The 2020 ZiPS Playoff Probabilities Are Live!

After a successful initial run — during which I managed not to break FanGraphs beyond repair — the ZiPS playoff probabilities have returned for the 2020 postseason. Again, they are not a replacement for the site’s existing playoff odds, which combine ZiPS and Steamer, but rather serve as a supplemental option with a slightly different methodology. These projections are arrived at similarly to how ZiPS does its roster strength projections during the regular season, only with roster constructions that reflect the very different ways players are used during the playoffs:

These odds will be updated continually as we get closer to first pitch in each round and each game’s starters become clear. Projections for the Division Series that will be played between the various Wild Card Series’ winners will populate after those series have concluded. For the moment, you’ll see their tabs grayed out. In addition to game-by-game projections, you’ll also find series odds, which will update as each series progresses.

The general methodology remains the same this year, though the mathematics-based shenanigans are slightly more robust. To aid in modeling these probabilities, the full ZiPS model is used, which includes updated platoon projections to (hopefully!) enhance accuracy. In situations where the starting pitcher has yet to be named, you will see the starter listed as “TBD,” which represents a weighting of different pitchers who could theoretically start the game in question. In addition, I’ve modified the model for bullpen quality somewhat to better simulate the mix of pitchers used in high- and low-leverage situations.

One final variable to consider is the effect of the playoff bubble. Home field advantage was larger in 2020 than is typical (teams are usually between .510 and .530 at home, but were .557 this year), but it’s hard to tell how much of that was due to the comfort of playing at home in what was arguably the most stressful season of players’ careers. So, how do we estimate home field advantage in a situation where the comfort and familiarity are no longer present, with no team having a true home park? It would be unsatisfying to simply say that home field advantage is completely gone since there does appear to be some small tactical advantage to hitting second. To estimate this, I looked at historical player home/road splits compared to actual record in a rough attempt to try to isolate decision-making rather than ability as an advantage. It’s unfortunate that teams have never alternated between hitting first and hitting second for a season so that we have data to go through! In the end, my estimate is that home field advantage in this situation is worth about 12 points of winning percentage:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Since FanGraphs offers a handful of projection tools, I’ve summarized in table form three of the most relevant for the postseason: the FanGraphs Game Odds, the FanGraphs Playoff Odds, and the ZiPS Game-By-Game:

FanGraphs Postseason Projection Tools Comparison
Feature FG Game Odds FG Playoff Odds ZiPS Game-By-Game
Projects Game Results YES NO YES
Projects Post Season Series Results NO YES YES
Projects Future Post Season Rounds NO YES NO
Lineup / Roster Game Lineup Projected Overall
Playing Time
Projected Game Lineup
Accounts for Starting Pitcher YES NO YES
Base Projection System Steamer/ZiPS Steamer/ZiPS ZiPS Only
Updates Before/during game Shortly after game ends Nightly

Let us know in the comments what other stuff you might be interested in seeing regarding playoff projections!





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Avoid The ClapMember since 2018
5 years ago

This looks very good – but are some of the NL odds for the WC round not adding up to 100%? For example, Cubs have a 54.3% chance of winning the WC and Marlins have a 41.0% chance of winning.

Is the remaining 4.7% that the series ends in an alien attack? Given that this is 2020, I don’t disagree with those odds if that was intentional.

Anon21Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Avoid The Clap

Maybe that got fixed, because what I see at this moment is Cubs 62.7%, Marlins 37.3%.

Avoid The ClapMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Thanks. Yes, it does appear that the odds were updated.

hombremomento
5 years ago

Will the Marlins take up the Mets’ fees to Bobby Bonilla so they can get him to start in the post?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

Playing against the Padres and Dodgers will do that to your playoff odds, especially if you gave an exceptionally average performance over the preceding 55+ games.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago

For the Cubs-Marlins series, the game by game odds show Hendricks starting game one and Darvish game two. MLB.com doesn’t have official starters listed yet, but I’m virtually positive they’ll start Darvish in game one. Not only does his performance make him an easy pick, but after clinching the playoffs, they adjusted the order of the rotation to have Yu pitch Friday against the White Sox, lining him up to start Wednesday on normal rest.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

They did just make it official, it’s Hendricks in game one and Darvish in game two. I’m pretty surprised, though it doesn’t make a huge difference, since both games are guaranteed.

Anon21Member since 2018
5 years ago

Teams ZiPS likes better in the WC round than the blended Fangraphs odds:
Rays
Twins
White Sox
Braves
Cubs
Padres
Dodgers

It sees Yankees-Indians almost exactly the same as the default playoff odds (basically a tossup with a very small edge for the Yankees).

Most of those are just ZiPS being somewhat higher on the favorite’s chances (or much higher, in the case of the Dodgers). Biggest substantive differences seem to be on the CWS/OAK and HOU/MIN series; Fangraphs odds see both of those series as pure tossups, but ZiPS thinks that Chicago and Minnesota are 60/40 favorites.

raikuraMember since 2019
5 years ago

Charlie Montoyo stated yesterday that Ryu is starting game 2 for the Blue Jays. Shoemaker is going in game 1.

Adam SMember since 2016
5 years ago

Thanks for running this analysis. Post season is always tough to model because the importance and schedule change how team use their roster. Doubly so in the first round where you don’t need a 4th and 5th starter and might not need a 3rd (sweep or bullpenning a game).

Why do the A’s matchup so poorly against the White Sox? That feels like a 50-50 series to me (of course that’s why you create a model).

This seems like a good place for something that’s troubled me for a while with FG data.
Respectfully, while I treat FG playoff odds as GOSPEL for the regular season, they’ve always seemed wacky for the post season. For example, the YANKEES are the team most likely to win the ALCS despite an evenly matched first round and a “likely” date with the #1 seed in the second round. It appears they think the Yankees are 60% to win the ALDS and ALCS the times they advance; that seems crazy high. Likewise IF they advance to the NLDS, Braves are 64% to win, Reds 61% and Cubs 41%. This might make sense if the system felt the Cubs were a mediocre team, but it also has the Cubs as 56% to win the first round.

I know you don’t do the FG projections, but can you shed any more light on how they work or perhaps get the person behind them to? Thanks!

Anon21Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Adam S

“Likewise IF they advance to the NLDS, Braves are 64% to win, Reds 61% and Cubs 41%. This might make sense if the system felt the Cubs were a mediocre team, but it also has the Cubs as 56% to win the first round.”

I think this is indeed what the system thinks. The Cubs are mediocre, but their first round is against a team that’s straight-up bad, and lucked into the playoffs.

Adam SMember since 2016
5 years ago

Dan, do you bet on post season games even just bets on paper with no money? Seems like that’s the best way to test a model. While any one series or game is can go either way, seems like over dozen of bets a good model would beat “Vegas” or at least break even.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago

Is the Reds vs Braves today a glitch? How can the Braves be nearly a 2-1 favorite? That makes the betting odds -125 seem like massive value. No?