It’s Time for the Red Sox To Change Gears

The 2020s have been a quiet time for the Boston Red Sox. Since winning the 2018 World Series, their fourth in a 15-year period, Boston hasn’t looked much like one of the titans, ready to throw down with the Yankees or Astros in brutal warfare for baseball supremacy. Instead, as an organization, the Red Sox have taken on the character of a genial, pastorale retiree, gently reclining on the porch of an American Craftsman house, as if they were in a 1980s lemonade commercial.
On Independence Day in 2022, Boston was second in the AL East with the junior circuit’s third-best record, but in the space of a month, it had lost Nathan Eovaldi, Garrett Whitlock, Michael Wacha, and Rich Hill to injuries. It was the prime time to make trades, but the Red Sox did basically nothing that would have helped them maintain their playoff relevance; their pitching staff’s 6.30 ERA for July dropped them below .500 by the time the Sox made their pointless acquisition of Eric Hosmer at the trade deadline. At last year’s deadline, when they were just 3.5 games out of the final wild card spot, they decided the day was intolerably hot and they were content to sip the last of their sweet tea as they watched and waited for the fireflies to come out at the dying of the day. Once again, Boston is in contention during trade season, a half-game up on the Royals for the last AL playoff spot, and it’s time for them to get up off the porch.
The first and most important reason for the Red Sox to move on from their gentle retooling cycle is that they have more to gain in playoff probability than most teams by making a few good trades. Teams right on the cusp get the most benefit from adding talent, and that’s where the Red Sox reside. Helping their case is that they may not need to win as many games to sneak into the playoffs this season as was required in recent years. The final AL Wild Card team won 89 games in 2023 and 86 games in ’22, and it would needed 90 wins in ’21, the last year before the playoffs expanded to 12 teams; this year, ZiPS projects the average AL winner of the last wild card spot will have 85.5 wins. This means that, without making any trades, the Red Sox could go 39-37 the rest of the way and still have a 50% shot to snag the last AL wild card.
To demonstrate this, I calculated the ZiPS playoff probability of every team after Thursday’s games and compared it to the playoff probability if you added two additional wins to each team’s bottom line, one at a time.
| Team | Playoffs | +2 Wins | Change (Percentage Points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston | 51.8% | 66.2% | 14.4 |
| Arizona | 35.7% | 48.9% | 13.2 |
| St. Louis | 42.5% | 55.5% | 13.0 |
| Kansas City | 33.6% | 46.4% | 12.8 |
| New York (NL) | 40.5% | 53.3% | 12.8 |
| San Diego | 55.8% | 68.4% | 12.6 |
| San Francisco | 33.4% | 46.0% | 12.6 |
| Houston | 49.2% | 61.5% | 12.3 |
| Seattle | 62.1% | 73.7% | 11.6 |
| Cincinnati | 20.8% | 31.5% | 10.7 |
| Minnesota | 71.7% | 81.6% | 9.9 |
| Tampa Bay | 17.9% | 27.7% | 9.8 |
| Atlanta | 74.4% | 83.6% | 9.2 |
| Texas | 15.6% | 24.6% | 9.0 |
| Milwaukee | 78.8% | 87.0% | 8.2 |
| Chicago (NL) | 11.6% | 19.2% | 7.6 |
| Pittsburgh | 8.3% | 14.7% | 6.4 |
| Toronto | 7.3% | 13.2% | 5.9 |
| Washington | 3.2% | 6.5% | 3.3 |
| Detroit | 2.5% | 5.4% | 2.9 |
| New York (AL) | 94.6% | 97.4% | 2.8 |
| Los Angeles (NL) | 95.7% | 98.1% | 2.4 |
| Cleveland | 94.4% | 96.3% | 1.9 |
| Los Angeles (AL) | 0.6% | 1.7% | 1.1 |
| Baltimore | 98.6% | 99.5% | 0.9 |
| Philadelphia | 99.2% | 99.7% | 0.5 |
| Chicago (AL) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Colorado | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Miami | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Oakland | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
As you can see, the Red Sox get the largest boost of any team from adding two wins of value to the roster. Of course, this doesn’t guarantee they will make the playoffs if they acquire two wins before the deadline, but this shows they have a lot to gain just by improving along the margins. Moreover, the Sox aren’t just incentivized to be aggressive at the deadline; they also have the ability to do this. In the last update last year, we ranked the Red Sox farm system as second in baseball, Keith Law ranked it eighth at The Athletic, and ZiPS ranked it highly. Baseball Prospectus and Baseball America were grumpier, placing Boston’s system at no. 13. Regardless of which version you agree with, the Red Sox have a farm system that’s at least slightly better than average, a maybe one of the best in baseball. Either way, Boston has the prospect capital to improve its big league roster without sacrificing its success in future seasons.
