Jay Jaffe FanGraphs Chat – 5/19/26
| 12:02 |
: Good afternoon, folks!
|
| 12:03 |
: Welcome to another edition of my weekly chat. Apologies for missing last week, as I was in the midst of my big Ted Turner/Bobby Cox tribute piece and didn’t have the bandwidth to pull this off.
|
| 12:04 |
: Before we get started, I need to note that we’re trying a new system with our chats, where you’re required to log in to FanGraphs to ask a question. You don’t need to be a Member, but you do need to have an account, just like you need an account to comment on any article. We’ll see how it goes. If you have feedback, feel free to just leave it as a question, or you can send a note to support@fangraphs.com.
|
| 12:05 |
: I’ve got a piece on the Padres’ surprising spot in the standings — first place in the NL West — despite the underperformances of Fernando Tatis Jr., Manny Machado, Jackson Merrill and others which should go up while this chat is underway.
|
| 12:06 |
: Yesterday I wrote about Blake Snell heading for surgery to remove loose bodies from his elbow. Dr. Neal ElAttrache will be using the same NanoNeedle procedure as he used on Tarik Skubal — the Skubal Scope, as some are calling it — which could shave about a month off his recovery time https://blogs.fangraphs.com/everybody-whos-anybody-is-getting-loose-bo…
|
| 12:07 |
: oh, and here’s that Turner/Cox thing. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/ted-turner-1938-2026-and-bobby-cox-1941-20…
You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
And now, on with the show… |
| 12:07 |
: The Red Sox have scored three runs or fewer in nine straight games, the first time that’s happened since 2012. If they’re held under again tonight it’s their longest string since 1955.
|
| 12:09 |
: While that’s not a question, it’s worth sharing. I … really just am amazed at the way the Red Sox have just continued to fall all over themselves since winning it all in 2018. They’ve produced some talented players, but they’ve bled top-level talent, and made some big mistakes along the way. Right now this looks like another unhappy summer in Beantown (derogatory).
|
| 12:09 |
: Level of surprise that Ohtani is 11th on the career ERA- SP leaderboard? He is 29th in career wRC+ so by peer rating he has somehow been a better pitcher than hitter.
|
| 12:14 |
: I get fifth in SP ERA- since 1871 using our defaults (https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=al%2Cnl&qual…), but should point out that he’s done that with just 572.2 innings, which the equivalent of about 3 seasons of full-time starting spread out over nine seasons due to injuries and other limitations.
|
| 12:14 |
: By comparison, he’s got 4500-ish plate appearances, about eight seasons worth of playing time
|
| 12:15 |
: so it’s not an equal comparison
|
| 12:15 |
: Realistically, do the Mets have 3 RoY candidates on the team right now?
|
| 12:17 |
: I see Nolan McLean as a legitimate contender for the award but don’t think Carson Benge is anywhere near consideration. Who’s the third?
|
| 12:17 |
: How much more leash do you think the Yankees give Bednar as closer, given the number of runs he gave up recently
|
| 12:20 |
: Probably not that long given that they have an obvious alternative — an experienced closer who’s throwing the ball well — in Camilo Doval, but I don’t think Bednar’s been that bad. he’s done a great job of suppressing hard contact but is being BABIPed to death to some degree.
|
| 12:20 |
: Let’s say two players end a season with exactly 2 fWAR. Player one put up his 2 fWAR in just 60 days, and is a net-zero for the rest of the season, while player two is consistently starter-level but nothing more nothing less throughout the season. Which player would you rather have on your team? Is player one worth it just for those two months of all-star-level play?
|
| 12:21 |
: over a longer haul, the higher-variance guy is probably the right answer, since those are the ones more likely to push you towards the playoffs in a good year, but over the shorter term, 2 months doesn’t get you that much except under the right circumstances so I think I’d go with Steady Eddie.
|
| 12:22 |
: Is it fair to say that Andy Pages is the Dodgers best fielding position player at this point?
|
| 12:23 |
: I’d say so, both by the eye test and by the metrics. He’s got the highest DRS and FRV on the team, and is second to Pete Crow-Armstrong among all center fielders in both categories.
