Bryce Harper Gets His Record-Setting Deal

Our long ex-National’s nightmare is over. According to a flurry of reports, Bryce Harper has agreed to a 13-year, $330 million contract with the Phillies, who apparently withstood late challenges from the Giants and Dodgers in landing the 26-year-old former overall number one pick. Thirteen years, as in through the 2031 season! That means Harper will still be in Philly when Gritty is bar mitzvah’d.

In the end, Harper and agent Scott Boras toppled Giancaro Stanton’s 13-year, $325 million extension (signed in November 2014) for the claim of the largest contract in baseball history. With an average annual value of “only” $25.38 million, the deal merely ranks 14th all-time, and third this winter behind Nolan Arenado‘s just-completed eight-year, $260 million extension ($32.5 million AAV) and Manny Machado’s 10-year, $300 million free agent deal. Philly-wise, it edges the $25 million per year of Ryan Howard and Jake Arrieta as far as the franchise record is concerned. It’s worth noting that the lower AAV over the longer time frame would allow the team some additional flexibility if, for example, a certain Millville, New Jersey native were to test free agency following the 2020 season (h/t Joe Sheehan). Via Cot’s Contracts, the team’s payroll for Competitive Balance Tax purposes is just shy of $188 million, leaving open the possibility that they could still sign Dallas Keuchel or Craig Kimbrel and still wind up under the $206 million threshold.

As far as bells and whistles go, Harper’s deal has a full no-trade clause, but it does not include any opt outs or deferred money; it’s been described as “front loaded.” As we recently learned — reportedly included roughly $100 million in deferred money, the 10-year, $300 million offer that the Nationals made reportedly included roughly $100 million in deferred money, lowering its present day value considerably. Our own Craig Edwards presented one such scenario:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

As far as the Phillies’ lineup goes, Harper would likely replace Nick Williams, who moved from right field to left to accommodate the team’s earlier signing of Andrew McCutchen and, eyeballing our depth charts, boost their projected win total from 83 to 87.

Edwards will have a detailed analysis shortly, and we’ll have more to say about the deal from a variety of angles as well.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

84 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
thecheesewiz
7 years ago

As a Phillies fan, allow me to say: Giggity.

Mahoney
7 years ago
Reply to  thecheesewiz

And his AAV leaves plenty of room to make a serious run for Trout in 2 years. Never thought it would be possible to have them both on one team.

David Klein
7 years ago

Welp as a Mets fan that sucks for us. The nl east is a monster division and some team will win 86 games and finish in 4th place. I’m sure people on social media will claim it’s an overpayment but it really isn’t at 25 mil per year. Goes without saying Harper will be a huge upgrade over Nick Williams.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

You misspelled “mediocre”

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Wow. Such Mets fans. Much anger.

hebrewMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

if you think the NL east is going to be mediocre, you haven’t been paying attention. That’s why you’re getting so many downvotes.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

To follow up on this point: Before Harper gets added in, the Phillies are projected for 83 wins, the Mets and Braves for 84, and Nationals at 90. This division was already loaded. Since Harper is replacing a guy who is projected for 0.7 wins, you can expect the Phillies to shoot up in the projections. Some of that will come at the expense of the Mets/Braves/Nationals, but there’s a really good chance that the 4th-best team in this division is going to get 84 wins. That’s a loaded division.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You guys are aware that the schedule is unbalanced, right?

Dave from DCMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

While obviously there are times when the unbalanced schedule inflates win totals, that doesn’t apply in a division where 4 of the 5 teams are projected to be good. Every matchup among the four is a loss for someone, so to hit those win totals they will have to do quite well against non-NL East clubs.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave from DC

“good”

Dave from DCMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

What kind of win totals do you foresee for NL East clubs?

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave from DC

This thread almost makes me feel genuine pity for Mets fans.

Almost.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

An 83 win projection in the NL East is more like a 77 win projection in a real league.

David Klein
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Let me guess you are a Yankee fan right?

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Predictably asinine assumption.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

this is my new favourite comment ever

FrancoLuvHateMets
7 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

I knew they were going to get him in the end, but I was hoping for stupid money territory like 40M AAV to torpedo their flexibility. Good deal for the Phils though. They needed more elite players to add from outside since their rebuild efforts are a bit iffy.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago

Record-setting*

Llewdor
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Thank you for this.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Llewdor

hahaha yw. I love triggering delicate honkeys

CM52
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

You are not an intelligent person.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  CM52

You are mad, eh?

