Is All Hope Lost for the Atlanta Braves?

For the Atlanta Braves, the 2025 season is a disasterpiece. Last season had its share of disappointments, but the long stretches of middling play still left the Braves in a playoff spot by the tiniest of margins. After 2024, it was reasonable to stay the course; no need to smash the red panic button like an unsupervised child in an elevator. This time around, however, the Braves are likely to finish the season with somewhere around 90 losses, making simply battening down the hatches and waiting for sunnier weather a lot riskier of a strategy. I cranked up ZiPS to see how much tinkering the computer thinks Atlanta needs to do in order to compete in 2026.
The Good
On the plus side, the Braves aren’t trying to build a winning team out of nothing. Much of the offensive core remains intact and is actually functioning quite well. Ronald Acuña Jr. has made a successful return from a second torn ACL and has been playing at a 7-WAR pace. Of course, he’s out at the moment with another Achilles injury, but this appears to be a minor issue, relatively speaking, and given his history and Atlanta’s position in the standings, there’s no real reason not to be conservative with his recovery. ZiPS is understandably down on his injury risk, but he still gets his usual dynamite projection for 2026, even if it’s a little diminished from a playing time perspective:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .301 | .409 | .537 | 462 | 109 | 139 | 24 | 2 | 27 | 78 | 79 | 111 | 29 | 159 | 5.4 |
| 2027 | .295 | .405 | .521 | 468 | 109 | 138 | 24 | 2 | 26 | 77 | 81 | 111 | 26 | 154 | 5.1 |
| 2028 | .288 | .399 | .502 | 466 | 106 | 134 | 23 | 1 | 25 | 75 | 81 | 109 | 23 | 147 | 4.6 |
Braves fans have understandably mixed feelings about seeing Freddie Freeman aging well in another uniform, but Matt Olson has been much better this season than he was in his down 2024, to the point he’s actually edging out Freeman in WAR for the year! A repeat of 2023 likely isn’t in the cards for Olson, but he should continue to be roughly the same player he’s been outside of that boom season, albeit with gradual decline expected in his 30s:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .252 | .346 | .470 | 560 | 82 | 141 | 33 | 1 | 29 | 95 | 78 | 155 | 0 | 123 | 3.3 |
| 2027 | .245 | .337 | .448 | 527 | 73 | 129 | 30 | 1 | 25 | 84 | 71 | 147 | 0 | 115 | 2.4 |
| 2028 | .239 | .331 | .428 | 486 | 64 | 116 | 27 | 1 | 21 | 74 | 65 | 138 | 0 | 108 | 1.8 |
Austin Riley is more of a question mark, as he’s had both of the last two seasons marred by injuries: first a fractured hand that ended his 2024 prematurely, and then multiple abdomen injuries that have reduced his 2025 attendance. He’s still on the right side of 30, and while we can expect him to mostly bounce back, after two underwhelming seasons, you can’t pen him down for the 5 or 6 WAR he put up annually from 2021 to 2023:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .266 | .330 | .467 | 568 | 82 | 151 | 30 | 3 | 26 | 86 | 49 | 163 | 2 | 117 | 3.6 |
| 2027 | .263 | .329 | .458 | 552 | 79 | 145 | 29 | 2 | 25 | 82 | 49 | 157 | 2 | 115 | 3.3 |
| 2028 | .259 | .326 | .447 | 532 | 75 | 138 | 27 | 2 | 23 | 77 | 47 | 150 | 2 | 111 | 2.9 |
The catching position has been a strength of the Braves, with Sean Murphy making a solid, albeit low-batting average, bounce back from an injury-laden 2024 season. Drake Baldwin has had a terrific rookie campaign, and while I’ll refrain from making any predictions about his Rookie of the Year chances — I’m a voter this year — I don’t think it’s out of bounds to suggest that every voter is going to have to take his case very seriously. Plus, I appreciate that his name sounds like a soap opera character, far better than mine did. While Murphy and Baldwin make for a terrific tandem, each is capable of being a full-time starter in his own right; a more effective use of Murphy in 2026 may be a trade to bring in talent the team needs elsewhere. ZiPS has generally been pretty conservative with Baldwin, but he seems to have hit a tipping point the last two months; his projections have improved rapidly month-by-month:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .233 | .322 | .443 | 343 | 41 | 80 | 16 | 1 | 18 | 55 | 36 | 104 | 0 | 109 | 3.0 |
