Justin Verlander’s Tommy John Surgery Throws His Future Into Doubt
Getting old is for the birds. Since turning 37 on February 20, as the 2020 season has gone through its starts and stops, Justin Verlander has dealt with triceps soreness, a groin strain that required surgery and, after throwing six strong innings in his Opening Day start on July 24, a forearm strain. On Saturday, he announced that he would need Tommy John surgery, not only ruling out what the Astros hoped would be a comeback for this postseason, but almost certainly sidelining him for all of 2021, sending him into free agency with just one outing over a two-year span, and preventing him from attaining upper-tier spots in the all-time rankings of some significant categories.
Verlander broke the news himself via Instagram, saying in a video that he felt something in his elbow during Wednesday’s simulated game, which led to an MRI. Here’s the written statement from that post:
After consulting with several of the best doctors, it has become clear that I need Tommy John surgery. I was hopeful that I would be able to return to competition in 2020, however, during my simulated game unfortunately the injury worsened. Obviously I’m extremely disappointed, but I will not let this slow down my aspirations for my career. I will approach this rehab the only way I know, attack and don’t look back. I’m confident that with a proper rehabilitation program and my unwavering commitment that this surgery will ultimately lengthen my career as opposed to shorten it. I can’t thank my teammates, coaches, the front office and my fans enough for the support they have given me so far in this process. I’m eager to get through this recovery and back on the field to continue to do what I love.
This isn’t entirely a shock, but it is a bummer. In the wake of his forearm strain, some outlets had reported that Verlander would be out for the season, though the pitcher and the team didn’t rule out a comeback. He resumed throwing of flat ground in mid-August, off a mound in the first week of September, and had gone as high as 55-60 pitches in bullpen sessions before Wednesday, when he threw a total of 75 pitches, though only 24 game during his simulated game. The Astros hoped that he could make one more simulated start on Monday and then one competitive start before the postseason, but Verlander’s ulnar collateral ligament wasn’t buying it.
Thus Verlander joins an the All-Star cast of pitchers who’ve undergone Tommy John this year, including Luis Severino, Chris Sale, and Noah Syndergaard. Despite the abbreviated schedule, more pitchers have undergone the procedure in 2020 (19 including Verlander) than last year (16). The first half-dozen of those, including the aforementioned big names, did so during spring training; you can’t pin those on the layoff and rapid ramp-up, and I suspect we’ll need a couple of years to understand the true impact of this season on what has generally been a leveling-off of TJ totals at the major league level over the past half-decade, accompanied by a downward trend throughout the professional ranks. Speaking of which, with no true minor league season, the total number of professional pitchers undergoing TJ this year is about half of what it was last year (35 vs. 72):

This is a difficult blow for the Astros, both for 2020 and ’21. Their rotation appeared flimsy even at the time of Verlander’s triceps scare, as the team shed Gerrit Cole, Wade Miley, and Collin McHugh via free agency over the winter without bringing in anybody of note from outside the organization in free agency or trade. Led by Zack Greinke — acquired at last year’s trade deadline to help offset that exodus — the unit hasn’t been bad, entering Sunday ranked sixth in both FIP (4.33) and WAR (4.0) and seventh in ERA (4.40), but it is short on depth and postseason experience:
| Name | GS | IP | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zack Greinke | 11 | 62.1 | 24.8% | 3.2% | 0.87 | 3.90 | 2.88 | 1.9 |
| Framber Valdez | 9 | 57.1 | 25.4% | 6.4% | 0.78 | 4.24 | 3.22 | 1.4 |
| Lance McCullers Jr. | 9 | 44.1 | 21.5% | 8.6% | 0.81 | 4.87 | 3.97 | 0.7 |
| Cristian Javier | 9 | 45.2 | 23.5% | 9.5% | 1.97 | 3.55 | 5.38 | 0.3 |
| Jose Urquidy | 4 | 22.2 | 13.8% | 9.2% | 0.79 | 3.00 | 5.69 | 0.3TK |
| Brandon Bielak | 6 | 21.2 | 16.2% | 12.1% | 3.32 | 7.06 | 8.31 | -0.5 |
McCullers, who missed all of last season due to his own Tommy John, has not pitched up to his presurgery standard, though on September 16, the 26-year-old righty returned from a 10-day Injured List stint due to a nerve irritation in his neck and spun seven scoreless innings against the Rangers. He’s got more October experience than anybody in the rotation besides Greinke, having pitched in the 2015, ’17 and ’18 postseasons; most notably, he closed out the Yankees with four shutout innings of relief in Game 7 of the 2017 ALCS and turned in 2.1 scoreless innings against the Dodgers to start Game 7 of the World Series. His experience in working long out of the bullpen provides Baker with an alternative to starting.
