It’s Time for Michael Pineda to Change His Approach
Michael Pineda has always had a bit of a weak spot in his pitching profile. From his debut in 2011 until his 2017 ended with Tommy John surgery, he threw 680 innings while allowing 91 total home runs. That translated to a 1.20 HR/9, putting Pineda in the bottom 20th percentile in the league among pitchers with at least 650 innings pitched.
Despite the eye-catching rate, the home runs were a manageable issue; Pineda’s FIP in those years was a fine 3.60. More than avoiding home runs, Pineda needed the health he enjoyed between 2015-16 to be an average starter. Even setting aside the Tommy John, his time in the majors is riddled with stints on the disabled list for a variety of maladies. Now in 2019, with the health of his arm finally restored, the home run issues looms larger.
After his first nine starts of the year, Pineda is leading the majors in home run rate among qualified pitchers with a 2.49 HR/9. Following his last start, he became the first Minnesota Twins pitcher to allow at least three home runs in consecutive outings since Bartolo Colon in 2017.
This is still a small sample, and Pineda’s home run rate will probably go down as he keeps pitching. However, given his previous home run issues, the recent spike merits a closer look.
First, let’s examine his fastball. Of the 13 home runs he has allowed this year, six have been against fastballs in the middle or upper part of the zone. Pineda has always liked to throw his fastball in the zone, challenging hitters with good gas, and he has been doing exactly that this year.
Have a peek at the location of his fastballs prior to 2019:

And here they are so far in 2019:

A few more pitches arm-side and few more pitches middle/middle, but generally speaking, it looks similar.
The thing about Pineda’s fastball this year is that it has lost 1.8 mph of average velocity when compared to his 2017 four-seamer (92.1 mph vs. 93.9 mph), and, perhaps more importantly, his spin rate is now really working against him pitching up in the zone.
Let’s look at the list of the fastballs with the lowest average spin rate in 2019 among starting pitchers:
| Name | Avg Spin Rate (rpm) |
|---|---|
| Wily Peralta | 1892 rpm |
| Jon Gray | 1992 rpm |
| Jose Quintana | 1995 rpm |
| Michael Pineda | 1999 rpm |
| Jalen Beeks | 2001 rpm |
| Michael Wacha | 2029 rpm |
| Cole Hamels | 2045 rpm |
| Kyle Dowdy | 2048 rpm |
| Homer Bailey | 2056 rpm |
| Pablo Lopez | 2076 rpm |
The fact that Pineda has lost a tick on his fastball and now ranks near the bottom of the spin rate leaderboard doesn’t match up very well to his tendency to challenge hitters in the middle part of the plate or up in the zone. That pitch, if it sustains its current specs, will probably continue to suffer if it’s thrown to that area.
A quick look at Statcast since 2015 tells us that four-seam fastballs with a 2000-rpm spin rate or lower that are pitched in the middle/upper part of the strike zone have had an xwOBA of .381. If the fastball has more than 2000 rpm of spin, the xwOBA lowers to .339. If it has more than 2300 rpm of spin, the xwOBA lowers to .324. And if it spins at more than 2500 rpm, the xwOBA lowers to .304.
Because spin rate and pitch velocity tend to correlate, the same happens with xwOBA as the average velocity creeps higher. But in Pineda’s case, it’s not the same to challenge hitters with a 92.1-mph average fastball as it is to do so with a heater that has an average spin rate of 1999 rpm. One of those is a bit more dangerous for the pitcher.
What pitchers in Pineda’s situation tend to do (if they want to survive in the majors) is to work lower in the strike zone and develop a secondary pitch that helps their fastball get some strikes in the zone.
Maybe Pineda’s power changeup can do the work of a sinker. After all, it’s a power changeup (less than 6 mph of separation with his fastball) and has good fade, and he uses it only 5.1% of the time against right-handed batters. But that pitch doesn’t generate ground balls (31.6%), and Pineda would likely welcome a pitch that elevates his current 32.9% ground-ball rate.
Maybe he could go for a sinker: According to Brooks Baseball, he threw 23 in 2011, two in 2013, five in 2015, two more in 2016, and four in 2017. But it looks like he never decided to make this pitch a part of his traditional repertoire.
Or maybe he could try develop a cutter. He wouldn’t be the first starting pitcher with fastball issues to do it in recent years: CC Sabathia did it in 2015, Anibal Sanchez managed to do it in 2017, and even his own teammate Martin Perez did it in 2019, just to name a few.
Then again, the home run problem Pineda has suffered from this year isn’t just a fastball thing. Let’s take a look at his slider. As his money pitch, his slider has resulted in almost half of his strikeouts, but things have been very messy when he throws it in the zone.
Here is the bottom of the xwOBA leaderboard on sliders in the zone this year:
| Player | xwOBA |
|---|---|
| Michael Pineda | .462 |
| Manny Banuelos | .438 |
| Nick Margevicius | .396 |
| Reynaldo Lopez | .389 |
| Kyle Freeland | .385 |
Pineda’s slider has been absolutely demolished when it’s thrown in the zone, ranking as the very worst one in MLB. He has allowed five home runs and a 93.0-mph average exit velocity with it. When it’s thrown out of the zone, things change dramatically, as they should: a .162 xwOBA.
