Breaking Down a U.S.-Canada-Colombia Tiebreaker Nightmare

As of this writing, Mexico leads Canada 10-3 in the ninth inning of its final pool stage game. If that result holds, Mexico will win World Baseball Classic Pool C. (Update: That result held.) This evening, the U.S. will take on Colombia to determine who advances as the second-place team in the group. If Team USA wins, it’s simple: both the U.S. and Mexico will finish 3-1, with Mexico advancing as the no. 1 seed by virtue of its head-to-head win on Sunday. If Colombia wins, it will finish 2-2, as will the U.S. and Canada, with each team having a head-to-head win over one of the others. That throws things to the WBC’s wonderfully confusing runs-allowed-per-outs-recorded tiebreaker. Making things more complicated: Because the U.S. beat Canada by mercy rule, all three teams will finish the group stage having recorded a different number of outs. That makes the math all the more complicated.
Fortunately, I did it for you. There’s no guarantee the game will actually go nine full innings; in addition to the potential for extra innings, Colombia, the home team, could win in nine innings but only bat eight times, leaving the U.S. on 45 defensive outs in the relevant games rather than 48. But assuming the U.S. and Colombia each record 27 outs tonight, here’s who would advance given a particular score:
| COLOMBIA SCORE | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |||
| 0 | X | USA | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | ||
| U | 1 | USA | X | USA | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| S | 2 | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| A | 3 | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| 4 | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | TBD* | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | ||
| S | 5 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| C | 6 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| O | 7 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| R | 8 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | COL | |
| E | 9 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | USA | COL | COL | COL | |
| 10 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | USA | CAN | CAN | CAN | ||
| 11 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | CAN | CAN | CAN | ||
| 12 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | CAN | CAN | ||
| 13 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | CAN | ||
| 14 | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | USA | X | ||
If Colombia beats the U.S. 7-4, those two teams would finish with the same run quotient. In that case, I am not 100% sure what would happen. Either the tiebreakers would continue down the line to earned run quotient in games among tied teams (so far there have been no unearned runs), then batting average, then drawing of lots; or Colombia would advance by virtue of a head-to-head tiebreaker against the U.S. The latter case would make more sense, but the posted WBC rules make reference to “identical winning percentage,” which might preclude resetting the tiebreaker to only include two teams. So, uh, let’s just hope it doesn’t come to that.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
Fantastic content! I am obviously now Team Seven-Four.
Thank you for breaking this down for us
So Canada is rooting for the hitters to have a good night!
So the USA must win or lose by 3 runs or less, unless Colombia scores 7 or more runs, in which case the USA must win or lose by 2 runs or less, unless a full-fledged football game breaks out, in which case the USA needs to win or Canada goes through.
It really depends on what you mean by “football game” If we’re talking the American weird ball, I favor the USA. If we’re using “football” in the international sense, I’m pretty sure Colombia will be fine.
Does anyone have any theories on why the tiebreakers are like this instead of just run differential?
Because the “home” team does not play the bottom of 9th when they are ahead and also there is mercy rule.
I guess those are sensible criticisms of run differential, but the current system seems just as fraught and also much more confusing.
If we must account for variable innings, what’s wrong with run differential per defensive out? It’s weird to just ignore the half of the game that’s offense.
The denominator isn’t the same. Because of the mercy rule and the home-team-leading 9th, the teams end up with a different number of offensive outs and defensive outs.
I guess, but in the current system a team that wins everything 2-1 advances over a team that wins everything 11-2. That seems bad.
There has to be a better way. I think I’d still prefer run differential, even though it would penalize teams that get fewer opportunities to score due to the ninth inning/mercy rule situations. But I do understand those objections. Any other ideas?
I don’t really disagree, but it’s the compromise they came up with to avoid putting too big an incentive on running up the score against bad teams. This way it’s all on the pitching, so you at least don’t get the dynamic where you have to keep pressing to humiliate an opponent you’ve already beaten.
I’m not sure that argument makes sense. The US clearly had incentive to run up the score against Canada for this very scenario, and good thing they did. You’re still incented to cream anyone you can to gain the tiebreaker advantage.
I’m not sure it makes total sense either, but I think that’s the motivation.
Boooo to FS1 for cutting away from the 9th inning of the Puerto Rico / Dominican Republic game! And FS2 is running some doc on FIFA? That’s so lame!
I second that boooooooo.
I was saying “boooooo-urns”
Their streaming app sucks so bad, too. After clicking on the game seventeen times and getting only Joe Davis, I finally found the game I had been watching, hiding in the box that said it was the FIFA doc. Poop emoji.
Not sure if I would prefer to see the US advance, or the chaos of a 7-4 Colombia win.
Funny to realize from this that the US clinched advancing at the end of the bottom of the 8th when it was no longer possible for Columbia to outscore them by enough (since even a 6-3 win for Columbia advances the US)
Yeah, a lot of weird incentives. US could have just issued 5 intentional walks in the 9th, lost by a run, advanced and saved a pitcher. But GB would have been furious.
As the road team, the US cannot get more than 24 defensive outs AND lose by more than 4 runs, correct?