Jose Altuve Is Back To Being Jose Altuve

Jose Altuve had the worst season of his career in 2020, hitting .219/.268/.344 in 48 games for the Astros for a 77 wRC+ and a near-replacement 0.2 WAR. It didn’t keep Houston from making the playoffs — albeit in a 16-team format with the Astros finishing below .500 — but his annus horribilis was one of the reasons the team dropped to 14th in the majors in runs scored, their worst showing since 2016. As a franchise cornerstone, the organization’s longest-tenured player, and the target of still-mysterious buzzer allegations, he naturally absorbed quite a lot of the heat generated by the sign-stealing scandal. To many, it was a case of just deserts, a cheater watching his legacy fade before his eyes. But reality cares not for made-for-TV storylines. In 2021, Altuve — and by extension the Astros — is having a great year.

A star falling off a cliff in their early 30s isn’t typical, but it does happen, and without any complications from getting caught stealing signs. One of the many cases that jumps out to me is that of Steve Sax, who went from having a nearly 50% chance of 3,000 hits in Bill James’ Favorite Toy to losing his job in the space of about a year; Sax faced more comical allegations of chicanery than Altuve. And one of this generation’s shining beacons of weapons-grade awesomeness, Albert Pujols, had a turning point in his early 30s when he transformed from Jimmie Foxx into Darin Ruf. Altuve did have a couple of relatively minor leg injuries in 2020, but neither could explain a season dreadful enough to have no silver lining.

Like Sax 30 years ago, a projection system (ZiPS in this case) had Altuve on an approach pattern to 3,000 hits. The combined effect of a shortened season and a performance that raised serious concerns about his future more than halved that milestone probability, from 40% to 19%. ZiPS, like the other projection systems, projected Altuve to have a significant bounce-back season in 2021, forecasting a .289/.355/.478, 3.6 WAR campaign. Most players would be quite happy with that result, but that line would only be a return to Altuve’s 2019 level, a drop from his 2014-2018 peak.

Altuve’s never been an exit velocity superstar — he’s not going to be a stunt double for the Incredible Hulk — but he still amassed a lot of offensive value over the years, thanks to being one of the most stubborn outs in baseball. He’s long been one of the best bad-ball hitters in the majors. Statcast defines the zones on the border of the zone as the “Shadow” zone, and entering 2020, he was a career .242 hitter in these locations, nearly a hundred points better than the league average of .149. The next zone out, the “Chase” zone, tells a similar story, with him hitting .179 vs. league-average .089. Altuve was simply getting more than his fair share of extra hits where pitchers get their strikeouts. But unlike a lot of bad-ball hitters, he could happily punish pitchers for staying in the strike zone, too.

Those characteristics disappeared in 2020. Altuve hit .229 and slugged .314 against pitches in the heart of the strike zone, a far cry from the average player’s .310 average and .577 slugging percentage. After regularly averaging a launch angle of 11-13 degrees on those pitches from 2015-19, his launch angle dropped to four degrees in 2020. A bad-ball hitter who hits weak grounders on crushable pitches is more Ozzie Guillen than Jose Altuve.

Those numbers have rebounded so far in 2021. On pitches in the heart of the zone, Altuve’s back to his prime numbers, hitting .343 and slugging .676. He’s also not doing it the same way he used to; his launch angle on these pitches has jumped from a career-low of four degrees to a career-high of 17 degrees, and his exit velocity numbers are up across the board. Altuve’s hitting like the good ol’ days, but he’s not quite the same type of hitter he used to be. He’s hitting more fly balls and swinging less often, both at good pitches and bad. His contact numbers aren’t back to his best years; he’s simply being more selective and making better contact without falling into the passivity trap.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

As such, his long-term projections have rebounded:

ZiPS Projection – Jose Altuve
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SB OPS+ DR WAR
2022 .287 .356 .490 520 93 149 24 2 26 76 53 9 127 -3 3.7
2023 .283 .352 .486 494 86 140 24 2 24 71 49 8 124 -5 3.2
2024 .280 .346 .475 472 80 132 22 2 22 66 45 7 120 -6 2.6
2025 .273 .337 .447 447 72 122 19 1 19 60 41 6 110 -7 1.8
2026 .269 .330 .436 417 64 112 17 1 17 53 36 6 106 -8 1.2
2027 .263 .319 .412 388 56 102 14 1 14 46 30 5 97 -10 0.4
2028 .255 .306 .387 349 47 89 11 1 11 37 23 4 87 -11 -0.4
2029 .246 .292 .352 256 32 63 7 1 6 24 15 2 74 -10 -0.9

The mean projection gets him to around 2,700 hits, with the chance of 3,000 hits back up to 31%. That’s still not where he was before 2020, but one-in-three is a puncher’s chance. Whether 3,000 hits is now enough to get him into Cooperstown is an argument we can have in 12-15 years or so.

Naturally, there will be a healthy dose of suspicion about Altuve’s comeback given the history, and that’s perfectly fair. I’m not of the belief that the sign-stealing really turned out to be all that beneficial, but the problem with cheating isn’t just the results, it’s the intent. Even if Houston’s scheme was of no real benefit, similar to corked bats, the intent is what matters. There’s no doubt that if Altuve makes the All-Star Game, the boos will be deafening. But if redemption can come through quality play, Jose Altuve appears to be putting together a strong case.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
descender
5 years ago

He’s back to being that cute little boy who was too embarrassed to have his shirt taken off. /s

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  descender

Post a shirtless pic of yourself coward.

