JAWS and the 2021 Hall of Fame Ballot: Omar Vizquel

The following article is part of Jay Jaffe’s ongoing look at the candidates on the BBWAA 2021 Hall of Fame ballot. Originally written for the 2018 election at SI.com, it has been updated to reflect recent voting results as well as additional research. For a detailed introduction to this year’s ballot and other candidates in the series, use the tool above; an introduction to JAWS can be found here. For a tentative schedule and a chance to fill out a Hall of Fame ballot for our crowdsourcing project, see here. All WAR figures refer to the Baseball-Reference version unless otherwise indicated.
a
In the eyes of many, Omar Vizquel was the successor to Ozzie Smith when it came to dazzling defense. Thanks to the increased prevalence of highlight footage on the internet and on cable shows such as ESPN’s SportsCenter and Baseball Tonight, the diminutive Venezuelan shortstop’s barehanded grabs, diving stops, and daily acrobatics were seen by far more viewers than Smith’s ever were. Vizquel made up for having a less-than-prototypically-strong arm with incredibly soft hands and a knack for advantageous positioning. Such was the perception of his prowess at the position that he took home 11 Gold Gloves, more than any shortstop this side of Smith, who won 13.

Vizquel’s offense was at least superficially akin to Smith’s: He was a singles-slapping switch-hitter in lineups full of bigger bats and, at his best, a capable table-setter who got on base often enough to score 80, 90, or even 100 runs in some seasons. His ability to move the runner over with a sacrifice bunt or a productive out delighted purists, and he could steal a base, too. While he lacked power, he dealt in volume, piling up more hits (2,877) than all but four players who spent the majority of their careers at shortstop and are now in the Hall of Fame: Derek Jeter (3,465), Honus Wagner (3,420), Cal Ripken (3,184), and Robin Yount (3,142). Vizquel is second only to Jeter using the strict as-shortstop splits, which we don’t have for Wagner (though we do know the Flying Dutchman spent 31% of his defensive innings at other positions). During his 11-year run in Cleveland (1994–2004), Vizquel helped the Indians to six playoff appearances and two pennants.

To some, that makes Vizquel an easy call for the Hall of Fame, and as his candidacy heads into its fourth year, he looks as though he’s on his way. In his 2018 ballot debut, he received 37.0% of the vote, a level of support that doesn’t indicate a fast track to Cooperstown but more often than not suggests eventual enshrinement. In the two cycles since, he’s climbed to 42.8% and then 52.6%, the last of those particularly significant; current candidates aside, every player who’s reached 50% except for Gil Hodges has eventually been elected, either by the writers or by a small committee.

These eyes aren’t so sure Vizquel’s election is merited. By WAR and JAWS, Vizquel’s case isn’t nearly as strong as it is on the traditional merits. His candidacy quickly became a point of friction between old-school and new-school thinkers and only promises to be more of the same, as though he were this generation’s Jack Morris. [Update: As if his case needed another polarizing factor, shortly after this article was published, it came to light that in October, Vizquel’s second wife, Blanca García, accused him of domestic violence via an Instagram live post. Further updates below.]

2020 BBWAA Candidate: Omar Vizquel
Player Career WAR Peak WAR JAWS
Omar Vizquel 45.6 26.8 36.2
Avg. HOF SS 67.5 43.1 55.3
H HR AVG/OBP/SLG OPS+
2,877 80 .272/.336/.352 82
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference

Born to an electrical company technician and a kindergarten teacher in Caracas, Venezuela on April 24, 1967, Vizquel grew up in the neighborhood of Santa Eduvigis. “We were considered middle class. But middle class in Venezuela is certainly not the same as middle class in America,” he wrote in his 2002 autobiography, Omar! My Life On and Off the Field, while noting that his family had only one black-and-white television until he was 11 or 12, when they got a color set.

Baseball was a constant in the young Vizquel’s life. He honed his quick reflexes and extraordinary hands by carrying around a rubber ball or tennis ball, which he would constantly bounce off of nearby objects and snare barehanded. Those skills were put to great use as he played on the rocky sandlots of his hometown, where preventing ground balls from hitting him in the face was a necessary survival tactic.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

When Vizquel cut his teeth on those sandlots, the presence of his countrymen in the major leagues had begun to ramp up significantly. The first Venezuela-born major leaguer was pitcher Alex Carrasquel, who spent 1939–45 with the Senators, with a brief cameo with the White Sox in ’49. The third was his nephew, Chico Carrasquel, who spent 1950–59 in the majors, including six years with the White Sox alongside Nellie Fox as one the era’s great double play combos. The younger Carrasquel became the first Venezuela-born All-Star in ’51 and made three more All-Star squads before being traded to the Indians for Larry Doby in October 1955. The White Sox replaced him with another Venezuelan, Luis Aparicio, who immediately validated the deal by winning AL Rookie of the Year and leading the league in stolen bases for the first of nine straight years. He won nine Gold Gloves and was eventually elected to the Hall of Fame. Through 1966, nine Venezuela-born players had reached the majors, but in ’67 alone, the year of Vizquel’s birth, five more did — the start of a steady stream that continues to this day.

The Mariners signed Vizquel in 1984, just short of his 17th birthday, for a mere $2,000 bonus and brought him to the U.S., where he lived with three other young Venezuelans. His parents had forced him to take a three-month crash course in English to prepare for his career, which began in Butte, Montana, with Seattle’s Pioneer League affiliate. He climbed the organizational ladder methodically: Low-A Bellingham in 1985, A-Level Wausau in ’86 (the year he began switch-hitting), A-Level Salinas in ’87, Double-A Vermont and Triple-A Calgary in ’88. Finally, he joined the Mariners on Opening Day 1989, filling in for incumbent Rey Quinones, who had sprained his ankle in spring training.

The 22-year-old Vizquel wasn’t an overnight success. He made a throwing error in his first game, added another error in his third, and was sent back to Calgary after going just 3-for-24. Quinones returned from the disabled list and reclaimed his job but was traded to the Pirates on April 21. Vizquel returned for the rest of the season, and while he was above-average defensively (+6 runs via Total Zone), he hit just .220/.273/.261 in 431 plate appearances for an anemic 50 OPS+, the majors’ worst mark for any hitter with at least 400 PA that year.

