Rockies’ Arenado Gets His Mountain of Money

Earlier this month, I made the case for the Rockies to sign Nolan Arenado to an extension that could rival Miguel Cabrera’s eight-year, $248 million deal for the largest average annual value of any position player contract. My suggestion wasn’t coming out of left field, as the going-on-28-year-old third baseman had just set a record for an arbitration-eligible player by agreeing to a $26 million salary for 2019, and had reportedly indicated a willingness to work out a long-term deal. That willingness has resulted in the completion of an eight-year contract reportedly worth $260 million, the fourth-largest guaranteed salary in MLB history.

The exact breakdown of Arenado’s contract has not been reported at this writing, but the deal replaces or incorporates the aforementioned $26 million salary for this year and runs through 2026, for a $32.5 million AAV, the highest of any player besides Zack Greinke ($34.17 million). The dollar value currently trails only those of Giancarlo Stanton (13 years, $325 million), Manny Machado (10 years, $300 million), and Alex Rodriguez (10 years, $275 million) in terms of overall value, though according to Craig Edwards’ inflation-adjusted conversions of MLB’s biggest deals into 2019 dollars, the amount would place just 19th. Taking account of Rockies history, that’s three spots behind the current $277 million valuation of Todd Helton‘s nine-year, $141.5 million extension, which covered 2003-11, and six spots ahead of the current $248 million valuation of Troy Tulowitzki’s 10-year, $157.75 million extension covering 2011-20. Arenado’s contract includes an opt-out after 2021, which would allow him to become a free agent after his age-30 season, and also gets him full no-trade protection now instead of waiting until the point in early 2023 when his 10-and-5 rights would kick in.

Arenado’s record-setting AAV gives free agent Bryce Harper (and agent Scott Boras) yet another target to shoot for in closing a deal. His deal also takes the player who likely would have headed next winter’s free agent class out of circulation. Depending upon the exercise of opt-outs or the completion of extensions over the next eight months, that class could still include the likes of Xander Bogaerts, Josh Donaldson, Paul Goldschmidt, Yasmani Grandal, and J.D. Martinez on the position player side, with Gerrit Cole, Chris Sale, Stephen Strasburg, and Justin Verlander on the pitching side. Arenado’s signing also leaves the Yankees — who were said to be targeting the pending free agent, either this summer (if the Rockies were to fall from contention) or next winter instead of pursuing Machado — in need of another solution if they don’t stick with incumbent Miguel Andujar, who made a solid rookie showing in 2018.

Reiterating a few of my points about Arenado’s recent performance, he’s coming off a strong 2018 season (.297/.374/.561, 132 wRC+, 5.7 WAR) in which he led the NL in home runs (with 38) for the third year out of the past four. That feat owes something to Coors Field (he has an 87-71 home/road home run split in that span), but improved plate discipline has helped Arenado increase both his wRC+ and WAR every year since his 2013 rookie season. Last year’s career-best 10.8% walk rate more than doubled his 2013-15 mark (5.0%); that increase has keyed a 52-point rise in on-base percentage from his first three years (.318) to his last three (.370). On the defensive side, he’s a six-time Gold Glove winner and a perpetual human highlight reel for his dives, spins, barehanded grabs, and seemingly impossible throws. While UZR doesn’t value his defense nearly as highly as DRS does (career totals of 37.6 and 109, respectively), the two marks converged last year (5.8 and 5, respectively).

In an interview with USA Today’s Bob Nightengale, Arenado said that he prioritized comfort with his current surroundings and optimism regarding the Rockies’ direction ahead of “searching for the biggest contract in the game.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

“I grew up here in this organization, so it feels like home in a way,” said Arenado. “I’ve been here since the tide has changed, and that’s a really good feeling. I was part of that change.”

As to that change, though the Rockies have never won an NL West title in their 26 seasons, they’re coming off back-to-back Wild Card appearances for the first time in franchise history. They’ve assembled an impressive nucleus of young, affordable starting pitching (Kyle Freeland, Jon Gray, German Marquez, Tyler Anderson, and Antonio Senzatela), which has been a major key to the team’s recent success, as has the development of shortstop Trevor Story. That core is under club control through 2021 and ’22, years for which the team had relatively little money committed prior to this deal — $40 million and $23 million, respectively, according to Cot’s Contracts, with the bulk of that money slated for Charlie Blackmon, who signed a six-year, $108 million extension last April. What’s more, the team just extended manager Bud Black’s contract through 2022. Black has overseen the development of the young rotation, and he appears to have a strong relationship with the star third baseman.