| 2027 | .227 | .315 | .420 | 326 | 38 | 74 | 15 | 0 | 16 | 49 | 34 | 100 | 0 | 101 | 2.5 |
| 2028 | .220 | .311 | .405 | 304 | 34 | 67 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 43 | 32 | 96 | 0 | 96 | 2.1 |
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .264 | .351 | .449 | 356 | 42 | 94 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 59 | 43 | 90 | 0 | 119 | 3.2 |
| 2027 | .259 | .345 | .445 | 375 | 44 | 97 | 16 | 0 | 18 | 62 | 45 | 93 | 0 | 117 | 3.2 |
| 2028 | .257 | .345 | .440 | 389 | 45 | 100 | 17 | 0 | 18 | 65 | 48 | 94 | 0 | 115 | 3.3 |
The Bad
Seeing Spencer Strider healthy has been great. Seeing Spencer Strider actually pitch has been less fun, especially since memories of his first year and a half in the majors are fresh. His fastball isn’t as explosive as it once was, and unlike in 2022 and 2023, hitters have been able to get at it early enough to pull it a long way. While he throws a curveball and changeup, he’s basically a two-pitch pitcher, which is a problem when one of those pitches goes south. He looks like he needs to seriously adjust his repertoire this offseason. ZiPS is hopeful he’ll be better in his second year back from Tommy John surgery [errr…internal brace surgery -DS], but it’s a big drop from his previous projections, which had him up with the best pitchers in the league:
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 11 | 7 | 3.49 | 25 | 24 | 134.0 | 107 | 52 | 16 | 41 | 170 | 117 | 2.6 |
| 2027 | 11 | 7 | 3.58 | 25 | 24 | 135.7 | 110 | 54 | 17 | 40 | 167 | 114 | 2.5 |
| 2028 | 11 | 8 | 3.68 | 26 | 25 | 142.0 | 118 | 58 | 18 | 41 | 168 | 111 | 2.4 |
On the plus side, Michael Harris II has been quite solid since the start of July, with a .317/.337/.577 triple-slash over 36 games. But he was so abysmal for the first three months of the season that this run has merely served to get his stats up to something halfway approaching respectability. He isn’t a 33-year-old veteran trying to hold off decline; he’s a 24-year-old who you’d hope to see rounding out his game and taking a step forward, not just trying to salvage a lousy year. ZiPS had big hopes for Harris breaking out in 2025 — that’s one projection that isn’t looking especially prescient — and it still gives him a solid projection for 2026, but it has lost some of its verve:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .270 | .308 | .431 | 534 | 67 | 144 | 27 | 4 | 17 | 75 | 26 | 114 | 18 | 101 | 3.3 |
| 2027 | .274 | .314 | .442 | 536 | 69 | 147 | 28 | 4 | 18 | 77 | 28 | 111 | 17 | 106 | 3.6 |
| 2028 | .276 | .317 | .443 | 537 | 70 | 148 | 28 | 4 | 18 | 77 | 29 | 109 | 16 | 107 | 3.7 |
There’s been no such salvaging of the season when it comes to Ozzie Albies. Picking up his $7 million club option for next year is still obviously the right call, but his projections have taken a very serious hit. Unlike Harris, Albies also underperformed in 2024, and while he’s rather young for an established player to just disappear absent an injury, it has happened (see Carlos Baerga or, arguably, Edgar Renteria). The fractured wrist that cost him time in 2024 is an insufficient explanation for his continued decline:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .246 | .307 | .385 | 512 | 66 | 126 | 25 | 2 | 14 | 65 | 41 | 89 | 9 | 90 | 1.6 |
| 2027 | .246 | .307 | .383 | 488 | 63 | 120 | 24 | 2 | 13 | 61 | 39 | 86 | 8 | 89 | 1.4 |
| 2028 | .245 | .306 | .381 | 457 | 58 | 112 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 56 | 37 | 81 | 7 | 88 | 1.1 |
What’s more, the team’s depth projects to be absolutely atrocious. ZiPS is still fairly optimistic about Nacho Alvarez Jr., but it sees little chance of any other help coming from the farm in the near future. The best 2026 projection for a Braves minor league hitter at the moment is Eddys Leonard at 0.9 WAR, and he was signed after being released from Detroit’s Triple-A affiliate. That means that without a more aggressive approach to their Plan B and Plan C talent, every injury in Atlanta will again have a massive impact beyond the lost player himself. Marcell Ozuna is a free agent and in decline, and losing his bat, which has been surprisingly potent the last few years, leaves another hole in a lineup the Braves have had trouble filling out.