After Vizquel sprained the medial collateral ligament of his left knee the following spring, the team left him at Calgary through his rehab and into early July. He went 2-for-3 with a homer in his July 5 return, and while he hit just .247/.295/.298 (67 OPS+) in 285 PA, he was 13 runs above average afield en route to 1.5 WAR. His bat remained similarly sluggish in 1991, but in a lineup where Ken Griffey Jr., Edgar Martinez, and Jay Buhner were developing into forces to be reckoned with, the Mariners could afford to carry Vizquel. His defense (+14 runs) played a part in helping Seattle to its first above-.500 season at 83–79.

The team regressed to 64–98 the following year, even as Vizquel hit a relatively robust .294/.340/.352 (95 OPS+) en route to 3.5 WAR, but he couldn’t maintain that gain, backsliding to .255/.319/.298 (67 OPS+) in 1993. He did claim his first Gold Glove with career-best defense (+16 runs), no doubt bolstered by the notoriety he gained for sealing Chris Bosio’s April 22 no-hitter against the Red Sox when he barehanded a chopper behind the mound on the second-base side and beat batter Ernest Riles by two steps at first base.

In 1993, the Mariners drafted Alex Rodriguez with the No. 1 overall pick. Though they weren’t teammates yet, the contrast between the light-hitting 5-foot-9 Vizquel and the powerful 6-foot-3 Rodriguez couldn’t have been more striking. Big men had played shortstop before, but not until the 6-foot-4 Ripken came along in the early 1980s had one flourished as a two-way threat. With Rodriguez waiting in the wings, the Mariners traded Vizquel to the Indians for stopgap shortstop Felix Fermin and DH Reggie Jefferson in December 1993.

It was an astute move by Cleveland general manager John Hart. The Indians had cracked .500 just once in the previous 12 seasons, but Hart was assembling a powerhouse lineup featuring youngsters Manny Ramirez, Jim Thome, and Carlos Baerga, as well as prime Albert Belle and Kenny Lofton. Though he missed seven weeks early in the season due to a right knee sprain, Vizquel solidified the defense, and the lineup could more than support his limp bat. The team went 64–47 during the strike-shortened season and stormed to a league-best 100–44 the following year, winning their first pennant since 1954. Vizquel hit just .266/.333/.351 (71 OPS+) and snagged his third Gold Glove, though for what it’s worth, Total Zone valued his defense that year at just one run above average, part of a four-year stretch (’94–97) in which he was barely in the black. Still, he gained no small amount of attention for his fieldwork in the postseason, with Sports Illustrated’s Tim Kurkjian calling him “the Indians’ most fascinating player to watch” in a feature the following spring.

The Indians lost the 1995 World Series to the Braves, but Hart’s foresight in signing Ramirez, Thome, Baerga, Charles Nagy, and Sandy Alomar Jr. to long-term extensions — many of which bought out players’ arbitration years — enabled the small-market team to afford its top players, creating a core that would win six division titles and two pennants from 1995 to 2001. Vizquel, who was heading into his age-29 season, was among those extended, inking a five-year, $15.35 million deal n December 1995.

Working with hitting coach Charlie Manuel — a bona fide guru as well as the next Indians manager circa 2000 — Vizquel matured considerably as a hitter. From his debut through 1995, he batted .256/.315/.314 for a 72 OPS+ and a combined -106 batting runs (the offensive component of WAR). From ’96 through 2004, he hit a composite .286/.356/.385 for a 93 OPS+ and was just 29 runs below average at the plate, with four seasons either at zero or in the black. In 1999, he set across-the-board career bests with a .333/.397/.436 line, a 111 OPS+, 42 steals, and 6.0 WAR.

Vizquel collected Gold Gloves annually from 1996 through 2001 — the last three while paired with Roberto Alomar for one of the most visually arresting double play combos in recent memory — though the advanced metrics suggest his defense wasn’t so exceptional. Here it’s worth yet another reminder that single-season defensive data captures a fair bit of noise along with the signal, and it’s better to consider in the context of multiple seasons. By Total Zone, Vizquel’s defensive value ranged from +14 to -8 runs relative to average in this six-year span. His 16 runs above average for the period ranked just 15th in the majors, far behind Rey Sanchez (+89) and Rey Ordonez (+62), the top two at the position.

Despite repeatedly winning their division, the Indians couldn’t nab that elusive championship. They came agonizingly close in 1997, despite just an 86–75 record. After defeating the defending champion Yankees in the Division Series and the Orioles in the ALCS, they took a 2–1 lead into the ninth inning of Game 7 of the World Series against the Marlins. Alas, closer Jose Mesa surrendered the tying run in the bottom of the ninth on two singles and a sacrifice fly, and an error by second baseman Tony Fernandez on Craig Counsell’s grounder in the 11th inning led to the series-winning run.

The sting of that loss lingered and became part of the biggest controversy of Vizquel’s career. Though he had been close friends with Mesa to that point, Vizquel’s subsequent actions towards his teammate were anything but friendly. First he irritated Mesa by cartwheeling across home plate after homering off him during an intrasquad game in 1998. In exchange, after the pitcher was traded to the Giants in midseason and signed with the Mariners the following winter, he brushed his old pal back during a ’99 encounter. Things came to a head when, on the opening page of his autobiography, Vizquel wrote of Game 7:

“The eyes of the world were focused on every move we made. Unfortunately, Jose’s own eyes were vacant. Completely empty. Nobody home. You could almost see right through him. Not long after I looked into his vacant eyes, he blew the save and the Marlins tied the game.”

Understandably livid, Mesa, by that point a member of the Phillies, plunked Vizquel during a 2002 interleague game and was fined $500. In the spring of 2003, he told reporter Randy Miller, “I will not forgive him. Even my little boy (Jose Jr.) told me to get him. If I face him 10 more times, I’ll hit him 10 times. I want to kill him.”

Mesa hit Vizquel in their next encounter in 2006 and was suspended for four games, after which the pair squared off three more times without incident. They never did mend fences, yet the shortstop somehow remained puzzled even while saying in 2014, “It was kind of sad that I never got to tell him that I didn’t really mean anything bad about what I said in the book.”

While Vizquel generally got high marks for his comportment throughout his career, his ongoing feud with Mesa was a low point. Games 7 are inevitably filled with heroes and goats, but it takes some chutzpah to humiliate a teammate — and a close friend — on the opening page of a memoir. Yeesh.