CM52
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Not even a little. But if you died today, no one in your life would care. You are a truly irrelevant human being.

ajake57Member since 2019
7 years ago

And here I thought it would be 10 years at roughly $330 getting the job done. That makes it feel like the Phillies are getting three years for free. Even if they end up being replacement-level seasons, that’s not bad.

SnowLeopard
7 years ago
Reply to  ajake57

Exactly my thoughts.

baubo
7 years ago
Reply to  ajake57

Those last 3 years essentially can be treated as deferred money. But the Phillies at least gain the small possibility that he’d still be a capable starter at that point.

Roger21
7 years ago

As someone without much of a rooting interest for the division, I’m glad to see Harper stay in the NL East. 19 or 20 games against the Nationals each year–with side-by-side comparisons of Harper, Soto, and Robles–should make for some outstanding story-lines.

Brewtown_Kev
7 years ago

There’s a saying among boat owners: your two happiest days are the day you acquire the boat and the day you get rid of it. Today is a day of celebration. Enjoy your new boat, Phillies fans.

WerthlessMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Brewtown_Kev

I’M ON A BOAT

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Brewtown_Kev

This is the best description of big-money contracts in free agency that ever existed.

adrock75Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

How is signing day better than the day (or, more likely, days) when Harper leads them into the playoffs? How about the day (which, over 13 years as an above-average franchise, has about a 50/50 chance of happening) when he wins a World Series?

It’s not any Phillies’ fans’ money (except for the owner, who I presume is a fan). They’ll have plenty of great days with Bryce.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

Because today all those possibilities seem real.

Tomorrow they may not be.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

WHAT ABOUT THE DAY I FINALLY HAVE SEX ON MY BOAT BECAUSE IM DEFINITELY HAVING SEX ON THIS FUCKING BOAT

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

I look forward to seeing Harper’s reaction to this when he finds out about that day.

agam22Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Brewtown_Kev

Except I’m on a boat that belongs to some random billionaire that I’ve never met

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Brewtown_Kev

What a relatable aphorism. Being a boat owner is a real hardship.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
7 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

You can have a cheap little boat with a small motor…it doesn’t have to be a mega yacht. It’s still a pain in the ass.

Estella
7 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

Imagine resenting people with more money than you this much.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago

Did anyone correctly guess that the closest comparables for Harper’s contract would be Ryan Howard and Jon Lester? *ducks*

hebrewMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

no one guessed that because it’s false!

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

hahaha is it, though?

Travis LMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Yes, it’s false. How are they similar?

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

The AAV is literally identical, but please, continue to be angery bois

hebrewMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Did anyone currently guess that the closest comparison to this apple would be these oranges?

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

Ah, a glib dismissal relying on a lazy, trite, low-energy aphorism.

FS54
7 years ago

Happy for Harper and wish him the best unless playing against my team.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

I can’t believe it took until training camp had already opened to resolve this, since we already knew that he was going to take a billion-year contract to get over Stanton’s contract, and that the Phillies were the only team motivated to spend that much money on anybody (at least not named Mike Trout or Mookie Betts). I’m mostly just surprised it’s only 13 years instead of 15.

Although there is certainly a lot to critique with this specific deal, I will say it’s refreshing to see a team revert back to the old tried-and-true method of giving someone a contract for life, letting the back half of the contract subsidize the first half (although how much will depend on how front-loaded this thing is). Teams kept on insisting that they didn’t want to go to 9 or 10 year contracts, which was kind of a bizarre way to frame it since I’m sure they would have been happy to stretch the same total value over 30 years if they could. And Harper, being only 26 years old, is the perfect guy to get it.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago

At least it’s reassuring to know that baseball teams (correctly) value Machado vastly higher

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
7 years ago

No opt outs?! Holy cow, so in the end it was just all about getting the biggest contract, not the best deal. What a joke.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago

Maybe he wasn’t feeling so eager to go through this again

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago

He turned down 4 years $180 million from the Dodgers. I think your second sentence is absolutely correct.

