Kevin McGonigle’s Time Isn’t Soon — It’s Now

Junfu Han/USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

After the signing of Framber Valdez served as an exclamation point on what had been a fairly quiet offseason, the Detroit Tigers have established themselves as the preseason favorites in the AL Central. With a generally deep lineup and a solid rotation further buttressed by what is likely Justin Verlander’s swan song, you have to like Detroit’s chances, even if you think that the Royals or Guardians could prove to be a bigger threat than Vegas currently does.

But as someone who has now spent decades feeding data into a cold, impersonal machine and watching it spit out projections, I know about as well as anyone that the future is horribly uncertain. Predictions are not destiny, and a team with a 75% chance of making the playoffs still has a one-in-four shot of watching them on TV. Over the next few weeks, the Tigers need to answer as many questions about their team as possible, and one of the biggest is whether their top prospect, Kevin McGonigle, will start the season in Detroit or Toledo. And if the Tigers are truly in win-now mode, McGonigle being in the Opening Day lineup is the absolutely correct move to make.

That the Tigers have made “now” into their most important timeframe isn’t an assertion that I’m just pulling out of nothingness. With the negotiating gap between Tarik Skubal and Detroit on an extension reportedly in the range of $250 million, retaining Skubal’s services for 2026 only makes sense if you’re going for it. If their goal is simply to try to quietly cruise into the playoffs with 86 wins, then they might as well have traded Skubal to a team that is willing to go all-in, and hoped that they’ll do fine with the impressive players they’re likely to get in return.

And yet, Skubal remains, which means that McGonigle ought to join him in the majors.

On a fundamental level, the primary purpose of the minor leagues is to develop players who can help the parent club win. And McGonigle didn’t just excel in the minors last season, he absolutely dominated multiple levels, posting a 182 wRC+ (162 at Double-A) with 19 homers in 88 games as a 20-year-old. Those are video game numbers, ones that suggest that you probably need to raise the difficulty level of the game you’re playing.

And there aren’t really any hidden concerns lurking, no wacky BABIP distorting things (he posted a .303 on the season) or disturbing contact rate (83% overall). McGonigle didn’t just torch minor league pitchers; he destroyed them with a very advanced approach at the plate. After the season, he continued his reign of terror in the Arizona Fall League, hitting .362/.500/.710 with a 19-to-12 walk-to-strikeout ratio. His spring training has gotten off to a solid start as well, going 6-for-15 with two doubles and a triple. And that’s not counting the exhibition game against the Dominican Republic’s WBC squad, which he led off with a home run against Luis Severino.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Giving McGonigle a fair shot doesn’t involve the Tigers having to reduce the playing time of, say, prime Cal Ripken Jr. or Alan Trammell. Javier Báez had a much better 2025 than most predicted going into the season — myself included — but it wasn’t like he had a resurgence into stardom. A .275/.310/.442 first half got him into the All-Star Game, but he hit .223/.230/.318 in the second half, and finished with just 1.4 WAR on the year. Even giving him a lot of leeway for a nagging shoulder issue in June and a September injury stemming from hitting a foul ball that womped him in the forehead, a 1-to-46 walk-to-strikeout ratio during that second half is truly abysmal — and no, I didn’t leave out a digit in the first number. Let’s not forget that Báez even having a roster spot last year had a lot to do with there being about $75 million remaining on his contract going into the season.

Likely sharing time with Báez at shortstop is Zach McKinstry, especially if Báez’s back continues to be a problem. McKinstry has been surprisingly adequate at short when he’s played there, but he’s also an incredibly flexible defensive player who will likely get a ton of plate appearances whether or not McGonigle is in the majors, as he’s basically the team’s best Plan B at several positions. Plus, I don’t think anybody would dispute the notion that McGonigle has greater upside than McKinstry.

ZiPS isn’t expecting McGonigle to instantly challenge Bobby Witt Jr. and Gunnar Henderson for shortstop supremacy in the American League, but it does project him to be in near-All-Star territory if given a full season of plate appearances. It’s rare for ZiPS to project a rookie to be that good, especially a player who hasn’t yet played at Triple-A, and of this year’s prospects, only McGonigle and Konnor Griffin project to be anywhere near that level of performance. Here are McGonigle’s ZiPS percentiles, assuming 600 projected plate appearances:

ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Kevin McGonigle
Percentile 2B HR BA OBP SLG OPS+ WAR
95% 53 36 .308 .391 .587 162 7.1
90% 47 30 .300 .378 .546 151 6.3
80% 42 26 .285 .362 .519 141 5.5
70% 39 24 .272 .352 .493 129 4.7
60% 37 22 .265 .340 .467 122 4.2
50% 35 20 .257 .332 .452 116 3.6
40% 33 18 .249 .325 .435 109 3.2
30% 31 17 .240 .317 .419 102 2.6
20% 27 15 .230 .307 .392 94 2.0
10% 24 13 .214 .294 .362 82 1.3
5% 22 11 .205 .285 .343 75 0.8

Per the projections, that’s an 86% chance of him accruing more WAR than Báez did in 2025, and a 92% chance of him putting up more WAR than the latter is projected to generate if he’s given 600 plate appearances this year. One of the unknowns, of course, is just how good McGonigle will be defensively at shortstop. ZiPS, which has a probability-based metric based on ball coordinates, thinks he is about average at short, but its method is a far more limited than the Statcast defensive data in the majors. Our prospect team, which ranked McGonigle fifth overall on February’s Top 100 as a 60-FV prospect, isn’t quite as positive, though they don’t think he’s likely to be a butcher or anything:

Shortstop defense is the only blemish here. McGonigle has soft hands and can transfer the ball quickly, but he often doesn’t, and his arm and range look light; he also doesn’t have the kind of frame or build you’d project to get any more nimble with maturity. The Tigers have mostly had him run out to short thus far, but he played third base a dozen times in the Fall League, where he was spotted doing infield work with Alan Trammell. He looked comfortable making throws at third with his body moving toward first. He position may be dictated more by Detroit’s needs than McGonigle’s best fit in a vacuum. Regardless of where he plays, McGonigle offers a great blend of a high floor with star upside.

The Tigers are well-insulated from the risk in the event that McGonigle proves that he does need time at Triple-A for additional polish. They’re not choosing between McGonigle and signing a free agent, but between McGonigle and a player who will already be on the roster. Báez, McKinstry, and Trey Sweeney (depending on the shoulder) remain the fallback options. If McGonigle puts up a .550 OPS in April or has a surprisingly leaden glove, they still have the guy they were going to use anyway. And let’s not forget that risk tends to have multiple sides; advancing a player too slowly can have deleterious effects because if they aren’t being challenged, they aren’t learning new skills or dealing with adversity. There’s a good chance that McGonigle won’t learn anything facing Triple-A pitchers except how much a cheeseburger costs at the Fifth Third Field concession stands.

The ZiPS season simulations attempt to take the interaction between performance and playing time into account when estimating team standings. In his higher percentile outcomes, McGonigle gets more than the 350 plate appearances he’s projected to get on average; when he struggles, he gets less playing time, with the simulated Tigers using their other shortstop options more. As of this morning, ZiPS projects the Tigers with a 61% chance of winning the division and a 5.8% chance of winning the World Series. When McGonigle hits his 80th-percentile OPS+, those numbers climb to 71% and 6.8%. A true breakout season from him would boost the Tigers to being on the level of any other team in baseball in a one-on-one matchup, with the possible exception of the Dodgers.

With three weeks of spring training remaining, the Tigers don’t have to decide who their starting shortstop is right now. But unless something changes drastically, the bold move would be to show faith in Kevin McGonigle, and give the team the strongest chance of ending the year soaked in beer and champagne. Sometimes you just have to push all your chips into the center of the table behind your best hand.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
andyh1818Member since 2024
6 months ago

Is it possible to see these zips projection by percentiles for other players?

Lunch AngleMember since 2016
6 months ago
Reply to  andyh1818

Szymborski releases 80/20 percentile projections on a team-by-by-team basis every winter https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2026-zips-projections-chicago-cubs/

andyh1818Member since 2024
6 months ago
Reply to  Lunch Angle

Thanks

mcraw4dMember since 2024
6 months ago

I was looking yesterday at their most likely means of getting him on the roster and I noticed Parker Meadows is 1 for 17 this spring and has a minor league option remaining. Shifting Baez out to share CF and sliding McKinstry to a super utility role (along with Vierling) seems like a very Tiger-y solution.

pmaguranMember since 2023
6 months ago
Reply to  mcraw4d

That’s what i think makes sense as well. Javy was surprisingly functional out there last year, and Wencel can be a credible backup.

GoodEnoughForMeMember since 2018
6 months ago

Yeah, I just don’t think there’s a world where his bat isn’t an improvement for this team. The lineup is flexible and deep but light in star power/ceiling. Plus he has as good a chance as any of RotY and nabbing the team a draft pick.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago

Feels like a candidate for a Chourio-type extension. It would have to be more but I think that could work out for everyone.

