JAWS and the 2021 Hall of Fame Ballot: Scott Rolen

The following article is part of Jay Jaffe’s ongoing look at the candidates on the BBWAA 2021 Hall of Fame ballot. Originally written for the 2018 election at SI.com, it has been updated to reflect recent voting results as well as additional research. For a detailed introduction to this year’s ballot, and other candidates in the series, use the tool above; an introduction to JAWS can be found here. For a tentative schedule and a chance to fill out a Hall of Fame ballot for our crowdsourcing project, see here. All WAR figures refer to the Baseball-Reference version unless otherwise indicated.

“A hard-charging third baseman” who “could have played shortstop with more range than Cal Ripken.” “A no-nonsense star.” “The perfect baseball player.” Scott Rolen did not lack for praise, particularly in the pages of Sports Illustrated at the height of his career. A masterful, athletic defender with the physical dimensions of a tight end (listed at 6-foot-4, 245 pounds), Rolen played with an all-out intensity, sacrificing his body in the name of stopping balls from getting through the left side of the infield. Many viewed him as the position’s best for his time, and he more than held his own with the bat as well, routinely accompanying his 25 to 30 homers a year with strong on-base percentages.

There was much to love about Rolen’s game, but particularly in Philadelphia, the city where he began his major league career and the one with a reputation for fraternal fondness, he found no shortage of critics — even in the Phillies organization. Despite winning 1997 NL Rookie of the Year honors and emerging as a foundation-type player, Rolen was blasted publicly by manager Larry Bowa and special assistant to the general manager Dallas Green. While ownership pinched pennies and waited for a new ballpark, fans booed and vilified him. Eventually, Rolen couldn’t wait to skip town, even when offered a deal that could have been worth as much as $140 million. Traded in mid-2002 to the Cardinals, he referred to St. Louis as “baseball heaven,” which only further enraged the Philly faithful.

In St. Louis, Rolen provided the missing piece of the puzzle, helping a team that hadn’t been to the World Series since 1987 make two trips in three years (2004 and ’06), with a championship in the latter year. A private, introverted person who shunned endorsement deals, he didn’t have to shoulder the burden of being a franchise savior, but as the toll of his max-effort play caught up to him in the form of chronic shoulder and back woes, he clashed with manager Tony La Russa and again found himself looking for the exit. After a brief detour to Toronto, he landed in Cincinnati, where again he provided the missing piece, helping the Reds return to the postseason for the first time in 15 years.

Though he played in the majors for 17 seasons (1996-2012), Rolen retired at age 37 and didn’t accumulate the major milestones that would bolster his Hall of Fame case. The combination of his solid offense and his defensive prowess — validated both by the eye test and the metrics — places his WAR and JAWS among the top 10 third basemen in history, but in his 2018 ballot debut, voters gave him a paltry 10.2%. While several conceded that they would have included him if space had permitted, his share only grew to 17.2% in 2019, but last year it more than doubled, to 35.3%; his 18.1% gain was the second-largest of the cycle, behind only that of Larry Walker — a candidate who similarly benefited from strong defensive metrics that underscore his tremendous value despite counting stats that may not be eye-catching. Voters are finally taking Rolen more seriously, and with the ballot traffic significantly thinned out, he should benefit from a lack of competition for those 10 precious slots.

2020 BBWAA Candidate: Scott Rolen
Player Career WAR Peak WAR JAWS
Scott Rolen 70.1 43.6 56.9
Avg. HOF 3B 68.4 43.1 55.7
H HR AVG/OBP/SLG OPS+
2,077 316 .281/.364/.490 122
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference

Born in Evansville, Indiana in 1975 to a pair of schoolteachers, Rolen grew up in Jasper, a town of 10,000 roughly an hour away, and excelled at both basketball and baseball. On the court, he was a 6-foot-4 point guard versatile enough to play shooting guard or forward as well. In 1993, he made the Indiana All-Star team and was the Tri-State co-player of the Year, among other honors. Heavily recruited by colleges, he was offered hoops scholarships by UCLA, Oklahoma State, Alabama, and Georgia. He played all around the diamond and even pitched in relief before moving to third base full time. During his senior year, he was voted Indiana Mr. Baseball, as the top high school player in the state (he was runner-up in Mr. Basketball).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Though Rolen committed to Georgia for a basketball scholarship, he reconsidered when the Phillies chose him in the second round of the 1993 draft and offered a $250,000 signing bonus. After 25 games in rookie ball, he hit .294/.363/.462 with 14 homers as a 19-year-old in the A-level South Atlantic League in 1994, a performance that placed him at number 91 on Baseball America’s Top 100 Prospects list the following spring. He climbed to 27th in 1996 despite being limited to 86 games due to a broken hamate, and after a combined .324/.416/.515 showing in Double- and Triple-A, he was recalled on August 1 by the Phillies, who were in the midst of a 67-95 season. He went 1-for-4 with a double off the Cardinals’ Donovan Osborne in his debut. With incumbent third baseman Todd Zeile traded later that month, the 21-year-old Rolen hit .254/.322/.400 with four homers in 146 PA down the stretch, but his season ended on September 7, when a pitch by the Cubs’ Steve Trachsel fractured his right ulna.

