.

If you’re analytically inclined, you know that Stanton and Judge are Statcast outliers. They’re the two players who most frequently push the upper boundaries of exit velocity. And even if you’ve never heard the word “Statcast” at all, you can understand that Judge just led the American League in home runs, while Stanton led the majors. Stanton was Judge before Judge, Judge v1.0, and he’s as big a power threat as anyone in baseball. Stanton could hit the ball out anywhere even before the ball started flying, and he’s associated with his power in the way Aroldis Chapman is associated with his fastball. The Yankees have landed a premium slugger, to go along with their other premium slugger.

But Stanton’s reputation might be a little misleading. Power is his biggest strength, sure, but there’s more to his game. Stanton’s more of a complete player than you might realize, after making some changes in the regular season.

You could always start with the fact that Stanton just played in 159 games. He has an extended injury history, and that can’t be erased, but his fragility or injury-proneness is probably overstated as a consequence. If Stanton isn’t actually durable, well, he was durable in 2017, which is a promising indicator for the seasons ahead. We know he can play a whole year, because he just finished playing a whole year. It’s the most you could ask.

But there’s also the matter of what happened with his numbers. Here’s one way of looking at things — Stanton’s career percentile rankings in strikeout rate and isolated power.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Stanton has always been a power hitter, from day one. He’s arguably the best power hitter in the game. But you can see that something just happened with Stanton’s strikeouts. This past season, Stanton’s strikeout rate ranked in the 26th percentile. That’s not good, not on its own — Stanton will never be mistaken for Jose Altuve. Yet Stanton’s previous high was the 12th percentile. In 2016, he ranked in the sixth. Stanton just meaningfully improved his contact, and here’s a plot that maybe makes a stronger impression.

I looked at every hitter from the past two years who batted at least 300 times in each season. I’ve plotted them by their changes in power and strikeouts. Stanton is marked in yellow.

We’re accustomed to thinking of power and contact as an either/or. And, generally speaking, that is indeed the relationship, but there are exceptions. Stanton just posted the 11th-biggest drop in strikeout rate, and he also had the eighth-biggest improvement in power. Now, Stanton had shown something like this power ability in the past, but he never made so much contact. Stanton worked to make himself more complete, and in that plot, his is a dot that’s hard not to notice.

I should note that Stanton isn’t alone. The three somewhat similar points in there belong to Justin Smoak, Eddie Rosario, and Whit Merrifield. Nevertheless, you don’t see many players do what Stanton just did. And I think there’s a pretty good chance this is going to stick.

There’s a mechanical explanation, as Stanton has adopted an extremely closed-off batting stance. Even before that, in fact, there were signs that Stanton was consciously trying to cut down on his whiffs, and in this era, with the ball taking off, Stanton doesn’t need to swing as hard as possible every time. You still find him atop exit-velocity leaderboards, though, and yet he’s kept his strikeout rate lower for several months. Stanton seems to have made one improvement without a consequential sacrifice.

You can also look at the player-pool history. I went back to the 1995 season and found players who batted at least 400 times in three consecutive seasons. I isolated all the players who reduced their strikeout rates by at least five percentage points between the first two years. The average reduction was 6.4 percentage points, roughly matching what Stanton just did. In the third year, on average, those players’ strikeout rates went back up less than two percentage points. There was regression, but only part of the way, with the bulk of the contact improvement sticking.

Every player has his own story, and follows his own course, but Stanton no longer seems so extremely whiff-prone. This past season, he struck out about as often as Addison Russell and Kevin Kiermaier. No one will ever confuse Stanton for being a pure hitter, but he’s trending more in that direction, his swing having fewer holes. This gets lost in the conversation about how hard he hits the ball.

And it should also be noted that Stanton isn’t only a good hitter. His offense is about more than his power, and his game is about more than his offense. No, Stanton isn’t that much of a threat on the bases. His career baserunning value is right around average. Yet his career Defensive Runs Saved total is +45. By Ultimate Zone Rating, he shows up at +29. And this isn’t just an artifact of his earliest, youngest seasons.

Over the past three years, 39 different players have played at least 1,000 innings in right field. By DRS, as a rate stat, Stanton ranks seventh-best. By UZR, as a rate stat, Stanton also ranks seventh-best. While Stanton isn’t as good of a defender as, say, Jason Heyward or Mookie Betts, he is a legitimate outfield plus. He’s a quality defender, which means he’s not by any means one-dimensional. Stanton is, overall, pretty well-rounded, which is one of the reasons why the Yankees feel comfortable rotating Stanton, Judge, and Brett Gardner. They can all handle a certain amount of versatility.

