JABO: Which Team’s Rotation Overachieved Most in 2015?
Luck. We know it’s a large part of baseball. It’s also the foundation for the central questions we ask when trying to analyze the game: what was a certain player or team’s actual performance? How much control did they have over their production? Can they recreate it next year? We never stop debating these points. We create new statistics to try to answer them a little better than we did last season. And, despite there being certain influences we can’t measure when looking at individual and team production, we do have a few tools at our disposal to tell us who might have been underperformed, and who might have overperformed.
One of those tools is Fielding Independent Pitching, which strips away some of the influences a pitcher can’t control — namely what happens when a ball is put into play and the timing of events that unfold against them. With FIP, we can see who might have gotten unlucky with batted balls finding holes in the defense more often than expected, and conversely, who might’ve benefited from batted balls being hit straight at defenders. After a lot of groundbreaking research, it was found that pitchers don’t have a lot of control over what happens once the ball leaves their hand. Comparing FIP to actual performance — namely ERA — we can see the teams and players who might’ve gotten lucky and unlucky over the course of this past season.
Today, we’re going to look at which team’s starting rotations overachieved and underachieved, as judged by FIP. I’ve charted each starting rotation’s ERA and FIP in an interactive graph, sorted by the best ERA in 2015. If a rotation’s FIP (their expected average runs against) was lower than their ERA (their actual average runs against), they underachieved; if their ERA was lower than their FIP, they overachieved. One of the best things about FIP is that it can be used exactly like ERA, so understanding it is intuitive: treat it exactly like you would Earned Run Average. After we look at the chart, we’ll go through some individual examples, but this should give us a good primer on the subject. Again, feel free to mouse over the chart to see each team’s specific data:
Owen Watson writes for FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. Follow him on Twitter @ohwatson.
Mets rotation was as good as advertised. Going to be even better next year with a full season of Matz, Harvey and Syndergaard plus the addition of Wheeler in the middle of the year.
Eh, that’s what we Nats fans assumed about last year, even with Doug Fister’s lucky season: surely our true talent lay somewhere between our league-best FIP of 3.24 and league-best 3.04 ERA, and adding Scherzer would counter any regression. Fast-forward to 2015 with a 3.42 FIP and 3.70 ERA.
Meanwhile, the Cards went from 3.67 FIP/3.44 ERA to 3.47 FIP/2.99 ERA
The point being, one year of FIP does not make that your true talent level, and run prevention bounces around all over the goddamn place especially when you’re a middling defensive team like the Nats or the Mets.
Totally agreed. Assuming “as expected” or better outcomes for every starter with no injuries or bad luck seems ambitious.
Hope it’s not a rotation of 5 Shelby Millers
I’M FIPPING OUT!!!!!!!!
Just don’t go making a WAR out of it!!!!!
If you guys don’t stop you’re going to get slugged!
Mmmmm, is that woBACON that I’m smelling?
Isn’t there a little bit more to that ERA-FIP difference than just luck?
Absolutely. I attempted to explain some of those forces, and also explain how certain pitchers perennially post lower ERAs than FIPs. Obviously this falls, as many things in baseball do, along a spectrum of luck and talent that’s different for every individual.
I see now. Missed in the article, but this comment makes it clearer anyway. Thanks.
Great! Dave’s article in June about Chris Young, ‘Breaking FIP’, is a good read on the subject.
Certain teams regularly outperform their FIPs (though luck certainly plays a part in that as well). It seems like those who do are the ones who try to get their pitchers to nibble a bit more and pitch to contact.
So, as a clever pitcher or staff can affect luck (Cardinals),it’s opposite (Red Sox staff) cannot, and a staff like the Mets has the stuff to blunt luck. Works for me.
Still, maybe folks can stop saying “batted ball luck” so much. It’s probably sending the wrong message and makes it easier for the pundits to misrepresent us statheads.
I agree with you. That’s one of several contexts where I think that “unpredictability” is a much better word than “luck.”
I’m sure playing the game the right way and having the best fans in baseball helps.
I love the two balls. Pleasing to the eye. Well done Watson.
I’d love two balls. Guess one is better than nothing, right?
one doesn’t *have* to be the loneliest number…
Nice job, but you could have mentioned how Toronto’s rotation did without considering Dickey, since the knuckleball always results in a lower BABIP.
Nice read; another factor not mentioned:
The teams with higher and lower strand rates for their rotations may very well have better and worse bullpens/situational guys to be brought in to kill rallies. Anecdotally the sox not only had a porous defense but also an incendiary middle relief core that had a knack for turning 2-1 with 2 outs and men on into 2-6 mop up time.
This doesn’t mean what I think you intended it to mean:
“pitchers don’t have a lot of control over what happens once the ball leaves their hand.”
What I think you mean is:
“pitchers don’t have a lot of control over what happens once the ball leaves the bat.”
Another interesting thing to look at along these lines is how much of the gap between WAR and RA9-WAR was due to sequencing (LOB wins) versus BABIP (BIP wins): http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=0&type=6&season=2015&month=0&season1=2015&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=4,d
Good stuff. It’s also interesting to look at how pitchers do with bases empty vs. with runners on when looking at the sequencing/LOB wins. Like BABIP, a lot of the LOB% variation is random noise, but some pitchers just seem to do much worse with men on (Strasburg comes to mind).
So the Rockies’ league-worst 5.27 ERA was actually not as bad as their league-worst 4.87 FIP? That’s a relief!
Why couldn’t the Rockies have won my posting rights? 🙁
Does the FIP-ERA gap correlate to defensive WAR?