Josh Naylor Reunites With Seattle on a Five-Year Deal

Technically, the starting gun for the 2025-26 offseason already fired. Back on November 5, Leody Taveras signed a one-year, $2.1 million contract with the Orioles, though you’d be forgiven for missing that news, seeing as it came just days after a transcendent World Series and didn’t even merit a writeup on this august website. So let us consider November 16 the official first day of the offseason. On Sunday evening, Jeff Passan reported that first baseman Josh Naylor and the Seattle Mariners were “finalizing” a five-year deal. (On Monday evening, Ken Rosenthal reported the terms: five years, $92.5 million.) In estimating Naylor’s contract for our annual Top 50 Free Agent ranking (he checked in at no. 11), Ben Clemens anticipated a four-year, $100 million deal, while the median crowdsource projection was four years and $80 million.
The first real move of the offseason, fittingly, is perhaps its most predictable. From the day their season ended, the Mariners’ front office shared its desire to bring Naylor back to the Pacific Northwest.
“It was a great fit and it’s definitely a priority for us this offseason — if not one, I don’t know what else would be, he’s no. 1 right now,” Mariners general manager Justin Hollander told MLB Network Radio on the first day that free agents were allowed to sign with other teams. “I don’t really see a reason, there’s no advantage to hiding the ball, to telling people, ‘It was just fine.’ It wasn’t just fine. It was awesome. It was a great fit for the two months, and we’d like to make it last a lot longer.”
That’s pretty unambiguous, and the clear fit for both sides, as well as the mutual good feelings between player and team, led most analysts to project Naylor’s return. Three out of four MLB Trade Rumors writers predicted Naylor would sign with Seattle, while Passan picked Naylor as the Mariners’ “perfect transaction” in his Monday column.
It’s not difficult to understand the team’s desire for a stable solution at first base. Prior to the 2024 and 2025 trade deadlines, the Mariners’ production from the position was subpar enough to merit acquiring a rental to cover the last two months of the season, with Naylor brought this year and Justin Turner the year before. Indeed, apart from two and half good years from Ty France, Seattle has cycled through guy after guy at first base for the better part of a decade. (Adam Lind! Ryon Healy! Danny Valencia! Donovan Solano! Rowdy Tellez!) And strong internal solutions weren’t on offer; the Mariners dealt their best first base prospect (Tyler Locklear) to the Diamondbacks in the July Eugenio Suárez deal, so if they stayed within the organization, the team would’ve been banking on Luke Raley to cover the bulk of plate appearances at the position.
And who better than Naylor, who put together a magical run after arriving in Seattle from Arizona. He put up a 137 wRC+ in his 54 regular season games with the Mariners and supplemented that batting line with one of the wildest baserunning hot streaks in recent memory, swiping 19 bags in spite of his third-percentile sprint speed. He somehow leveled up in the playoffs, delivering a .967 OPS and countless clutch hits when major parts of the lineup were otherwise flailing.
This is FanGraphs, but it must be said that the intangible elements of Naylor’s presence on the club almost certainly played a part in the front office’s enthusiastic desire for a reunion. When asked on Saturday who he’d deem MVP of the clubhouse, Cal Raleigh named Naylor. The erstwhile Diamondback played (and cheered on the team) with an intense, palpable energy, and appeared to form close personal connections with many of the team’s core players, including Tucker, the Mariners’ clubhouse dog.