Kevbot034
7 years ago

This is fascinating, with no trades or opt outs + that length. I wonder if Harper or the Phillies will really end up happy with this long term (and not 13 year long term, like, 7 year long term). Either way, they’ll certainly all be thrilled together for the first 5 or so. Happy for Bryce, sad cause I don’t like the Phillies lol

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago

13 years in a league with guaranteed contracts is insane. Boras clearly played this correctly. Phillies front office had a mandate, and little incentive not to go the extra years, because, just like with Stanton, the approach GMs probably take to these mega contracts is “Après nous le déluge”, since presumably we’ll be through one or two front office shakeups by the time the contract turns regrettable. In the meantime, you got your guy.

ascheffMember since 2017
7 years ago

13/390 would have been insane, but for a guy who was going to get 10/300 easily and was pushing hard for 10/330, 13/330 is a good deal. It slightly decreases the AAV for cap purposes, and if he’s below replacement a decade from now, then they can just cut him and pretend it was a 10/330 deal with some deferred payments. The Phillies actually got a concession in the form of those three years just so Harper could beat Stanton’s contract in terms of total money.

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

Oh yeah, 13/330 is much nicer than 10/330, which seemed to be the original ask. No question.

I probably would’ve even called the 10/330 insane – I am more or less categorically against mega contracts though, since the need to provide 3-4 years of windfall at the end of a contract just to get the elite production at the start of it seems like an odd way to run a business. Unless, of course, you’re unlikely to be there for those 3-4 years anyway 🙂

miltonfriedman
7 years ago

Could never be a Phillies fan. Don’t want to win that way

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

So your favorite team only drafts and develops players and never signs free agents?

miltonfriedman
7 years ago

Tell me how Tampa could have signed Harper

RaysFan7
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

I just want to read one article without somehow being randomly thrown in and shamed!

Nasty Nate
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

By offering him a better deal than Philadelphia, obviously

Alice Cooper
7 years ago

As a Pirates fan,

Yes

Shattenjager
7 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

We all know you’re a Tigers fan, Alice.

ascheffMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

You don’t want to win by paying money to good players to do the thing they’re best at? Which way do you want to win, exactly?

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

On a level playing field. Tell me how Small market teams could have signed Harper

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Baseball fields are quite level.

HughesMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

Unless you do something wacky like add a hill.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Ask the Padres.

HughesMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Adding Harper would still leave the Rays within their typical spending range.

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

By paying really good players?

Which NL travesty do you claim to support?

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Which championship felt better? The 1999 Yanks or the 2009 yanks? Golden State Warriors pre or post Durant? We know the answer

agam22Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Yeah, bring back the reserve clause so championships can be pure again

Dave from DCMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  agam22

Someone around here posted a link just the other day arguing the reserve clause could be good for baseball. I read it expecting to think it was a load of nonsense, but it was surprisingly compelling!

Edit: here it is, in case anyone is curious. Hat tip to The Kudzu Kid.

https://www.si.com/more-sports/2010/01/14/andrecheck-freeagency

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  agam22

Exactly. Pure like college sports are pure. Purely exploitative.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

How about “both”?

Baron Samedi
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Who cares?

Ryan DCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Of all the bad takes I’ve ever seen in an FG comment section (which are thankfully not ubiquitous), this is maybe the dumbest one.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Of course, lives in big market DC. I bet you are going to argue that someone should be making 300 million

agam22Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Wait, is someone named Milton Friedman advocating for either strict price controls on the free agent market or wealth redistribution among the teams?

EasyenoughMember since 2016
7 years ago

I don’t know the structure of what the Nats offered but both of these deals effectively have lots of deferred money. If Nats offered $25m/10 + $5/10, with 2.5% inflation, the NPV is $250M. The NPV of the Phillies deal is $275M with three more years of work. They seem pretty similar to me.

Doug LampertMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

The article includes a statement that the NPV of the Nationals offer is 244M. There is little enough chance that the NPV of Harper’s age 37, 38, and 39 seasons is as high as $31M that I’d take that gamble were I Harper.

ThrasiusMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Well from the way you are defining “deferred money,” yes all long-term contracts have “deferred money.” As long as the real interest rate is positive, the present value will always be less than the nominal value of the contract.

Adam SMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Thrasius

Technically sure. And none of us have seen the terms. But relative to Machado and Arenado, the Phillies guaranteed 3-4 years when they can’t expect to get anything useful from Harper in order to spread payments over 13 years instead of 8-10.

Put another way, if the deal was 10/$330 but he received $25M in each of 2029, 2030, and 2031, we’d all agree there was deferred money. That the contract extends through those years changes it very slightly.

Adam SMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Inflation is the wrong factor to calculate the time value of money in this case. You want some estimated return on investment which is 7-10%.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago

Who is Gritty?