Meanwhile, the Rockies’ TV revenue situation is better than has been previously reported, with the team currently making $40 million per year instead of $20 million, which was tied for last among the 29 US teams in Edwards’ 2016 roundup. Negotiations for a new deal are expected to begin this summer, as the current one expires after 2020.

Previously, I ran Arenado’s numbers through our internal contract estimation tool with very conservative parameters — $8.0 million per WAR (a number that’s empirically supported according to the recent work of Eno Sarris) and just 3% average annual inflation, as opposed to $9 million or more, and 5%. Even then, his valuation over that timespan approached $300 million.

Nolan Arenado’s Contract Estimate — 8 yr / $293.9 M
Year Age WAR $/WAR Est. Contract
2019 28 5.2 $8.0 M $41.6 M
2020 29 5.2 $8.2 M $42.8 M
2021 30 5.2 $8.5 M $44.1 M
2022 31 4.7 $8.7 M $41.1 M
2023 32 4.2 $9.0 M $37.8 M
2024 33 3.7 $9.0 M $33.3 M
2025 34 3.2 $9.0 M $28.8 M
2026 35 2.7 $9.0 M $24.3 M
Totals 34.1 $293.9 M

Assumptions

Value: $8M/WAR with 3.0% inflation (for first 5 years)
Aging Curve: +0.25 WAR/yr (18-24), 0 WAR/yr (25-30),-0.5 WAR/yr (31-37),-0.75 WAR/yr (> 37)

Using ZiPS projections provided by Dan Szymborski, with the same financial parameters, yields a considerably different picture:

Arenado’s Next 8 Years by ZiPS
Year Age AVG OBP SLG OPS + Def WAR $/WAR Value
2019 28 .289 .356 .552 123 9 4.5 8.0 $36.1 M
2020 29 .288 .356 .552 123 8 4.2 8.2 $34.9 M
2021 30 .288 .355 .550 122 7 4.0 8.5 $33.9 M
2022 31 .286 .352 .537 119 7 3.6 8.7 $31.1 M
2023 32 .279 .344 .512 111 6 2.8 9.0 $25.3 M
2024 33 .274 .336 .487 103 5 2.1 9.3 $19.7 M
2025 34 .268 .327 .468 96 4 1.5 9.6 $14.4 M
2026 35 .261 .318 .437 87 3 0.8 9.8 $7.6 M
Totals 23.5 $203.0 M

Here it’s important to note that the first estimate offers no information about playing time, simply scaling WAR to the aging curve shown at the bottom of the table. ZiPS starts with a 154-game projection for 2019, and from the data Szymborski has provided, lops off an average of seven games per year for the rest of the deal (104 games in 2026), so if Arenado proves more durable, the falloff would be less than what is shown above. Likewise, a 5% inflation figure more in line with recent norms would boost the valuation as well, though with that and a rosier estimate of playing time featuring an average decrease of three games per year (133 games in 2026), we’re still talking about a boost of “only” about $15 million worth of value over the eight years beyond the estimate above. The bigger boost in valuation would come with an assumption of $9 million per WAR (still well below Matt Swartz’ 2017 estimates), which would kick the valuation to $233.3 million using a 3% rate of inflation and $245.8 million using a 5% rate.

Still, splitting the difference between the two estimates from the tables puts us right in the ballpark of where the Rockies and Arenado ended up. If they’re paying a premium to keep a franchise cornerstone and fan favorite at a time when they project to be on firm financial footing, it’s tough to fault them, likewise, if Arenado is landing a record-setting salary while staying in his preferred place of employment, without enduring the scrutiny, nitpicking, and rancor that can come with a trip through free agency during a time of labor strife. There are no guarantees that come with this size of a deal besides the money, but both sides did just fine, and Rockies fans have reason to smile about securing one of the game’s top 10 players for the long term.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

92 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Fredchuckdave
7 years ago

Good for Arenado, let’s see if he can get to 3000 Hits, 600 HRs and somehow still not get in the HoF because lolcoors.

ryancc
7 years ago
Reply to  Fredchuckdave

I mean, he still might not get to those numbers. He’d have to continue his current level of play for 13 years to reach those milestones.