The Ugly
Atlanta was one of the most injured teams in baseball in 2024, which served to partially explain the team’s middling season. But while the Braves have lost a lot of pitchers to injury again this year, the offense has generally been healthy, and the team is so far back that the injuries needed to explain their 2025 performance would almost have to include an Ebola outbreak.
There are good reasons to think that Chris Sale, Spencer Schwellenbach, Reynaldo López, and Grant Holmes could form a pretty nice rotation with Strider, but all are currently out with injury, along with the Braves prospect ZiPS has liked the best, AJ Smith-Shawver. And Smith-Shawver’s not going to be back any time soon, as he went the Tommy John route a couple of months ago. The other four could all be pluses in 2026, but there are serious risks. Sale’s injury isn’t arm related, but he also has a long injury history, which means you can’t just depend on getting 150 innings from him in any given season. López has missed the season with shoulder surgery, and while the team appears to be hopeful, shoulder injuries don’t have the same record of recovery that elbows do. Holmes is trying to rehab a partial UCL tear, and I don’t think I have to tell you those associated risks. ZiPS loves Schwellenbach — as it did before the season — but an elbow fracture is nothing to scoff at for a pitcher.
What’s Next?
If I do a very early 2026 projected standings for the NL East, with all the teams only having the players under contract for next season on their respective rosters, the Braves project for just an 79-83 record, third in the division and well behind the Phillies and Mets. While the front-end talent is still there, ZiPS cares about the team’s depth and injury status, and the uncertain pitching coupled with the holes in the lineup put a damper on the team’s win total in most of the simulations. Injuries will happen, and the current roster is ill-equipped to weather them.
The Braves aren’t cheap in the sense of the Rays and Marlins, but they do strive to spend as efficiently as possible. I don’t think they can get away with that any longer; the times call for inefficiency, not thrift. While the rotation could be good, the team needs more certainty. And if they end up with too much starting pitching? Well, no team has ever had that be an actual problem. There are plenty of interesting pitchers out there, from Dylan Cease to Framber Valdez to Ranger Suárez, and Michael King is likely to join them. There are also a lot of fascinating maybes, like Brandon Woodruff, Shane Bieber, and Zac Gallen, but the Braves aren’t in a position where they should be chasing maybes. They have sufficient supply of those.
Similarly, hanging around all winter to see which free agents are left unsigned in March, and then bringing in a couple to fill out the roster, is not going to work. The Braves don’t necessarily need to sign a superstar, though one is always welcome. Instead, this is a roster that just screams for a robust corps of veteran role players, even if Atlanta has to pay a bit more for them.
So are the Atlanta Braves doomed? No. But something has to change in the team’s approach for it to return to being a top-tier contender in 2026.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Great article as usual Dan. I tend to think Cease is a pretty likely pursuit given a) where he’s from and b) AA’s long-standing stated interest in him. Regardless though, there’s no excuse for this team to not splurge this offseason.
I don’t see him as a likely addition simply because he’s going to get some ludicrous offers on top of his QO. I think he would have to take a lot less money to play for the Braves. I think it’s probably more likely they go after buy low candidates like Dustin May, kind of like how they did with Lopez. And I think they would be justified if they did that.
A common-sense change to the QO should be that if you sign a free agent contract you are no longer eligible for a QO. The whole charade falls apart.
Isn’t that effectively already the case? A player can only be offered a QO once, and only if he’s been with the offering team for a full year at the time of his FA. Trying to think of an example scenario that you are suggesting and can’t figure it out.
I don’t disagree. However, between the lack of deadline activity and the rake-stepping profit quotes from their investors meeting, I think it may be more likely they splurge this offseason. Plus, Cease (like 80% of the league, seemingly) grew up a Braves fan and is from Georgia, so it’s not impossible they’d have a leg up in negotiations.
I think he is a Boras client and if so the most likely scenario where he lands in Atlanta is on a short term deal where the QO can’t be applied to him later. I don’t believe that Boras has power over his clients the way that others do but if someone hires him it gives me some sense of what they’re looking for.