In February 2001, Vizquel signed a two-year, $15 million extension with the Indians, one that raised his salary for that season from $3 million to $4.5 million and included a $5 million mutual option for 2005. His streak of Gold Gloves ended in ’02, but he set a career high with 14 homers and earned All-Star honors for the third time; the first two had come in 1998 and ’99, no small achievement with Rodriguez, Jeter, and Nomar Garciaparra in their collective heyday as “the trinity.” A pair of surgeries to repair the meniscus of his right knee — he tore it again while rehabbing — limited Vizquel to 64 games in 2003 and, after he failed a physical, prevented a trade of the 36-year-old shortstop back to the Mariners that winter.

At 37, Vizquel enjoyed a strong rebound with the Indians (.291/.353/.388, 99 OPS+) en route to 4.0 WAR, the second-highest total of his career. While the Indians declined their end of the mutual option, Vizquel parlayed that performance into a three-year, $12.25 million deal with the Giants. He won Gold Gloves in the first two of those years, albeit with Defensive Runs Saved totals of just +1 and +7, and WAR totals of 1.5 and 2.9 in full-time play. His bat fell off the table in 2007, his age-40 season (.246/.305/.316, 61 OPS+), and despite a career high +16 DRS, his total value was just 0.7 WAR.

While the Giants re-signed Vizquel, his performance slipped even further in 2008. That year began with a seven-week stint on the DL for surgery to repair the meniscus in his left knee, as well as a bone bruise, and he finished with career worsts in OPS+ (45 OPS+) and WAR (-0.5). One highlight: On May 25, 2008, he surpassed Aparicio for the most games played at shortstop with 2,584.

Graduating into a utility role that included ample time at second and third as well as short, Vizquel spent four more years in the majors with the Rangers (2009), White Sox (’10–11, while switching from No. 13 — which both he and Chicago manager Ozzie Guillen wore in tribute to Dave Concepcion — to Aparicio’s No. 11, un-retired with his blessing), and Blue Jays (’12), the last of those coming at age 45. He hit a combined .262/.312/.320 for a 70 OPS+ in 931 PA in those four years, and only in ’10 did he play regularly. In June 2012, he announced that he would retire at season’s end, and on Oct. 4 in Toronto, with former teammate Baerga and fellow Venezuelans Aparicio and Andres Galarraga on hand, he threw out the ceremonial first pitch and collected a single in the final at-bat of his 24-year career.

…

Vizquel’s longevity, which allowed him to play a record 2,709 games at shortstop (and 2,968 overall, 12th all-time), collect 2,877 hits (fifth at the position) and win 11 Gold Gloves (more than all but Smith), is perhaps the best point in his favor when it comes to the Hall of Fame. Beyond all of that, his resumé is a mixture of good and bad news. Vizquel helped his teams reach the playoffs six times and the World Series twice, though he was less productive at the plate there (.250/.327/.316 in 264 PA) than in the regular season. Thanks in large part to the presence of the shortstop trinity, he made just three All-Star teams, a comparatively low total for a modern Hall of Famer, and the entirety of his MVP consideration consisted of a 16th-place finish in 1999. Still, his Hall of Fame Monitor score of 120, while not indicating a slam dunk, is on the side of “more likely than not.”

Then there’s the defense. Vizquel’s flair afield produced countless highlight loops that received considerable attention thanks to the internet and cable TV, not to mention the routine exposure he got in the expanded postseason format from 1995 through 2001. Observers such as Kurkjian weren’t shy about letting the superlatives flow, and Vizquel was a fan favorite, albeit not enough of one to be voted to start a single All-Star Game. Having written more than once on the pros and cons of his case, I can attest that his defenders will come out of the woodwork to drop a good word on his behalf (along with a few unprintable ones on mine).

Baseball-Reference credits Vizquel as being 129 runs above average for his career defensively, via a combination of Total Zone (+80 runs through 2002) and Defensive Runs Saved (+49 from ’03 through ’12). Ultimate Zone Rating credits him as 48 runs above average as well for the latter period. The combined total doesn’t blow the doors off the shrine, but it’s a respectable 18th all-time among shortstops, better than 12 of the 20 Hall of Famers at the position, and within four runs of three more (Marty Marion, Bobby Wallace, and Rabbit Maranville).

Should it be better? Advanced fielding statistics aren’t easy to penetrate, but feel around the margins of the basic stats and you can see why the metrics don’t put Vizquel on the same level as Smith. Vizquel holds the edge in fielding percentage, .985 to .978, but both were 12 points higher than their respective leagues’ shortstops during the course of their careers. From there, the comparison becomes more lopsided in the Wizard’s favor.

While Vizquel is third all-time in assists for a shortstop (7,676), it’s largely a product of his longevity. He never led his league in the category, and while he ranked in the top five eight times, seven of those were either fourth or fifth. Smith, the all-time leader among shortstops with 8,375 assists — in 1,175 fewer innings, roughly 130 games — led his league eight times, and was second in four others. The story is similar concerning double plays: Vizquel, the all-time leader at 1,734, led his league once and was third three times; Smith, second all-time with 1,590 double plays, led his league five times and was second six times.

True, Smith played in an era with more balls in play and fewer strikeouts. According to B-Ref, during his time in the field, 83% of his pitching staff’s plate appearances ended with a ball in play; for Vizquel’s teams, the rate was 77%, leaving him fewer chances for him to make a play. Likewise, his staffs faced a smaller proportion of right-handed batters, those whose natural pull tendency would be to the left side of the infield: 58%, in line with the league average, where Smith’s teams faced 61% righties, two points above average.

Calculations such as those go into the Total Zone defensive metrics, and while it’s an oversimplification to say that the difference between Smith and Vizquel can be boiled down to range factor (putouts plus assists per nine innings) relative to their league averages, such a comparison gets the point across. The Wizard averaged 5.22 plays per nine, while the league’s shortstops averaged 4.78, a difference of 0.44 per nine. Vizquel averaged 4.62 per nine for his time at shortstop, while the league averaged 4.61 — a difference of just 0.01. Aparicio and Maranville, both enshrined for the perception that their glove work offset similarly light sticks, have larger gaps as well; the former was 0.16 above his leagues, the latter 0.28 above.