The issue I have with Walker and Helton, is they played in Colorado for all or most of their careers and still didn’t reach the major milestones.

rhdx
7 years ago
Reply to  ryancc

Walker reached 70 WAR. That seems like a major milestone.

Shirtless George Brett
7 years ago
Reply to  ryancc

The issue I have with Walker and Helton, is they played in Colorado for all or most of their careers

Considering only 2501 of Walkers 8030 career PA’s were are Coors Field that seems like a pretty disingenuous issue to have.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago

As a fan of this team and this player, this makes me exceedingly happy for both.

The valuation seems very, very fair, and Nolan will hopefully continue to build on his early success that has him on a clear path to Cooperstown.

jdbolickMember since 2016
7 years ago

This was a huge win for Arenado, especially if reports of an opt-out after the third year and a full no trade clause are true.

JediHoyer
7 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Opt out seems hugely player friendly just because if he has a peak arenado season another 7 or 8 deal is not out out the question. However I believe post 2021 would mean a new cba and might change market value.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Based on the rhetoric from players this offseason, it seems like the new CBA will be more friendly to veteran free agents than the current one.

Dave TMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

I’m doubtful that there are CBA changes that would significantly change teams’ appetite for signing 30 year old FA’s to contracts in excess of the roughly 5 / $160 million that Arenado will have remaining when he has his opt out decision. (I’m approximating as 5 / $160 million based on flat annual numbers because we don’t yet know the detailed contract breakdown.)

Changes that lessen the bite of the luxury tax could help a player like 30 year old Arenado at the margin but obviously wouldn’t change aging curves. If the players are realistic about pushing for more career earnings as a group, I think they need to target a variety of ways for players to make more money in their 20’s (e.g, higher minimum salaries and service time for arb / free agency).

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

I agree that players should focus on increasing earnings for younger players. But I’m doubtful that will actually happen given the fact that the MLBPA has only ever cared about increasing salaries for veterans in the past. Plus, all the angry quotes from players this offseason have been focused on veterans not getting deals, not young players making too little.

Richard Bergstrom
7 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Just because you have an opt out doesn’t mean you have to use it. A player though can use it for leverage to get changes done in the organization if they think things are going bad.

jdbolickMember since 2016
7 years ago

That’s exactly the point. It gives the player additional leverage and power, which is fine except that players typically receive less money in exchange for that additional leverage and power whereas Colorado paid full market value for Arenado and gave him the opt-out. I can see the argument that the Rockies had to pay whatever it took to keep the face of their franchise, but it reinforces just how far the team capitulated to the player.

Spitball McPhee
7 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Sure, but it also favors the Rockies because their contention window will be closed and new TV deal signed; so they’d be getting $$$ off the books.

rhdx
7 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

The no trade clause isn’t worth that much to me because he would earn one in a few years when he gets his 10-5 rights. It he would have been traded before his opt out clause that wouldn’t be too costly anyway.

Cave Dameron
7 years ago

Overpay.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Do you think Harper is worth more?

If so, why?

Cave Dameron
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

No.

JoserMember since 2021
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

Cave Dameron is clearly the expert on overpays given what his team, the San Piego Dadres, gave to Heric Osmer

Compton
7 years ago

If you were curious(I was), Arenado is the only player in the majors to increase his wRC+ in each of the past five seasons.

Take it down from five to each of the past four seasons (14-15, 15-16, 16-17, and 17-18), and three other names show up: Didi Gregorius, Andrelton Simmons, and one of Arenado’s current teammates…Mark Reynolds!

jmsdean477
7 years ago
Reply to  Compton

khris davis has almost done this also but he stalled at 122 for 2 straight years a couple back. Still the only player to ever bat the same in 4 straight seasons while qualifying for the batting title.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  Compton

Cool observation. Still, the last 4 increases were modest — some might be surprised to learn he’s never reached MLB’s qualified top-20 in any season. (Not meaning to disparage a great player, just observing….)

tung_twista
7 years ago

This is effectively a 7 year $233M extension and should be treated like it.
People were throwing around figures like 7 year $210M~8 year $240M and this is slightly higher than that.
With the opt out just after three years increasing the ceiling of this deal for the player, this seems like a no-brainer for Arenado.