The injury carried a silver lining, in that Rolen’s 130 at-bats left him barely eligible to be considered a rookie for 1997. He got his money’s worth out of the designation, climbing to 13th on the BA list and hitting .283/.377/.469 with 21 homers, 16 steals, and 4.5 WAR. He was unanimously voted NL Rookie of the Year, beating out the likes of Vladimir Guerrero and Andruw Jones. The Phillies, however, went just 68-94 under first-year manager Terry Francona, their fourth straight losing season since their 1993 NL pennant.

After signing a four-year, $10 million extension in the spring of 1998, Rolen broke out, bashing 31 homers, driving in 110 runs, and stealing 14 bases while hitting .290/.391/.532 for a 139 OPS+. Stellar defense (+12 runs according to Total Zone) earned him the first of his eight Gold Gloves; his 6.7 WAR ranked eighth in the NL. The Phillies climbed to 75 wins, and then 77 in 1999, before falling back to 65 in 2000. While Rolen hit a combined .284/.369/.539 for a 124 OPS+ and 9.2 WAR in those last two years, he missed 84 games due to a lower back strain (which ended his 1999 season on August 25) and a left ankle sprain. The team’s regression cost Francona his job.

Avoiding the disabled list for the first time in three years, Rolen put together another typical Scott Rolen season (.284/.375/.511, 25 HR, 107 RBI, 5.5 WAR) in 2001, but under the hood, things were far from normal. The Phillies tried to hash out another extension during spring training, but talks broke off due to Rolen’s concerns about the team’s payroll, which had ranked 20th in 2000; despite their large market, the Phillies received significant help from revenue sharing. Under Bowa, the team improved to 86-76, but the new manager did his part to alienate Rolen. In June, Bowa called him out after a series loss to the Red Sox, saying, “If the No. 4 guy [Rolen, the cleanup hitter] makes contact in either Boston loss, we sweep the series. He’s killing us.” Rolen was incensed. In August, Green said during a radio interview, “Scotty is satisfied with being a so-so player. He’s not a great player. In his mind, he probably thinks he’s doing OK, but the fans in Philadelphia know otherwise. I think he can be greater, but his personality won’t let him.”

“I don’t feel as welcome in this organization as I have in the past,” said Rolen in response. In November, he rejected a seven-year, $90 million extension, with options and incentives that would have elevated the total package to 10 years and $140 million. In December, Orioles owner Peter Angelos scuttled a tentative nine-player deal to the Phillies upon learning the potential cost of an extension.

When Rolen came to spring training, he elaborated on his discontent even while saying that he might have been “an idiot” for passing up such a lucrative deal. He told ESPN’s Jayson Stark, “Fans deserve a better commitment than this ownership is giving them. I’m tired of empty promises. I’m tired of waiting for a new stadium (not due until 2004), for the sun to shine.” A livid Bowa was caught on camera profanely telling general manager Ed Wade that Rolen should be traded; the footage never aired, but was leaked and became sports talk radio fodder. Still a Phil, Rolen was elected to start the All-Star Game even as he was being booed and portrayed as a clubhouse cancer, though a conciliatory Bowa called him “the best third baseman in the NL,” adding, “He’s earned that free-agency right. That’s the process, and he has earned it.”

Finally, on July 29, the Phillies traded Rolen, a Triple-A reliever, and cash to the Cardinals for third baseman Placido Polanco, starter Bud Smith, and reliever Mike Timlin. “I felt as if I’d died and gone to heaven,” Rolen — who grew up attending games in both St. Louis and Cincinnati — told ESPN’s Peter Gammons. His numbers improved after the trade (from a 123 OPS+ with 17 homers in 100 games to a 139 OPS+ with 14 homers in 55 games), and he finished with 6.4 WAR. Before doing that, he signed an eight-year, $90 million extension for 2003-10.

