How Did Nolan Arenado Get So Good At Defense?

Over the last two years, only one National League third baseman has had better defensive numbers than Nolan Arenado. It wasn’t supposed to be this way.

Back in 2011, when Arenado debuted on Keith Law’s top 100 list at 92, Law had this to say about the young third baseman in the Rockies’ system:

He’s more “baseball athlete” than “true athlete,” a below-average runner with good hands and a strong arm but thick legs and slightly slow feet. To stay at third base, he’ll have to do everything right with his upper body to make up for what his lower half prevents him from getting, but he seems to have the work ethic and makeup to do it.

In no way is this meant as a gotcha — this represents the feeling at the time about Arenado’s defense. He was a bat looking for a position. There weren’t many mentions of gold gloves in his future.

A year later, things had changed already, if just a little bit. Mark Anderson, in comparing Arenado to Anthony Rendon, had this to say about the young third baseman in Colorado’s system:

The report on Arenado’s defense has changed dramatically over the last year. In 2011 scouts reported improved reactions and footwork at third to go along with his now solid hands. While several scouts I spoke with last year tossed a future 55-grade on Arenado’s glove work, I was a little more cautious in my own assessment. I believe many of the gains seen last year were real but I still firmly believe he maxes out as a steady, average defender.

Looks like cautious optimism moved in where cautious pessimism used to live. While nobody questioned his arm much, there is a focus on Arenado’s lower half. ‘Thick legs that don’t move well’ was still part of the prognosis.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Arenado agreed that his lower half was a problem before a game against the Giants this week. “I was out of shape,” the third baseman admitted. “I wasn’t moving real well.” The team put an emphasis on his defense and health, and responded with a diet program for Arenado.

Infield coordinator Scott Fletcher had some help from Jerry Weinstein, and Arenado appreciated their attention. They had him working on “lateral movement stuff,” including “how to go to the ball, how you use your glove, and how to field it,” as the third baseman put it. “They both helped me big time.”


Skip to 1:35, and it certainly does look like Arenado’s lower half is a tad slow and perhaps thick 2011.

If fielding is one part hands, one part feet, and one part anticipation, Arenado felt he at least had one thing going in. “I always knew my hands were there when I was younger,” he said. “I think my feet weren’t there.”

The work was difficult for the youngster. “We practiced how to go to the ball, different movements — we were trying to create a better habit,” he said. “It was hard. It was hard in the beginning, because I wasn’t very good at it.” But hard work on his positioning, combined with diet and a new training regimen that focused on slimming Arenado down and improving his quickness, paid off in the end.


Now in 2014, Arenado is leaner, quicker, and more direct to the ball.

Though some third baseman prefer to start low — Arenado said he admired David Wright and Scott Rolen for their low approaches — the Rockies’ third baseman is more upright. For him, it’s a feel thing, and he didn’t feel good getting low. “I never felt good, I felt I couldn’t get to the ball, I didn’t feel very athletic. I felt flat-footed,” he said of starting low. “I like to start up, constantly moving. For me, starting tall, I feel like I can react in any direction.”

That puts Arenado in a camp with Matt Dominguez, who once told me that he felt quicker on defense when he was taller. Wright felt it was “easier to go up then to go down.” Either way, the Rockies’ third baseman has found the beginning stance that fits him best, and it looks just a little bit like the stance of the guy standing to his left at shortstop.

Along with a new stance, a new lower half, and a better approach to the ball, the arm and hands he’s always had make him a plus defender at third. For that, Nolan Arenado can thank a lot of hard work and the careful attention of the organization that developed him.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
hbar
12 years ago

thanks for this. I get to go seem him play tonight–now I have a few things to look for. “Thick” is not a description I’d have applied to him now. maybe it’s the pinstripes?

Phantom Stranger
12 years ago

Not everything a scout writes is sacrosanct or etched in stone. Arenado is basically Machado’s equal at 3B defense but gets a lot less press playing for bad teams in Colorado.

wait wait
12 years ago

Imagine that–the scouting community missing on someone. Crazy.

Costanza
12 years ago
Reply to  wait wait

Maybe they didn’t miss on evaluating how good he was at the time. It seems pretty clear that his improvement is the exception, rather than that they missed a pattern.

Spit Ball
12 years ago

That’s cause his fielding is totally due to the thin air and Park Factor in Denver. That’s what a scout told me.

Stuck in a slump
12 years ago

It feels almost blasphemous that Uribe’s DEF score is 5 pts higher

Stank Asten
12 years ago

Uribe has always been a good defender at 3B and used to be a superior fielder at SS.

Stuck in a slump
12 years ago
Reply to  Stank Asten

If you look at the guy, he doesn’t seem like he’d be athletic enough to be a premiere defensive 3B. Having watched Arenado closely, it’s hard to imagine that a guy like Uribe could manage to be significantly better than him.

LHPSU
12 years ago

Also an elite defenseive 3B: Pablo Sandoval.

Stuck in a slump
12 years ago

Sandoval has a 0.8 UZR/150 since 2013 and a 5.1 DEF score. That puts him in the top 15 defensive 3B. Good, but hardly elite.