Prospects are, of course, not the only way to acquire players. You can buy talent with prospects, but you can also buy talent with money, and the Red Sox have the ability to eat other team’s large contracts in order to conserve their prospects. In recent years, Boston has made an effort to cut back on its spending; the franchise has exceeded the first luxury tax threshold just once over the past five seasons, including this one, and even in the year that the Red Sox did pay the tax, 2022, they ranked sixth in spending. All this is to say that it’s safe to assume that Boston will not exceed the CBT threshold this year, even if it decides to take on larger contracts in order to keep its top prospects. No matter, though, because the Red Sox are about $19 million below the tax line this year, which would be more like $40 million because any contract they take on would be prorated for the remainder of the season. So, realistically, that means the Sox could afford anyone who might be available while still staying below the threshold. And they have even more flexibility next season if they want to go big for someone who could help for more than just the remainder of this year; Boston is currently about $100 million below the $241 million tax line for 2025. The team has four players eligible for arbitration this winter, but three of them will be heading to arbitration for the first time, so the amounts are likely to be fairly small, and the fourth, Reese McGuire, is a non-tender candidate.
Should the Red Sox go crazy and trade one of their top two prospects, Roman Anthony and Marcelo Mayer, for two months of a third-tier starting pitcher? Of course not. But as the month goes on, more teams are likely to join the league doormats and fall into the seller category. The Rays, a team always willing to trade talent, are likely to be there, as are the Blue Jays, who have plenty of desirable players under contract beyond the end of this season. Two teams with high hopes coming into the season, the Cubs and Rangers, may find themselves retooling as the playoff math becomes too treacherous. There are certainly a number of interesting players who could become available in the right scenarios. I know the Rockies say they’re not trading Ryan McMahon, but he’s having his best season and has a lot of experience at second base. Bo Bichette’s line drive swing could make him a beast at Fenway. The White Sox are a husk of a team, but Garrett Crochet and Erick Fedde are worth picking up for any contender.
While it’s not explicitly required for my job, I like to keep tabs on how the passionate portions of individual fanbases perceive their favorite teams. This is one of the reasons that you’ll see me lurking on team subreddits or blogs, even finding me in the most random internet arguments. (My penchant for getting into arguments is another one of the reasons.) One of my favorite things to do at games is to completely avoid the press box and just wander around talking baseball with fans, especially ones who are clearly rooting for the visiting team. There was a lot of unhappiness after the Mookie Betts trade, but the overall impression that I get these days isn’t necessarily rage against the ownership, but a dull apathy toward the organization. In a lot of ways, this kind of grim acceptance is harder to turn around than white hot anger.
