Kenley Jansen is Mariano Rivera 2.0
Kenley Jansen has never been better.
On Sunday, Jansen threw 12 pitches — 12 cutters — and 11 for strikes to close out the Reds during a 1-2-3 ninth. Video evidence of the simplistic, ruthlessly efficient, Jansen Way:
When he struck out Eugenio Suarez to end the game, Jansen recorded his 50th strikeout of the season. He has still not walked a batter. He keeps bettering his MLB record which he set earlier this month in Milwaukee, when he recorded his 36th strikeout of the season without issuing a walk.
In an era when relievers have never missed more bats, thrown harder, or produced more devilish breaking pitches, Jansen is arguably the best reliever in the game. He leads all relievers with a 0.30 FIP, 0% walk rate (LOL), and a K-BB rate of 47.7% (LOL). He is second in relief WAR (1.9) to Craig Kimbrel (2.1) and is fifth in ERA- (22).
He has the eighth-lowest in-zone contact rate among relievers (73.2%) and the ninth highest out-of-zone swing rate (39.6%), which is a career best. You can view all the aforementioned and sortable leaderboards here.
He is a one-trick pitcher, but it is a heckuva trick. He has thrown his cutter on at least 84% of his offerings every year since 2012, but he’s leaning on it at a carer-high 91.2% rate this season. While the number of pitches in the strike zone (54.3%) is near his career average of 53.6%, his first-pitch strike rate (79.4%) has jumped 11 points from last season (68.1%) and is well above his carer mark (64.9%).
The Jansen cutter ranks second in vertical movement among all major league cutters (9.35), third in horizontal movement (3.19), third in whiffs per swing (37.26%) and first in pop-ups per balls in play (22%), according to the Baseball Prospectus leaderboards.
The pitch is getting better. It’s moving more and generating more whiffs and weak contact compared to last year and his career averages (33.4% whiffs per swing) and 14% pop-up rate.
And because of the cutter reliance, because of his utter dominance, the comps to Mariano Rivera have been common throughout his career.
But the comp is growing in relevance. Jansen is no longer like Rivera. He is Rivera, at least through eight major league seasons. He is as close to Rivera as anything we might see. While Craig Kimbrel is arguably more dominant, Jansen’s profile is a better match and perhaps a batter guide of what to expect going forward. Some, especially those residing between Connecticut and Philadelphia on the Eastern seaboard (or having migrated to Florida), would consider comparing any reliever to Rivera as sacrilegious. But though their first eight seasons, Jansen is Rivera —- minus the World Series rings and opportunities.
Consider FanGraphs’ ERA- leaderboard since 1997:
| Name | ERA | FIP | xFIP | ERA- | FIP- | WPA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mariano Rivera | 2.02 | 2.71 | 2.99 | 45 | 61 | 50.69 |
| 2 | Craig Kimbrel | 1.79 | 1.77 | 2.05 | 46 | 46 | 19.03 |
| 3 | Aroldis Chapman | 2.12 | 1.87 | 2.15 | 54 | 47 | 14.32 |
| 4 | Billy Wagner | 2.31 | 2.65 | 2.76 | 54 | 61 | 27.58 |
| 5 | Takashi Saito | 2.34 | 2.81 | 3.26 | 55 | 66 | 9.97 |
| 6 | Kenley Jansen | 2.11 | 1.82 | 2.23 | 57 | 48 | 15.48 |
| 7 | Greg Holland | 2.36 | 2.24 | 2.73 | 57 | 56 | 14.16 |
| 8 | Jonathan Papelbon | 2.44 | 2.81 | 3.27 | 58 | 69 | 28.52 |
| 9 | Darren O’Day | 2.48 | 3.4 | 3.61 | 58 | 80 | 14.08 |
| 10 | Koji Uehara | 2.54 | 2.72 | 2.94 | 59 | 65 | 13.65 |
| 11 | Mike Adams | 2.41 | 3.09 | 3.38 | 60 | 75 | 9.21 |
| 12 | Clayton Kershaw | 2.36 | 2.59 | 2.93 | 62 | 66 | 35.58 |
| 13 | Pedro Martinez | 2.78 | 2.76 | 3.44 | 62 | 64 | 43.72 |
| 14 | Cody Allen | 2.57 | 2.84 | 3.23 | 63 | 70 | 8.22 |
| 15 | Brad Ziegler | 2.59 | 3.42 | 3.58 | 63 | 85 | 13.62 |
| 16 | Robb Nen | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.76 | 64 | 62 | 10.09 |
| 17 | Joakim Soria | 2.8 | 3.09 | 3.27 | 66 | 74 | 18.9 |
| 18 | Jose Fernandez | 2.58 | 2.44 | 2.72 | 67 | 65 | 9.23 |
| 19 | Kelvin Herrera | 2.79 | 3.14 | 3.25 | 67 | 78 | 7.33 |
| 20 | Joe Nathan | 2.87 | 3.36 | 3.22 | 67 | 79 | 30.63 |
The entirety of Rivera’s career was not watched by PITCHf/x tracking, but Rivera did not reach 80% cutter usage until 2008, according to the PITCHf/x and FanGraphs pitch tagging. That was Rivera’s Age 38 season. Rivera leaned on the pitch at an 82% or greater rate throughout the rest of his career, retiring after 2013.
While Jansen and Rivera’s first eight years are remarkably similar when accounting for run-scoring environment and ballparks, Jansen, 29, is three years younger than Rivera was in his eighth season.