(For another interesting breakdown of Vizquel’s defense, see this thread from Chris Dial, the creator of the zone-based Runs Effectively Defended system, which is part of the Sabermetric Defensive Index that in non-pandemic seasons accounts for 25% of the Gold Glove voting. Long story short: That Gold Glove count, so central to Vizquel’s case, wouldn’t be so high had the SDI existed then.)

By the advanced stats, Smith has an edge of 110 runs over Vizquel on the defensive side, and that’s before considering offense. Vizquel’s .272/.336/.352 slash line closely resembles Smith’s .262/.337/.328, but Omar played in a much higher-scoring era than Ozzie, so his OPS+ is just 82 compared to Smith’s 87. Over the course of his 12,013 plate appearances, Vizquel was 244 runs below average with the bat, the 13th-lowest total among players who spent the majority of their careers at shortstop. That’s 16 runs worse than Maranville, the worst among current Hall of Fame shortstops, and 127 runs worse than Smith. What’s more, where Smith made up 80 runs on the bases (steals as well as advancement on hits and outs) and 23 more on avoiding double plays, Vizquel — who stole 404 bases, albeit with just a 70.8% success rate — was one run below average in the former and nine above in the latter. His net offense was -236 runs to Smith’s -14. In other words, despite their similar slash lines, the gap between the two players on the offensive side was twice as large as on the defensive side.

For all of his Gold Gloves and perceived defensive value, Vizquel’s offense was so deficient that he ranked in the top 10 in his league in WAR just once (eighth with 6.0 in 1999). Smith made his leagues’ top 10 six times, Maranville five times, and Aparicio twice. Vizquel’s career total of 45.3 WAR ranks 29th among shortstops, but is higher than just four of those enshrined, namely the the BBWAA-elected Maranville, the Veterans Committee-elected Travis Jackson (who ranked in the top 10 six times) and Phil Rizzuto (who ranked in the top 10 three times), and the Old Timers Committee-elected Hughie Jennings (who led the NL in WAR four times). Vizquel’s total is a hefty 21.9 WAR below the standard at the position. Within 2.0 WAR on either side are Jimmy Rollins, Miguel Tejada, Art Fletcher, Vern Stephens, Fernandez, Roger Peckinpaugh, Troy Tulowitzki, Garciaparra, and Jackson, the only Hall of Famer of the bunch, largely thanks to some Veterans Committee cronyism. Here it’s worth noting that while Vizquel was padding his career totals, with 405 hits (and 282 games at shortstop) from 2007 onward and a total of 0.6 WAR — one run above replacement level per year.

The news is even harsher when it comes to Vizquel’s peak score of 26.8, which ranks 61st all-time. Of the 18 players within two wins on either side, there are notable names, including Francisco Lindor (already at 28.4), Carlos Correa, Edgar Renteria, and Marion, but of the lot, the only one enshrined is Monte Ward, whose career is so bifurcated between pitching and shortstop that I exclude him from the JAWS set entirely. Thus Vizquel’s 36.2 JAWS ranks 41st, just ahead of popular Era Committee candidates such as Concepcion and Maury Wills but lower than all of the enshrined shortstops, with Maranville (42.9/30.4/36.7) bringing up the rear. Reigning glove whiz Andrelton Simmons, who just finished his age-30 season and has seven full seasons plus a 49-game rookie campaign and a 30-game 2020, has a 36.6/34.4/35.5 career/peak/JAWS and likely would have passed Vizquel in a more ordinary season.

The player whom Vizquel most closely resembles from a Hall of Fame case standpoint, Mark Belanger, is one spot ahead at 40.9/31.9/36.4. “The Blade” was utterly dreadful as a hitter (.228/.300/.280, 68 OPS+), with a net offense that was 191 runs below average, though he did have a trio of seasons with an OPS+ ranging from 95 to 100. An eight-time Gold Glove winner whose range factor exceeded the league average by 0.23 (5.16 vs. 4.93), he’s the all-time leader in fielding runs (+241, two more than Smith). Playing next to the best defensive third baseman of all time, Brooks Robinson, he started for six Orioles division winners and four pennant winners from 1969 through ’79 (his career spanned from ’65 through ’82). He received 3.7% of the vote in ’88 and hasn’t been considered since.

All of which is to say that Vizquel receiving an order of magnitude more support at the outset of his candidacy was rather surprising, as neither WAR nor JAWS can support his case. His advantage in greater exposure, particularly in an age of increased specialization, explains a lot, but it’s still maddening that a much better all-around player such as Scott Rolen (third in both Gold Gloves and fielding runs at third base, and 10th in JAWS), is far less supported at 35.3%, that after paltry voting shares of 10.2% and 17.2% in his first two cycles, respectively.

With 52.6% of the vote on the 2020 ballot, Vizquel appears to be in very good shape. Since 1966, eight other players received 48–58% of the vote in year three, with all but Hodges (exactly 50%) elected. The others needed an average of 4.5 years to gain entry, with Eddie Mathews (48.7% in 1976, elected two years later) the fastest and Don Drysdale (51.4% in ’77, elected seven years later) the slowest. All of those candidates hail from the era of 15-year eligibility windows, with the last of them (Andre Dawson) elected in 2010.

With the windows shortened to 10 years, things tend to move more quickly, but the full picture is still emerging. Of the nine players who reached the 50–58% range for the first time in the 2012–19 stretch and eventually had their eligibility windows shortened to 10 years, six were elected, needing an average of 2.8 years. The other three — Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Curt Schilling — have yet to gain entry; they’ll increase that average, but given the baggage they’re carrying, their cases are very different from Vizquel’s.

Update: As for the domestic violence allegation, on October 6, García — whom Vizquel married in July 2014 — held a live broadcast from her Instagram account during which she said the couple was in the midst of a divorce, accused him of domestic violence, and said in part that Vizquel “the man wants me to shut my mouth so as not to damage his career, so as not to damage his Hall of Fame.” Her broadcast was in Spanish, as is most of the reporting on the allegations.

Garcia showed documents from 2016 and ’17 pertaining to a charge of fourth-degree domestic violence assault filed on January 18, 2016, a PDF of which is here. At the time, Vizquel was on the coaching staff of the Tigers.

