How Good of a Defender is Adam Eaton?

Even before all this recent activity, it was pretty apparent the White Sox had the makings of a good core. In fact, the existence of the core is probably in large part what drove all this recent activity. There’s an opportunity to be seized, and the White Sox had plenty of financial flexibility to play with. Clearly, Jose Abreu is a star-level player. Clearly, Chris Sale is a star-level player. Clearly, Jose Quintana is a borderline star-level player. And then there’s Adam Eaton. Eaton, unquestionably, is a part of the core. But how valuable he is depends on where you’re looking.

Looking at Baseball-Reference, last year Eaton was baseball’s fourth-most valuable center fielder, with a WAR over 5. However, looking at FanGraphs, he wound up more middle-of-the-pack, with a WAR under 3. There are a few different reasons for the disagreement, but mostly this is about defense. Here at FanGraphs, we make use of UZR. Over at Baseball-Reference, they make use of DRS. Most of the time, the metrics get along, but it’s both interesting and frustrating when they don’t, and with regard to Adam Eaton, they most certainly do not get along.

And this is important — Eaton’s offensive ceiling is limited by the absence of power, so defense is what will or won’t make him a star. According to DRS, last year Eaton was 12 runs better than average in center field. Yet, according to UZR, last year Eaton was three runs worse than average in center field. This took place in a little over 1,000 innings.

Let’s look only at defenders last season with at least 900 innings. On a per-1000 basis, no one had a bigger DRS/UZR gap than Eaton did, at roughly 15 runs. No one had a bigger difference in the same direction, and no one had a bigger difference in the opposite direction. So you could say there was no greater source of disagreement than Adam Eaton, at least as far as defensive metrics are concerned. That seems like the sort of thing that ought to be at least quickly investigated.

Now, I don’t care to try to find out how good Eaton was in 2014. What I want to come up with is a sort of defensive projection, or an evaluation of Eaton’s true talent. Talking about his 2014 is part of that, but it’s not the whole picture. Post-2014, how good a defender can we say that Adam Eaton is in center field? We’ve got to look at what evidence we have.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

By DRS, Eaton just ranked fifth out of 21 regular or semi-regular center fielders. This functions as a data point.

By UZR, Eaton just ranked 12th out of 21 regular or semi-regular center fielders. This functions as another data point. We already went over this; this is the whole reason this post exists.

What about the earlier years of Eaton’s big-league career, though? The samples are more limited, but we do have more than 700 innings. Those innings were split between center field and the corners. DRS put Eaton at exactly 0. UZR actually put him at -10, and remember, these are innings in center and left, so it’s not a pure-center performance. Eaton’s brief earlier track record doesn’t support the idea that he’s an awesome defender.

Is there anything to be found at Baseball Prospectus? According to their Fielding Runs Above Average, Eaton was indeed mediocre in 2012 and 2013, and then he was most recently slightly above-average. Very slightly. These numbers side more with UZR than with DRS.

We can try to make some use of Inside Edge data. This time I’m isolating 2014 — the Inside Edge processes have changed each year, and I don’t want to blend inconsistencies. Eaton just made 312 putouts. Based on the batted balls he saw, as evaluated by Inside Edge, he would’ve been expected to make about 310 putouts. So that’s average, or very slightly better.

Personally, I always love taking a glance at the Fan Scouting Report. I know it’s not great science, but I’m a sucker for crowdsourcing, and I think the FSR is decently selective for people who genuinely give a damn and aren’t looking to make things chaotic. Last year, Eaton drew a 64 overall rating. That’s comparable to the previous year’s 59 overall rating. His greatest strength is his speed. The average center fielder last year had a 60 overall rating. Jacoby Ellsbury and Andrew McCutchen wound up at 62. Leonys Martin wound up at 65, and I should note his positive defensive ratings are almost entirely because of his arm.

Eaton has a strong defensive reputation, and he’s had one for a while. His style of play is sufficiently aggressive that it can get him into trouble, but he’ll run through walls if there are baseballs over there, and when you just read how people write about Eaton, or when you hear how people talk about Eaton, they love his intensity, and how much ground he covers. Definitely, the consensus is that Eaton is more of a plus than a minus. No one ever talks about Adam Eaton as a defensive minus. Granted, in order to play center field, you have to be damn athletic, or you have to be not very good and a member of last season’s Dodgers. Most center fielders are really good fielders. Visually it can be challenging to tell them apart.

