Breaking Down a U.S.-Canada-Colombia Tiebreaker Nightmare

Zachary BonDurant-USA TODAY Sports

As of this writing, Mexico leads Canada 10-3 in the ninth inning of its final pool stage game. If that result holds, Mexico will win World Baseball Classic Pool C. (Update: That result held.) This evening, the U.S. will take on Colombia to determine who advances as the second-place team in the group. If Team USA wins, it’s simple: both the U.S. and Mexico will finish 3-1, with Mexico advancing as the no. 1 seed by virtue of its head-to-head win on Sunday. If Colombia wins, it will finish 2-2, as will the U.S. and Canada, with each team having a head-to-head win over one of the others. That throws things to the WBC’s wonderfully confusing runs-allowed-per-outs-recorded tiebreaker. Making things more complicated: Because the U.S. beat Canada by mercy rule, all three teams will finish the group stage having recorded a different number of outs. That makes the math all the more complicated.

Fortunately, I did it for you. There’s no guarantee the game will actually go nine full innings; in addition to the potential for extra innings, Colombia, the home team, could win in nine innings but only bat eight times, leaving the U.S. on 45 defensive outs in the relevant games rather than 48. But assuming the U.S. and Colombia each record 27 outs tonight, here’s who would advance given a particular score:

USA-Colombia-Canada Tiebreaker Scenarios
COLOMBIA SCORE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0 X USA USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
U 1 USA X USA USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
S 2 USA USA X USA USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
A 3 USA USA USA X USA USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
4 USA USA USA USA X USA USA TBD* COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
S 5 USA USA USA USA USA X USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL COL
C 6 USA USA USA USA USA USA X USA USA COL COL COL COL COL COL
O 7 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X USA USA COL COL COL COL COL
R 8 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X USA USA COL COL COL COL
E 9 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X USA USA COL COL COL
10 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X USA CAN CAN CAN
11 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X CAN CAN CAN
12 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X CAN CAN
13 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X CAN
14 USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA X

If Colombia beats the U.S. 7-4, those two teams would finish with the same run quotient. In that case, I am not 100% sure what would happen. Either the tiebreakers would continue down the line to earned run quotient in games among tied teams (so far there have been no unearned runs), then batting average, then drawing of lots; or Colombia would advance by virtue of a head-to-head tiebreaker against the U.S. The latter case would make more sense, but the posted WBC rules make reference to “identical winning percentage,” which might preclude resetting the tiebreaker to only include two teams. So, uh, let’s just hope it doesn’t come to that.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

Fantastic content! I am obviously now Team Seven-Four.

Crispy Waffles and Fluffy EggsMember since 2017
3 years ago

Thank you for breaking this down for us

Eric MartellMember since 2020
3 years ago

So Canada is rooting for the hitters to have a good night!

Trevor May Care Attitude
3 years ago

So the USA must win or lose by 3 runs or less, unless Colombia scores 7 or more runs, in which case the USA must win or lose by 2 runs or less, unless a full-fledged football game breaks out, in which case the USA needs to win or Canada goes through.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago

It really depends on what you mean by “football game” If we’re talking the American weird ball, I favor the USA. If we’re using “football” in the international sense, I’m pretty sure Colombia will be fine.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago

Does anyone have any theories on why the tiebreakers are like this instead of just run differential?

tung_twista
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Because the “home” team does not play the bottom of 9th when they are ahead and also there is mercy rule.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

I guess those are sensible criticisms of run differential, but the current system seems just as fraught and also much more confusing.

If we must account for variable innings, what’s wrong with run differential per defensive out? It’s weird to just ignore the half of the game that’s offense.

Last edited 3 years ago by cowdisciple
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

The denominator isn’t the same. Because of the mercy rule and the home-team-leading 9th, the teams end up with a different number of offensive outs and defensive outs.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago

I guess, but in the current system a team that wins everything 2-1 advances over a team that wins everything 11-2. That seems bad.

Last edited 3 years ago by cowdisciple
Trevor May Care Attitude
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

There has to be a better way. I think I’d still prefer run differential, even though it would penalize teams that get fewer opportunities to score due to the ninth inning/mercy rule situations. But I do understand those objections. Any other ideas?

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

I don’t really disagree, but it’s the compromise they came up with to avoid putting too big an incentive on running up the score against bad teams. This way it’s all on the pitching, so you at least don’t get the dynamic where you have to keep pressing to humiliate an opponent you’ve already beaten.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago

I’m not sure that argument makes sense. The US clearly had incentive to run up the score against Canada for this very scenario, and good thing they did. You’re still incented to cream anyone you can to gain the tiebreaker advantage.

Last edited 3 years ago by cowdisciple
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

I’m not sure it makes total sense either, but I think that’s the motivation.

BrianInWI
3 years ago

Boooo to FS1 for cutting away from the 9th inning of the Puerto Rico / Dominican Republic game! And FS2 is running some doc on FIFA? That’s so lame!

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  BrianInWI

I second that boooooooo.

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

I was saying “boooooo-urns”

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  BrianInWI

Their streaming app sucks so bad, too. After clicking on the game seventeen times and getting only Joe Davis, I finally found the game I had been watching, hiding in the box that said it was the FIFA doc. Poop emoji.

Ryan
3 years ago

Not sure if I would prefer to see the US advance, or the chaos of a 7-4 Colombia win.

mikejuntMember
3 years ago

Funny to realize from this that the US clinched advancing at the end of the bottom of the 8th when it was no longer possible for Columbia to outscore them by enough (since even a 6-3 win for Columbia advances the US)

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Yeah, a lot of weird incentives. US could have just issued 5 intentional walks in the 9th, lost by a run, advanced and saved a pitcher. But GB would have been furious.

Last edited 3 years ago by cowdisciple
Philip ChristyMember since 2016
3 years ago

As the road team, the US cannot get more than 24 defensive outs AND lose by more than 4 runs, correct?