I think they’re probably looking for Corbin Burnes money, would settle for Aaron Nola money, and are willing to take a 2 year deal with an opt out. It’s not impossible he would take a slight discount to sign with Atlanta on a long term deal but Atlanta has typically preferred to spread its money around more than that, and Cease’s performance this year probably makes every team (including Atlanta) a bit gun shy for a $150M+ deal.
The Braves did offer Nola $160m fwiw
They also offered Freeman $135m. They just don’t tend to get caught in bidding wars and also don’t do NTC or opt outs so the chances of winning on the top tier free agents is close to zero.
I don’t think the freeman situation is comparable, frankly to any other FA situation give all the ~stuff~ associated with it.
Just chiming in here as a lifelong Mets fan to say that, while I never like seeing guys get injured, it’s nice when some misfortune finally hits Atlanta. They do so much right as an organization that it almost seems unfair. Some sort of karmic justice is usually all the retribution we, as Mets fans, get, over Atlanta.
ratio, ’86-er
Karma is generally used in a “people get what they deserve” fashion. The notion that Atlanta doing so much right should be punished by misfortune isn’t karmic justice. It’s just you being a douche fan.
If they really did “so much right as an organization”, they’d have Freeman still rather than Olson and could have used that trade fodder for another upgrade.
Never ever ever be glad that another human has been physically injured. Just a helpful tip for meeting the bare minimum requirements of being a good person.
IDK there are definitely some baseball players who I wouldn’t mind seeing get injured, but MLB and teams have tended to shy away from the truly bad people lately (at least ones that we know about). Like, Milton Bradley basically beat his wife to death but there’s no way he would have stuck in the league under the current DV policy.
B.J. Upton is still the biggest guaranteed free agent contract the Braves have signed (Ozuna’s deal will end up being 5 years and $80M but the last year was a team option). Atlanta’s FO isn’t about to just start handing out nine-figure free agent contracts, but they likely bring on a reclamation guy on a deal similar to what they gave Morton and take a scattershot approach with minor league deals and hope they hit on a few to fill out the rotation/bullpen depth. Every single starter is going to have pretty big concerns on durability/effectiveness, but I seriously doubt they’re willing to commit the amount of money it would take to really backfill rotation depth so Elder isn’t making >20 starts next year.
Honestly, if Elder filling in for 20 starts is the worst of it, I’d take that.
Please no. I’m done with Elder as anything other than mop-up duty.
acuna, Harris, profar is the OF next year. Olson, Riley are set at the corners. Catcher is fine. The big areas of improvement don’t require giant, long term contracts. But solutions will require more than one year, cheap reclamation projects. First, a genuine SS is necessary. Second, the bullpen must be rebuilt. Solid arms cost solid money. Adding a veteran hitter that can DH/OF would be very useful. Albies is an interesting case. Unless Atlanta thinks he’s done, run it back. Otherwise, find a swap with a different team that thinks a change of scenery would help him.
If Albies could actually hit again (unlikely) then carrying Allen as a glove only SS would be fine.
I think the Braves are probably more in Reynaldo Lopez territory than Max Fried territory, if that makes sense. I wouldn’t rule out them being opportunistic but I don’t see them handing out a deal much over $100M.
As a fan I more than want them to sign a starter, but realistically I don’t see it happening with who they have available currently and the prospects that’ll be ready next year. This team doesn’t need it that badly so long as you don’t expect to lose the entire opening day rotation by July for a second year in a row.
Harris’s run has come with a completely altering of his stance, I am quite bullish on his future.
I’ve heard the walk rate is still terrible though
Thanks for saying what a lot of Braves fans are feeling, Dan, re signing tangible upgrade FAs in the upcoming offseason. I’m still hopeful but am less hopeful now that they’re happy to be landlords as their primary business interest, but it would be cool if they didn’t run it back, again.
It’s rare that it is actually the case that the coaching/manager are really all that a big part of the blame. I think this is one of those special cases. I’m glad that Harris II has bounced back, but it looks very likely that him and Ozzie were sabotaged (obviously accidentally) by a horrible coaching strategy to try to make them into a type of hitter they’ll never be. Snitker also still does a lot of weird, 20th century style pitching management and load management is just not a thing on this team other than that they’ve fairly consistently carried two capable catchers to ease the pain there, which has worked. The lack of quality bench pieces and spending way more money on middle relievers than bench bats should be reconsidered.