|
| 12:24 |
: Yeah, I feel like the Sox went from a really well-run franchise to a crap show. Dylan Crews – from what I can remember, the Nats sent him down, basically cause he was striking out too much. So far, in AAA, he’s struck out more than at any other place in his career. Yet, they are bringing him up. I guess the question is: do the Nats know what they are doing? they have a fair amount of talent, at least at the plate.
|
| 12:27 |
: it’s always a little concerning when you see a guy posting higher K% and swinging strike % at Triple-A than he had in the majors but… we don’t always know the whole story; the team may be asking him to look only in certain spots, or whatever. A lot of times guys are better off in the majors with more hands-on instruction than in the minors, but I’m not sure about the particulars in Washington. They’re a respectable 23-25 while scoring an NL-high 5.46 runs per game, so I’m inclined to cut them a bit of slack but… we’ll see how it goes for Crews.
|
| 12:27 |
: I feel like the Tatis homerless streak isn’t getting enough play given just how…insanely improbable it feels given his career numbers. Based on his HR/PA numbers, he would be expected to be in the high single digits now, but nothing. Can you recall anything similar to this degree?
|
| 12:29 |
: Wrote a bit about Tatis today, mostly just reiterating what Mike Petriello wrote recently at MLB.com https://www.mlb.com/news/fernando-tatis-jr-strange-start-2026. Basically he’s closed up his stance and is trying to use the whole field more, but his attack angle has become more shallow and he’s hitting a lot more on the ground. He’s still got an excellent 56% hard-hit rate, but he’s just not elevating — all of which is to say that the power is still there but I think he needs to iron out his mechanics and timing.
|
| 12:33 |
: Mike Trout had a 28-game homerless drought in 2015, when he was still at his peak. I’m sure there are other famous ones that I’m not thinking of right now but that one comes to mind – it probably cost him an MVP award
|
| 12:33 |
: That was a 41-homer season, btw!
|
| 12:34 |
: “Falling all over themselvea” is fair as a general summation but incomplete. As a Red Sox fan, I think a lot of what went wrong this year was a kind of myopic, excessive principledness. Breslow was determined not to trade Duran except for fair value as he perceived it, and not to give up more than perceived fair value for an infielder (he does deserve credit for acquiring Contreras, but that obviously wasn’t enough). He overvalued run prevention in acquiring Durbin and being content with the catching tandem (whose defense they like better than fWAR does). And he put too much faith in internal projections for Mayer and (last year) Campbell. They’ve tried to be a “smart” team in hiring Bloom amd Breslow, and they have been, in some ways, too “smart” for their own good.
|
| 12:38 |
: I remember when half a chat jumped all over me for being less than wowed by Duran’s 3.9-WAR 2025 season after his 6.8-WAR 2024, but even i”m surprised how Duran has bottomed out (.181/.247/.301) — and of course he’s bled value. The Sox have come up with some good players but their roster construction stinks on ice, and there’s been a lot lost in translation between prospect status and the majors for the likes of Kristian Campbell and Marcello Mayer.
|
| 12:39 |
: They’ve come up with some good pitching (Early, Tolle, etc) but Bello was supposed to be at least a solid back-of-the-rotation pitcher and he’s now a mess.
|
| 12:40 |
: Is there a Schwarber article coming anytime soon? 8 HR’s in 9 games recently, and if he gets even hotter when the weather gets hotter, some records may be in reach.
|
| 12:41 |
: Surprisingly, no, so I just nominated myself to do something on him soon
|
| 12:41 |
: I know you’re posting an article about this – but can the padres keep getting away with this? Adding Giolito and Canning should help
|
| 12:43 |
: Giolito should help but Canning has been roughed up in his last two starts. The short version of what I wrote is that the Padres have had some very good situational hitting and have excelled in high-leverage situations on both sides of the ball. They obviously have a great closer in Mason Miller to anchor the back end of the bullpen but i’m expecting some regression on the offensive side even as the big boys right themselves
|
| 12:44 |
: Speaking of underperforming sluggers, where do the issues lie with Vlad? Seems he intentionally changed his approach but such a huge dropoff in HHR and Barrels. Is his body type catching up to him or something else? Decent hitter but no longer imposing.