How much more apathy will be created if the Red Sox, for the third season in a row, simply twiddle their thumbs at the thought of contention? The Kyle Schwarber trade in 2021, their only big acquisition that year at the deadline, should be the type of thing that a big market club like the Red Sox repeats every summer. Being aggressive certainly has its risks and comes with no guarantee of success – just ask the Padres – but not doing anything yet again has risks of its own. Fans will accept retooling only for so long. At some point, they want their team to rage against the dying of the light, and they’ll be more supportive of a team that puts up a good fight and loses than one that doesn’t go for it at all. Organizational apathy begets only apathy from the fanbase.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Need to see how the next 3 weeks play out but I agree with this. The difference this year is that this roster is not going to change much over the next few years. Barring some blow-it-up situation which is extremely unlikely, Devers, Duran, Bello, Houck, Crawford, Rafaela, Abreu, Casas, Story, Yoshida, Wong and Grissom are going to be getting the bulk of playing time. The prospects in the upper minors will slowly trickle in as well. But this is the team they have decided to field.
They still have a few clear holes but the roster they are going to field for the next 2-3 years is ~90% set. Time to complete it and try to compete.
I am having a hard time imagining what sorts of players would be serious upgrades here. The obvious choice would be a high quality middle infielder and a 3+ win starter. But that’s what almost everyone wants. They going to trade Roman Anthony and / or Marcelo Mayer to the Blue Jays and let them torment Boston to get Bo Bichette? Or to try and outbid the Mariners / convince the Rays to trade Brandon Lowe? Or for Crochet? I’m not seeing it. Kiner-Falefa seems like a more appropriate target. This is also one of the few teams that needs warm bodies for the infield, so even DeJong would help them out. These don’t seem like difference making moves but they would keep them out of replacement level. As far as pitching goes, I would think Fedde would be a logical target to slot into the rotation and protect against injuries to their top 2. Might be able to get away with not trading Mayer / Anthony / Teel for him.
It’s really just another starting pitcher to go along with the above group of guys, who will replace Pivetta when he walks. It doesn’t necessarily need to be the of the Crochet tier – but it should be someone that is <27 with 3+ years of control and who has a starters pitch mix. Won't be cheap but the Red Sox have been cheap for many years now, I think it's time to splurge a little.
That seems like it would be a lot easier to address in the offseason. Or to just sign Pivetta to an extension.
As, at worst, one of the longest bonafide members of Red Sox Nation on the Fangraphs blog I agree with you 100%. I feel that Dan has quite accurately measured the mood of the fans of New England. I know that I am not screaming that a trade needs to be made. I can live with Houck, Crawford, Pivetta, Bello and Winckowski in the rotation and the pen is as solid as most, if not all, of the rest of baseball. There is a also good chance that Liam Hendriks will join the group shortly. Is Wong now a capable catcher? I certainly think so. Will Story ever contribute? Count me in there as well. 2024 and beyond look to be very interesting and sending any of the top prospects from the recent list off for a pitcher is a foolish gamble. A quick look at the returns on in season acquisitions like Montas by the Yankees in 2022 or Flaherty by the Orioles last year show them to be disasters. The reports on Anythony, Teel and Mayer are getting better and the new prospect, Campbell, is turning heads. As long as the team doesn’t become the White Sox or the Rockies I, and I believe most of Red Sox Nation, are willing to wait, are quietly comfortable with the path that the old town team is on.
Ditto to all the above.
I am less sanguine about Story, who hasn’t had a wRC+ over 100 since 2019 (edit: whoops, 2020), when he was 5 years *younger*. His defense can still play, which is impressive, but the bat (in only 34 ABs, to be fair) has been downright bad, with poor power and contact. Maybe he perks up, but I’m not sure there’s good reason to be optimistic.
I’m also blown away by how Connor Wong is all that’s left from the Betts trade
I agree on Story. At this point, I’d rather see David Hamilton in there than Story.
If you count the return from the Alex Verdugo trade as part of the return on the Betts trade (I do), then the Red Sox also have right-handed pitchers Richard Fitts, Greg Weissert, and Nicholas Judice left from the Betts trade. It remains to be seen what value they bring, but yeah, I’d still rather have Betts (he was my favorite player). Though without Wong the Sox would probably be worse off at catcher for 2024.
Cora doesn’t trust Hamilton defensively….I expected him to play more the last ten days.
Which is insane given he’s been up for about half a season total. So many worse butchers have gotten much more run with Cora, and few also hit .270 with a bunch of SBs.