The state of Washington defines fourth-degree assault as “an attempted battery on another person that causes contact that a reasonable person would find offensive. To receive a fourth-degree assault charge for domestic violence, the other person must be one of your family or household members.” In the incident report, Garcia described Vizquel as pushing her to the ground, causing her to strike her left shin and break multiple fingernails. The court issued a no-contact order. On January 27, she wrote a letter to the prosecuting attorney, saying, “I do not believe I was assaulted,” and requesting that the charge and no-contact order be dropped so that the couple “can work through our problems.” the court ordered individual counseling for both parties; upon the completion of that in July 2017, the case was dismissed. It is unclear at this writing whether García has shared additional allegations.

Vizquel is not the only candidate on this year’s Hall of Fame ballot who has been accused of domestic violence. Barry Bonds, Andruw Jones, and Manny Ramirez have as well, and we have included acknowledgements of those cases in their profiles. While it does not necessarily follow that voters would or should directly connect their incidents to the “integrity, sportsmanship, [and] character” clause in the Hall of Fame’s voting instructions, such matters might complicate voters’ decisions on whether to support these candidates.

Voting history strongly suggests that Vizquel will be elected eventually, regardless of whether he has the imprimatur of WAR, JAWS, and any math more complicated than his career totals. As the ballot battle over Morris, who was nowhere close to the standards in WAR and JAWS, showed, the conversation surrounding his candidacy between the statheads and the eye-test crowd is likely to be a shrill and polarizing one, with emotions running high. To these eyes, Vizquel was a fine ballplayer, but one whose road should stop short of Cooperstown. Those who feel similarly had best take a deep breath, however, because the likelihood that he gets his plaque is increasing with every year.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
rodMember since 2017
5 years ago

Great writing as always, Jay. I was always on the fence regarding Vizquel, but after reading about his treatment of Mesa, which I was previously unaware of, I now firmly do not believe that he is deserving of a spot in the HOF.

TonyMember since 2017
5 years ago

I saw Omar play several hundred of his Cleveland games and I have a hard time not believing he was a great defender. I’m not one who curses the metrics, but I don’t think they are fairly evaluating his defense. I will admit that I’m not objective and there are problems with evaluating players by the “eye test. I’ve never read or heard anyone who saw him play in a regular basis say he wasn’t a great defender.

I’ll leave it for more qualified minds than mine to say whether he is HOF worthy or not. However I will state that Omar was a great defensive baseball player, and a hell of a lot of fun to watch play.

Scottdids
5 years ago
Reply to  Tony

Elite fielders create more outs than their peers at their position. For outfielders this is mostly by catching fly balls. For 2B, 3B and SS, its mostly by getting to ground balls and making outs.

All the other guys who we think of as legendary defenders (Mays, Ozzie, Brooks, Andruw, Beltre) consistently rank near the top of leaderboards in newer metrics as well as simple assists and putouts. So we can’t claim something is wrong with the metrics, as those guys are right where we thought they would be. But those same metrics don’t show Vizquel as elite.

He was consistently above average defensively, which certainly has value, especially since he did it into his 40s. But he has this legend of being a premier defender that simply isn’t backed up by anything other than our memories, which are simply wrong in this case. This is why we shouldn’t trust the eye test.

dodgerbleu
5 years ago
Reply to  Scottdids

That’s not what all advanced metrics say though.

BBRef is mentioned above but combines it with UZR to summarize him as the 16th highest rated SS of all time. For some reason it doesn’t mention that BBRef alone, without adding UZR, has him ranked 9th. Of all time. For ANY position. Nor does it mention that 6 of the 8 guys ahead of him are also SS, or that BBRef has 16 SS in their top 26 for all positions combined, so comparing him to other elite SS downplays the significance of being top 16. Even if he was a top 16 SS there instead of a top 8, he would still be in the top 26 defensive players of all time instead of top 10 players of all time.

BBRef has him ahead of Mays (#67), Beltre (#13) and Andruw (#22), below Ozzie (#1) and Brooks (#3)

I suspect top 16 with UZR combined still leaves him as a top 30 overall defensive player in history.

And as far as traditional stats, having the highest fielding percentage of any SS of all time, with the most total chances of all time, isn’t nothing. It is worth mentioning in an article like this. It speaks to him having the greatest hands of all time. Though we don’t value fielding percentage like we used to, that is still an absolutely incredible achievement. But for some reason it wasn’t even mentioned.

This article is clearly biased, and that’s ok, it’s his opinion and he’s earned the right. But we can’t say it isn’t missing important facts that would paint Vizquel more favorably.

Scottdids
5 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Except that this is all compiling stats, and he was never near the top of yearly leaderboards. All of those things that you just said back up the fact that Vizquel was an above average, but not elite, fielder.

When you combine above average fielding with below average hitting, you get a guy who was an average player, very consistently, for 2 decades. That has value, its just not HOF value.

dodgerbleu
5 years ago
Reply to  Scottdids

Huh?

None of the things I said lead to that conclusion. I said that BBRef has him as the 9th most valuable defender ever, at any position. That doesn’t happen by merely being above average.

I said that he has the highest fielding percentage of all time – that I mentioned his TC only makes that more impressive, more reliable, not less.

If you re-read my post it’s clear that according to BBRef, he was an absolutely elite, all time great fielder. I’m not even saying that’s my opinion. Point was that even though the article mentioned both BBRef stats and fielding percentage, it skewed the BBRef metrics and don’t actually include what BBRef metrics say, and that it oddly didn’t mention him having the best fielding percentage of any SS in history,

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

How many more innings did he have than all of those others? Correct me if I’m wrong, but you’re using a cumulative stat. Staying well above average into his late 30s and 40s is amazing, but it’s not HOF worthy.

I think a better idea of all time best fielders would be like a 10 year peak.

John
5 years ago
Reply to  Tony

I don’t think anyone would say that he wasn’t a great defender. It’s more that he wasn’t such a historically good defender that he warrants entry into the Hall of Fame despite essentially bad offensive performance.

marchandman34Member since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  John

Comment of the day, THIS 100%!