|
| 12:45 |
: He’s chasing more and hitting the ball on the ground more while striking out even less. I guess he wants to be Luis Arraez?
|
| 12:46 |
: not really sure what’s going on there but yeah, he’s worth a closer look
|
| 12:47 |
: I would guess the Mets question before meant A.J. Ewing as the 3rd candidate who might get ROY votes. He’s been super-exciting to watch, but it’d take a ton for him to get into the conversation with McLean, Stewart, Weatherholt, and Marksee. But don’t sleep on Benge–looking really good the past few weeks…
|
| 12:49 |
: Benge and Ewing looking good for a couple of weeks is a positive develpment but i’d stop short of calling either of them true ROY candidates. A candidate is a guy whom I’d at least consider for one of the five spots on ROY ballot and neither has the numbers for that yet. Ask me again in August and maybe that will have changed.
|
| 12:51 |
: Lunch has arrived, so if the breakneck pace of this chat slows down, that’s why
|
| 12:52 |
: it’s chicken tinga sopes, for those of you scoring at home
|
| 12:54 |
: Emerson Hancock has been a bright spot this year for an underperforming Seattle squad. Is there anything in his underlying numbers that indicated these results are sustainable or is he a SSS mirage?
|
| 12:57 |
: I don’t think i’m ready to call him a true-talent 3.00ish ERA guy but both his 3.63 FIP and 3.98 xERA are run-and-a-half improvements over last year, and his 27.1% strikeout rate and 4.8% walk rate are both exceptional. It’s a real breakout |
| 12:58 |
: Here’s that Padres piece https://blogs.fangraphs.com/timely-play-has-put-the-padres-in-first-pl…
|
| 12:59 |
: What’s your overall opinion of Ben Cherington’s career? In Boston he “won” and in Pittsburgh he’s “winning” but I was surprised he was given this chance. I thought he deserved to be fired last year with Shelton. Is he a top 50% GM?
|
| 1:03 |
: It’s very hard to judge a Pirates GM given the team’s spending limitations but he’s got a .500ish team with some very bright spots including Skenes and Griffin, both of whom he drafted, and it’s not like they’ve got a lot of terrible contracts on the books. I’d put him in the upper 50% but still towards the middle of the pack
|
| 1:05 |
: I had been planning to ask about Brayan Bello, and then just now I saw Baumann’s article, which certainly eases no concerns. What are the likelier options here? When guys start coming off the IL, Tolle has to stay in the rotation,, the way he’s pitching, right? So, long reliever role for Bello? Or figure things out in Worcester?
|
| 1:09 |
: he had two very good outings in a bulk role behind an opener and then got the snot beat out of him as a traditional starter. I’m not sure why he’s struggling so much, especially against lefties, but i’d probably try to keep using him in an opener/bulk format and work on finding him a better approach against lefties. Finding the missing mph would help too
|
| 1:11 |
: If Juan Soto got one plate appearance next season and then left baseball forever, would you vote for him for the Hall Of Fame?
|
| 1:13 |
: i’d need more context than that. Is he retiring to become a doctor and cure rare diseases? is he suffering some terrible physical ailment? or is he buying the world’s biggest yacht and spending his days counting his money? Would seem to be a waste of talent if it’s the last of those. I’d need a good justification for retirement to vote for him.
|
| 1:13 |
: The Cubs have had a remarkable season from the perspective of runners left on base, being dead last in the league with just over 8 per game and more than half a runner ahead of (or behind?) the Pirates. It’s infuriating to watch them load the bases and then pop out to end the inning. This is just small-sample theater and has got to eventually come out in the wash, right? The league-leading Padres are stranding two fewer runners per game than the Cubs are.
|
| 1:15 |
: interestingly enough, there’s a table in today’s Padres piece where I compare team hitting with bases empty vs. with runners in scoring position. The Padres are basically tied for the second-largest gap (RISP > Empty) while the Cubs have the largest negative gap (Empty > RISP).
|
| 1:16 |
:
|
| 1:16 |
: I’d chalk up most of that to small-sample theater, and would expect some regression.
|
| 1:16 |
: but I understand it’s gotta be maddening to watch nonetheless
|
| 1:17 |
: What players of the 70s/80s do you think would be most helped by being active now, with the way the game is played/tech advances? For some reason, John Wockenfuss leaps to mind. As he does.