I understand why one would count the 2nd degree acquisitions from the trade. To me, it’s a tougher sell because one of the justifications for trading Betts was to remain competitive by trading one possible HoFer for multiple long term starters rather than going full rebuild/prospect hunting. Consequently, I’m less inclined to see a starter traded for prospects as a success from the Betts trade (though the Verdugo trade might very well turn out to be a big win for BOS). And Jeter Downs never seemed viable.
I’m willing to believe in long term catcher development. Especially when they come from the Dodgers; their farm system is like Catchers University.
The Red Sox enjoyed 10+ years being a top 5 payroll (often top 3) then slid to 6th and now down to 10-12 for the last couple years. You get what you pay for.
The Red Sox COULD afford anybody out there, but they COULD have also afforded the Mookie Betts contract instead of trading him. But ownership has prioritized marginal savings over the on field product since January 2019, and unless/until that changes, it won’t matter what they COULD do. This is not your father’s, or even your slightly older cousin’s, Red Sox. Ownership no longer operates it as a big market team that strives to win.
Betts wanted out. Maybe the organization was an issue, but at that point, he wasn’t signing with them.
You are most certainly correct Tommy. Could the Red Sox have afforded to pay Mookie? Of that there is no doubt but was there any chance for it to happen, again there is very little doubt that it was not. No subject has ever been the focus of more ignorant commentary than the Red Sox forced trade of Mookie Betts. I wonder how many of the comments about the forced trade come from people in New England. In this neck of the woods the feeling, and it was very strong, was that Mookie would never sign an extension with the Red Sox. The return, while not comparable to the absolutely great Mookie Betts, is looking better every day as Connor Wong continues to hit and throw at a very high level, Weissert does a good job and Fitts may even work out. There is still more to come after 4 decent years from Verdugo.
Unwilling to sign a team friendly early extension does not mean unwilling to resign with the team.
This narrative that Mookie was leaving no matter what is absolute malarkey and it’s the exact thing this ownership group spoon feeds to friendly local media types every time the do something dumb.
Mookie was on the record then and maintains to this day that he wanted to be in Boston for his entire career, but not for a $150M discount. That is perfectly reasonable to me. I still love Mookie and I’m very happy with how it’s worked out for him and how he’s been able to flourish and continue to exceed expectations in LA. Any retcon attempts that put his leaving town as predetermined should be treated as the bunk it is. If you’re still falling for Shaughnessey’s lines that’s your own fault.
I’ll second this. The “Mookie Wanted Out” narrative never had any evidence behind it, and I can’t fathom how anybody could claim that the return in that trade is looking better. It will remain one of the worst trades in decades.
I don’t think anyone outside of the “BOSTON HAS NEVER DONE ANYTHING WRONG” crowd thinks that the Red Sox ownership was ever serious about signing Mookie. They *might* have thought they’d get another shot in FA and were likely surprised by the Dodgers getting him to sign before that point, but the Red Sox have several years to sign Mookie for life and chose not to.
Ah, Shaughnessey, the curly haired boyfriend of Boston’s BS; thank you Jurassic Carl for that moniker (& breaking up Mussina’s perfecto.)
But, yeah… apathy; the attitude of ownership is self evident & people are allocating their own dollars in reflection of that.
Lots of other things to see & do in Boston & New England, including plenty of other baseball games.
They should probably look to absorb Bassitt or Gausman and their big contracts but let’s be real, that’s unlikely. The Blue Jays are a big market team too, it’s within the division, and the Red Sox have been weird about money. But it definitely makes the most sense from the perspective of winning now and later.
It seems really dumb to not go as all out to win as possible in the New England plus world market. Red Sox should be a global brand like Cowboys, Yankees, Warriors, etc. The brand can be worth a lot more than $100 per season or whatever they think they’re saving. Right now they’re worth less than the Commanders and Knicks.