On one hand, good for the Rockies fans for being able to keep their favorite players.
On the other hand, I don’t know if paying retail for Blackmon and now Arenado is good for the club’s financial future.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

For me, the Desmond contract was (and is) way more egregious than either of these.

Much more worried about the Blackmon deal than Nolan’s. I believe the NL will have the DH before Arenado’s deal expires and he can go that route if needed.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

Desmond is an outside FA. You are supposed to pay retail for free agents.
Signing Desmond to play 1B remains one of the most puzzling decisions but that is besides the point.

The whole idea of giving extensions is that teams are giving the players insurance against injury/decreased performance and receive some discount from expected value.
But $233M/7 years ($33.3M AAV) with opt out after three years seems like a pretty reasonable expectation for what Arenado could have received next offseason.
So the Rockies are protecting themselves from… a scenario where Arenado wins an MVP?
To me, it seems like Rockies decided that they *must* sign Arenado and started from there.
Blackmon is an extreme but good example. Rockies signed $94M/5 year extension (with opt-outs) for his 32-36 season.
If they waited a year, they could have easily signed him for 2/3 of that.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

“If they waited a year, they could have easily signed him for 2/3 of that.”

That’s the view after the fact, though. There was no way to know that going in.

Just like there was no way of knowing that Ottavino was going to come back the way he did this past season, so they went for it and signed three other guys for the bullpen only to watch Adam have a career year and walk because they couldn’t afford him anymore.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

I’m saying the risk/benefit is not in favor of Rockies.
There was a good chance that Blackmon would have been available for $70M/5 years. (and it happened)
On the other hand, the odds of his stock going up to $120M/5 years was relatively small.

Similar with Arenado, I view the odds that he would be worth significantly more than $233M/7 years to be quite smaller than he would be available for less.

jmsdean477
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

The market only collapsed last season, and he had what would have been a not great walk year, if he looked almost as good as 2017 you would be stoked on him.

Joe
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Maybe true, we’ll never know. But if the Rockies FO waited it out until free-agency, they’d have to convince Nolan that their money is better than the same money from LA or NYC or any of the other teams out there. Much easier to negotiate and secure your guy when there is only one offer on the table, not many.

Richard Bergstrom
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

Instead of waiting a year, they could’ve saved themselves a ton by signing Desmond a year earlier, before he signed with the Rangers for one year at $8M. Then he could’ve been used as a backup SS if Story didn’t work out (he worked) or outfielder if Dahl or CarGo or got injured (Dahl did). Instead they went with Parra.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Pretty much every report since the initial announcement says this overwrites the arbitration deal he and the rockies agreed to a month ago. This isn’t an extension on that deal, it’s a new, 8-year contract.

If it was considered an extension, his no-trade clause wouldn’t begin until the extension kicks in, at the end of the season, a major detail in the dealings.

JSJohnSmithAnon
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

No shit bro, he said “effectively”. If I have a contract to sell you a car worth $10k for a dollar, and we renegotiate that I’ll sell you two cars worth worth $10k each for $15k total, it’s a shitty renegotiation for you even though you’re getting $20k worth of cars for $15k. Jaffe analyzed this incorrectly.

tb.25
7 years ago

So if I say “effectively” I can hand-waive $30 million? OK.

Jay analyzed this really well, given what was known at the time.