Rolen’s post-trade performance helped the Cardinals win 97 games and run away with the NL Central. In his postseason debut, his two-run homer off the Diamondbacks’ Randy Johnson in the Division Series opener proved decisive. Unfortunately, in a collision with pinch-runner Alex Cintron in Game 2, he suffered sprains in four regions of his shoulder and collarbone “including a severe hyperextension of the three ligaments supporting his clavicle.” The injury ended his season; the Cardinals advanced to the NLCS but lost to the Giants.

Luckily, the injury didn’t carry over to 2003. Rolen played 154 games, his highest total since 1998, made his second All-Star team and hit .286/.382/.528 with 28 homers, 13 steals, and a 138 OPS+. While the advanced metrics gave mixed reviews on his defense (-4 Defensive Runs Saved but +7.7 Ultimate Zone Rating), he won his fourth Gold Glove. The Cardinals missed the playoffs, but rebounded to win 105 games and the NL pennant in 2004. Rolen set career highs across the board (.314/.409/.598, 34 HR, 124 RBI, 158 OPS+, 30 DRS, 9.2 WAR), with the last of those surpassing hot-hitting teammates Albert Pujols and Jim Edmonds. He won another Gold Glove but finished fourth in the NL MVP voting, sandwiched between the aforementioned teammates as Bonds won.

In a July 12, 2004 article in Sports Illustrated, Tom Verducci described Rolen’s appeal:

When he’s not flipping middle infielders like flapjacks, Rolen, 29, is playing the best third base of his generation, piling up more RBIs than Mike Schmidt did at the same age and carrying himself with such humility that even his teammates have to strain to hear him when he does speak. “Rolen’s the perfect baseball player,” Milwaukee Brewers manager Ned Yost says. “It’s his tenacity, his preparation, the way he plays. He tries to do everything fundamentally sound. And he puts the team first — there’s no fanfare with him.”

In an uneven October, Rolen went hitless in both the Division Series against the Dodgers and the World Series sweep by the Red Sox, but bashed three homers and went 9-for-29 in the NLCS against the Astros, with a pair of homers in their come-from-behind Game 2 victory and a two-run blast off Roger Clemens that put the Cardinals ahead to stay in Game 7.

While the Cardinals won 100 games and reached the NLCS in 2005, Rolen was limited to 56 games due to surgery to repair a torn left labrum, suffered in a collision with the Dodgers’ Hee-Seop Choi on May 10; after missing 34 games, he returned and attempted to play, but five weeks of hitting .207 without a homer made clear that he needed to go under the knife. Back to form in 2006 (22 homers, 126 OPS+, 5.9 WAR, the last sixth in the league), he made his fifth All-Star team and won his seventh Gold Glove.

The Cardinals weren’t nearly the powerhouse of 2004-05, barely winning the division with an 83-78 record, but they went on a roll in October. Rolen, however, was hampered by left shoulder fatigue and was benched twice by La Russa, who felt he wasn’t being forthright in conveying the condition of his shoulder — first for Game 4 of the Division Series against the Padres, then for Game 2 of the NLCS against the Mets. To that point, he was just 1-for-14, but upon returning, he carried a 10-game hitting streak through the remainder of the postseason. Though famously robbed of a homer by Endy Chavez in Game 7 of the NLCS, he homered off the Tigers’ Justin Verlander in the World Series opener, and went 8-for-19 overall.

The Cardinals won in five games, but the relationship between Rolen and La Russa was strained and would continue to worsen in 2007, Rolen’s final year in St. Louis. The 32-year-old third baseman hit a meager .265/.331/.398 with eight homers in 112 games, and while outstanding defense (+12 DRS) bolstered his value, continued left shoulder woes ended his season in late August; he underwent a bursectomy and the removal of scar tissue. After the season, Rolen told general manager John Mozeliak that he wanted out. “There’s absolutely no intention to accommodate Scott,” said an unsympathetic La Russa at that year’s winter meetings. “If he doesn’t like it, he can quit.”

Five weeks later, Mozeliak traded Rolen to the Blue Jays straight up for Troy Glaus; later, the GM hinted that spite may have played a role in the north-of-the-border destination, and conceded that the move weakened the team, calling Rolen “the only player I regret trading.” Rolen, for his part, was rather cryptic when asked later about his frosty relationship with La Russa, saying, “We’re different people with different morals… That’s as politically correct as I can say it, I guess.”