While Naylor’s connection with Tucker is heartwarming, it probably wasn’t sufficient to merit a deal that approached nine figures. Helpfully, the signing also manages to make good baseball sense. Between Raleigh, Randy Arozarena, and (until this season) Julio Rodríguez, the offensive core of the club features a healthy amount of swing-and-miss. Naylor’s high-contact approach lends balance to a lineup that has suffered through spells of being overly reliant on the long ball. Since he started earning regular playing time in 2022, Naylor’s 15.1% strikeout rate ranks among the stingiest in baseball; his 13.7% K rate in 2025 sat in the 91st percentile. And unlike most other low strikeout hitters, Naylor can launch a tank every now and again. While it’s hard to see him matching his 31-homer peak from 2024, there’s enough pop in the bat to boost his isolated slugging to respectable levels, rounding out his offensive game:

Mariners president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto has, in his now decade-plus tenure at the helm of the franchise, stayed away from lucrative deals for free agent hitters. Mitch Garver’s two-year, $24 million contract was the richest he’d given to a hitter since he landed in Seattle. (That didn’t go so great.) But one could see why it’s easier to get behind a five-year deal for a guy like Naylor. He won’t turn 29 until next June, meaning the majority of the contract will unfold within his relative physical prime. (As recent research by former FanGraphs contributor Justin Choi shows, bat speed tends to start its graceful decline around a hitter’s age-32 campaign, though more on that in a minute.)
While Mariners fans, the front office, and presumably Naylor himself all appear enthusiastic about the reunion, the deal is not without its potential downsides. Generally, players receiving five-year deals are closer to the star end of the spectrum than Naylor, whose 3.1 WAR last season was a career high. Steamer projects him for 2.4 WAR in 2026; ZIPS is a bit more optimistic, forecasting 3 WAR and a .784 OPS:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .272 | .334 | .450 | 529 | 67 | 144 | 31 | 0 | 21 | 91 | 48 | 82 | 18 | 125 | 3.0 |
| 2027 | .266 | .328 | .437 | 519 | 64 | 138 | 29 | 0 | 20 | 87 | 47 | 80 | 16 | 120 | 2.5 |
| 2028 | .262 | .326 | .426 | 500 | 60 | 131 | 28 | 0 | 18 | 81 | 46 | 77 | 14 | 116 | 2.1 |
| 2029 | .255 | .318 | .409 | 479 | 55 | 122 | 26 | 0 | 16 | 74 | 43 | 75 | 12 | 109 | 1.6 |
| 2030 | .252 | .315 | .399 | 449 | 50 | 113 | 24 | 0 | 14 | 67 | 40 | 71 | 10 | 106 | 1.2 |
One could perhaps add that a man of Naylor’s physique is not necessarily the one you’d want to bet on to age the most gracefully, though it does appear he’s slimmed down since his days in Cleveland. And it is hard to see a world where Naylor pops a six-win season; in all likelihood, he’s pretty well locked into the “above-average regular” tier of player with a low probability of garnering MVP votes.
Another potential element of concern is Naylor’s bat speed decline. His average swing speed went from 72.9 mph in 2024 to 70.9 mph in 2025, the largest drop-off of any qualified hitter. As Jay Jaffe argued in October, however, that drop may have been part of an intentional “power for contact” tradeoff on Naylor’s part; those slower swings helped him increase his squared-up rate by nearly four percentage points and his batting average from .243 to .295.
Ultimately, “above-average regular” is what the Mariners are paying and hoping for from this signing. In terms of star-level hitters, they are well-covered: Rodríguez and Raleigh are two of the best in the sport, and Arozarena — the weird shape of his production aside — slots in well as a third banana.
With Cole Young ready to assume a regular big league role, Colt Emerson waiting in the wings, and J.P. Crawford on the final year of his deal, the Mariners aren’t likely to sign a middle infielder. And with roughly $35 million to spend on free agents this winter, and the third base job the only clear place still in need of an upgrade on the offensive side of the ball, the team was always likely to spend some cash for a first baseman. As long as Naylor can hold down the cold corner while delivering his yearly 120 wRC+ and acting like a benevolent maniac for the next three years or so, the Mariners will be satisfied customers.
Michael Rosen is a transportation researcher and the author of pitchplots.substack.com. He can be found on Twitter at @bymichaelrosen.
Love the write up – just want to mention that the dollar value of the deal is not included in this article.
Yes, the first paragraph said that the final dollar value hasn’t been publicly released yet.
I think you misspelled “Now says,” mate.
No worries, though.
92 mil. full no-trade clause. KInda team friendly.
Yep – I like it a lot for both sides.
