How Could Aroldis Chapman’s Future Look?
So much of what we do is try to tell the future. So much of what we do is get the future wrong! But still we keep on plugging away, with any noteworthy trade, or any noteworthy signing. One noteworthy signing last week reunited the Yankees and Aroldis Chapman, with the closer getting a five-year guarantee. The history of relievers getting long-term deals isn’t great, but one thing we can’t ignore is that Chapman is kind of extraordinary. By some measures he’s even unique. Baseball doesn’t have an extended track record of Aroldis Chapmans (Chapmen?). Projecting his future is tricky, as it always is.
We know that, if Chapman stays the same, he’ll remain nearly unbelievable. That much, he’s proven. We know that he could snap something after any given pitch. That much, countless other pitchers have proven. But what else might we able to say?
One issue that’s come up is imagining Chapman throwing at lower velocities. Every pitcher eventually loses his zip. Some start at 25, and some start at 35, but it’s a guarantee. There’s no getting around it. For Chapman in particular, there’s one positive sign. Last year, his average fastball was 100.4 miles per hour. That’s the highest mark of his career, and he was around 98 in his first full season. So Chapman hasn’t lost anything yet. Maybe he’ll continue to hang around triple digits for a while to come.
Inevitably, though, there will be decline. And what then? To attempt to answer that, I want to try something. How might Chapman perform at lower velocities? Well, we can look at how he’s already performed at lower velocities.
Tables, ahoy! I looked at Chapman’s game log from 2012 to 2016. For every single game, I grabbed Chapman’s average fastball velocity, and then it was a matter of putting numbers together. In this first table, Chapman’s numbers are split into six groups.
| FA Velocity | IP | TBF | K-BB% | H/9 | HR/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101+ | 35.7 | 130 | 38% | 3.5 | 0.0 |
| 100 – 100.9 | 75.0 | 305 | 40% | 5.8 | 0.2 |
| 99 – 99.9 | 73.7 | 282 | 36% | 3.7 | 0.4 |
| 98 – 98.9 | 63.0 | 246 | 29% | 5.0 | 0.6 |
| 97 – 97.9 | 32.3 | 128 | 32% | 4.7 | 0.8 |
| Under 97 | 34.0 | 145 | 23% | 6.4 | 1.3 |
That’s fairly informative already, but let’s increase the sample sizes. We’ll do that by condensing from six groups to three.
| FA Velocity | Split | IP | TBF | K-BB% | H/9 | HR/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100+ | Chapman, High | 110.7 | 435 | 39% | 5.0 | 0.2 |
| 98 – 99.9 | Chapman, Med | 136.7 | 528 | 33% | 4.3 | 0.5 |
| Under 98 | Chapman, Low | 66.3 | 273 | 27% | 5.6 | 1.1 |
Surprise! When Chapman has thrown his hardest, he’s been his best. He hasn’t allowed many hits, and he’s allowed only two home runs. The home-run category here might be the most dramatic, but it’s also the noisiest, since Chapman hasn’t allowed many homers overall. Even when Chapman has worked around 96-97, he’s still been a strikeout machine. For reference, he’s a top-10 table since 2012, looking at strikeout rate minus walk rate. Chapman leads all pitchers, overall, but I took him out and replaced him with the three versions of himself.
| Pitcher | K-BB% |
|---|---|
| Aroldis Chapman, High | 39.3% |
| Edwin Diaz | 33.6% |
| Kenley Jansen | 33.0% |
| Aroldis Chapman, Med | 32.8% |
| Andrew Miller | 32.1% |
| Dellin Betances | 30.9% |
| Craig Kimbrel | 30.8% |
| Koji Uehara | 29.8% |
| Aroldis Chapman, Low | 27.5% |
| Seung Hwan Oh | 27.2% |
The hardest-throwing Chapman is in first, easily. The medium-throwing Chapman is in fourth. The slowest-throwing Chapman is in ninth, out of 776 pitchers. Ken Giles just missed this table. So did Sean Doolittle. And maybe that’s older Chapman: some kind of healthier Sean Doolittle equivalent. Doolittle has sometimes given up his home runs, and he hasn’t been considered one of the highest-tier relievers, but he has been excellent when he’s pitched. So Yankees fans can be somewhat encouraged.
Aroldis Chapman, at some point, will lose some velocity. Aroldis Chapman, at some point, will get worse. But, of course, he has a lot of velocity to give. And when he’s worked at lower speeds before, he’s been only somewhat less incredible. Chapman comes with a lot of what you might consider wiggle room.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
I think the odds are more likely than not he opts out after 3rd year. I don’t think it’s too bold not to expect much fall off within 3 years.
Every pitcher eventually loses his zip. Except John Lackey.
Except Billy Wagner.
And some gain it back in their late 30’s/early 40’s like Clemens!
Chapmii ?
Anything there in the H/9 and HR/9 flipping between High and Med?
Higher velo:Less command (more hits) but less squared up pitches (less HR) and vice versa?
Possibly best thing that can possibly happen to the Yankees (and this would be true with the Dodgers and Jansen) would be for Chapman to be great the next three years, opt out, and let some other team sign him. Sooner or later, everyone, even the cyborg named Rivera, has to get old.
Rivera had a 2.09 ERA in his first season as a reliever, and a 2.11 ERA in his final season.
I think he just got bored.
Is it reasonable to think that, as he loses fastball velocity, he could gain something else? Better command of his secondaries, maybe? His fastball has always been so good that he has never needed much of anything else. If he loses velocity, he will probably be more motivated to work on other stuff.
Jansens cutter ages better than The Missiles heater.
When Chapman (or any pitcher) throws 3mph slower in a given game than his average, it’s usually because something is wrong. Either he is hurt/fatigued or his mechanics are off. I would argue that they are both the same thing actually because the hurt/fatigue changes the mechanics (slower arm action, shorter stride, whatever). Either way, that hurt/fatigue/mechanics issue is bound to affect other things like control, command, secondary pitches’ effectiveness, pitch selection.
Can we compare Chapman fatigued or messed up mechanics throwing 98 to Chapman perfectly healthy, mechanics on point throwing 98 (just older)?
Interesting experiment that may or may not be possible: take a sample of pitchers that stayed in MLB for say at least 10 years to cover a lot of velocity loss. Compare their effectiveness when throwing 3mph slower than their highest season average during seasons when they averaged within 1mph of that highest season TO when they throw 3mph slower than their highest season average during seasons in their career when that represents their current season average.
OTOH, is losing strength from age really that different from losing strength from fatigue? Different acute causes, but possibly same effects on performance.
Well maybe, but I think you’d have more command with lost velo from age than lost velo from fatigue (which makes delivery more difficult).
There’s potential bias in looking at chapman by pure velocity. The issue with this is that, most of the time, his lower velocities are when he’s fatigued, and any number of issues could occur when a pitcher is tired, like changed or lack of movement on pitches, sloppy mechanics, bad command, etc. Here, velocity is a good proxy for energy, so we’re merely comparing tired levels of chapman.
I’m curious what the effect of throwing all those pitches in the WS will be (as if we could ever know.) It became obvious then that the Cubs had no intention of resigning him — they traded a lot to get him and they squeezed everything they could out of their “investment,” and if his arm fell off at the end, it was of no concern to them.
Now the Yankees get to find out.