The trade may have alleviated that conflict, but before debuting for the Jays, Rolen broke a knuckle on his right middle finger and lost the fingernail completely due to a mishap during a fielding drill. He missed the season’s first 23 games, and later missed another 13 due to power-sapping left shoulder soreness. He finished at .262/.349/.431 with 11 homers in 115 games, though again, stellar defense (+9 DRS) bolstered his value (3.4 WAR).

Despite his sizzling showing in the first four months of 2009 (.320/.370/.476), Rolen and the Blue Jays were bound for nowhere. Desiring to be closer to home, he asked for a trade. On July 31, he was sent to the Reds — whose general manager, Walt Jocketty, had traded for Rolen as the Cardinals’ GM in 2002 — for Edwin Encarnación, Josh Roenicke, and Zach Stewart. Jocketty desired Rolen’s leadership as much as his ability, saying, “He will bring a lot to this ballclub that’s been lacking.”

(While today, the move appears imbalanced because Encarnación, a defensively challenged 26-year-old third baseman at the time, blossomed into an All-Star slugger, that wouldn’t happen for another three years; in fact, the Jays lost him to the A’s on waivers in November 2010, then re-signed him after he was non-tendered.)

Rolen suffered a beaning-related concussion in his second game as a Red. After sitting for two days, he homered in his first plate appearance back, but post-concussion syndrome soon sent him to the Disabled List. “I’m just in La-La Land out there,” he said. “I have headaches I can’t shake.” Despite the injury, Rolen finished with a 116 OPS+, 17 DRS and 5.2 WAR, his highest total since 2006. In December, a contract restructuring converted his $11 million salary into a three-year, $24 million extension.

The deal paid off in 2010. Despite suffering lower back spasms, at age 35 he made his sixth All-Star team, won his eighth and final Gold Glove, hit a Rolenesque .285/.358/.497 with 20 homers, a 126 OPS+ and 4.1 WAR, and drew praise for his clubhouse leadership. The Reds, who hadn’t finished above .500 since 2000 and hadn’t made the playoffs since 1995, went 91-71 and won the NL Central. No-hit by the Phillies’ Roy Halladay in the Division Series opener, they were quickly dispatched; Rolen went just 1-for-11 while striking out eight times.

Rolen spent two more seasons in Cincinnati, but protruding discs in his lower back and problems with both shoulders — culminating in offseason surgery to remove bone spurs and fragments from the perennially troublesome left one — limited him to a total of 157 games, 13 homers, an 86 OPS+ and 2.2 WAR. The Reds did win the NL Central again in 2012, but squandered a two-games-to-none lead in the Division Series against the Giants, who beat them in five games and went on to win the World Series. Though he collected two hits in Game 5, Rolen struck out with two men on base in the bottom of the ninth against Sergio Romo, ending the Reds’ season. Afterwards, he conceded that he was mulling retirement, but hadn’t made up his mind. Teammates again lavished him with praise, with Ryan Ludwick saying, “A Hall of Famer, in my opinion, no doubt about it. I played with him in St. Louis, too, and he’s a gamer, a guy that goes about his business the way you want to teach a 3-, 4-, 5-year-old kid. He’s a grown man and he plays the game every out, every pitch at max intensity.”

Rolen remained on the fence about retirement. Both the Dodgers and Reds showed interest that winter, but he never did play again, putting the wraps on his stellar career.

At first glance, Rolen’s case for Cooperstown appears respectable but not overwhelming. Despite his eight Gold Gloves and seven All-Star appearances, his Hall of Fame Monitor score of 99 is a whisker below “a good possibility,” and his postseason line (.220/.302/.376 with five homers in 159 PA) offers little help outside of his stellar 2004 NLCS and ’06 World Series performances, not that those weren’t important. Regular season-wise, his totals of 316 homers and 2,077 hits don’t scream instant enshrinement, though at least he’s on the right side of “The Rule of 2,000.” Neither BBWAA nor committee voters have elected a post-1960 expansion era players with fewer than 2,000 hits, though it’s noteworthy that Walker (2,160) just supplanted Willie Stargell (2,232) for the lowest total of any non-catcher from the expansion era. Ron Santo, who collected 2,167 of his 2,254 hits after 1960 (his rookie season), is in the same neighborhood and a reasonable comparable for Rolen, as a player who was in the majors in his early 20s but was done by his mid-30s. Both had keen batting eyes, augmenting their power with good on-base percentages, though Rolen was by far the more valuable defender. Santo wasn’t elected until 2011, a year after his death at age 70. Gulp.