Urquidy, a 25-year-old righty who made seven starts and two relief appearances totaling 41 innings last year, didn’t make an appearance until September due to a positive test for COVID-19, but he’s a seasoned veteran as far as the postseason is concerned, at least relative to this bunch. His four appearances totaling 10 innings last October include five shutout innings in his lone start in Game 4 of the World Series against the Nationals. He’s fully stretched out, having gone at least six innings in each of his past three starts, though only one of them (September 10 against the A’s) was against a playoff-caliber team.
The Astros do have reasonable alternatives in Valdez, a 26-year-old lefty, and Javier, a 23-year-old rookie righty. Valdez, now in his third season in the majors, has rebounded from a dismal 2019 season (5.86 ERA, 4.98 FIP in 70.2 innings) to be the team’s second-best starter, though he was pounded for 13 runs in 12 innings across back-to-back starts against the Angels and Dodgers before righting himself against the lowly Rangers. Javier has outpitched his gaudy walk and homer rates, though he’s done a very good job of limiting hard contact, placing in the 91st percentile in hard-hit rate (29.0%).
In the end, Dusty Baker’s choice for who starts behind Greinke may come down to matchups. At 27-26, the Astros are locked into the sixth seed for the Wild Card Series; currently, they’d face the A’s (33-20), though it’s not out of question that the White Sox (34-19) or Rays (35-19) could fall to third. Tampa Bay has the strongest left-handed presence, followed by Oakland, with Chicago last in the league among PA by lefties; Urquidy and Valdez have been the most successful from among this group against lefties over the past two seasons, holding them to wOBAs of .218 and .289, respectively, and McCullers has held them to a .278 mark in his career (.319 this year). Chicago is the most righty-heavy, and Javier (.200) has fared the best against righties, with the rest between .328 and .338 — a big step down. Most likely, the Astros will have to piece together a plan, because they have nobody behind Greinke who presents himself as an obvious answer once such considerations are brought into play.
From a longer-term standpoint, this may mean that Verlander has thrown his last competitive pitch as an Astro, or at least the last under the two-year, $66 million extension he signed in March 2019 (I’ll pause while you fetch the Kleenex to weep for Jim Crane paying him $11 million per inning). With Michael Brantley, Yuli Gurriel, Brad Peacock, Josh Reddick, and George Springer coming off the books this winter, general manager James Click will have money to put towards the rotation — that is, if the Astros are hoping to contend in 2021 rather than start another cycle of tanking.
As for Verlander, he likely punched his ticket to Cooperstown in 2019 while collecting his third no-hitter, second Cy Young, and 3,000th strikeout (via his first 300-strikeout season, achieving both milestones in the same game). Via Baseball Reference’s version of WAR, his 71.8 career/50.0 peak/60.9 JAWS line is pretty close to the position standards (73.3/50.0/61.6); he’s the active leader in the latter two categories, though Greinke and Clayton Kershaw will likely pass him in JAWS (they’re at 60.2 and 59.7) before he returns.
Losing his age-37 and -38 seasons will likely deprive Verlander a shot at topping Pud Galvin (67.7) to claim a top-25 spot in JAWS, but that’s less likely to be noticed among voters and fans than getting to 300 wins and/or 4,000 strikeouts, or at least a spot in the top 10 in the latter category, which would mean surpassing Greg Maddux’s 3,371.