The dumbest possible move would be any sort of rebuild. Even while Zips is down on several of the key pieces, it still thinks there are six position players that should get 3+ WAR. Definitely also need to find a way to add two real starting pitchers to the roster.
I’m definitely nervous that they’ll just promote Weiss after Snitker (presumably) retires. This would be a good time to be big boy and splash the cash for Cash.
This is so depressing. Have any team’s fortunes taken a greater beating since October 2023? They were on top of the world, looked like they were the only team with a real chance of taking the Dodgers’ crown as best team in baseball, and now they’re deeply fucked. And with a chintzy front office that is essentially allergic to bidding on premium free agents and a terrible farm system, the bright future that the Acuña-led core appeared to represent may have completely disappeared.
This reminds me a lot of the Cubs after they won the World Series. That was still a very good team for several years but they didn’t ever put it all together again.
This reminds me of the end of the last competitive White Sox teams after there first down season. Fangraphs said much the same then that there is talent but that they needed to supplement it we all know that’s not what happened. The Braves have a better roster overall than the White Sox did then but they play in a much tougher division. The Braves have shown creativity before in addressing their roster holes it will be interesting to see what they do to address where they are weakest.
I do worry about all of the pitchers who have broken over the recent years with the Braves and their inability to get them healthy and returning to form.
Rough times for Oriole fans, and Charm City’s last title: 1983…
Yeah, Orioles are a good call, they have also crashed hard since notching 101 wins in 2023. They had a more successful 2024 than the Braves, but have seen multiple core players’ performance deteriorate, much like the Braves with Albies, Harris, and (to a lesser extent) Riley.
I am having a very hard time seeing *any* of the free agents as being a great fit for them. This is a very well rounded team, there are no glaring holes (even if the depth is bad) and there are some reasons to think that Strider could bounce back next year. Ozzie Albies and Nick Allen are the most likely position players to get replaced, and unless you think Bo Bichette is the answer there aren’t many options for the middle infield.
I think they’re probably more likely to trade for a guy who either has a prohibitive salary or has been injured or both (like they did with Chris Sale) and maybe work out a longer deal. If he would waive his no-trade Sonny Gray would be a great target. That seems like more their style.
I don’t agree with this, whether they will actually pay the likes of cease/framber etc is a different question. But I definitely do think given the injuries to Schwellenbach, Strider’s pitching coming off his second TJ, Sale’s age/durability concerns that SPing should be a significant worry and they should pay for 1 and it should be viewed as a big need.
Something to keep in mind, and is part of why they didn’t really go after a big starting pitcher contract in ’25, is they have 3-4 prospects that will likely get opportunities next year.
Riley hasn’t maintained the star level performance I expected from him but his struggles in 2024 can be attributed to an early oblique injury. This season is a bit more troubling but having a recurrence of an ab injury is extremely troublesome. They should shut him down for the season. 2026 will be a huge swing year for him.
The injuries to Sale, Lopez, Holmes, and Schwellenbach were entirely predictable (with the exception of Sale’s broken rib) given the way they were worked last year and this one given previous limited workloads. That’s entirely on the organization.
Snit is asleep at the wheel. He didn’t notice AJ Smith-Shawver was shaking his arm early in the outing he got hurt. They also ignored that Holmes basically didn’t throw his fastball until halfway throwing his outing the outing BEFORE he went down. They’ve got to be more attentive.
The Braves really need to have more depth next year. I see the pitching staff as the first priority, given that so many key pitchers are coming off injuries. They need to add both to the rotation and the bullpen. Some of their pitching prospects will probably contribute next year, but none are a sure thing. They probably need to acquire two starters and 2 (or more) relievers.
Because the Braves have so many position players signed to long term contracts and because they tend to play their position players every day, the Braves almost never spend on their bench. That needs to stop because every year there is an enormous fall off when a regular gets injured. And Alvarez is their only position player prospect who is close to major league ready. But it seems that his defense isn’t good enough at SS or 2B
The thing is they really tried to have a solid bench this year, it just all went wrong. It wasn’t for lack of effort / foresight though. If you think back early, we thought we’d have a plethora of platoon backups with Profar, MH2, and Acuna only missing a month. Eli/Kelenic/De La Cruz/Allen really should have been a fine bench. It just didn’t work out.
Great article per usual Dan, and well done with the subtle Slipknot references.
Even if Acuña and Harris have good years they might need another outfielder.