As for his offense, Rolen was a model of consistency who rarely put up extreme numbers or made a splash on the leaderboards. He never ranked among the league’s top 10 in hits, homers, or batting average; he did so just once in walks, OBP, and SLG, and in OPS+ twice. Nonetheless, his numbers stand out relative to his position. His .490 SLG is fifth among players who spent most of their careers at the hot corner, but that’s in part a reflection of playing in a high-scoring era; contemporaries Aramis Ramirez (who’s making his debut on this ballot) and Matt Williams are fourth and sixth, and nobody’s stumping for their election. Adjusting for the environments in which Rolen played, his 122 OPS+ ranks ninth on a list topped by six Hall of Famers (Schmidt, Eddie Mathews, Chipper Jones, George Brett, Wade Boggs, and Santo), though none of the other players in the top 15 are enshrined. Via batting runs, the offensive component of WAR, Rolen’s 16th at 234, behind a mix of Hall of Famers, perennial All-Stars, and 19th century obscurities. Among his contemporaries, only Jones (who’s first at 558), David Wright (285) and Beltré (257) outrank him; the latter doing so only with the benefit of 3,612 additional plate appearances.

It’s Rolen’s combination of strong offense and elite defense that’s his true selling point. He’s considered by many to be the best defensive third baseman of his era, and has both the hardware and the advanced metrics to bolster that claim. His eight Gold Gloves are more than any third baseman besides Brooks Robinson and Schmidt, and he’s third at the position in fielding runs, 175 above average via a combination of Total Zone (1996-2002) and Defensive Runs Saved (2003-12), with only Robinson (294) and Beltré (218) ahead. Rolen had 11 seasons where he was at least 10 runs above average in the field (second only to Robinson) including five of at least 15 above average.

Rolen cracked the league’s top 10 in WAR a modest four times, but had six seasons of at least 5.0 WAR, tied for 10th at the position, and 11 of at least 4.0 WAR, tied for third with Boggs, behind only Schmidt and Mathews. That’s particularly impressive considering his career length. Take away his cup-of-coffee 1996 season, his injury-wracked 2005, and the two at the tail end of his career, and in 11 of the other 13 seasons, he was worth at least 4.0 WAR, which is to say worthy of All-Star consideration. Only in 2007 and ’08 did he play more than 92 games and finish with less than 4.0 WAR.

Thanks to that consistency, Rolen ranks 10th at the position with 70.1 career WAR, behind eight Hall of Famers plus Beltré, all of whom played at least 200 more games. He’s 1.7 WAR above the career standard at the position. His 43.6 peak WAR is a more modest 14th, but still 0.5 above the standard, and ahead of six enshrinees including Paul Molitor (who spent more time at DH). Rolen’s 56.9 JAWS ranks 10th, 1.2 points above the standard. Particularly at a position so drastically underrepresented in the Hall — there are 15 third basemen, but 27 right fielders, and 19 to 23 at every other position besides catcher — that’s a player who belongs in Cooperstown.

Rolen’s candidacy got off to an inauspicious start; his 10.2% debut was lower than the lowest post-1966 candidate to be elected by the writers (Duke Snider, 17.0% in 1970), while his 17.2% in his second year surpassed only Bert Blyleven (14.1%) — and both of those candidates needed more than 10 years be elected, time Rolen doesn’t have. The caveat is that he was competing for space on a pair of ballots so crowded that for the first time in history, back-to-back quartets of candidates were elected, with five other candidates topping 50% in 2018, and four others in ’19.

The trend of the ballot’s heavy traffic clearing is worth illustrating, and it’s applicable to several candidates who have lingered on the ballot, awaiting their opening:

Where nine candidates besides Rolen met the JAWS standards at their positions when he debuted in 2018, and 12 besides Rolen had a JAWS of at least 50, those counts are respectively down to four and eight this year.