Richard Bergstrom
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

With good homegrown starting pitching and a crop of rookie middle infielders and outfielders coming up, as well as Desmond and Murphy locked in for a few years, there are few areas the Rockies can spend money on besides a catcher.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago

Not a total product of coors like most rockies “stars” in their history, but still highly overrated. They still don’t get it. This guy isn’t a top ten player and might not even be top 25

Jon
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

I think he’s a little overrated offensively due to Coors (e.g. not many casual fans would know that Nelson Cruz is consistently better offensively), but WAR handles that and he’s consistently right around the 10th-12th best.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  Jon

Sorry. His career road splits are basically a Good dean Palmer season with good defense. You are counting on his defense remaining great.

jdfree49
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Hi, my name is miltonfriedman and I have no idea what the Coors effect is, nor am I aware that everyone has home/road splits.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  jdfree49

I know what the Coors effect. I also know that everyone has home road splits. Helton, Holliday, Tulowitski all had them. Look how that turned out. Just sign Jeremy Burnitz for 1 million, and he will hit 40 homeruns. THen, spend the rest on pitching. . I’ll accept your apology in 5 years.

Dave TMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

At least Holliday – I haven’t checked the others – was a player who supported the idea that the “Coors effect” was an in-season issue that led to more dramatic splits but that it wasn’t destined to be a problem once the player moved on from the Rockies. In other words, his performance fit with the widely theorized idea that the Coors effect was mostly due to difficulties hitting on the road because of differences in breaking pitches compared to Coors.

Holliday’s home/road wRC+ splits when he was with the Rockies were 157 / 107 . Once he went to the A’s (briefly) and Cardinals, though, he continued putting up several seasons in the range of 140 to 150 wRC+.

jrogersMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

You can’t look at how it turned out for Helton because he never played for another team.

jrogersMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  jdfree49

Also rarely mentioned by the road-splits crowd is the fact that the Rockies are the only NL team that doesn’t get to play road games at Coors.

AJS
7 years ago
Reply to  jrogers

10 of the NL teams play 3-4 games at Coors a season. Hardly enough to make an impact on other players’ home/road splits.

aweb
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

A good Dean Palmer season with good defense is a very good season (3-4 WAR, since Palmer’s ~2 WAR years featured him losing a win or more to bad defense, and Arenado gains a win from good defense). So if the downside of Arenado is good defense, good year Dean Palmer (850 OPS), that’s still an all-star player.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

So performing poorly on the road makes a player not top 10 or top 25?

List of notable players’ away wRC+:

Edwin incarnation 107
George Springer 107
Manny Machado 106
Nolan Arenado 104
Anthony Rizzo 98
Aaron Judge 90

Dave TMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

Are these 1-year numbers?

I looked up one (Rizzo), and I see a career away wRC+ of 117. Admittedly, he does have a larger than normal split because his career home wRC+ is 144. The average home/road wRC+ in recent seasons has been in the range of about 5 to 10 points.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

One year numbers, yes. Forgot to mention that. Figured someone who writes a comment like Milton’s would only care about the previous year. Career-wise, I think Arenado’s had a slightly larger split than most, but not horrifically off – as in, wRC+ and the park-factors don’t perfectly capture Coors, but capture it enough to eliminate doubt as to him being a top15 player.

Pepper Martin
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Definitely not career numbers. Aaron Judge has basically played two seasons, and has had Away WRC+’s of 147 in 2017 and 90 in 2018.

Sleepy
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

Forget it, he’s rolling.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  Sleepy

Rolling with my homies? I’m serious as a heart attack. I have said this about the last 10 Rockies superstars and haven’t been wrong. Tell me the last Rocky “star” who exceeded expectations after the Coors field jig was up(AKA- He became a star off the back of coors field)

Stovokor
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Andres Galarraga
Matt Holliday

Dave TMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Stovokor

Larry Walker also hit just fine when he left Coors, especially considering those were his 37 and 38 year old seasons.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

And hit pretty damn well before getting to Coors…

Chickensoup
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Even if you’re right (I don’t think you are but i’ll pretend) if he’s that good because of Coors, then the Rockies are correct in signing him since he just signed up for an additional 567 games there, it’s not like he’s moving away from Coors

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Does the Coors Effect really matter (aside from a potential future Hall of Fame case) when he’s going to remain with the Rockies for most if not all of his career? He’s still going to be playing half his games in Coors Field, after all.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

I think Arenado got the better end of this deal, but it’s misleading to call it an 8/$260M deal because it starts now, and tears up the $26M salary this year. It’s 7 years and $234M in new money, with $10M of that coming in the form of an upgraded salary this year when he was already under contract.