How does Eaton do with the eye test? I can’t possibly provide for you a representative sample of plays, so here are three real good plays, accompanied by three plays that were less good. This is evidence that Eaton is talented, and also doesn’t not make mistakes.

Good play no. 1:

Eaton1

Good play no. 2:

Eaton2

Good play no. 3:

Eaton3

Worse play no. 1:

Eaton4

Worse play no. 2:

Eaton5

Worse play no. 3:

Eaton6

I don’t know how much that accomplished, but it felt nice to make .gifs. Feels like it’s been a while since .gifs.

Eaton’s 26 years old. Pretty much just turned that number. He’s seriously fast, and he’s never really talked about as a liability. Last year was his first full year in the majors, and unlike in 2013, the White Sox didn’t have Eaton bounce between positions. Nearly all the evidence from last year suggests that Eaton was at least a little better than average. So that informs our opinion of him going forward. Working against it a little is UZR, plus the fact that Eaton wasn’t a statistically strong defender in 2012 – 2013. But I think if I had to peg Eaton’s talent, that is his talent right now over a full season in center, I’d call him a small number of runs better than average. Or, I think he’s worse than last year’s DRS, but better than last year’s UZR. So this would make my opinion a few runs higher than Eaton’s 2015 Steamer projection. It’s such a small deal, ultimately, but then you’re talking about a WAR maybe rounding down to 2, versus a WAR maybe rounding up to 3. So there’s a small psychological effect, and I’m fairly certain White Sox fans would disagree with the assertion that Adam Eaton is a below-average defensive center fielder.

No matter what, this is a core piece. Eaton’s a center fielder with a .350 OBP. Those aren’t easy to come by. And when they add a few runs with the glove? That’s better than doing the opposite. Chicago’s not about to move Eaton to a corner, nor would there be any reason to do so.

Finally, just because I like polls, I’ve elected to attach a poll. Here, you can chime in with your own opinion, and while I know the Fan Scouting Report already exists, this is a little more direct, and I’m curious to see how the results are distributed. You know what I think of Adam Eaton. What do you think of Adam Eaton?





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Hurtlocker
11 years ago

Worse play number was a really tough play, he mis-judged #2 and 3. Having played CF for years, you have to account for windy days, slick OF grass, the ball coming off the bat with spin etc. By the eyeball test, he looks like a plus defensive CF.

Hurtlocker
11 years ago
Reply to  Hurtlocker

Number one, sorry

Captain Tenneal
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Does Inside Edge know that the play brought him right to the wall, or does it just know that it was a fly ball hit x miles per hour to a spot 400 feet away? Basically, is it accounting for ballpark and the fact that he pretty much ran out of room?

mgoetze
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Inside Edge has no credibility for me. Whenever Jackie Bradley Jr. made a ridiculously difficult play this year I checked his Inside Edge stats a day or two later to see they had credited him with another “even” play.

glib
11 years ago

I did not think this was a good article. If by your metrics he is -12, and another metrics he is +5, then eviscerate the differences between the two metrics. Don’t present GIFs.

James
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Don’t listen to him Jeff – ALWAYS include GIFs 🙂

FishMonster
11 years ago
Reply to  James

Yeah. Make sure it doesn’t feel like a while since.gifs.

bob
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

What are GIFs? I thought the videos were JEFs

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

“I don’t know how much that accomplished, but it felt nice to make .gifs. Feels like it’s been a while since .gifs.”

Everything on the internet should be written by Jeff Sullivan.

Tangotiger
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Anyone who criticizes Jeff’s efforts is a person you don’t want to know.

glib
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

for starters, I assume these metrics are linear sums of statistics. Where are they most different?

Captain Tenneal
11 years ago
Reply to  glib

Well one’s negative and the other is positive. That’s definitely where they are most different.

Lenard
11 years ago

This is the type of thing that really makes me look forward to the StatCast data, should it become publicly available. Obviously he’s fast, but it would be great to get some route efficiency numbers for him, instead of just having to rely on the eye test.

BRH
11 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

“Efficiency” is only relevant when an outfielder fails to make a play. If an outfielder gets a great read and break on a ball, he may run an inefficient route to avoid over-running the ball, or to get his feet and body in better position to throw the ball after the catch.