One of my biggest fears heading into any election cycle is a strong candidate immediately suffering the indignity of falling off the ballot with less than 5% of the vote, cast into oblivion like Bobby Grich, Lou Whitaker, Kenny Lofton, Ted Simmons (the first player to rebound from such a fate by being elected by a small committee) and others. Players who derive a significant chunk of their value from on-base percentage and defense, but lack big triple crown stats, often suffer such a fate. Rolen fits that description to tee, though thankfully he survived those first two election cycles, and gained significant ground last year. His gains for the past two cycles were foreshadowed via Ryan Thibodaux’s indispensable Ballot Tracker, where voters who used all 10 slots reported that they would consider him the next time around; 15 voters did so for the 2018 cycle, and then a dozen in 2019, the highest of any candidate.

Lo and behold, Rolen jumped to 35.3% in 2020, a greater share in year three than Tim Raines (30.4%), Bruce Sutter (29.1%), Walker (21.6%), Snider (21.2%), and Blyleven (17.4%), and just a bit behind Martinez (36.5%). With the percentage of full ballots dropping from 43% in 2019 to 21% in ’20, far fewer voters offered such names last year, and I’m told that the counting was incomplete, but from what’s in the Tracker, Rolen (three votes) was second only to Billy Wagner (five).

Last year, I wrote that Rolen might be in for an Alan Trammell-like run on the ballot, receiving lower levels of support than his case merited but hopefully amassing enough support over time to better position his candidacy in front of a small committee to be named later. Trammell debuted with 15.7% in 2002 but didn’t break 30% until his 11th year, peaked at 40.9% in his 15th year of eligibility and was elected by the Modern Baseball Era Committee in 2018. Already, it’s apparent that Rolen’s electoral ceiling is much higher. Particularly in light of the precedents set by Raines, Martinez, and Walker, both in terms of voting trends and in the stathead-driven attention to his case, his big jump gives me optimism that he can get to 75% before his 10 years are up. I know that I’ll be checking his box on my ballot for the duration of his run, and you’re damn right, it feels pretty great to say that.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
gtagomoriMember since 2017
5 years ago

Rolen sure seems like a slam dunk HOFer to me. And I’ve never been a particular fan of him or STL/PHI. He just passed the eye test at the time he was playing and the stats augment his case (IMO of course)

Question: If you could have either Rolen or Adrian Beltre for their entire careers which one would you prefer?

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  gtagomori

Beltre and it’s not even close.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

I agree that its Beltre, but only due to his longevity. Rolen was every bit as good on a per game basis.

BenZobrist4MVP
5 years ago
Reply to  gtagomori

It’s close, but I’d say Beltre. On average Rolen was about 10% more valuable per plate appearance than Beltre (combining offensive and defensive value), but Beltre had over 40% more career plate appearances.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  BenZobrist4MVP

From ages 22-35, they were basically equivalent (using BR):

Beltre: 69.7 WAR in 8598 PAs
Rolen: 68.3 WAR in 7773 PAs

But Rolen did virtually nothing outside of ages 22-35 (1.9 WAR) where Beltre did a lot (24.1 WAR). That, in my opinion, gives Beltre a fairly large lead.

Adam C
5 years ago
Reply to  gtagomori

Rolen is not a slam dunk Hall of Famer. A slam dunk Hall of Famer would be a Mike Schmidt or a George Brett. But Rolen is a deserving Hall of Famer.

tomerafan
5 years ago

Thrilled you’re starting the series with Rolen, the best eligible position player at his position to not be enshrined already. He is indeed the best defensive 3B of his era and with a dangerous enough bat to push him into HOF territory. Top-10 all time at your position deserves enshrinement unless there’s a cheating or character-clause issue to consider.

Jimmie Foxxalorian
5 years ago

Harold Baines just told me Rolen deserves 100% of the vote

emh1969
5 years ago

Yeah but Baines drove in a LOT more runs than Rolen and we all know that’s what REALLY matters. 🙄🙄🙄

epitaz
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Baines retired in the top 50 all time in hits, home runs and rbi’s. That has to count for something. There’s only a small group that can actually say that. He also retired with a very respectable .289 batting average and .356 obp. Not too shabby.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago

Hopefully, with the ballot getting less crowded Rolen finally gets some more love and eventual enshrinement.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago

I wonder if the relative dearth of deserving newcomers combined with the difficulty of voting for Schilling (to quoth Zoidberg, “Why not Rolen?”) will lead to more voters re-evaluating Rolen, especially in light of TLR’s more-diminished star?

Cave Dameron
5 years ago

Rolen: 69.9 WAR in 2038 games

Jeter: 73.0 WAR in 2747 games

I rest my case.

LenFuegoMember since 2025
5 years ago

The trouble Rolen’s candidacy has is the dearth of high impact MVP-caliber seasons.