|
| 1:19 |
: I don’t know about accounting for the tech stuff, and i’m probably not the first one to say this, but Brian Downing and his 20-homer, .370 OBP seasons would have gotten a lot more love than just one All-Star selection. And the proto Zobristian Tony Phillips would have made an All-Star team at least once.
|
| 1:21 |
: I missed that you had a Padres piece out. Sorry for all the questions I posted that could be answered with a URL!
|
| 1:22 |
: Hey, it went live like half an hour ago. it won’t answer all your questions but it’s a start.
|
| 1:22 |
: Both Murakami and (to a much lesser extent) Okamoto are having better seasons than Bregman. I didn’t like the Bregman signing because of the length, but now I’m wondering if even a 3-year deal would have been too long. He’s been fine, but only just, and I feel like they could have had the exact output from Shaw for virtually nothing. With the benefit of hindsight do you think the Cubs would have been better off chasing one of the NPB guys as a DH instead of Bregman as a 3B?
|
| 1:25 |
: I think eight weeks is a bit early to start second-guessing too much. Murakami is off to a great start despite striking out nearly one-third of the time, and maybe the industry misjudged his ability to adjust somewhat, and he does have the age advantage over Bregman, but I think the Cubs valued Bregman for non-statistical reasons as well, and I still think there’s a big gap between where he and Shaw are presently.
|
| 1:26 |
: OK folks, it’s Air Conditioner Installation Day here at Casa Jaffe-Span, so i’ve got an appointment with a couple of windows. Thanks for stopping by!
|
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Benge has had more than a couple of good weeks- he’s had a 136 wRC+ for the last 30 days. Ewing has a wRC+ of 185 over his first 7 games, and while he almost certainly won’t keep that up, he shows every sign of being a pretty good player. Both of them are guys who could be among the top rookies when the season is over. Don’t let any of that stop you from being a dick when someone asks you a Mets-related question, though– stay true to you!!!
You could also look at the stats and realize that Wetherholt, Sal Stewart, K. Griffin, Rumfield, Ballesteros, and even Justin Crawford have put up better seasons so far than Benge, and that doesn’t even get into the pitching side (McLean, B. Rodriguez, etc.) in the NL. Ewing being 35-40 games behind a bunch of other dudes and Benge’s rough start is going to make votes hard to come by.
By the way, most of Benge’s 136 wRC+ in the last 30 days is in the last two weeks — from 4/18 to 5/3, he hit .225/.279/.350. So a “couple of good weeks” is an accurate description of his season so far.
They have one legit contender, one guy with an outside shot if he continues to play at a high level — probably on the level of his last two weeks for more or less the rest of the season, and one guy where it is WAY too early to tell either way. That offend you less?
Translation: “I’m the actual dick”.
I’m not the one who was completely dismissive about a person’s question (not my question, BTW). I’m not the one who chose to publicly answer that question in a way that made the person who asked it feel small.
They get a decent number of questions for this chat. Jaffe has complete control over the questions that he chooses to publish and respond to. He gets a question from a Mets fan who is excited about their three rookies (who have been one of the only things for Mets fans to be happy about so far this season). He chooses to publish the question in order to say that one of the rookies is not anywhere near consideration and that he can’t even think of who the third is. (Both Benge and Ewing are top 10 in fWAR among NL rookie position players, FWIW- Ewing after 7 games).
Jaffe is a medium-smart dude with politics that I respect; but he’s also completely happy to try to make people feel stupid if he doesn’t agree with them. That is dickish. I stand by my assertion. Maybe it didn’t have anything to do with this being a question from someone who wanted positive feedback regarding the Mets (though Jaffe has a long history of this).
Are either Benge or Ewing guys you would vote for if you had to choose right now? No, of course not. Benge had one of the roughest starts you will see and is still recovering, and Ewing has only been up for a week. Are these guys who could possibly be among the top rookies at the end of the season? Yes. Was it necessary to throw cold water on a fan looking for a reason to feel happy? I guess so– if you’re a dick.