Josh Nelson
11 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

Totally agree with you, Lenard. StatCast is going to bring more clarity when we discuss how “good” or “bad” a player is at defensively.

James
11 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

Just looking at the selected .gifs, it looks like route efficiency is a weakness – good play 2 is the only play where it looks like he took a good route, the other plays were all drifty-to-circuitous.

Phantom Stranger
11 years ago

I think his greatest strength as a fielder, after the speed of course, is his fearlessness. It’s a real skill to play with that much abandon in CF without constantly ending up on the DL. He doesn’t look afraid of the wall.

Ever wonder why some CFers play so shallow? They are afraid of the wall…

Juan Lagares
11 years ago

The wall is afraid of me.

Eminor3rdMember since 2019
11 years ago

He hit the DL for four weeks last year because he did just that — inexplicably ran directly into the walla at full speed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY0MCYPgUl0

Phantom Stranger
11 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

Sometimes you win, sometimes the Wall wins.

Matt
11 years ago

Sox fan here.

So you’re telling me, that the guy the Sox will pay league minimum salary next year is *only* a league average defender, and is projected for a .343 OBP with 20 stolen bases?

Victory for the White Sox?

steex
11 years ago
Reply to  Matt

I don’t think anyone, Sox fan or otherwise, is debating that Eaton is a nice piece for the team and worth his current salary.

The investigation here is just how good Eaton really is, and obviously stems from the overall question of whether the Sox are a bad 2014 team that improved or baseball’s newest dynasty. Too many Sox fans are opining the latter based on the subjective claim that projection systems are criminally underrating players like Eaton (and that the computers behind them are capable of only two emotions, hatred of the White Sox and love of the Cubs).

COMPUTER
11 years ago
Reply to  steex

BLOOP BLEEP

BRING BACK TERRY BEVINGTON. AND FUCK THE WHITE SOX.

BLEEP BLOOP

Kyle
11 years ago

Might be interesting to grab a few scouting reports from his minor league days, see what kind of defensive grades that scouts were throwing on him. Scouting reports obviously aren’t gospel, but it would at least be another angle to gather information.

BJG
11 years ago

I watched ~100 Sox games last year and my “eyeball test” result is that Eaton is average defensively for a CF. I agree with most of what is written in this article.

IMO, Eaton’s best attribute is his attitude. He’s a good clubhouse guy and he’s famous (in Chicago, at least) for running to 1B after drawing a walk, Pete Rose-style. It’s obviously difficult to quantify an intangible like that in terms of WAR, but he did seem to provide a certain “spark” to the team. The morale on this roster was in the dumps just seven months prior.

bob
11 years ago
Reply to  BJG

he must be a 8 WAR guy then right?

abreutime
11 years ago
Reply to  bob

No, but his GAR (Grit above replacement) is elite.

BJG
11 years ago
Reply to  bob

No, I”m saying that he’s an overall plus to the team, in an unquantifiable way.

circlechange11
11 years ago
Reply to  BJG

… and the nickname Charlie Hustle was given to Pete rose as an insult by Mantle after PR climbed the LF wall on a homer 14 rows deep.

I’m not sure pros view such things the same way fans do.

I doubt the cardinal players feel tougher just because Carpenter doesn’t wear batting gloves.

Eric Byrnes epitomized, to me, fake hustle. I dont think fellow players really put a lot of stock into things like running to first base on a walk.

BJG
11 years ago
Reply to  circlechange11

If you had watched the 2013 ChiSox, you would’ve seen a hapless, offensively-impaired crew of zombies who looked liked they didn’t want to be at the ballpark. And while I’m sure you’re correct that a number of players roll their eyes at Eaton, his intensity is exactly what this team needed to get past that disaster of a season.

Andy Cleary
11 years ago
Reply to  circlechange11

“I dont think fellow players really put a lot of stock into things like running to first base on a walk.”

Baseball players are, however, entertainers, and their job is to entertain the *fans*. Being good such that their teams win is the most reliable way to do that, but if you can add some entertainment in ways like running to first on a walk, then good on ya’.

JLRC
11 years ago

I agree with the overall sentiment of the article that Eaton is probably a little better than average CF. With that said, I do not like presenting as evidence that regular people think he’s good. Regular people think Torii Hunter was a fabulous CF, and Matt Kemp.

Brian MacKinney
11 years ago