The Lizard King Reigns in St. Louis

The St. Louis Cardinals answered one of their long-term rotation questions Tuesday afternoon, signing starting pitcher Miles Mikolas to a four-year, $68-million extension that keeps last year’s 6th-place NL Cy Young finisher from hitting free agency until 2023.

Bringing in Mikolas was one of the league’s best free-agent signings last year, as St. Louis reeled him in from Japan on a two-year, $15.5-million contract. At the time, both my computer and I saw him as a slightly above-average innings-eater who would solidify the middle of the team’s rotation. This was an especially crucial need for the team with Alex Reyes needing Tommy John surgery, Adam Wainwright declining, Mike Leake traded to Seattle, and Lance Lynn a free agent.

The Lizard King was better than that, going 18-4 with a 2.83 ERA, a 3.28 FIP, and 4.3 WAR for the Cardinals in an All-Star campaign. Mikolas’s return to the United States resembled in many ways the career path of Colby Lewis, a struggling Rangers prospect rapidly declining into journeyman-player status found his way to Japan before coming back as a pitcher with much improved command of his pitches. Lewis had a nice little career after his return, with four two-WAR seasons in Texas before joining the front office last year.

Time was crucial for the Cardinals in signing Mikolas. Even though he only has two years worth of service time, he signed with the team as a bonafide free agent from overseas, and as such, had more leverage than most players with his service time might; his original deal would have made him a free agent after 2019.

Just from his basic stats, the natural comparison you’d want to draw is Bob Tewksbury, but Mikolas isn’t really that type of pitcher. He hits the mid-90s very comfortably, and that fastball has more than one look. But that’s not the money pitch for Mikolas, nor is it his changeup, which wasn’t a significant part of his 2018 arsenal (though he’d like to use it more in 2019).

What powered Mikolas was his slider, rated the third-best in baseball in 2018 in terms of wSL and second-best on a per-slider basis. This may be the place Mikolas most leverages his excellent command. Even against left-handed hitters, Mikolas isn’t afraid to keep those inside sliders painted just on the inside of the strike zone, and he’s not just fishing for a swing on a down-and-in pitch. As an example, 46% of Mikolas’s sliders against lefties were in the strike zone. Compare that to Trevor Bauer and Patrick Corbin, two other pitchers who get a lot of value from sliders, who were both at 28% zone for their sliders against the platoon advantage. A pitcher with poor command can get destroyed doing that sort of thing.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

ZiPS unsurprisingly, already having seen Mikolas as a legitimate mid-rotation starter going into 2018, isn’t going to see him as a worse risk in 2019 after a legitimately excellent season. And there may be more strikeout upside here than one would see from his 6.5 K/9 in 2018. He went from 6.6 K/9 to 8.2 to 9.0 while in Japan, and going down to a 6.5 is a much larger-than-expected drop than you would think from his NPB stats.

With continual questions around Carlos Martinez and his shoulder, now shut down for at least two weeks after a platelet-rich plasma injection, this was a good additional motivation for the team to close a deal for a currency-rich salary injection into Mikolas’s bank account. For a conservative, careful organization, the thought of going into 2020 with too many open questions about the rotation likely amounts to heresy.

At four years and $68 million, I don’t think it’s an unreasonable risk for either side, even though ZiPS projects an extension a little pricier at four years and $83 million. Remember that while it’s possible that Mikolas would have seen that in free agency, there are additional factors that a projection system won’t take into account: a deep supply of quality aces in free agency next winter, the fact that some teams don’t hold Japanese translations in the same esteem as ZiPS does, and the fact that Mikolas is already 30 and doesn’t have $80 million in career earnings to fall back on.

Both sides get fair value and some certainty in their lives, so there’s not much for me to complain about on this one.

ZiPS Projections – Miles Mikolas
Year W L S ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2019 11 9 0 3.66 29 29 174.7 178 71 19 39 138 112 3.1
2020 10 8 0 3.63 26 26 156.3 159 63 16 34 122 113 2.9
2021 10 8 0 3.75 26 26 153.7 160 64 17 34 116 109 2.6
2022 9 7 0 3.78 24 24 143.0 149 60 16 32 108 108 2.4
2023 9 7 0 3.83 23 23 134.0 140 57 16 31 101 107 2.1





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BrendanMember since 2018
7 years ago

A look at Bob Tewksbury’s stats really makes you appreciate how much baseball has changed in the past couple decades. In 1992 he managed a 2.16 ERA with 91 strikeouts in 233 innings.

johnnygoette
7 years ago
Reply to  Brendan

Eat your heart out, Doug Fister.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  Brendan

And of course the 20 BB (0.8 BB/9, 3.5 K/9).

He was never quite a “HR > BB” player but he came close.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
7 years ago

Mikolas IP by year…

2009 (age 20) 136 (A-/College)
2010 (age 21) 81 (A)
2011 (age 22) 83 (A+/AA/AFL)
2012 (age 23) 64 (AA/AAA/MLB)
2013 (age 24) 62 (AAA/MLB)
2014 (age 25) 112 (AAA/MLB)
2015 (age 26) 145 (Japan)
2016 (age 27) 91 (Japan)
2017 (age 28) 188 (Japan)
2018 (age 29) 200 (STL)

He pitched exclusively as a reliever from 2010-2013 before transitioning to the rotation in 2014. I know the easiest way to predict pitcher injury is by saying they all get hurt eventually, but with that said, does anyone have an opinion if his limited innings from age 21-24 make him more or less likely to be injured moving forward (even if it clearly hasn’t been an issue the last two years)?