As a fan of the sport, I think it’s really dumb to own a franchise and not try to win as many games as possible every season; this would require a change in ownership/Commissioner. But I don’t think it’s dumber for Boston to be more interested in profit than wins than it is for Colorado to choose the same approach; I find them equally unethical and economical.
So out of all the teams the RedSox have most to gain with a 2 game jump. .SP stands out as you mention as need. Chris Sale… Sox also seemingly need a 2b. Taillon and Morel from Cubs…. would an offset of Anthony and Raefaella be close? Sox have Mayer, Story for 2025+ . Morel controlled for a few years… it it a win now for BRS it seems close. Trading away too much for Red Sox?
Can you imagine the Red Sox with Chris Sale? Seriously, this team wouldn’t need to go shopping for a starter or even really want one. That was an unforced error.
Also, I don’t think Morel and Taillon have much trade value. Taillon’s trade value is probably negative, Morel’s is probably worth an FV40+ prospect.
what Cub pitcher outside Imagna and Steele would BRS desire from Cubs? Is maybe an Assad and Hoerner package better?
Hoerner would get some real offers, he can play SS and is under team control for a while. Both the Dodgers and Red Sox would get involved, maybe other teams too. I think there’s a real benefit in trading him to get more prospects, he’s a phenomenal defender at 2B but I’m not sure that’s necessary for them. The situation with the pitching is weird because the Red Sox POBO used to handle pitching stuff with the Cubs. There may be guys that he would be interested in, or maybe he thinks he’s already pushed them as far as they can go.
The relationship with Breslow to Cubs, that is one of the reasons I see a possibility.
No chance this Red Sox FO shells out for a long term starting MIF piece. Not with Story still on the books, David Hamilton playing well, and Yorke, Meidroth, and Grissom around. I honestly don’t think it’s worth the trouble either.
Javier Assad, now, is something that makes sense
I think it’s probably not a safe bet to rely on any of those four names to hit over the long term, although Hamilton is probably the closest to that. On top of that, Story can’t stay healthy, and Yorke is not going to be a middle infielder, and Grissom can neither hit nor field. If this were a small-market team, I could see your point about hoping something comes up. But this is not a small market team, and at some point you have to come up with functional replacements.
Mayer is probably the only guy you can count on, but he is a couple years away.
Imagna and Steele was a terrible song by Walter Egan
It sure was. Why is it on every other compilation album from its time? Like “Lady in Red.”
SS seems like their worst position, and Bo Bichette is the best one who could possibly be available.
Kevin Gausman could be available and Chris Bassitt is even more likely to be. Eovaldi is an old friend. Scherzer is old but might be OK. To me guys like Flaherty, Kikuchi, Crochet, and Luzardo aren’t worth the risk. I’m probably prejudiced against Fedde because I remember him from Washington.
Mayer shouldn’t be untouchable. Some combination of guys other than Anthony could be enough to get Bichette and Gausman. I can’t see Scherzer or Bassitt costing much.
Trevor Story is still on the books for 3 more years. At worst he his an all-star defender and Mayer is very possibly a valuable contributor. The last place the Red Sox should be looking is SS. As it stands now there are too many players for the available positions causing Hamilton, an absolute menace on the bases, to sit so Duran, who is simply sensational, Rafaela, O’Neill and Abreu can all be in the lineup. In today’s low average power game Valdez is playable. This team needs Tristan Casas more than Bo Bichette or any of the available pitchers. All that is on offer is a wild card spot and that is not worth the expenditure of any of the prospects.
Fedde is a completely different pitcher than he was in Washington.