Captain Tenneal
5 years ago
Reply to  Tony

It is possible that he was an extremely talented fielder whose value was hurt by poor positioning. Just one way that both views (“great defender” and “not very valuable”) could be correct.

tomerafan
5 years ago

We often think of “compilers” of offensive statistics. Vizquel is a compiler on defense. He did one thing really well, but most of his case is based on longevity rather than impact. Is there anyone who would take Vizquel over Alan Trammell, who lasted 15 years on the Ballot but never came close with the writers? Vizquel’s vote totals remain incredibly surprising to me; superb defensively but far, far below average as a batter with leave-average performance only a couple of times in a 20+ year career. He was better than Belanger but no Ozzie Smith, and far behind guys like Rolen, Andruw Jones and even Kenny Lofton and Lou Whitaker in terms of overall impact.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

I mean, I’m a Cleveland fan and I’m stunned that he’s gotten this much support. No one, absolutely no one, thought he was a future HOFer player, when he was in Cleveland. You can see that in his lack of MVP votes and lack of All Star games. But you can also see it in his contacts. Look at all the great players that Cleveland has let walk in free agency or traded away. But Vizquel they were able to retain for 11 years because it was clear that he wasn’t valauble enough to warrant a huge contract.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

He was a compiler. By the same measure, you would think Moyer, or Buehrle would be in.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

Btw, Vizquel is actually quite a bit behind Belanger in dWAR and fangraphs’ defensive value rating and Vizquel played 900 more games. I’m not saying Belanger is more deserving since his bat eliminates him from consideration, but he was a far better defender than Vizquel.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I’d like to get Laurila on the line here. He has been really committed to Vizquel as a Hall of Famer. In the past, his logic is basically that Vizquel has a ton of total bases and good years with the glove, but given that he was usually below average with the bat I don’t really like that argument.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

For anyone who’s interested, this is the piece (or one of them) where Laurila endores Omar for the Hall. And while I hate to say something like this, I find it disappointing that a Fangraphs writer would post such a poorly thought out article. Just look at this paragraph:

“Vizquel has 3,727 total bases. That is more than the career totals of Edgar Martinez (3,718), Andruw Jones (3,690), Lou Whitaker (3,651), Mark McGwire (3,639) and Scott Rolen (3,628).”

I mean that’s interesting. But so far only one of those players is in the Hall. And I’m pretty sure that no one ever said “I’m going to vote for Edgar because of how many total bases he has”. So ultimately, the fact that Omar has slightly more extra base hits than Edgar (in a LOT more PAs) is completely irrevelant.

Ovearll, it’s such a poorly argued article and not something that I really expect from Fangraphs

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/sunday-notes-omar-vizquel-tips-the-scales-of-justice/

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Tell David to now calculate career outs made.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

I tend to agree with your assessment of that article. There’s a major fallacy going on here, which is that because every other player with 12000 PAs is either a Hall of Famer or would have been if not for steroids, then he should too. The problem is that it confuses the outcome with the process. The reason why all those other guys had 12000 PAs is because they were really, really good and so them getting worse meant they were declining from a higher peak. He’s a latter day incarnation of Rabbit Maranville.

It’s also really funny to re-read the comments on that because that’s where I put together that Omar Vizquel was the Bizarro World Version of Harold Baines, and now Baines is in the hall, and everyone agrees that Baines is one of the silliest inductions ever.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I was laughing over all the Baines references, beginning with one by David himself:

“Vizquel ranks 43rd all-time with 2,877 hits. Nine of the 10 players directly below him on that list — Brooks Robinson among them — are in the Hall of Fame. The one who is not is Harold Baines. “

Adam C
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Laurila used totals bases? Seriously? Ummm…Pete Rose is 9th all time in total bases, has just 41 fewer total bases than Babe Ruth. Rose has more total bases than Eddie Murray, Frank Robinson, Ken Griffey, Jr, Tris Speaker, Lou Gehrig, Mel Ott, and Jimmie Foxx.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago

In baseball reference’s d WAR rankings, he’s 9th and the only guy ahead of him who isn’t in the hall is Mark Belanger, who was a far better defender but an awful hitter. That’s about as close as you can get to a hall of fame argument for him, because even with his lengthy career, Vizquel is 34th among shortstops in fangraphs’ defensive value ranking. And when you look further down the dWAR list, you see guys like Bill Dahlen and Art Fletcher who were much better defenders on a per game basis and were every bit as good of a hitter, yet aren’t in the hall. And if you think Vizquel deserves your vote, then Andrelton Simmons is a first ballot guy because he’s going to fly by all of Vizquel’s numbers. Even guys like Marty Marion and Roger Peckinpaugh have a better case than Vizquel because their defensive numbers are better on a per-season basis yet they also matched his offensive ability. So, even if there was a “defensive hall of fame”, he probably wouldn’t make it. Even if you were to argue that he was the best defensive shortstop of his era its a hard sell (Rey Sanchez, among others, probably has a better case).

And that’s before you get to his offense. He wasn’t a terrible hitter like Belanger so that doesn’t disqualify him from consideration, but when you account for era and baserunning, he isn’t as good as Aparicio and Maranville, the guys that his proponents like to compare him to. All three of them had an OPS+ of 82, yet Aparicio stole 100 more bases in less time and also got caught less. Maranville is less sure of a case since his caught stealing numbers weren’t kept during his entire career. He’s the only guy on the short list of comparables who has less overall bWAR than Vizquel too. However, if you look at fWAR, Maranville has the same total yet had 800 fewer at bats. Maranville also had 8 all star appearances to Vizquel’s 3. Not to mention Maranville’s 5 top 10 MVP finishes, including a 2nd and a 3rd. Vizquel got MVP votes just once, finishing 16th in 1999. In other words, the comparison between Maranville and Vizquel’s bWAR is literally the only thread of an argument that Vizquel is better than a current hall of famer in any way. Its a pretty poor argument to make.

He’s obviously a heck of a nice guy to have curried so much favor during and after his career. But, if he gets elected, he bumps Jim Rice as the most ridiculous writer vote of the modern era. He might even bump Harold Baines as the most ridiculous entry of the modern era (Baines had just four less WAR in three fewer seasons).

Stoic Stathead
5 years ago

Vizquel (52.6%) and Rolen (35.3%) are both in their 4th year of eligibility and their voting results make no sense given their playing careers.

Rolen was a substantially better hitter (~40% better or so).

Rolen has him beat in career WAR, 70 to 43. That’s even with Vizquel playing ~1,000 more games.