Towards that end, I asked Dan Szymborski to run some ZiPS projections to give us an idea of the impact Verlander’s injuries will have on his future seasonal and and career numbers. First, here’s how he would have looked if he had been healthy to start 2021:
| Year | Age | W | L | ERA | GS | IP | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38 | 11 | 6 | 3.38 | 23 | 143.7 | 33 | 179 | 131 | 3.5 |
| 2022 | 39 | 10 | 6 | 3.54 | 21 | 127.0 | 30 | 152 | 125 | 2.9 |
| 2023 | 40 | 9 | 6 | 3.76 | 20 | 124.3 | 31 | 145 | 118 | 2.5 |
| 2024 | 41 | 9 | 6 | 3.73 | 19 | 115.7 | 28 | 135 | 119 | 2.4 |
| 2021-24 | 39 | 23 | 3.60 | 83 | 511 | 122 | 610 | 124 | 11.2 | |
| Thru 2020 | 226 | 129 | 3.33 | 454 | 2988 | 851 | 3013 | 129 | 71.8 | |
| Totals | 265 | 152 | 3.37 | 537 | 3499 | 973 | 3623 | 128 | 83.0 |
Part of the problem with projecting Verlander is how far into the future to go; he himself has said he wants to pitch until he’s 45, which is hardly impossible given his ability to miss bats; atop the career strikeout list are Nolan Ryan, who pitched until he was 46, followed by Randy Johnson (45), Roger Clemens (45), and Steve Carlton (43). The projection above certainly suggests a pitcher successful enough that he could keep going, but if he were to pack it in at that point, he’d rank seventh in strikeouts, 17 short of Tom Seaver, who pitched “only” through his age-41 season and finished with 3,640 K’s. He’d also finish with 66.5 JAWS, good for 26th on the career leaderboard, between Galvin and Amos Rusie (64.6), who are followed by Curt Schilling, Ed Walsh, and Mike Mussina in the rankings.
The post-surgery projections, on the other hand, suggest he would be about league-average in limited duty:
| Year | Age | W | L | ERA | GS | IP | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 39 | 5 | 3 | 4.31 | 11 | 64.7 | 15 | 69 | 103 | 0.9 |
| 2023 | 40 | 4 | 3 | 4.42 | 9 | 57.0 | 14 | 58 | 100 | 0.8 |
| 2024 | 41 | 4 | 3 | 4.68 | 9 | 54.7 | 13 | 54 | 95 | 0.6 |
| 2022-24 | 12 | 10 | 4.46 | 29 | 176 | 42 | 182 | 99 | 2.3 | |
| Thru 2020 | 226 | 129 | 3.33 | 454 | 2988 | 851 | 3013 | 129 | 71.8 | |
| Totals | 238 | 139 | 3.39 | 483 | 3164 | 893 | 3195 | 127 | 74.1 |
Via this route, which looks as though it would be a slog, Verlander would eke past Fergie Jenkins (3,192) for 12th in strikeouts and finish 0.1 behind Ryan (62.2) in JAWS, 32nd ahead of 19th-century hurler Tommy Bond (61.8).
Regarding Verlander’s chances at the aforementioned round-numbered milestones, I asked Dan for some estimates. Entering 2020 in good health, he had a 32% chance at 300 wins and a 38% chance at 4,000 strikeouts. With no season but good health entering 2021, those would have dropped to 14% and 30%, respectively. With a non-TJS injury that wiped out his 2021, those odds would have instead dropped to 10% and 27%. With the surgery, he’s down to 4% and 11%, though again, it’s important to point out that those odds depend upon the length of his return past the point when most players hang ’em up.
“Since he was already ‘off’ the pace,” explained Dan, “the scenarios under which he manages 300/4,000, especially the former, relied on him aging better than ZiPS expected on average. But two missed seasons to injury means there’s practically no chance of him aging better than ZiPS expected on average after 2019.”
Again, that’s a bummer. If there’s an upside to this, it’s that Verlander will join John Smoltz on the short list of enshrined pitchers who underwent Tommy John surgery. Billy Wagner — who did jump from 16.7% in the 2019 BBWAA balloting to 31.7% in 2020, his fifth year of eligibility — could beat him there, though he still faces an uphill battle, and it will be awhile before another candidate (Sale or Jacob deGrom, both much further away) even gets on that particular radar. For now it will suffice to say that Verlander’s injury is a loss for the Astros, and will likely cost him some significant milestones. Let’s hope we haven’t seen the last of one of the game’s greats pitching at the top of his game.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Verlander should have a third Cy Young award (2018), which would make him a no-doubt HOFer.