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Don’t see why that would be a problem.

lslonecaMember since 2020
5 years ago

Oh boy, can’t wait to see some honest and objective discussion about one of the better players in the American League this season

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

bah, Jose Altuve. Too short. Never gonna be a star. He’s no Jonathan Schoop, that’s for sure! At least Schoop is over six feet!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

(only about 15-20 people are gonna get the reference here, and that’s okay)

OddBall Herrera
5 years ago

“I’m not of the belief that the sign-stealing really turned out to be all that beneficial, but the problem with cheating isn’t just the results, it’s the intent.”

Thank you for the measured summary of the issue, considering any post about Altuve or other Astros is instantly responded to with “ZOMG CHEAT-UVE” and other nonsense. It was cheating, and shouldn’t have been happening, but it’s probably time to move on folks.

SenorGato
5 years ago

Great player is great, love to see it

Honestly the most important thing about the big sign stealing scandal is that Jim Crane and Disney led the charge in the name of hope, fairness, righteousness, and definitely not making a poop ton of money off of it

baseballenjoyer
5 years ago

Ahh yes, the ironclad buzzer allegations that came from a fake twitter account claiming to be Beltran’s niece (that also claimed Didi used a buzzer) and was amplified by Kevin “I’m Not a Journalist” Jomboy being unable to identify a piece of confetti.

We’re at the point where we can pretty definitively say that Altuve didn’t cheat. The data says he didn’t cheat, other players both on the Astros and not say he didn’t cheat and Martino’s book says he didn’t cheat.

You can take issue with how he handled the cheating going on in his clubhouse, but he didn’t participate.

As for 2020, Altuve likely struggled for the same reason Astros fans are defensive of him in a way they aren’t of the other players. He’s a quiet, sensitive, and very religious guy who was made the face of a scandal he wasn’t a participant in. He was also, according to Dusty, dealing with several COVID deaths in his family.

I appreciate the analysis of his current campaign, but I feel like FG would do better than to blithely lend credence to fantastical rumors.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I haven’t read the book but I saw an excerpt of it where Kevin Goldstein features prominently, arguing rather emphatically *against* acquiring Osuna. It was nice to see. Have you read it? I’m curious what else is in there.

baseballenjoyer
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I just got it from the library, but haven’t cracked it yet. Only seen excerpts on twitter.

baseballenjoyer
5 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Sure, I think it can be addressed, but in the same way that one would address similar fantastical claims in a “hard news story.”

Though I guess you never know, maybe Altuve’s buzzer was manufactured by Dominion Voting Machines.

Joe Joe
5 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Considering the number of pitchers who have had a notable drop in spin rate , the Astros and Red Sox sign stealing schemes, and any cheating schemes we don’t know about, the number of players that remained silent while their team cheated is likely a majority of the league. Is the elephant in the room that MLB knew cheating was rampant, but did nothing to prevent cheating unless prompted by a team or to save face when it became public knowledge?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

ehhhhh the excerpt I saw made it pretty clear that he showed his disapproval. He’s not exactly AJ Hinch here.

tung_twista
5 years ago

http://signstealingscandal.com/players/
In case anybody missed it.
Bottom line: Altuve and Reddick are the only two Astros regulars who opted-out of the trash can banging scheme in 2017.
The hate that Altuve gets compared to say Springer is odd if somewhat understandable.

nickolai
5 years ago

“We’re at the point where we can pretty definitively say that Altuve didn’t cheat.”

We are? I consider myself pretty mild-mannered (and only a medium-Astro-hater), but if this is the popular consensus today, color me flummoxed. Did Altuve benefit via getting any RBI’s or runs scored involving a cheating teammate in 2017? Was he externally silent about the cheating? Yes to both, so he is definitely complicit.

Even if we believe he was 100% innocent of sign-stealing when he was at the plate, his overall performance benefited from being in a lineup full of cheaters. Mileage may vary, but to me Altuve = cheater.

baseballenjoyer
5 years ago
Reply to  nickolai

It is remarkable how this kind of culpability extends to Altuve and none of the guys in the juicing clubhouses.

Eusebio
5 years ago

Maybe 2020 was bad cause it was a 60 game season that began in late July.

jkates
5 years ago

Altuve was proven to not be a beneficiary of the trash can scheme, so it’s good to see him hitting at a high level again, even past age 30. He’s a great guy in the city of Houston and we love him.

Raidas77
5 years ago

I’m sure there is a way to back into it, but I’m curious at what is driving down his average over the course of the ZIPS projections? K’s aren’t included on the table, so can’t tell, but is it expecting his K% to increase with age? I see his ISO decreasing. If his K% is driving the reduction in hits, I wonder how that compares to other similar players as they aged?

Altuve has HOF bat-to-ball skills and I would be surprised by significant deterioration in that skill as he ages. These projections seem to imply that Altuve’s prime is already over that he will never get more than ~500 ABs again (~130 games). Seem a little pessimistic with to me.

SertoriusMember since 2023
5 years ago
Reply to  Raidas77

Remember these are averages. Think of 400 PA prediction being a 60% chance of 600 PA and a 40% chance of 100 PA (big injuries being more likely as he gets older).

si.or.noMember since 2017
5 years ago

Just deserts — not a plant in sight

sbentonMember since 2022
5 years ago

I’m glad Altuve has risen above the mob’s lying accusations. Another egregious smear job by the sports media. It’s obvious Dan is butthurt over Altuve not ratting out his teammates, but if that same standard was applied across MLB, there wouldn’t be any games because everyone would be suspended. All teams try to steal signs. That didn’t start with the Astros.