There is no way Vizquel’s defense is being undervalued so much as to close that overall gap.

Rolen is being severely underrated while Vizquel overrated by the voters.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Stoic Stathead

Especially when you consider that Rolen was the better defender.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  stan

Rolen wasn’t a better defender, why do you keep repeating that?

Vizquel: 29.5 baseball reference dWAR, 262 fangraphs runs
Rolen: 21.1 baseball reference dWAR, 180 fangraphs runs

Vizquel had 40% more playing time (24,500 innings vs Rolen’s 17,400), and 40% more dWAR and 45% more fangraphs runs.

Rolen isn’t better by any metric. Not rate stats or counting stats.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Pretty close to even by the numbers, isn’t it? And I think Rolen might be better on a per-season basis.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  Alby

They’re close and if anything it leans in favor of Vizquel. Nothing points to Rolen being better.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Now compare them to the averages at their positions.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  Alby

You don’t need to. That’s what positional adjustments are for. The best defensive 1st basemen isn’t more valuable than the 2nd best defensive shortstop just because he’s relatively better at his position.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

For someone who, at best, can only show that Vizquel is Rosen’s equal in a single statistic, you’re unbelievably confident. As I noted above, your hero is on page two all time on fangraphs’ defensive list for shortstops. His various stats back that up. Rolen is ninth overall.

iancal
5 years ago

To me he’s the epitome of Ozzie Smith ‘lite.’ I don’t know if that’s enough. It’s not like he’s Honus Wagner lite. Ozzie did one thing better than anyone, another really well,(SB) and was average elsewhere. Does Tony Gwynn ‘lite’ get into the HOF? (And I’m not really sure who exactly that is btw) Omar just seems like a guy who really has to make it on his intangibles and I’m not sure there’s enough there. Then again, I wouldn’t cry if he got elected…

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  iancal

Tony Gwynn lite would be Ichiro’s bat. But Ichiro was a terrific baserunner and defender, which makes him a HOF player. Without that he wouldn’t get in.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

I think you’re wrong. Getting to 3,000 hits while not debuting in North America until age 27 would probably get it done even if he were average defensively.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Early career Gwynn was an excellent baserunner as well. It is hard to picture speed being his carrying tool, but he was certainly a ++ runner (70-80 grade, true story) early in his career.

rocktomatoMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

if base running skills, speed and defense were base justifications , Kenny Lofton would be HOF.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  rocktomato

That’s another odd aspect of Vizquel’s candidacy. Lofton was a contemporary of Vizquel’s and was a far better player statistically who also got far more acclaim at the time, yet Lofton fell off the ballot in his first try. I don’t see how anyone who watched the two play on the same field could conclude that Vizquel was more deserving of the hall of fame.

whynotqat
5 years ago

I’ve always assumed the older players on early 00’s Giants teams all used steroids, and certainly group Vizquel in that category. If other people took this possibility seriously, there’s no way Vizquel would be getting any Hall of Fame love. True, there’s no smoking gun like Palmeiro or Sosa, but the suspicion should be there. It’s not a huge part of the WAR part of his campaign, which is lacking anyways, but makes a big difference when it comes to compiling stats. Surprised to see no one else mention this.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  whynotqat

Why should suspicion be there? Because you suspect Giants players of acting as one?

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  whynotqat

See, I see it somewhat as the opposite. One of the arguments that I´ve seen put forth in favor of Omar is that “he was clean and played the game the right way”. The assumption that he was clean seems to be based on the fact that he wasn’t a power hitter. But lots of non-power hitters have been caught taking steroids. So I think we should be agnostic as to whether or not Omar was a steroid user or not. There’s no evidence that he took steroids but the fact that he wasn’t a power hitter isn’t evidence that he was clean.

Adam C
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

“But lots of non-power hitters have been caught taking steroids. ”

Case in point on those early 2000’s Giants team: Marvin Bernard, 5’10”, 180 lb.

3cardmontyMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  whynotqat

Omar was almost definitely on PEDs, he has the same body type as known juicer Dee Gordon.

(I don’t actually believe this or even care much, I just think it’s a hilarious argument to make after seeing it made against Bagwell, Piazza, etc)

The Duke
5 years ago

It’s a simple case really. 2877 hits and 11 gold gloves. If that was all you knew, he’d be in.

It might not be a case that 75% of the writers can get comfortable with, but it’s how vet committees will decide it. He’s got a chance especially with other good defensive players on the ballot like Rolen and Jones

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Over 23 seasons, it’s just not as impressive. Longevity is a hell of a thing but it sure distorts the impact of the counting stats. And Gold Gloves tend to be a magnet award; winning a couple increases the odds of winning many.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

23 seasons is impressive. Longevity is a hell of a thing as you said. Availability is one of the most important skills in sports.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

It’s a simple case for simpletons, which many of the writers clearly are.

joelbarlow
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

The 220 hits he added as a bench player over his final four years really seem to wrongly be a major part of his case. Playing 70 games a season, posting a 70+ OPS and likely posting average defense (which is highly correlated to youth and athleticism)… blah

Total empty filler.

Put him in the Hall in a Blue Jays hat then

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago

I’m definitely preparing for a Vizquel induction, not this year, but sometime in the future. The vote totals just continue to trend in the right direction for him. I can’t say that it makes much sense though.

fjtorres
5 years ago

Agreed on both counts.
The debate over his performance is moot.

He will hardly be the first player to get in on reputation rather than performance.
Ultimately, the voters are media, and the media’s job is to focus on the notable.
And Vizquel was notable, for his flashy style.

Ultimately the place is called the Hall of Fame, not Hall of Performance.
Rice is in, so is Baines. So are Rizzuto, Haines, Ferrel, and Lyons.
Arguing over them or Sutter or Santo or whoever won’t change the votes.
The plaques are there and they’re not coming out.

And Vizquel is very likely getting in.
Probably sooner than Schilling.
It can be fun to run the numbers and ponder his pace in the panteon of performance but it won’t change the numbers. And too many of the voters will sooner vote for Vizquel the flashy than the “PED-tainted”. Performance or not.

It may not be fair but life isn’t.

tomerafan
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Several of the cases you mentioned were Committee votes rather than traditional votes. That’s what makes Vizquel’s vote totals so surprising to me. He seems like the classic 5-10% of the traditional vote kind of guy who the Committees ultimately take up in a small number and vote in.