Jansen should, in theory, have more tread left on his tires, though having 11 more Rivera-like seasons is asking a lot. The fact that Jansen has leaned more on the cutter earlier in his career might compromise his longevity if you are among the believers that the pitch places more stress on a pitcher’s elbow and shoulders relative to other pitch types. Some organizations believe this, like the Orioles, which had Dylan Bundy shelve his cutter earlier in his career.
While linear weights is not a perfect measure to gauge pitch effectiveness, it does boil down value to one measure, and cutters don’t age any less well than most offerings:
| wFA | wFT | wFC | wSL | wCU | wCH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 25 | -375.5 | -131.6 | 63.9 | 543.4 | 41.7 | 73.8 |
| Age 26 | -124.2 | 4.4 | 110.8 | 753.4 | 69.3 | 30.7 |
| Age 27 | -213.5 | -100.1 | 62.6 | 729 | 78.3 | -3.6 |
| Age 28 | -3.4 | -198.4 | 113.1 | 639.7 | 94.8 | 73.6 |
| Age 29 | -101.4 | -33.7 | 90.2 | 378.7 | 64.6 | 126 |
| Age 30 | 136.9 | -63 | 97.6 | 371.6 | 79.9 | 5.7 |
| Age 31 | 9.2 | -50.9 | 76.8 | 273 | 81.3 | 66.6 |
| Age 32 | -115.5 | -13 | 87.7 | 163.6 | 88.8 | -3.1 |
| Age 33 | 78.8 | -13.2 | 29.5 | 107.5 | -61.1 | -34.8 |
| Age 34 | -96.4 | -75.2 | -1.1 | 50.4 | 8.8 | -12.6 |
| Age 35 | -21.4 | -52.3 | -43.6 | 153.5 | -59.3 | -40.2 |
Not only do Jansen and Rivera test conventional wisdom in regard to how many pitches a pitcher requires to be elite, even in the bullpen, perhaps they will also change some thinking about the cutter.
Jansen is a glaring reminder to remain open-minded.
Would every organization have experimented with Jansen, then a struggling catcher with the High-A Inland Empire 66ers, as a pitcher in 2009? He slashed .202/.268/.303 in 26 games as a catcher, and struck out 19 in 11 2/3 innings that season as he chose the right fork in the road.
Would every staff allow a pitcher to rely so heavily on one pitch? And it is perhaps that usage that is allowing such a mastery of the pitch. After a walk rate that hovered near double-digits earlier in his career, Jansen is well on his way to posting a sub-5% walk rate for a third straight season. Heck, maybe he will not a walk a batter this season.
Jansen is so unusual he invites the only comp that makes sense: Mariano Rivera.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
kek
wtf
It’s important to remember that Jansen throws a fastball that cuts but he does use a cutter grip.
Jansens 4 seam grip shows cutting action when he throws it 90 to 93. Above 95 it straightens into a 4 seamed. He always uses a 4 seam grip and does not intentionally spin the baseball.
Even if cutters are hard on the arm, there’s no reason to think Jansen would be subject as he doesn’t do anything to get the action he shows.
Eno mentioned in a chat that his grip actually had his thumb and pinkie connecting underneath the ball, which is certainly not a conventional 4-seam grip (or cutter for that matter). It’s possible, on top of being a basically entirely unique grip, it’s also like Zach Britton’s cutter grip sinker, where a grip that supposed to do one thing, does something completely different in this one case.
His hand is much larger than most humans.
That’s why they touch.
The more I look at it the more it seems like this is correct, though Eno (here’s the chat BTW: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eno-sarris-baseball-chat-61517/), who spends much time discussing and looking at grips, found it a bit strange.
I trust eno but the natural cut of Kenley’s fb is widely discussed by the Dodger organization and I trust them more.
Yeah, I watched an interview where he says it’s just a 4-seam grip, and other than his mammoth hands probably causing the fingers touching, it looks like a 4-seam grip.
To be fair to Eno, he never said anything about the grip other than the fingers touching.
So…Kershaw and Pedro are pretty good, eh?
That chart must be wrong. That Billy Wagner scrub is #4 and I don’t see Trevor Hoffman anywhere and he almost got inducted to the HoF this year.
Jansen almost looks upset in the first video that Duvall even makes contact even though it’s a harmless popout.
Also, convert all catchers to relievers NOW.
*ahem*
https://goo.gl/3AZC2H
One can really appreciate his cutter if you get a camera angle directly behind the pitcher. When the camera is offset to the right of the pitcher (most angles) his cutter just looks like an average fastball which is maybe why he seems less overwhelming than many elite relievers yet is just as effective.
did you account for survivor bias on the aging table?
The level of noise in that table even after summing up the whole league really makes me shake my head at pitch linear weights.
They seriously think the cutter injures arms? It’s almost exactly like a fastball except your finger pressure. Also, what good that did Bundy, he still got his arm screwed.
The ERA- since 1997 leaderboard would have been more fun if it compared MRs first 8 reliever seasons. Or if you had excluded to cumulative stats. Clouds the main point, to compare these guys.
“While Craig Kimbrel is arguably more dominant…” So you say you might prefer the guy with a 0.38 FIP instead of the guy with a 0.29 FIP? Well, I prefer to have BOTH–one to pitch in the 8th and the other one to pitch in the 9th. And I also want Betances and Osuna to pitch in the 6th and 7th innnings. And a pony.
Takahashi Saito, wow.