It’s perfectly natural to focus on power. There’s nothing in baseball more valuable than a home run, and no hitters hit more last year than Stanton did. Stanton’s power is his calling card, and, in the past, he did come with other concerns. In the most recent year, however, Stanton didn’t get hurt. In the most recent year, Stanton significantly cut down on his strikeouts. And, in the most recent year, Stanton continued to play a good right field. The Yankees didn’t trade for a source of home runs. The Yankees traded for a source of value, to be delivered in a number of different ways. You could say that Stanton’s reputation almost does the reality of his game a disservice.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mahoney
8 years ago

Kind of like Joey Gallo, except with a third fewer strikeouts.

bunslow
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

That’s a really scary way to phrase it, though I suppose we are talking about the reigning MVP

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago

“If you’re a Yankees fan, you love it, and if you’re a fan of anyone else, you don’t”

I’m a fan of a different team (an NL team, so I don’t normally hate on the Yankees that much) and all I can say to the latter is, hey, every albatross contract out there today seemed like a really good idea to someone at some point in time.

Not saying it’s definite that this deal will go bad, but I put at least at a 25% chance that in five years Yankees’ fans are looking at the remaining years of this contract and wondering what the front office was thinking and how in the world Jeter and the Marlins managed to fleece Cashman.

Mike NMN
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

I’m a Yankees fan and I don’t love it. The same contract issues that virtually every commenter made on this site (and others) are still there. No one really wanted Stanton with that contract, and certainly didn’t want to give up anything for him. Then the Yankees made the trade and people began to faint in anger. To me, there’s too much money and too much risk. It reminds me of the Giambi contract (without the Juice). For years the Yankees were never sure whether he could play the field, or play at all.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

All fair points, and there’s also of course some chance that Stanton’s great (and healthy) for at least two of the next three years, opts out, and the Yankees are disciplined enough not to re-sign him, which would work out great for them.

The writers, and most of the commenters, here also understand how baseball player performance and contracts tie together better than about 95% of baseball fans and better than about 90% of people who write about sports for a living. I’m a Cardinals fan, and I recently stumbled across a St. Louis sports columnist (not the Cardinals’s beat reporter, TBF) writing about how Ozuna would cost a lot more in prospects than Yelich, which is of course ridiculous if you look at remaining years of team control (2 arb years vs. 5 on a team-friendly contract) and year-by-year WAR. I’m sure it will floor some people again if/when one or both of those guys are traded for a better return than Stanton.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago

Stanton may have the “big name player on whom the Cardinals finished second” curse, though. Pujols, Heyward, Price. Devil magic, indeed.

outfield_acrobat
8 years ago

Cool article. The Stanton highlights that always come to mind are those absolute laserbeams (hard, low linedrives) he’s able to hit. Didn’t he lower his launch angle this year too? Yeah, just looked it up, 11.1 degrees this year compared to 14 last year. Crazy.

outfield_acrobat
8 years ago

Also want to say that while I’m not a Yankees fan, I was kind of rooting for this trade because Judge and Stanton hitting back to back is mind-blowing. How many times have players hit not just back to back home runs, but back to back 500+ ft home runs ever? It’ll happen next year for sure.

dodgerbleu
8 years ago

I agree with the sentiment, about back-to-back moonshots! The longest HR hit last year was 496 feet, so don’t think we’ll literally get back-to-back 500 footers..

outfield_acrobat
8 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

I was embelishing, of course–I follow statcast numbers too!–but if anyone could do it, it would be Judge and Stanton.

Captain Tenneal
8 years ago

I would say with almost certainty that back-to-back 500 footers have never happened before.

dl80Member since 2020
8 years ago

Really great article, Jeff.

I got curious when I read your sentence about him being the best power hitter in the game from day one, so I looked at some leaderboards (as one does in the offseason).

Stanton is 8th all time in home runs through age 27 with 267. Every single guy above him is or will be a Hall of Famer: ARod, Foxx, Matthews, Griffey, Pujols, Mantle, Ott. And Stanton is more than 600 plate appearances behind the next lowest guy above him, which is Pujols.

Stanton will need 35 to remain in 8th through age 28 after 2018, 40 would put him 7th, 53 would put him 6th and 54 would put him 5th.

And because no leaderboard adventure is complete without mentioning Mike Trout, he is currently 28th through age 27 despite having two more years to climb it. Trout has averaged 33 home runs over the last 6 years, so he could tie Giancarlo for 8th place through age 27 if he hits 66 the next two years. And 99 over the next three years would put Trout right back in 8th place through age 28.

(Trout is currently 7th through age 25, his appropriate leaderboard for his age)