I mean, Omar Vizquel getting multiples of the vote that Lou Whitaker ever got makes zero sense to me.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

The Whitaker case right there–and Grich and how long Edgar took to get in, etc–show the disconnect between performance and voters priorities. Some vote on performance but too many still vote on reputation. “Jim Rice was the most feared hitter!” “Morris biggest winner of the decade”.
It is currently *less* than it used to be but the voting still isn’t solely by performance. All those ESPN glovework highlights matter to voters. And voters’memories.
It is something of a race between Vizquel and voter turnover.
And push comes to shove there’s the committee voters.
The high vote totals in the media votes will count if it comes to the committee.
It might be a squeaker but the odds are in his favor.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I agree with your comment except for the last line. I think the % of hard no’s is likely above 25% already. And will only grow with every year as voters “age out” and newer voters are added. My guess is that he peaks around 60-65%.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Agree. I think he gets close but doesn’t make it.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Thanks for the Bobby Grich mention. If any of the Vizquel voters want to vote for an elite defender who could handle the bat as well, Grich is the guy (though I realize he’s not on the ballot anymore). He’s 8th all time in WAR as a second baseman (and Carew is one of the guys ahead of him). Grich has 69 WAR in 2000 games. Vizquel, who is 34th on the WAR list for shortstops, has 42 WAR in 2900 games. How in the world can they leave Bobby Grich out and put Vizquel in? Grich was also overlooked for awards because he was primarily a great defender, but he still had 6 all star appearances to Vizquel’s 3 and got MVP votes 5 times to Vizquel’s 1.

bigchuck
5 years ago

I suggest we keep in mind that Omar was “accused” of the spousal issue – not convicted. Accusations do not mean guilt. There have repeatedly been cases where the charges have been dismissed. At one time the man was automatically guilty when these accusations appeared. I am glad these times are over. Let’s judge Omar – and all other players – on baseball skills, not on social rumors and vitriol.

JballinMember since 2018
5 years ago

In the Fall 2019 Baseball Research Journal, Campbell Gibson makes an interesting (at least to this uneducated mind) case for using Wins Above Average to evaluate players’ careers. According to Baseball Reference, Vizquel clocks in at 5.3 WAA for his 24 year career. I dunno – that seems awfully close to average for a guy (maybe) about to be enshrined in Cooperstown. For comparison, Ozzie racked up 42.1 WAA.

The Duke
5 years ago
Reply to  Jballin

Being average for a long time is a Hall of Fame skill in his case Not many have done it. You usually get run out of town long before you rack up 3000 hits.

Nick markakis is another good example. Covid is going to derail his run to 3000 but if Nick can find a home on a team like the Pirates for four more years he might be the next one in this discussion

JballinMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Certainly no shame in being an average major leaguer. Several years ago a writer with an HOF vote (I can’t remember who) was talking about Johnny Damon. For a while it looked like Damon might get to 3000 hits. This writer was relieved that he didn’t. The writer said if Damon had reached 3000, he would have felt obligated to vote for him, even though he really didn’t believe Damon belonged in the Hall.

The Duke
5 years ago
Reply to  Jballin

Damon, Pinson and Oliver all sit in the 2700 hit range. Assuming vizquel gets in, it looks more and more like 2800 is the line that merits automatic induction.

Gilvin
5 years ago

Wonderful article, just one thing, as a Caracas native I would not consider Santa Eduvigis as a poor neighborhood, it was mostly middle class… then again venezuelan middle class is probably poor
But to be honest I recall the image of Vizquel for venezuelans was mostly as the “rich boy” when compared to other players

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  Gilvin

His lifestyle and hobbies were signs of an upscale upbringing.
(That might explain his unending feud with Mesa, too. Classism.)

As for Venezuela’s economics, they were solid when he was growing up; Venezuela was a prosperous country from the 50’s through the 90’s; the disaster came after he was an adult and settled in the US.

Gilvin
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Indeed, my point was that maybe the image of “poor neighborhood” comes from an impossible to avoid current state of things. I don’t think hi issues with Mesa were calssism, to be fair if he had that problem he would had issues with 90% of fellow latin players, sometimes people just don’t like each others

fordfestival
5 years ago

There’s an Ernie Riles reference in this article! When he came up his first name was spelled “Earnest,” and to Brewers’ fans of a certain age he’ll always be known as “Ear Nest Riles.”

comment image

BreadbakerMember since 2022
5 years ago

Two semi-irrelevant points:

First, what’s the deal with shortstops named “Rey”? Three are mentioned in the article.

Second, it amazed me at the time and still amazes me that Vizquel was traded to the Indians for Felix Fermin and Reggie Jefferson. Yes, the Mariners had A-Rod coming up, but you’re trading the reigning Gold Glove recipient at shortstop for basically nothing (Jefferson hit 9 home runs as a Mariner; Fermin was replaced by Luis Sojo) and the combined salaries were pretty close, even in 1994 money. How do you not get more for a Gold Glove shortstop?

epitaz
5 years ago

He should be in. over 2800 hits, over 400 steals, over 1400 runs. .272 career avg. ( which is really good considering his career length ) and 11 gold gloves including 9 in a row. He was the shortstops shortstop. There was even an episode of TWIB ( this week in baseball ) that was the shortstop episode and they had about a handful in studio and each one said Omar was the best defensive shortstop in the game (aired in the early 00’s with a animated version of Mel Allen ).

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago

his FWAr is simply not good enough. If he got to 50 then he is borderline based on the great defense, but that bats was just bad most of his career.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
5 years ago

Hard pass. He benefitted a lot from playing when the SS mentality was still glove first and slap the ball around/bunt the runner over.

Even if you believe in the glove being all time (not a super convincing argument imo), he’s, as the article stated, basically Andrelton Simmons without an offensive breakout. Or maybe even more like a whole career of Tigers era Jose Iglesias. Putting him in context of the era he played in doesn’t help much either.

Filtering SS by WAR from 1990-2012, he’s in the Edgar Renteria to twilight Cal Ripken space despite playing in almost 1000 more games.

Vizquel is a defensive specialist who got to play a long ass time because GMs didn’t know any better.