But the answer can’t just be a “throw your slider out of the zone” approach, can it? Hitters will adjust, stop chasing it, and very soon the Pineda Home Run Thing will become a Walk Thing, right? Well, the numbers tell a different story. Walks and control have not been an issue for Pineda this year. Right now, he has a 4.5% walk rate and a 46.6% zone rate (12th among qualified pitchers). Those numbers could suffer a bit in order for him to avoid barrels and home runs.
Another suggestion that a change of strategy could possibly be successful is the fact that hitters are swinging at his slider at a 54% rate. He is not the leader in that category, but he is 25th among 150 pitchers with at least 100 sliders thrown. This aggressiveness could be used by Pineda for generating whiffs out of the zone and avoiding hard contact with his breaking ball.
There are plenty of examples of pitchers that throw most of their sliders out of the zone, don’t have particularly overpowering velocity on the pitch, and generate a healthy amount of swings. In fact, his teammate Kyle Gibson is the poster boy of this trick, offering only 25% of his sliders in the zone and producing a 50% swing rate. Julio Teheran is another case with a 35.5% zone rate on his slider and a 49% swing rate. Patrick Corbin does something similar with a 30.1% zone rate and a 50.7% swing rate.
Of course, successfully executing these types of adjustments is not an easy thing to do, and it is even trickier to pull off in the midst of a season. Then again, the home run spree that Pineda is suffering right now will probably remain as a real and constant problem if he doesn’t evolve and change according to his new stuff on the mound.
Head of the advanced metrics department of Diablos Rojos del Mexico and former assistant GM of Leones del Caracas (Venezuelan Winter Ball). Just a Venezuelan baseball journalist trying to help my region get on board with advance stats. It's not the future of the game. It's just the present.
All he has to do is stop giving up HR – that sounds easy! Lots of guys that are around the plate have HR issues. Solo HR are not the worst thing in the world.
Brilliant analysis.
Put him in the bullpen so he can let loose with some nastier stuff going just one inning. Good chance he becomes the next Wade Davis.
Just neighing.
This seems so obvious to me at this point. He can still induce swinging strikes, but gets very predictably lit up on the 2nd and 3rd time through the order. Also he missed all of last season. So what can you actually expect from him in the 2nd half of the season as a starter?
The Twins really don’t have anyone to replace him in the rotation. They need to be adding a starter.
I don’t see much of a difference in the rotation between…
Option A: Continuing with Pineda every 5th day until they add someone in July.
Option B: Rochester revolving door of Smeltzer/Stewart/ Littell/Thorpe/Gonsalves every 5th day until someone takes the job and/or they add someone in July.
Both options require the (realistic) hope that the offense will out-bash the opponent. But with Option B, Pineda likely helps a bullpen in need.
I don’t disagree, but I’m not sure Pineda really helps in the bullpen unless we think that move would mysteriously cure his gopheritis.
It also seems pretty likely that they’ll eventually have a starter go down and need both Pineda and the revolving AAA door options.
Of that AAA group, I can really only see Thorpe with the potential to hold a regular rotation spot. The rest seem like one start desperation plays. Maybe I’m too pessimistic.
Of the AAA group, I think Smeltzer is the guy to watch.
I hope they both are. Either way the rotation is frighteningly shallow for a team that could be a real contender.
With Smeltzer’s ugly K/9 I think Thorpe is the guy to watch, even if his results haven’t been great.
I also think it would be smart for them to be aggressive with promotions for Graterol (to AAA) and Balazovic (to AA) by the end of June, assuming they keep up what they’re doing. Get them some high minors experience in case they’re needed later on.
Pineda’s actual ERA was 4.05 thru 2017, in 680 IP, so that 3.60 FIP is not very persuasive. The formula isn’t equally predictive for all pitchers. Some guys are less effective from the stretch, and Pineda’s splits show signs of that.
Good article but I think all the suggestions don’t really work, i.e. he is doomed.
The sinker is a dead pitch. And throwing the slider out of the zone won’t work because hitters will stop swinging. It is possible to live out of the zone but only with great command. Pineda always was a decent control but bad command guy, i.e he needed to work the middle to keep the walk rates in check. If he starts nibbling his walk rates will skyrocket.
Because of this he always was dependent on his stuff. He has the same problem Lincecum and felix had, they also were decent control bad command pitchers who were aiming down the middle and letting stuff and movement do the work. This type of pitcher is doomed when the stuff goes and not much he can do, he won’t suddenly develope in a command artist.
Greinke has made the throw less strikes approach work but he has great command. Pineda doesn’t have that, he either needs his stuff back or he is done.
I mean, if this is all the Twins have to worry about…
But a cutter might not be a bad addition
Pineda actually threw a pretty good cutter back in 2014. It got tagged in ‘15 though and he seemed to mostly abandon it after. So I don’t know if that’s the answer for him.
Post-labrum Pineda giving up a ton of bombs as he recovers from TJ?
Shocking, I tell you!
Love Big Mike…but it’s who he is, at this point.
Let him work behind an opener to start.
I really love this piece because it helps counter-balance the survivor-bias story we often hear about power pitchers adapting and developing more finesse to stay in the majors. I’ve always wondered “well… then who didn’t adapt? and how i would i spot someone like that?”
This article is thorough explanation of exactly that.