Glad they’ve been updating the article (at least twice, by this point!).
Also, apparently no deferrals.
The expected dollar figure (5 years, $90-100M) is a touch more than I would have expected but it makes sense because Naylor simply has more value to the Mariners than anywhere else.
One of the reasons why Dipoto doesn’t like giving out big contracts to free agent hitters is because you have no idea whether someone can hit in that home stadium until they’ve done it (the other reason is ownership, which is cheap). I don’t think Naylor is likely to hit anything like he did in his 100-or-so PAs at home since he joined the Mariners going forward, but he feels like a very strong bet to continue posting a wRC+ in the 120-125 range going forward. Which would probably make him either the second or third best hitter on the team depending on what happens with Julio Rodriguez.
I don’t really know that a team should bring back the same players and expect the same results, but I think it makes sense for them since it’s so hard to hit in Seattle. Their other big hole is third base, and Suarez is a good fit there. Probably shouldn’t let Polanco play the field though.
As a pnw dude I think there are a lot of factors. First the park is hard to hit, you have to imagine park factors aren’t what a hitter is thinking about when he sees his name on the big screen when he steps up to the plate. He sees his conventional line. Also more travel than any other team by a ton. Iirc like 25-33%. That can’t be easy. Also he’s from the cold and rain, it’s harder on people who aren’t used to it. It can be depressing for a lot of people: These are all non math factors, but when you find a guy who not only thrives he looks genuinely happy to be there, well shit resign him.
I have been thinking a lot about what Teoscar Hernandez said about the batters eye in Seattle ever since he made the comments about a year and a half ago. Unless there has been some change to it, it’s going to be an issue.
Unlike a small stadium or thin air that is the kind of thing a weird batters eye is going to affect different hitters very differently. If you can find someone where they can perform like their normal selves in that environment you should keep them.
Interesting. What is weird about it? It seems like a normal batter’s eye to me. Tall, black. blocks out the sun. I go there a lot, tough place to hit though.
By the way, Naylor also fielded very well and made an impact on the bases. Great re-signing, at a bargain-type rate, especially for a playoff star. Likeable player too, so Seattle fans are happy today.
It’s been described as being angled in a weird way while most are more parallel with home plate.
The most commonly cited complaint is the angle of it as seattlefan said but it’s not the only park with an angled batters eye. However it does appear to be the only batters eye that is angled and made out of a weird pitch black material that might create a problem with depth perception. (It also might be the most angled, I am not sure about that)
You can imagine how some players fall for the optical illusion repeatedly while others are able to adjust more easily.
Naylor’s two months in Seattle was the second-best season by a Mariners first baseman in the past 16 years (behind 2022 Ty France). So, considering he’s already one of the best Mariners 1B since Olerud, and was clearly an incredible fit in the clubhouse, bringing him back is the most obvious of obvious moves.
But for ~$20M a year for five years, I don’t really see it. He alternates between hitting 10 and 20% better than your average first baseman, and I really dislike profiles that are entirely bat-to-ball dependent, especially for a guy with this build. He’s young enough that it’s unlikely we see a total offensive collapse during this contract, but I wouldn’t be shocked if it happened. The baserunning is also cool but definitely not something I would bet on.
I feel like at these terms, I would rather pony up ~$10M more for Alonso, who’s in a totally different tier of bat even if he’s two years older. But Naylor will probably hit well at a position where the Mariners have been bleeding wins for year, and the fans and players would’ve rioted if he left. I would be happy about this if I was a Mariners fan, but I don’t think it’s a great signing.
Realistically, I think that both Alonso and the Mets want a reunion. The M’s had their chance last off-season to buy the dip, but I think that ship has sailed. And Cohen doesn’t get outbid when he wants someone.
I did not vote this down, as I don’t agree with that stuff. I do disagree that 92 million for five years is a poor signing. It is doubtful with his speed he gets anywhere near 30 steals again, but the fact he did this is a function of a hard working player that gets the most of his ability. I love this signing both from the team and player sides.