Also, knowing what a competitor Verlander is, if he can’t rebuild his arm strength to be an effective starter, I’d love to see him in a high-leverage bullpen role, with Smoltz as a model. Topping off his career with a couple of 30-40 save seasons would be a lot more interesting than trying to build on 226 wins, since 300 isn’t in sight.
Smoltz isn’t exactly a model for that, since he underwent a mid-career role chance and eventually returned to starting.
I mean, he should have won in 2016 too, but I don’t think there was any question that he’s a no doubt HOFer already.
Actually, he should have won in 2012, also. He had by far the best peripherals in 2012, but, David Price won 20 games in a low run scoring environment in Tampa, while Verlander “only” won 17 due to poor run support in Detroit
Lack of run support by Detroit cost him in 2012 & 2016. Blake Snell’s ridiculous luck with men on base cost him in 2018. That said, Cole probably deserved it last year.
Valdez is a stud–he is great at keeping the ball on the ground, and with respectable walk/strikeout numbers too. He has a very strong chance to be a solid 4-win starter in a regular year. So that’s good, but losing a guy who put up over 6 wins in back to back seasons really hurts your postseason chances.
Not sure there are a lot of guys with good spin rates and huge velocity that aren’t adding up available, like the Astros found when they got Cole and Verlander. It seems almost impossible to replace him for next year, much less this one.
I remember there was a big deal about him changing his posture in his wind-up in early spring, and to me that isn’t surprising that it coincided with an arm injury. Seems weird that a guy who has been one of the best pitchers in the MLB decided to make that type of change.
Verlander has been making a lot of adjustments as he ages. I know that this is an ongoing debate, but the guy went from being a 3-win pitcher with the Tigers to being a 6 win pitcher with the Astros. I think it’s hard to see because his velocity seems fine, but part of the reason why he has been so good is because he keeps trying out new things.
Have to assume that some of that might be somewhat related to recovery/compensation for the groin injury.
300 Wins is going to be tough. Per baseball reference, here are the top 10 in wins after age 40:
1. Phil Niekro 121
2. Jamie Moyer 105
3. Jack Quinn 96
4. Bartolo Colon 76
5. Warren Spahn 75
6. Cy Young 75
7. Randy Johnson 73
8. Nolan Ryan 71
9. Charlie Hough 67
10. Roger Clemens 61
There are a couple of “crafty lefties” that pitched forever a couple of knuckleballers (that pitched forever) and a few guys from the before times. He needs 74 and he’ll be 39 when he comes back. Johnson, Clemens, and maybe Ryan are probably good comps for era/style and if he wins a few games in 2022 (assuming no prolonged work stoppage) that puts him in striking range based on those guy’s totals.
Since Verlander will be 39 in 2022, not 40, I ran the list at that cutoff https://stathead.com/sharing/mN8Bt. 11 pitchers with 74 or more wins from 39 onward, four with 987 or more strikeouts (for 4,000), 31 with at least 359 strikeouts (to surpass Maddux and crack the top 10), 8 with at least 689 strikeouts (to surpass Blyleven and crack the top 5), 14 with at least 13.7 bWAR (to surpass Galvin in JAWS and crack the top 25), 7 with at least 20.8 bWAR (to surpass Perry, Pedro and Old Hoss and get into the top 20 in JAWS), etc.
Verlander is truly a freak of nature, and it’s a miracle his UCL didn’t explode years ago from all of the IPs, elevated MPH and general work-horsiness.
A random bonus from this piece: learning a bit about HOF pitcher Pud Galvin. 3 amazing facts I picked up: 1) he won 46 games in consecutive years in 1883-84, and completed 70+ starts each of those seasons, 2) he’s among baseball’s first high-profile PED abusers, injecting an extract of monkey testes before a game in 1889, and 3) he was called “Pud.”
Today’s starters are wusses.