From that perspective, the Rockies come out a whole heck of a lot better than 8/$260M, which is not all that different than what we would expect him to get on the open market. For one, it is worth less “new money”; for another, it is one less lousy year at the end of the contract if he doesn’t opt out. For comparison purposes, Machado–who is about 2 years younger now than Arenado will be next offseason–got about $66M more, but the two more years take them to the same approximate age.

Would Machado have gotten 8, 9, or 10 years if he had waited until the offseason and had his typical Arenado-ish year? I don’t know. On the one hand, nobody is worried about Arenado slacking off once he gets his money, and he’s not a head case like Bryce Harper. On the other hand, every team probably has their own park adjustment for Coors, and some teams might seriously discount his production as a result. I suspect that he might get an extra year if he had made it to the free agent market (so a true 8-year deal, not a 7-year add on), but that the AAV would have been lower, for similar overall “new” money. Ideally, you would want to get a better discount than this if you’re locking him up now.

On the other hand, I am inclined to think this will turn out well for the team anyway, because while I’m pretty skeptical of that $8m/win number for position players, and even more skeptical that it will continue to increase over time, it seems pretty clear that $/win should be non-linear even if it is hard to see in practice. (also, because I’m not convinced that Arenado’s BABIP is going to drop off at Coors, or that his playing time is going to decrease that quickly).

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

So, given what you’ve said here, you see this as a pretty fair deal on the whole?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

I don’t know. I think Arenado has every right to be very happy with this deal. From Colorado’s end I’m not sure. The Rockies spend a surprising amount when they decide to go shopping; the relievers from last offseason, Gerardo Parra, Ian Desmond…they are very aggressive with their money. That sort of makes sense on the free agent market, but then they locked up Charlie Blackmon for a deal that they easily could have given to him this offseason and he would have taken; they paid free agent prices for an extension. This leads me to believe the Rockies have some unusual valuation, or are willing to stray from that to get what they want.

This one I think the Rockies did get a discount, but I’m not sure if it was enough. On the one hand, he was going to be the best free agent on the market by quite a bit next year–he wasn’t going to get the same amount of guaranteed money as Machado did, but every team that was in on Machado this year except the Padres will be in on Arenado, plus some. On the other, it is really hard to imagine that he would do any better than 8/$260M in “new money” considering that he’s two years older than Machado and looks like they’re following similar paths. If you think that an appropriate extension is about 80% of what you would probably get on the open market (which protects against downturns in a walk year but also gives up the chance at a bigger payday) then this falls short; it’s about 90% of his likely outcome. The only way this looks “good” for the Rockies is if you think he would get a full $300M contract next offseason.

Still, I don’t think it’s that far off from fair. I still think an 8/$240M that started in the current year is about what he should have gotten, and that’s basically what happened except he got an extra $20M on top of that. I think the structure of the deal is fair but it’s a little rich, and it’s not a big issue as long as the Rockies keep the money flowing despite having some less-than-ideal contracts on the roster.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One way to think about is this.
Rockies are additionally committing $234M for Arenado’s 29-35 season. (7 years)
Padres are paying $300 for Machado’s 26-35 season. (10 years)
Assuming Machado and Arenado’s 29-35 seasons are expected to be similar, which seems reasonable to me, the difference becomes $67M/3 years for Machado’s 26-28 seasons.
That, most people would agree, is a huge bargain.
For the record, ZiPS projects 22.5 war for Machado’s 29-35 season and 19 war for Arenado’s 29-35 season.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

That is a good way to think about it. Machado’s contract looks a lot better for the Padres than Arenado’s is for the Rockies.

Does that mean that Machado is undervalued in a more absolute framework, like $/win? That Arenado is overvalued? That part I don’t know. With the caveat that Machado’s contract was the subject of a competitive bidding process and Arenado’s wasn’t (and so Machado will tell us more about the “going rate” than Arenado does).

martyvan90Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

ST, the point you’ve made about aging curves not being linear is a good one. I suspect future performance/aging curves will delineate offense, defense, and types of offense/ defense. Of course its all based on data to develop statistical probability curves which my engineering son would say isn’t true math (more inexact than other mathematical disciplines)… However the data is getting better. IMO the point of these 8-10 year deals is there generally is more downside risk (team risk) versus upside gain (player risk). I also suspect the teams with greater analytic departments are developing better(?) models to predict value- however it will remain an inexact science.

