The 2020 ZiPS Playoff Probabilities Are Live!
After a successful initial run — during which I managed not to break FanGraphs beyond repair — the ZiPS playoff probabilities have returned for the 2020 postseason. Again, they are not a replacement for the site’s existing playoff odds, which combine ZiPS and Steamer, but rather serve as a supplemental option with a slightly different methodology. These projections are arrived at similarly to how ZiPS does its roster strength projections during the regular season, only with roster constructions that reflect the very different ways players are used during the playoffs:

These odds will be updated continually as we get closer to first pitch in each round and each game’s starters become clear. Projections for the Division Series that will be played between the various Wild Card Series’ winners will populate after those series have concluded. For the moment, you’ll see their tabs grayed out. In addition to game-by-game projections, you’ll also find series odds, which will update as each series progresses.
The general methodology remains the same this year, though the mathematics-based shenanigans are slightly more robust. To aid in modeling these probabilities, the full ZiPS model is used, which includes updated platoon projections to (hopefully!) enhance accuracy. In situations where the starting pitcher has yet to be named, you will see the starter listed as “TBD,” which represents a weighting of different pitchers who could theoretically start the game in question. In addition, I’ve modified the model for bullpen quality somewhat to better simulate the mix of pitchers used in high- and low-leverage situations.
One final variable to consider is the effect of the playoff bubble. Home field advantage was larger in 2020 than is typical (teams are usually between .510 and .530 at home, but were .557 this year), but it’s hard to tell how much of that was due to the comfort of playing at home in what was arguably the most stressful season of players’ careers. So, how do we estimate home field advantage in a situation where the comfort and familiarity are no longer present, with no team having a true home park? It would be unsatisfying to simply say that home field advantage is completely gone since there does appear to be some small tactical advantage to hitting second. To estimate this, I looked at historical player home/road splits compared to actual record in a rough attempt to try to isolate decision-making rather than ability as an advantage. It’s unfortunate that teams have never alternated between hitting first and hitting second for a season so that we have data to go through! In the end, my estimate is that home field advantage in this situation is worth about 12 points of winning percentage:

Since FanGraphs offers a handful of projection tools, I’ve summarized in table form three of the most relevant for the postseason: the FanGraphs Game Odds, the FanGraphs Playoff Odds, and the ZiPS Game-By-Game:
| Feature | FG Game Odds | FG Playoff Odds | ZiPS Game-By-Game |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects Game Results | YES | NO | YES |
| Projects Post Season Series Results | NO | YES | YES |
| Projects Future Post Season Rounds | NO | YES | NO |
| Lineup / Roster | Game Lineup | Projected Overall Playing Time |
Projected Game Lineup |
| Accounts for Starting Pitcher | YES | NO | YES |
| Base Projection System | Steamer/ZiPS | Steamer/ZiPS | ZiPS Only |
| Updates | Before/during game | Shortly after game ends | Nightly |
Let us know in the comments what other stuff you might be interested in seeing regarding playoff projections!
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
This looks very good – but are some of the NL odds for the WC round not adding up to 100%? For example, Cubs have a 54.3% chance of winning the WC and Marlins have a 41.0% chance of winning.
Is the remaining 4.7% that the series ends in an alien attack? Given that this is 2020, I don’t disagree with those odds if that was intentional.
Maybe that got fixed, because what I see at this moment is Cubs 62.7%, Marlins 37.3%.
Thanks. Yes, it does appear that the odds were updated.
Will the Marlins take up the Mets’ fees to Bobby Bonilla so they can get him to start in the post?
Playing against the Padres and Dodgers will do that to your playoff odds, especially if you gave an exceptionally average performance over the preceding 55+ games.
For the Cubs-Marlins series, the game by game odds show Hendricks starting game one and Darvish game two. MLB.com doesn’t have official starters listed yet, but I’m virtually positive they’ll start Darvish in game one. Not only does his performance make him an easy pick, but after clinching the playoffs, they adjusted the order of the rotation to have Yu pitch Friday against the White Sox, lining him up to start Wednesday on normal rest.
They did just make it official, it’s Hendricks in game one and Darvish in game two. I’m pretty surprised, though it doesn’t make a huge difference, since both games are guaranteed.
Teams ZiPS likes better in the WC round than the blended Fangraphs odds:
Rays
Twins
White Sox
Braves
Cubs
Padres
Dodgers
It sees Yankees-Indians almost exactly the same as the default playoff odds (basically a tossup with a very small edge for the Yankees).
Most of those are just ZiPS being somewhat higher on the favorite’s chances (or much higher, in the case of the Dodgers). Biggest substantive differences seem to be on the CWS/OAK and HOU/MIN series; Fangraphs odds see both of those series as pure tossups, but ZiPS thinks that Chicago and Minnesota are 60/40 favorites.
Charlie Montoyo stated yesterday that Ryu is starting game 2 for the Blue Jays. Shoemaker is going in game 1.
I’m aware, but didn’t want to make updates until the online tool was properly adding to 100%.
Thanks for running this analysis. Post season is always tough to model because the importance and schedule change how team use their roster. Doubly so in the first round where you don’t need a 4th and 5th starter and might not need a 3rd (sweep or bullpenning a game).
Why do the A’s matchup so poorly against the White Sox? That feels like a 50-50 series to me (of course that’s why you create a model).
This seems like a good place for something that’s troubled me for a while with FG data.
Respectfully, while I treat FG playoff odds as GOSPEL for the regular season, they’ve always seemed wacky for the post season. For example, the YANKEES are the team most likely to win the ALCS despite an evenly matched first round and a “likely” date with the #1 seed in the second round. It appears they think the Yankees are 60% to win the ALDS and ALCS the times they advance; that seems crazy high. Likewise IF they advance to the NLDS, Braves are 64% to win, Reds 61% and Cubs 41%. This might make sense if the system felt the Cubs were a mediocre team, but it also has the Cubs as 56% to win the first round.
I know you don’t do the FG projections, but can you shed any more light on how they work or perhaps get the person behind them to? Thanks!
“Likewise IF they advance to the NLDS, Braves are 64% to win, Reds 61% and Cubs 41%. This might make sense if the system felt the Cubs were a mediocre team, but it also has the Cubs as 56% to win the first round.”
I think this is indeed what the system thinks. The Cubs are mediocre, but their first round is against a team that’s straight-up bad, and lucked into the playoffs.
ZiPS projects the likely White Sox lineup to have an .853 OPS against a league-average left-handed pitcher. The extent of their lefty dominance in 2020 is exaggerated due to facing below-average pitchers on-average (.886 OPS), but the lineup *should* be beating up southpaws.
Dan, do you bet on post season games even just bets on paper with no money? Seems like that’s the best way to test a model. While any one series or game is can go either way, seems like over dozen of bets a good model would beat “Vegas” or at least break even.
When I have good opportunity relative to odds I do! For example, last year, ZiPS had Dodgers at only 51/49 to beat the Nats, which was as really nice value bet to take. Similarly, I’m betting on White Sox too.
Is the Reds vs Braves today a glitch? How can the Braves be nearly a 2-1 favorite? That makes the betting odds -125 seem like massive value. No?