Has there ever really been any proof that high workloads make pitchers get hurt? Seems like in Asia they go under the knife a lot less, yet throw a lot more, and they aren’t all finesse pitchers. Bauer talked about throwing 100s of pitches between starts, and while he is certainly unique, maybe it is a combination of factors. I’d imagine the harder you throw the more likely it is, but I always wonder if babying pitchers when they are young is actually a good thing?
Well, something is hurting their arms. I don’t doubt that there are at least a few pitchers who could tolerate a higher work load than is common now, but the only way to find them would be to give everyone a high workload and see who doesn’t get hurt. For every Nolan Ryan, you have a Don Gullett (done at 27), or Smoky Joe Wood (25), or a Steve Barber (36, but pitch who pitched half his career with a “dead” arm).
And while people often point out that even with the reduced workload pitchers still get hurt, they are throwing harder than ever, and there are very few positions in opposing lineups where they can take it easy.
A lot of people are taking their anger for the Astros out on JV, which is all sorts of unfair. JV has been a fantastic pitcher his entire career, and didn’t even debut for the Stros until a month before the postseason. Same thing with guys like Greinke and Yordan- it’s not their fault a team they were not on at the time cheated.
I think criticizing him for changing his tune re: electronic sign stealing is fair. This article has a decent summary of how he went silent on issues about which he was formerly outspoken.
https://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2020/1/27/21082717/mlb-justin-verlander-sign-stealing-houston-astros-detroit-tigers-roberto-osuna-domestic-abuse
This I had not known about, thank you for this
Agreed. It’s completely fair to criticize JV. He sat in that dugout, heard the banging, saw his teammates gathered around that dugout video monitor, and said and did NOTHING to stop it. He enjoyed the benefits of the extra runs and extra pressure on opposing pitchers.
When the Astros got caught cheating, JV said NOTHING about the fact that he looked the other way and reaped those benefits. He’s got to own it just as much as anyone else, but he hasn’t even come close.
I agree with this. I was on the JV HOF train but no longer. I’m of the view the writers should keep him out but I’d probably be ok with a vet committee selection at some point.
He’s a liar and a hypocrite. Bad things happen to bad people.
Even if Verlander had a career-ending injury before 2019, he still would have breezed into the HoF.
Top 3 pitcher in the 21st century (with a reasonable case for #1), top 10 Cy Young share of all time.
To be fair, the main reason he is potentially the top pitcher in the 21st century (so far, with the other main contenders being Kershaw and Halladay) is because Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez split their career across different centuries.
Of course, the easy way to respond to that is: If the main argument against someone is that they aren’t as good as Randy Johnson or Pedro Martinez, that’s a pretty good player.
I would say that Kershaw, Halladay, and Verlander all should be Hall of Famers, and all three were better than Sabathia (who probably is but I need to think about it more).
Verlander will go into the Hall, and it’s very much deserved. The future of the Astros is pretty interesting though. They have a brutally bad farm system and a lot of talent leaving in the next few years. They still compete next year if they bring in some free agents, but the path to being competitive in 2022 and beyond is pretty unclear. It’s kind of amazing how quickly they went from dynastic juggernaut to possible rebuilders.
Right, for 2021 is to hope that Bregman and Altuve and Correa and McCullers bounce back enough that if they fortify with free agents they can make one last run before everyone becomes a free agent. They hope they can bring back or find replacements for Springer and Brantley, and they’ll sign some pitchers to fill out the rotation.
In 2022, when Bregman and Altuve are the only ones under contract, I think the plan is to trade Bregman (hopefully he has a good year in 2021), whatever relievers are good and still under contract, find a way to lock up Valdez and Tucker and Alvarez long term, and hope that those three + Altuve + Whitley/Javier/Urquidy gives the team enough of a floor so they can rebuild with prospects.
Brutally bad farm is very much an overstatment.
Verlander certainly has the “bona fides” to have value when he comes back from TJ. The Mariners would be smart to offer him a “make good” contract and Seattle would be a great home for him to get back to speed. However, unlike the deal the Mariners made with Taijuan Walker, if they sign Verlander they should have at least a 2nd year that vests to Verlander for certain benchmarks in year 1, so he would be there for 2022 and 2023 if he works out. Win-Win