London Yank
7 years ago
Reply to  martyvan90

Marty, it’s not the math that is inexact, it’s that the phenomenon that is because described is incredibly complicated. Your engineering son does simple and exact calculations because the underlying process he is describing mathematically is simple and well understood. There will never be formulas that accurately describe ageing curves for individual players. The reason is that some of the parameters that affect ageing curves are common to all the players (e.g. senescence), while other factors are unique to each individual and cannot possibly be modelled (e.g. becoming an alcoholic, or becoming depressed, or getting in a car accident, or suddenly getting a passion for physical fitness, etc.).

Some fraction of the variation in player ageing will always be left unexplained. This isn’t a problem with the maths or the science. It is just that some things that we’d like to understand are inherently stochastic.

martyvan90Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Agreed and much better stated. Are those “maths” you have anything like our math? 😉

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

You could think about it that way, but a player’s years prior to free agency are supposed to be a huge bargain. I don’t know if the thinking stands up in practice, but a player’s 3 arb seasons are theoretically supposed to respectively resemble 40%, 60%, and 80% of his open market value. In that sense, $67M for Machado’s 3 arb-eligible seasons isn’t actually that much of a bargain.

Sleepy
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“…and he’s not a head case like Bryce Harper.”

What?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Sleepy

I think Bryce Harper is often worth the price of admission, but he gets out of whack so easily. Perhaps I should have said “as inconsistent as Bryce Harper” because we don’t exactly know why he’s so inconsistent.

Sleepy
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Inconsistent is much better. “Head case” gives off a Milton Bradley/Carlos Zambrano/etc. vibe.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Sleepy

I don’t think Bradley is a head case. Bradley is a bad person. But I agree he looked like a head case when he was playing–we didn’t know how deep it went.

Puig, however, is a head case. In a charming, if maddening, way.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

FWIW sad, I’m working with free agency data to try to find my own version of $/WAR and found, during the 2017-2018 offseason, teams spent about $8 million per projected WAR. I present-valued their AAV with a discount of 5% annually and projecting their WAR using a Marcel-like projection (3 4 5 last three years weighted average).

I plan to grab and present-value each years salary independently (backloaded vs front loaded contracts make a huge monetary difference) to increase accuracy and then write a post about it. I’m not sure how to add in draft pick compensation, no trade clause values, opt outs, deferred money, etc. (once I figure that out, that may be a second post) but I think it’s safe to say that regardless of how one calculates $/WAR, it is between $7 and $9 million.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

This is excellent news that someone is doing it systematically. If you had to make me guess, I’d do $7.5M/win overall. $8M isn’t that far off. But my objection is that he’s a position player; we know that relievers get more $/win, perhaps starters too. So I don’t disagree with you; $8M/win is probably pretty close to what it is overall (and it’s Eno’s conclusion too, although I don’t know he got there).

Johnnie TMember since 2024
7 years ago

I personally would have slightly preferred Manny Machado at his contract to Arenado at this one. My quick look at WAR suggests that they are comparable players, but Machado’s contract gives the Pads 2 more years of prime performance at a little less AV. And Machado can play adequate ss too.

Of course, there is the character issue; Arenado is widely viewed as a positive clubhouse influence while Machado is, well, not as well regarded.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

But the Rockies effectively already got those two extra years of prime performance out of Arenado at a heavily discounted salary via the arbitration system.

Dave TMember since 2016
7 years ago

Rendon is also a free agent after the 2019 season, barring an extension.

Tahoe WillieMember since 2016
7 years ago

248/325/772 road splits last year. In all fairness, road splits 283/355/886 2017, 277/340/832 2016, but still?
Rendon should be in line for a nice long term deal.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago

The recent MLB TV rankings of the top 100 had Arenado at #3. This contract is commensurate with that well-earned ranking. His home/road splits are not far from the norm. Aaron Judge, for example, has much more of a home park bias, 1.137/.793 OPS and 55/28 in HR’s. With all due respect for Chapman, Arenado’s long record of great play still makes him the premier defender at 3rd base. Knowledgeable fans do not need numbers to to tell them if a defender is good, especially since the numbers still seem to produce different results for the same occurrence. Of the three mammoth contracts that are going to be signed this off-season, forced to pick one, Arenado is the player that I would want on my team.

emh1969
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

“His home/road splits are not far from the norm.”