Jaffe used the term “MVP” only once in this article, pointing out that in Rolen’s best season, 2004, he finished 4th in MVP voting, behind one teammate (Pujols) and just ahead of another (Edmonds). Only three other times in his career did Rolen accumulate any MVP votes whatsoever, finishing 20th with 3 points in 1998, 24th with 1 point in 2001 (behind two teammates – Abreu and Rollins) and 14th with 26 points in 2010 (behind teammate Votto, who won it). So only once in his career did Rolen finish as the top MVP vote-getter on his own team — when he finished 20th in 1998.

The years in which Rolen received MVP votes were also spaced apart — he never followed up a season in which he received MVP votes by getting any the next season or even the following season. So he never had a span in his career where he was considered a perennial MVP caliber player.

When you add it all up, Rolen ranks 439th in career MVP Award Shares at 0.57, which is, to be honest, pretty anemic for a Hall of Fame candidate. High impact MVP caliber seasons make an impact on voters’ impressions, and it will be challenging for Rolen to overcome his lack of such seasons, regardless of how many career WAR he accumulated or the excellence of his glove.

jgrub7
5 years ago
Reply to  LenFuego

Correct, this is because Scott Rolen was a good but not great hitter. In terms of wRC+, during his best 7-year stretch (1998-2004) he ranked just 29th in MLB (134 wRC+). This means that his best was on par with players like Will Clark (133) and Moises Alou (133) during that timeframe. Good hitters but not Hall of Fame level. His candidacy is not helped by the fact that during that time other players who are not in the HOF were simply much better at the plate like Berkman (148), Delgado (148), Helton (148), Giles (148), Edmonds (146), and Abreu (142). Additionally, he was constantly overlooked in the NL because Chipper Jones was the premier third baseman.

LenFuegoMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  jgrub7

Yeah, ultimately, nobody ever marveled at what Rolen could do, they just said “damn good player” and moved on. And marveling is kind of what the Hall of Fame is about – that’s why it is a Hall of Fame rather than a Hall of Achievement.

Eddie McKennaMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  LenFuego

The only reason that matters is those same voters get HOF votes… uh oh

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago

This is just the first time of many I will probably say this hall of fame season. Whoever is voting for Vizquel for the hall on the theory that he was an elite defensive player (he actually wasn’t) needs to re-examine Rolen’s career highlights and defensive numbers. Even if Rolen was only a Vizquel-level hitter, he would still deserve a plaque in Cooperstown just based on his glovework.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  stan

Vizquel is absolutely an elite defensive player, he was just so bad with the bat that it didn’t make up for it.
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2020&month=0&season1=1871&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=1871-01-01&enddate=2020-12-31&sort=21,d

If Rolen was a Vizquel level hitter then he wouldn’t deserve to be in Cooperstown, because he was a worse defender than VIzquel. Even on baseball reference he’s superior, Vizquel has 29.5 dWAR to 21.1 dWAR for Rolen.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

You’re getting confused by Vizquel’s longevity. Yes, he has 29.5 dWAR, but he played twice as many innings in the field as Rolen (22000 to 11000). Since dWAR is a counting statistic, Rolen is much, much better. None of Vizquel’s rate-based defensive numbers measure up to the barely-worthy defensive shortstops like Maranville and Aparicio (who also are better offensively due to baserunning numbers btw). Check out the career defensive numbers on fangraphs. Vizquel is nowhere near the top, even among shortstops.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  stan

Longevity is important. And the eye test when it comes to defense is important.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  stan

You’re the one getting confused. Maybe you should re-check the numbers because your innings analysis of Rolen vs. Vizquel is way off. Rolen did not play 11,000 innings, he played 17,400. Vizquel didn’t play twice as many innings, he played 32% more innings but had 40% more dWAR.

Vizquel is better both on a rate-basis and counting basis when compared to Rolen. Rolen is not much, much better. He is a worse defender in both counting and rate stats.

Besides, if like you said a hypothetical Rolen was a Vizquel-level hitter then he would have around 400 less offensive runs. That’s ~40 WAR less than his career total of 70. A 3rd basemen with a career WAR of 30 does not deserve to be in Cooperstown.

Your hypothetical version of Rolen that hit like Vizquel, was a worse defender than Vizquel, and played less games than Vizquel doesn’t deserve to be in Cooperstown. That’s someone who averaged 2 WAR per year, AKA an average player. It’s basically a worse version of Vizquel that you think should be in Cooperstown. That would be a tragedy.

bluerum29
5 years ago
Reply to  stan

I’m all for the best defenders at their position getting into the hall. Just like the best hitters should be getting in, so should the best defenders. Some just happen to be a combination of both.