The Red Sox, who play in a big market and have an entire region of the country who support them will probably add the most token of improvements and stay below some piddly luxury tax. All this for a franchise that’s worth $4.5 billion dollars…
This is all a symptom where the Red Sox are the most egregious – sitting on your hands and not earnestly trying to compete. Only competing “enough”
Trying:
Dodgers, Yankees, Astros, Phillies, Braves, Orioles, Padres
Hedging their bets:
Mets, Cubs, DBacks, Twins
“Darn it, whattaya know, we couldn’t get Judge or Ohtani, so I guess we stand PAT”:
Blue Jays, Giants
Small towns that could have done the Padre route but are still doing okay:
Cards, Royals, Tigers
Small towns that could spend more but will never let you forget they’re not New York:
Reds, Brewers, Pittsburgh
Only try to win 54% of your games:
M’s, Guardians
Spinning wheels and waiting for later:
Nats, White Sox, Angels (lol)
World Series hangover year, will spend more next year:
Los Rangers
Actively and crassly trying to cut payroll at every turn:
Rays, Marlins, A’s (deserve their own category straight out of a Hollywood plot)
The business plan of teams 70 years ago… the turnstiles are fine, so who cares?:
Rockies!
TL;DR only seven teams are putting their resources into winning
Part of the apathy for me is FSG-owned NESN. The NESN+ app is truly one of the worst ways to watch live sports. It buffers constantly, costs $30 / mo, and offers zero watchable programming outside of the teams you’re paying to see.
I’m sure people are angry about ownership and it’s clear disinterest in giving this team the resources to compete. That said, don’t underestimate the apathy stemming from the fact many of the cord-cutters in New England now get to choose between drastically overpaying for an inferior app, piracy, or not watching.
It’s a nice run, but given the past couple of off seasons and trade deadlines, I am keeping expectations low until the end of the year. I don’t want to be surprised or let down when Sox management does little to nothing to improve the team again. My apathy is my shield!
They’ll tease you with a playoff berth and heartbreaking loss. They’re cunning
Ah, 2021…
The thing about “making moves” is that teams are not just potentially giving up payroll efficiency but also The always coming never here Future. Winning a championship can be extremely inefficient and, frankly, is a very naive way of looking at sports. A GMident of baseball is looking for Value. Value is determined by stuff like years of control, age, prospect ranking (think of it like a social credit score), salary, options, and then maybe that stupid game stuff starts to matter.
Get a starter.
Then go get Trout. Eat all the money.
DH him as much as possible.
Let him mentor the kids.
I was really hoping to see a table similar to that prior to the deadline. Thanks!
Not that it affects the Red Sox, but I’d be curious what that tables looks like for WS% odds delta instead of just playoffs. Teams like the Orioles and Guardians are low on the playoff odds table because their spots are essentially secured, but their WS odds could be greatly affected because additional wins will boost their present ~50/50 odds to secure first round byes.
Recent history says that the playoffs are a relative crapshoot and that having a bye isn’t a huge advantage.
Doesn’t the playoffs being a crapshoot make the bye valuable? If that first round is a crapshoot or nearly 50/50 for each team advancing, guaranteeing you advance because of a bye should roughly double your WS odds.
For cheaper 2B targets, I am thinking Davis Schneider as a target off the Blue Jays. Should come fairly cheap as he seems more like a Quad-A guy or a play everywhere utility guy who’s just OK but better than Valdez. If you want to get a little more expensive, how about Jonathan India off of the Reds. He’s been up and down, and the Reds have too many infielders in their long-term plans.
There should be plenty of rental starters depending upon what you’re looking for and what you are willing to give up. Plenty of contract year players like Scherzer, Kikuchi, Flaherty, Eovaldi (wouldn’t that be fun1), other Rangers SP? (Gray, Lorenzen, Heaney).
Getting these 2 would probably get 1 to 1.5 wins.
If they add an infield piece, it should be a glove-first one. Schneider/India would only add to the glut of decent bat/bad field 2B/DH types they’ve accumulated
I’d agree, but there’s no one available like that unless the Rockies make McMahon available. If you blink, you might be able to pull Brendan Rodgers off of the Rockies or Thairo Estrada off the Giants (that would be really good, but Giants are still in it?).
Schneider is ok defensively with positional versatility and an ok bat. India has a more proven and better bat but the defense would suffer. Either would be an upgrade over what we’ve got for me (0.5 win?)