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

With how far in the past you’re looking and the frequency of pitcher injuries in general, I’d think that would have a negligible at best effect in any prediction of future injuries.

FrancoLuvHateMets
7 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

I think the only real correlation between usage and injury prediction involves teenage years (or younger)

Kevbot034
7 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Interesting question. I never really thought about it. I know for some pitchers, like Sean Newcomb, their coaches say their notably less IP is a positive. “Arm still fresh” or something. But that’s probably useless anecdote from the team anyway.

Graves
7 years ago

I love the title. I literally sent a text to my fantasy baseball league with a similar statement. Love me some Lizard King and you can’t beat that Mustache.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
7 years ago

Man I just don’t know about this one, as it might be a bit rich for me.

I think in today’s game, you want to pay for strikeouts rather than command. In the end I suppose it comes down to run prevention and FIP, and a 3 ERA/FIP is the same no matter how you accomplish it, but just feels Mike Leake-esque?

But hey Leake got 5/$80M so this is what Leake-esque players are getting.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Yeah, I sort of agree. The issue with command guys is that if they lose even a little bit of precision, things can go bad in a hurry. If they start elevating a bit or stop getting calls on the corner.

Guys with lots of strikeouts and great stuff can sometimes adjust by either working on their command or keeping the ball way down. Maybe that’s Mikolas?

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

FIP is a myth, you know. It’s been proven that pitchers do have some control over the quality of contact they give up. Add in Mikolas’s stingy BB and HR rates, and there’s no reason not to think his success can’t be mostly sustained.

gorillakilla34
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Eh, it’s not really as much of a myth as a tool, right? Like here’s this guy’s ERA, here’s his FIP. Now let’s look deeper to see if he earned the ERA or is going to regress to the FIP.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  gorillakilla34

FIP is a better predictor, but ERA is still the better analyzer of past performance. It’s why B-R’s WAR stat is much superior for pitchers than FG’s pitcher WAR.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

It has been proven that pitchers do have some control over the quality of contact they give up. It has also been proven that at the population level, home runs do a decent job of proxying for that.

There are definitely cases where you can demonstrate that a pitcher has some control over it beyond FIP. ZiPs is a system that tries to carve out exceptions, with at least some success. The problem is that once you start carving out exceptions, it’s tempting to do it across the board.

aschrag83
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

This, yeah (edit: “this” to what sadtrombone said). I don’t know offhand the exact size of the subset of pitchers who have meaningful true-talent ERA-FIP splits, but it’s a minority. If you take the existence of that minority as proof that FIP is a junk stat, you’re creating more mistakes than you’re fixing.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  aschrag83

It’s not junk, but it’s far from gospel as well, even when you remove HRs from the equation. Pitchers have good control over their GB%, which is proven to heavily limit SLG% (which more than offsets the rise in BA) even among balls in play, while they also have some control over how much soft contact they get with things like weak grounders, pop-ups, and lazy fly balls. It’s the very reason why the xwOBA pitcher’s stat is gaining traction, after all.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

So they should go ahead and do it across the board. It’s true for all pitchers, after all. It’s just that some do it better than others, while some have such neutral results at it that it still resembles their FIP.

JayMember since 2023
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Not a good comparison at all. The season Mikolas just had is far better than anything Leake has ever done. Both ERA and FIP were over half a run better than the best numbers Leake has ever posted in his 9 year career. He had the highest WAR of any pitcher in the NL Central.

deanmachine5488Member since 2019
7 years ago

“Have I told you my real name yet?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzgG94Tz2Ak

Kevbot034
7 years ago

When the Cardinals first signed him and I saw that Tweet linked in there, I got in a spiral reading about his wife’s fame overseas and it is quite interesting actually, lol. She really is very pretty, but many were apparently almost obsessed with her.

RadermecherMember since 2018
7 years ago

Mikolas was the only reason StLouis was above .500 last year.
The most under rated pitcher in the NL.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  Radermecher

The Cardinals had an 88-74 record. That’s a 7-game difference from being a .500 team. As good as he was, Mikolas was still not a 7 WAR player by any measure.

kozy21
7 years ago

His power derives from his mustache.

kozy21
7 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

If only I could post a meme of Thorny from Super Troopers.

ScottyBMember since 2017
7 years ago

Mikolas was only slightly better than Keuchel last year. Keuchel has been a cy young winner and post-season hero. Mikolas was already under contract, and Kauchel could conceivably have a wide market. Yet, Mikolas gets 4/$68M and Keuchel so far gets nothing? Crazy.

This FA/signing season has been really weird. Most players are getting less and fewer years than expected, but a few have gotten considerably more than expected.

WARonEverything
7 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

You should say ‘Keuchel so far accepts nothing’ I have to think he is waiting Harper to sign and will see what happens. My bet is we find out soon and it will not be nothing. maybe these guys really just wanted a shorted spring training.

Dave TMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

I don’t have a good sense of what Keuchel’s offers have been. There was a report early in the offseason that Boras’ initial contract request for Keuchel was 6 to 7 years in the range of $25 to $30 million per year, and I don’t think any outside observer expected him to end up with a contract close to $150 million guaranteed.

As for 2018, Mikolas totaled 4.1 fWAR and 5.4 RA9-WAR compared to 3.6 fWAR and 3.4 RA9-WAR for Keuchel, so one can construct an argument that Mikolas was more than “slightly better” than Keuchel in 2018. That said, Keuchel has a longer track record of MLB success, which is reflected in slightly higher 2019 WAR projections for Keuchel (just over 3 WAR per both Steamer and ZiPS) than for Mikolas (just under 3 WAR).

Redneck Redbird
7 years ago

Thank you, Dan.