Ken BergenhamMember since 2020
5 years ago

Rolen still has a lower Career WAR than Lou Whitaker. NOBODY gets in until Lou gets in.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Ken Bergenham

I’m a small hall guy and I also support Whitaker’s candidacy, but he’s just a hair behind Rolen when you consider that he only has less than 4 more WAR yet he played more than 2 more full seasons.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Ken Bergenham

It turns out we *can* have our cake and eat it too with Whitaker and Rolen, but unfortunately, only one of them is on the ballot (but I don’t think the FG community is anything but supportive of Sweet Lou)

dl80Member since 2020
5 years ago

Three unrelated points:

1) Rolen deserves to be in, but by a hair, and it’s definitely not a slam dunk. He’s unfairly hurt by playing for so many different teams.

2) That Endy Chavez catch is amazing, and I’m glad to be reminded of it.

3) Placido Polanco had a really good career. Not a Hall of Famer, obviously, but that trade is not nearly so lopsided as it would otherwise seem.

mrdog61Member since 2017
5 years ago

This recounting of LaRussa’s “performance” with Rolen bodes well for the team that just weeks ago fell all over itself to hire LaRussa. #goingtotheship #thesinkingone

The Duke
5 years ago
Reply to  mrdog61

Rolen seems to have had problems everywhere he played except Cincinnati. Not sure why. It’s never been clear why he aggravated so many people in management but it seems he did.

john0lerude
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

I don’t recall him having any problems with the Jays

Eddie McKennaMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

He aggravated me, and I wasn’t even his manager. Just never liked the guy. Happy to support him for HOF though

The Duke
5 years ago

Rolen would have been a slam dunk hall of famer but the Hee-Seop Choi injury ruined him. But we aren’t allowed to vote on what he might have been. What he was is pretty good but he’s another guy like Vizquel who will need people to recognize his defense to get in. His offense is good, not great.

I want to see vizquel and Rolen get in and Keith Hernandez get a shot as well. The great defensive players should get in. Andruw Jones is another one. Andrelton Simmons is another one that will require a focus on defense. Molina as well.

Having said that, I don’t think he will get in. The ballot crush was already over last year and he has to double what he has already received. I think both he and vizquel will fall short with the writers and need the Vets to get in.

stanMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Vizquel and Hernandez aren’t actually great defensive players though. They were both overrated in their time as defenders and in retrospect the numbers show they weren’t special at all. Hernandez’ fangraphs defensive value is barely positive for his career. Fangraphs is tough on first basemen due to positional value and rightly so, but even if you only compare him to other first basemen, he’s 47th. Vizquel is looking up at Aparacio and Maranville both in terms of WAR and defensive value despite him having a lot more playing time, and you’ll find a lot of people who put both Aparicio and Maranville on the list of guys who don’t belong in the hall. He’s just not close to being worthy. He’d have a hard time getting into the hall of very good.

And even with Rolen’s short career he’s still 9th in WAR among players who primarily played 3b. Vizquel? 34th. How is Vizquel even receiving votes?

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Kirby Puckett’s plaque would like a word with you

jgrub7
5 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Keith Hernandez absolutely should be in the Hall of Fame. Also Jim Kaat! 16 Gold Gloves and 280+ wins!

Eddie McKennaMember since 2020
5 years ago

Great piece Jay. Most surprising to me on the comments are how little readers value longevity. Blank production per blank unit of measure is very cool, but compilers are cool too. Not even talking about someone like Vizquel. More like Tommy John.

epitaz
5 years ago

I see Rolen alot like Buddy Bell. Rolen hit for more power but Bell collected more hits. Both were really good defensively ( Bell won 6 gold gloves and 1 silver slugger, Rolen won 8 gold gloves and 1 silver slugger ). Bell played on some really bad teams and unfortunately played at the same time as Schmidt, Brett, Brooks Robinson was still around and sometimes at third Pete Rose so he was kind of lost in the shuffle ( like Ted Simmons for so many years ). I think both should be in and I hope Bell makes his way onto a committee vote at some point.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago

70 Career fWAR is automatic if you ask me. this guy was injured all the time and STILL got 70 fWAR! WOW! he was clearly very impactful when he played.