Scherzer Scratched From Game 5 Start
Fresh from the unpleasant surprise department, the Washington National announced Sunday afternoon that Max Scherzer would be scratched from his Game 5 start. Scherzer has suffered neck pain in recent days and in the words of Nationals GM Mike Rizzo, is in “ungodly pain.” In for Game 5 is Joe Ross, whose only appearance so far this postseason was when he threw two shutout innings of relief in Washington’s Game 3 loss to Houston.
Considering that at times this postseason Scherzer has looked as if he would have to be dragged from the mound by a full SWAT team, I would imagine there’s not a great deal of hyperbole involved in the description of his pain. The Silver Hammer’s replacement, Joe Ross, fared well in 2019 when used as a starter, allowing a 3.02 ERA and 3.86 FIP in nine starts, all in the second half of the season. Ross, who once assisted shortstop Trea Turner in making the Wil Myers three-way trade look like a disaster for the non-Washington teams, has otherwise had his career waylaid by injuries.
The larger question, of course, is just what this means for Washington’s bottom-line playoff odds. Initially coming into Game 5, ZiPS projected the Astros to have a 61%-39% edge to win the series. But what scenario are we exactly projecting now? The answer depends on what actually happens with Scherzer’s injury, which is speculation at this point.
Ross’ start is essentially forced by the Nationals’ relief corps. Washington doesn’t have the arms to make a bonafide bullpen game a palatable scenario to the team, and with Austin Voth off the roster, they can’t start him without ruling another pitcher out due to injury. In any case, the Nats certainly don’t want to rule out Scherzer’s return unless they absolutely have to, and one would imagine the league looking very closely at the situation if Fernando Rodney or Tanner Rainey were to “suddenly” suffer injuries that necessitated them being replaced on the roster.
For the ZiPS World Series probabilities, I’m going with the happy scenario for now: Ross starts tonight, with Stephen Strasburg going in Game 6, and Scherzer left for a return in a possible Game 7. If you look at the probabilities right now, you’ll actually see the Nationals’ championship probability get a small bump to a 40%/60% deficit. ZiPS is a noted Aníbal Sánchez skeptic, and projects Ross as a minor improvement, by about two-tenths of a run per nine innings.
That, of course, doesn’t mean that this is welcome news for the Nationals, only that it’s beneficial in one very specific scenario, one the Nationals are far from guaranteed to see. To get an idea of the probabilities in some of the scenarios that are far uglier for the Nats, I re-ran the probabilities with a few of the possibilities, and condensed them into one pretty little chart!
| Scenarios | Nats Championship |
|---|---|
| Scherzer pitching in Game 5 as intended, Scherzer-Strasburg-Sánchez | 39% |
| Scherzer Game 7, pitching normally, Ross-Strasburg-Scherzer | 40% |
| Scherzer Game 7, ERA 10% worse than projection, Ross-Strasburg-Scherzer | 38% |
| Scherzer Game 7, ERA 30% worse than projection, Ross-Strasburg-Scherzer | 36% |
| Ross-Strasburg-Sánchez, Scherzer healthy enough for 2 relief innings Game 7 | 37% |
| Ross-Strasburg-Sánchez, Scherzer out for playoffs | 35% |
| Ross-Strasburg-Voth, Scherzer out for playoffs, Sánchez to bullpen | 37% |
Losing Scherzer for the rest of the World Series would be the worst-case scenario for the Nationals, but not one that dooms them. People tend to drastically overrate the dependability of a great starter’s excellence or a lousy starter’s ineptitude in an individual game. As terrific as Scherzer is, even in his best season, he was “only” worth 0.23 WAR per start, and was “just” 0.17 WAR better than the average pitcher. You want your best pitchers in the actual games, but even without Scherzer, who wins the series will come down to a lot more than his attendance.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
great piece….
With Ross numbers- are you taking into account he pitched in 2 innings on Friday so probably won’t be as sharp?
I’m assuming 4 1/3 innings, on-average, from Ross. He didn’t throw a lot of pitches, luckily.
Is Fedde on the roster? It would make sense to take a chance on him rather than going with a proven bum like Rodney.
You have to be injured to be removed from the roster. And an actual injury- not a feelings injured.
He is not on the roster.ross took his slot.
So Nats lose 1/8th of their WS odds if Scherzer is done assuming Sanchex pitches Game 7. I’d call that big.
Who’s Voth? Haven’t seen him pitch. Seems Nationals could use him in pen if he’s good enough to start.
Wonder of Nats thought of that?
Presumably the Nats could remove Scherzer if he’s a scratch for game 7 and bring in Voth, who could at least add some pen depth.
True.
I realize it’s moot with starters announced, but I would really like to know what the model thinks of going Stras/Sanchez/Corbin all on short rest.
In no way do I want to denigrate this article or disparage the true fact that understanding these statistics and probability is of great value but the only sentence that is of real consequence to the outcome of this game is the last one, which I agree with completely.
I feel like this raises an interesting question. If the Nationals have slightly better chances of winning the World Series with Ross starting tonight, and Scherzer starting Game 7, is that what they should have been planning all along? Or would there be some other justification for going with Scherzer in Game 5 and Sanchez in Game 7? Or would it have been most optimal to use Scherzer tonight and then Ross in Game 7?
If Scherzer could have started tonight, and Strasburgh in Game 6, it was possible the Nats wouldn’t have needed anyone for (an unnecessary) Game 7. With Ross starting tonight, its more likely they’re going to need someone to start Game 7 (and there’s also a greater possibility they won’t because the Astros end up winning 4 straight).
Order doesn’t matter as to series win % though…
It’s solely because ZIPS likes Ross more than Sanchez AFAIK. In reality Ross should probably be dinged because he pitched a couple days prior.
I disagree that Tampa did poorly in the Myers trade. They basically turned Bauers into Yandy Diaz (1.5 WAR, 5 pre-FA years left). They got six WAR out of Souza across three seasons, including a 3.8 season. They turned Souza into Solak into Peter Fairbanks, who has 5 (6?) pre-FA years left and throws 99 with cartoonish milb K rates. They still have Anthony Banda on hand from this series of transactions, as well, although injuries may have broken him.
If I sell you my car for $2 and use that $2 to buy a Powerball ticket and win, it doesn’t make my first transaction a great one.
Jerry Dybzinski was traded for Pat Tabler, which was a fine trade for the Indians. But it would be stretching it to make the trade Jerry Dzybzinski for Pat Tabler, Bud Black Alex Sanchez, Willie Blair, Kenny Lofton, David Justice, Jake Westbrook, and Corey Kluber.
I will agree the Padres did poorly.
Not to mention, the best outcome for Tampa, if San Diego really wanted Wil Myers, was to just take Turner and Ross and cut out the Nats
Souza was projected to be a monster in a crowded DC outfield. The trade made sense if you look at organization needs.
ZiPS projected him to hit 228/304/396 in 2015 for a 97 OPS+. He hit 225/318/399, 100.
Steamer wasn’t excited either; 246/313/420.