I don’t think it’s a poor signing overall. Just not a great one, and I have concerns with the profile although I ultimately think bringing him back will be worth it.
I would have concerns also if Naylor was getting the kind of money that Alonso wants. There is always risk, but even if Naylor declines quickly, this contract should not break the bank for Seattle. Naylor seems like a good supporting cast member.
Also, he’s 28. That is young for a free agent, no? I like the dice roll of buying years 28-33. I think it’s actually a great signing. I also love how early in the offseason that they did it. Everyone here wanted him back
It is not at all clear that paying $10M more for Alonso is going to be enough. If that deal is available to any team at all, it is probably for the Mets and probably not for the Mariners.
Unless you mean $10M more per year, in which case I just disagree with you.
I strongly suspect that Alonso is going to wind up back on the Mets with a similar but slightly richer deal than what he got last year, because I don’t think a 7 year $140M deal or whatever is on the table from anyone.
He has pop, fields well, and added value on the base paths. Those aren’t dependent on bat to ball.
There is nothing terribly WRONG about this contract. However:
1) He is merely a pretty good player, but if he starts declining with age, the contract will be one the Mariners regret.
2) I have not done anything systematic on this, but contracts signed in the sugar-rush of a successful season seem to go bad more frequently than regular contracts.
3) They should be able to improvise something at first base that will give them this sort of production on the cheap so they can spend their limited resources at like 2nd or 3rd base. I know they don’t have a good history with this, but that’s the kind of stuff that good front offices do.
Johnnie T wrote:
“They should be able to improvise something at first base that will give them this sort of production on the cheap so they can spend their limited resources at like 2nd or 3rd base. I know they don’t have a good history with this…”
This is exactly what the front office thought – and acted upon – for years. The end result was failure after failure. Back in 2023, the Mariners first base position was listed here at Fangraphs as the highest leverage position in baseball. Now that is a tricky concept, but it mostly meant that a dollar spent there was more valuable than a dollar spent by any team anywhere, and that was because a league-average first basemen would be a big improvement and league-average first basemen are not that expensive. So what did they do? They went out and signed Tommy La Stella for peanuts and got a -0.1 WAR season as their reward. Rinse, repeat, ad nauseum.
Exactly. The Mariners organization appears to be good at a number of things, but digging up acceptable solutions at 1b does not appear to be one of them. And it’s going to cost them some.
How many championships would the Mariners have won if they could have found cromulent first basemen and left fielders to support their long string of up-the-middle superstars? How often in the last several years have the Mariners lost winnable games because their boom-and-bust offense busted?
Every free agent contract works by providing surplus in the first couple of years, which hopefully outweighs the decline risk at the end.
This team needs this player.
Having a better 1B definitely would have been helpful these last several years, but I don’t know that it was the difference between championships (plural!) and not. The use of the term cromulent embiggens my soul, however.
Going back to 2014, they’ve missed the playoffs by a game or two 5 times and 2021 was the only time they had an above average 1B all season.
Good point. Also, a league average to above hitter has to actually be better than that to do that in Seattle. It makes sense to prioritize and pay for that production, at that spot.
The article explains why they weren’t going to sign a middle infielder to a long term deal. The third basemen on the market are either older or coming from Japan.
Also which smart front offices have successfully improvised a first baseman recently? Milwaukee with Vaughn? The Yankees and Red Sox successfully developing so many hitters that Ben Rice and Romy Gonzales had to move down the defensive spectrum? It would be a mistake to count on someone like Lowe or Mountcastle finding their 2024 form when they’re favorites to win the division.
I am also pretty convinced that most teams are not able to pull a good hitting first baseman out of nowhere. 10 teams last year averaged under a 100 wRC+ at first base and another 7 were in between 100 and 110. The Mariners were the next lowest and that was basically all Naylor.
Of the remaining 12 (I think? I have lost count now) only the Brewers and Yankees managed to hack together an acceptable bit of offense at first base from unexpected sources.