Graham
12 years ago

I don’t think UZR is quite the argument-ender you want it to be, though. Until there is anything resembling a consensus on which defensive metrics to use, I’m okay with 2014 Panda as an elite defender. He’s been spectacular, and, much more so than Arenado, he’s also been steady.

stuck in a slump
12 years ago

UZR over a large enough sample is a pretty good indicator of a player’s defensive abilities. I would have gone back further, but Arenado wasn’t playing in 2012, but going back to 2012, Sandoval has a UZR/150 of 1.0. His DEF score is 7.6. His DRS is -2!!!

Meanwhile, Arenado has a UZR/150 of 15.4. He has a DEF score of 30.9. He has a DRS of 45!!! That’s a +47 runs saved difference with over 1,000 innings played LESS. Sandoval is a good 3B, but he’s not elite, when all three metrics agree that Sandoval is right about average or above, but claim Arenado is truly elite, it’s time to stop arguing. Get over it.

stuck in a slump
12 years ago

Perhaps I should have stated this in my last post, but Sandoval, when ranked with all other 3B with at least 1500 innings played (Arenado fell just under the 2k inning mark), ranks 19th in DRS, 18th in UZR/150, and 17th in DEF out of 29 players that qualified for the list. Meanwhile, he comes in 9th in innings played with just shy of 3,100. I think we have a large enough sample to start judging. He has two years where UZR/150 rates him as bad, two years where it rates him as scratch, one year where he was truly elite, and this year where he’s been well above average. DEF seems to agree with this, while DRS has been even more harsh on him during his bad years.

No one is saying that the metrics are spot on, but none of them support a narrative that Sandoval has been truly elite defensively over the whole of his career.

Graham
12 years ago

I don’t think it’s so easy to get a bead on Sandoval, though, because his conditioning (and thus his defense) has fluctuated wildly. If you go for the large sample size — and I understand why you would — then you’re in a sense penalizing 2014 Sandoval for the play of 2013 or 2012 Sandoval. While it may take more than a year’s worth of data for us to feel confident that we’ve eliminated noise in our statistics, it’s also possible for a player to have a good deal of volatility between years.

If you haven’t watched Sandoval regularly this year, I don’t know that you can so easily dismiss him.

Stuck in a slump
12 years ago

I believe it was Dave (though I might be wrong on this) who recently talked about defensive peaks and slumps, and that we should dismiss defensive metrics for being as volatile as their offensive counterparts. And knowing that Sandoval has had up and down years defensively doesn’t mean that we should dismiss them. Sandoval is having a well above average year by the metrics in 2014. I’ve acknowledged that and have no issues with that, Sandoval’s reputation at 3B is in line with what he’s doing this year. But with only one truly elite year of defense by the metrics, should we really discount the fact that he’s had two bad seasons and two scratch seasons by the metrics? Which is the real Sandoval? The two plus years? The two scratch years? The two bad years? If I’m going to try to put a label on him, I’d have to look at his entire career, because otherwise I’d be cherry picking to see what I wanted to see. Knowing his reputation though, I’d give him a slight boost, but I wouldn’t go beyond calling him an above average defensive 3B.

KK-Swizzle
12 years ago

3B defense is about quickness, not range per se. up the middle, you need to cover a lot of ground, but at third its much more dependent on quick reactions and having a strong arm. This is why you routinely see guys with mediocre athleticism and world-class hand-eye coordination grade out as above average fielders there. Heck, even Casey McGehee has graded out as average for his career!

Dick Monfort
12 years ago

I taught him everything he knows.

Cicero
12 years ago

Law left Arenado off his top 100 and off his 10 to watch too pre 2013

Cicero
12 years ago
Reply to  Cicero

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/4/2/4140222/taking-a-look-at-2013-pre-season-prospect-rankings

Surprising Exclusions:
Name Con. Rank Lists
Nolan Arenado 53 10
Michael Wacha 72 9
Yasiel Puig 73 9
James Paxton 75 9
Yordano Ventura 83 9

Alex Gordon
12 years ago

Defensive metrics are unreliable at best…at least that’s what everyone keeps telling me.

John Salmon
12 years ago

More “baseball athlete” than “true athlete”? Is athleticism purely a function of foot speed? If you can hit major league pitching, you’re an athlete, as this remains the hardest task in sports. Defining athleticism as having a body type ideal for basketball or football is a silly thing for a baseball writer to do.

Paul
12 years ago
Reply to  John Salmon

Athleticism is a combination of body control, speed, and agility; it has nothing to do with body type. This article said that his body type was cutting into his athleticism, not that body type is athleticism.

And it’s not silly to demarcate because it factors into a player’s defense. Pablo Sandoval has decent athleticism despite his body type, so he’s not a counter example. Even if he were a counter example, though, one or two outliers doesn’t make an entire system faulty.

BobbyJohn
12 years ago

The funny thing is that all the hype around him in the minors was over his bat. He led all of minor league baseball with 122 RBI in 2011 and was the Arizona Fall League MVP right behind that.

Mike13
12 years ago

how may gold gloves for him? 10?