That’s not true at all. Last year, all players has a 99 wRC+ at home vs 94 on the road. Arenado was 132 vs 104 (all Rockies were 97 vs 78).

So he has a bigger split than the league as a whole and his Rockies teammates.

That being said, he’s above average relative to the norm both at home and on the road. Add in his plus defense and I’d want him on my team as well.

(btw, Judge has some of the most extreme home/road splits in the history of baseball. Not really a good comparison point).

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Even so, what does it matter as long as he continues to play his home games at Coors Field?

emh1969
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Ummm…it matters because the truth matters and what bosoxforlife said about Arenado´s home/road splits simply isn’t true.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago

I had major deja vu reading this article and realized about halfway through that it’s because large portions of the “Rockies and Arenado Approach the Summit of a Long-Term Deal” article you penned a few weeks ago are repeated word-for-word. I don’t mean this as a harsh criticism, and I understand that it makes sense to recycle some of that language since both articles concern the same player and topic, but it just felt weird.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
7 years ago

The price for that Rendon extension just went way up.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

I’d put the chances of that Rendon extension actually happening at about 10%.

JediHoyer
7 years ago

The Rockies remain the most frustrating franchise to Me. Extension is fine, leans arenado friendly with opt out but fine trade for keeping face of franchise. Blackmon extension was dumb, corner OF without power don’t need big deals. Desmond signing dumb. Spending so much on mid tier bullpen pieces and a declining Wade Davis, dumb.

All that said they are in a great position moving forward. I’m a Garrett hampson believer which to me makes brendan Rodgers expendable. Rodgers, Welker and McMahon sounds like enough to fetch an ace or an elite position player.

Joe
7 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

“I hate all of their deals!!! Oh, but yeah, they are in a good position moving forward…but I still hate all their deals and would trade all the top prospects for an ace” said every Denver sports media personality for the last 3-years.

Art Fay
7 years ago

I’m happy for the 2016 NL MVP. Hopefully he wins some more MVPs

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
7 years ago
Reply to  Art Fay

You should watch Frozen.

GoNYGoNYGoGo
7 years ago

Good for Arenado. My concern would be that his production would fall off much quicker than shown in the estimates due to the toll of all those diving stops on his body.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Let’s ask Adrian Beltre and Graig Nettles about that.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago

For me, the Harper vs. Arenado discussion comes down to consistency. They have both accumulated basically 20 WAR in the past four seasons, but Arenado got there by essentially putting up four 5-win seasons and Harper had one monster year with three above-average ones.

I would always prefer the guy with the lower ceiling but higher floor than the other way around. I also get it that other folks look at it the other way.

j27roenick
7 years ago

I can’t remember what article it was, but a writer on this website intimated that Nolan Arenado would get $40M/season. When I objected to that figure, I was promptly derided en masse. So, what changed in the past few months that makes this such a great get for Arenado?

(For the record, I love Arenado and would take him over KB, and I’m a die-hard Cubs fan with lots of KB paraphernalia. I just think paying a great player $40M/season is absurd if that player’s name is not Mike Trout.)

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  j27roenick

If he has another year remotely close to last year, Mookie Betts is going to challenge that $40M/year figure.

j27roenick
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

I think Mookie certainly has a case. I don’t think Arenado ever had a case. Apparently, he felt the same way. So what changed in the past few months to change the narrative around here? It’s not like he got all that close to $40M/year and the extension included his last arb year instead of a year at the end of the contract that would likely be in the midst of his inevitable decline. Yet he still came up well short of that figure.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  j27roenick

I’ll admit to some bias as this is discussion is about my favorite player on my favorite team, but the more I look at this the more fair the total deal seems to me for both Nolan and the Rockies.

$40M was never, ever going to be there for him, even in free agency, I don’t believe.

The GuruMember since 2026
7 years ago

rockies got a steal, arenado would’ve added 50mm if he went through with fa.