And the Brewers themselves have struggled mightily at 1B for the vast majority of the 15 years since Prince’s departure. Jumpstarting Vaughn’s dying bat was hardly the team’s plan going into 2025 and by no means a confident multiyear solution.
I would cite Milwaukee as more of an example of a smart front office that fails to cobble together 1B on the cheap. There just aren’t that many steady 125+ OPS hitters out there, platoon or otherwise.
They were paying Rhys Hoskins a similar amount to Naylor while still having to cobble together a first base situation, which included former Mariners 1B pile guy Jake Bauers. Maybe Naylor is bad in a few years but I like it more than rolling the dice on a bounce back guy every few years.
I’ve thus far resisted the urge to declare the Brewers had a real “eureka!” with Vaughn and that there’s anything sustainable there. Likely as not his destiny is to be the next in a long line of pumpkins. At least Daniel Vogelbach had the quaint charm of looking like Barrel Man.
The Yankees likely would have had a better number if they had started curtailing Goldschmidt’s ABs sooner.
Merely a pretty good player…but if…the contract…21st century sperts, folks! This is a reminder we should all be glad western society is doomed to collapse, violent and slow as that collapse seems
Good to see ya, MISTER SUNSHINE!
I agree Naylor back to Seattle made the most sense and I understand why they did this but I just want to note that just because a hitter has hit in Seattle’s difficult park environment does not mean they will continue to hit in that environment
The other guy they got at the deadline a great example!
Suarez has always been like that though. 3 months of the worst hitter in the mlb, 1 month god mode, 2 months ok. Didn’t he have like a 50-60wrc at all star break in 2024 also?
I didn’t like the deal at first (Naylor had two good months, basically, to drape over a 1 WAR/yr career; that’s a lot to commit to for five years.) But then I started thinking of the alternatives that Seattle had and I get it. Feels like it was either that or buy a Murakami lottery ticket, or perhaps buy a Pete Alonso lottery ticket, and while you’re waiting to be told no, the best remaining 1B on the market is, I dunno, Dominic Smith, which is roughly the same as just promoting someone from AAA.
Also I enjoy the part where Naylor escapes Cleveland and gets enormously rich while his little brother waves from a tiny window at the top of Terminal Tower, a tear dripping down his cheek.
I mean…Naylor averaged 2.7 WAR/650 from 2022-2024, which:
A) I weight far more highly than the 0.1 WAR from 2019-2021 and
B) Figures to be well worth $18m/year from ages 29-33.
This makes sense for both sides, but I was hoping my Nats signed him if we lose out on Alonso, as expected. He does not need 30 homeruns to be above average.
It seems harder to find an above average first basemen in recent years than theory would imply, and teams need one to have any decent shit at the playoffs. Heck even average first basemen seem hard to find, lately.
As teams have gotten better at maximizing value from their own resources, it’s a lot harder to pluck a cromulent corner guy out of another team’s system. There are a lot fewer Erubiel Durazos floating around than there used to be.
Another aspect of the Naylor situation was just how much of an organizational black hole first base had become for the Mariners, and that was BEFORE Tyler Locklear was traded.
Locklear is a rated prospect and maybe the D’backs saw something, but there are some glaring issues with his profile that need to be resolved. Locklear put up a .205 SLG last year against fastballs. All three of his homers were pulled breaking balls*; he did not have a single other extra base hit in 116 at bats. Sum it all up, and he simply has not shown an ability to get around on a major league fastball.
There is no room in MLB for a first baseman who lacks the ability to pull a fastball, and banking on improvement on this particular issue is not the sort of longshot bet that a contending team should be making.
*One homer was off a change-up from Garret Crochet, the only pitch that game that Crochet threw that was not a fastball. Locklear had no chance against his fastball.
Nice!
Nice! Pls Mariners don’t forget to trade Logan Gilbert to the Cubs this offseason finally
In regards to the bat speed question, he hit a ball 118mph this year! So, I think the max bat speed definitionally has to be there? And that he’s just (as you suggested) tamping things down a little to increase contact, but picking his spots to unleash. Which really fits the bill of him as a baseball genius.