Profar getting suspended and Kelenic turning into his worst self are big parts of the Braves being snakebit. Profar is projected to be barely above replacement next year, there’s plenty of potential to outperform that, but it’s much easier to write off the 26 year old not hitting in AAA.
“Acuna has made a successful return from a second torn ACL and has been playing at a 7-WAR pace. Of course, he’s out at the moment with another Achilles injury“.
Acuna doesn’t have an Achilles injury. It was a calf strain. And he has never had an Achilles injury. So, “another” isn’t correct.
He healed so quickly from the Achilles injury that it never even happened.
“He was rushed to a nearby hospital where he was pronounced dead… He was quickly transferred to a better hospital where doctors upgraded his condition to alive.”
I think ZIPS is the best projection system out there but… Find someone who looks at you the way ZIPS looks at Ronald Acuna. First, here’s what it projected for him after his incredible 2023 season:
It’s not looking good. 🙂 Here’s what has happened since:
2024: 222 PA, 0.9 WAR
2025: 238 PA, 2.5 WAR (plus ??)
In the past 5 years, he’s missed 80, 43, 3, 113, and 66 (so far) games. So what does ZIPS think now?
2026: 462 PA, 5.4 WAR
2027: 468 PA, 5.1 WAR
2028: 465 PA, 4.6 WAR
That would surprise me a little.
I dunno…tearing your ACL isn’t quite like a pitcher having shoulder surgery, where it tends to be correlated with future health problems. It’s possible he’ll continue to miss lots of time, and it’s also possible he’ll be pretty healthy going forward. ZiPS is kind of splitting the difference.
But he’s missed big chunks of time every year except 2023. with chest, ankle, back, and leg injuries. As a result, he’s played only 464 of his team’s 769 games over the past 5 seasons, accumulating 19.4 WAR. That’s a 98 game/441 PA/4.1 WAR per season pace.
Over the past two years (since the previous ZIPS projection, it’s 104 of his team’s 283 games, with 3.5 WAR. That’s a 60 game/265 PA/2.0 per season pace.
It seems optimistic to think that he’ll be considerably healthier AND considerably better going forward.
I think ZiPS is right to go very high on the performance and see him having reached a new level he had not demonstrated in the earlier part of your 5-year window. He smashed in 2023 and then came back in 2025 and smashed again. The man is one of the best hitters in MLB, and he’s demonstrated that the second ACL injury hasn’t affected him at the plate. It is regressing his recent performance, because it’s not projecting him for a 170 wRC+.
The playing time stuff I just feel I don’t know enough to have a strong view. I vaguely recall that studies on this also show huge amounts of variation. For pitchers, I think it is relatively tractable to figure out who is injury-prone (but not who is injury-proof–there is a big skew towards the “injury-prone” end of the distribution). For hitters, I just don’t know if we’re there yet.
Those are good points–maybe I’m being too hard on ZIPS.
Anecdotally, it does seem like position players who rack up a variety of different injuries are likely to continue to do so, but I can’t say for certain.
I have to wonder if Snitker isn’t part of the injury problem. I’ve read that the Braves run out the starting 8 more frequently than other teams. Obviously, a weak bench is a plausible reason, but it can’t be the only cause surely.
Seeing the projections make me optimistic about the Braves going forward. They have 4 or 5 reliably good-to-great players in their lineup, some decent contributors, and a chance that Sale and the Spencers will be able to anchor the rotation. They also have two excellent options behind the plate, allowing them to deal one to fill another hole. They’re in better shape than most teams and seem capable of competing for a playoff spot.
If they prefer the trade route, Riley seems the best candidate. I guess Murphy if they get a lot. Strider and Sale should be available if someone pays like they’re aces. I don’t see why Albies option should be a given.
Replacing expensive front line people with pre arb guys and depth should be how a 79 win team operates
Albies’ option is $7 million with a $4 million buyout. I think it is a no-brainer at $3 million difference; that kind of money doesn’t even buy you a fifth outfielder these days.
But then he has to play and occupy a roster spot
Assuming they could find some reasonable solution at second base, you don’t think he’s worth $3 million as a backup and PH?
Trading Riley would be incredibly stupid.
How does Harris being a 3.5 WAR player going forward from age 24 qualify as “bad”?
Waldrep looks like a different pitcher this year. They may have found another quality starter.
I would give it some time to see how it shakes out…he’s definitely been better, but those strand rates and HR rates aren’t sustainable