Good grief, you are projection waaaay too much into what was intended to be a concise answer at a time I had no shortage of questions to choose from — not one intended to piss on the Mets or the questioner. Note that further down I mentioned Benge’s uptick as a positive development and didn’t rule out considering him later this season, when he might have statistics that actually withstand comparison to other rookies. Right now, a guy with an 85 wRC+ isn’t a guy I’m thinking hard about in in that context (to say nothing of Ewing, who’s literally one week into his major league career). As others have pointed out, there are several rookies who would merit consideration if we were voting now.
Here’s a rule of thumb: if you aren’t obviously the best ROY candidate on your team, you’re probably not somebody I’m going to think too hard about if I’m voting, given just five ballot slots. And I say that as somebody who’d probably tab McLean if the balloting were right now.
But hey, thanks for the “medium smart” comment. Really, I’m going to treasure that.
I truly meant it when I said medium smart. I have medium respect for you. If you don’t mind me asking, since you had no shortage of questions to choose from, what made you choose this one?
LOL @ you thinking you’re entitled to a response.
I have absolutely no sense of entitlement, especially since I told him I thought he was being a dick! But it never hurts to ask, and I am really curious about why he chose it.
That doesn’t make any sense. I shouldn’t be surprised.
Which part doesn’t make sense? The first sentence or the second? I’m happy to keep stretching this ridiculous discourse out on a rainy Tuesday evening!
Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself. Jay is under no obligation to respond to someone who addresses him like this.
If someone was with my group at a bar and talking like this I would escort them to a cab and send them home before they had a chance to make things worse.
There’s more projection here than inside a Best Buy in the 1990s.
What part of the response was him being a dick?
“I see Nolan McLean as a legitimate contender for the award but don’t think Carson Benge is anywhere near consideration. Who’s the third?”
Let’s start with “anywhere near consideration”–that’s not saying, ‘I disagree’, that’s saying ‘I think you’re wrong to even suggest such a thing.
Let’s move on to “Who’s the third?”– I think it should be pretty obvious (especially to a professional baseball writer) that the person asking the question is referring to AJ Ewing. Phrasing it this way is basically playing dumb to make it seem like you can’t even think of a third player on the Mets that could receive ROY consideration.
The biggest thing is how unnecessary the entire interaction was. The question was clearly just a fan looking for some positive affirmation regarding the young players on his team. Jaffe is under no obligation to provide that, of course. But he could have simply ignored the question if he didn’t want to play along. Instead, with malice aforethought, he chose to yuck somebody’s yum.
What’s unnecessary is the absurd jumping to insane conclusions you are doing.
You’re bringing the malice, through narrative you invented.
But Benge isn’t anywhere near consideration. In any sense of “consideration”. He literally has just been a bad hitter so far this season. Obviously he may have turned it around but there are more players who don’t have to turn it around because they haven’t been bad. Maybe more realistic candidates in the NL than any other year I am aware of. Benge is currently not one of them.
I don’t even know who AJ Ewing is and I don’t know why anyone would expect someone to watch one of the saddest teams in baseball to be aware of someone who debuted this week. I also don’t know why when the NL has like 7 guys I’d consider before Benge if someone would ever consider a guy who has been up for 7 days.
If someone just speaking the truth is a tone you don’t like I certainly have a political party for you!
Just hopping on to say I read absolutely no disrespect or malice in Jay’s tone … nor was it dismissive (I think not answering the question at all would be dismissive).
jb1205 … you have made a mountain out of your own molehill and seem quite content to die on it. Good on you, I guess, but the evidence ain’t on your side.
I’m glad to hear that you weren’t bothered. I can admit with a day’s distance that I may have read too much into JJ’s response– he comes across as a dismissive egotist to me so often that I tend to automatically interpret him through that lens. FWIW, I think you may ultimately be right about these three guys being at least among the top 10 or so NL rookies at the end of the season– I am guessing that was the spirit of your question, as opposed to the idea that they are all top candidates right now.
I’m guessing it’s not important to your job to know who Ewing is; if JJ doesn’t know who he is then we really shouldn’t be asking for his opinions about 2026 baseball. As of yesterday, Benge and Ewing were both top 10 in fWAR among NL rookie position players. I can’t argue with you calling the team sad, especially after the past two night– but the original question isn’t as far-fetched as a lot of you seem to believe.