Also, even if McGonigle is a work in progress defensively he’s got to be better than Colt Keith at third. If you stuck McGonigle at short and McKinstry at third that would be a lot better, and the other way around would almost certainly be better too.

PC1970Member since 2024
6 months ago

I would easily take the over on that .257 50th percentile BA. With his barrel rate, hard hit % & contact/bat-to-ball ability, he just screams “.300 hitter”..even in this day & age.

Flip side is I would expect less power than Zips does, at least for now. I could see a .290/.365/.465 slash line or something like that.

BTW, that HR off Severino went 471 ft. I think he has the power potential, but, it just may take some time to actuate.

& honestly, if I was to pick the player with the best odds to hit .350 or .400 (as unlikely as anyone doing either would be), it would be McGonigle.

Last edited 6 months ago by PC1970
Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
6 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

From May 2024-May 2025, Aaron Judge hit .371 over a 162 game period. If we’re talking who might hit .350 this year, he’d be the guy I chose. If we’re talking career from this point forward, McGonigle would be in my top 5, easy.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago

I don’t like that the Tigers didn’t pick a direction this offseason with Skubal. Framber is a talented pitcher and getting Verlander back is a nice story. But Framber is a weird fit with that infield defense and Ranger Suarez signed for a similar total salary over 5 years instead of 3, Kenley Jansen is a weird choice for a closer IMO, they should have been all-in on every Suarez (Eugenio, Robert, and Ranger). And if not they should have seen what they could have gotten out of a team that wanted to win the offseason (would the Cubs have parted with Jefferson Rojas, Kevin Alcantara, Owen Caissie, Jaxon Wiggins, and Pedro Ramirez? Would the Orioles have traded Beavers, De Leon, Forret, and de Brun? We will never know)

But since that ship seems to have sailed, how much is too much for a Skubal extension? I don’t think that $250M gap is accurate, that’s probably the difference between what his camp wanted last year and what they offered him on an extension. The Tigers were probably offering to buy out two years and a couple years of free agency and Skubal wanted to be set for life

You’re clearly not getting him for less than Gerrit Cole’s AAV or total contract value. That was 9 years, $324M with $36M AAV, but you’re also buying him out a year before free agency so you’re assuming some risk that he might get hurt. Of course if he hits free agency he could get as much as $500M. Not likely, but possible.

If you did 10 years, $400M I think that would be enough to get him to sign. And then you avoid all of the questions about whether their window is now or the next 6 years.

VinnieDaGooch
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

A lot of this criticism kind of just seems like you preferred other players in the same tier and same position as their signings instead of a criticism of their direction this offseason. Also, they did pick a direction, they are going to compete this year with the best pitcher on the planet. Why would it be ok for the Cubs or Orioles to trade for one year of him but it is weird for the Tigers to enjoy the one year of him that they have?

Last edited 6 months ago by VinnieDaGooch
sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  VinnieDaGooch

They did well with starters. Ranger Suarez is a better fit for a number of reasons, but Framber Valdez is very good.

I would have been way more aggressive on the reliever and position player markets.

If you want to go far in the playoffs you need a whole bunch of excellent relievers. They only have one reliever projected for more than 0.4 WAR. Here is a list of pitchers who are projected for more WAR who signed one year deals and they easily could have beaten: Drew Pomeranz, Gregory Soto, Mark Leither Jr, Calbe Thielbar, and Sean Newcomb. And that’s before we start talking about Robert Suarez, who is projected at 0.9.

On the position player side, there are some weaknesses that I understand why they are unfilled. But I cannot imagine going into a win-now season where your Plan A is Wenceel Perez getting 525 PAs and Colt Keith playing any position other than first base. Maybe Kerry Carpenter is healthy enough to play the corner outfield again and they can platoon Perez and Carpenter, and Statcast projects a whopping forty nine of Eugenio Suarez’s home runs would have gone out in Detroit.

Why would it be ok for the Cubs or Orioles to trade for one year of him but it is weird for the Tigers to enjoy the one year of him that they have?

From the perspective of team building I think it’s very weird Cubs signed Bregman to that huge deal and that the Orioles did the same with Alonso (plus trading for Ward). Neither of those teams are the ones that I would think would want to go for broke.

But their GMs are feeling the heat. So in that sense it is not weird at all.

robert jamesMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The entire “all in” binary makes no sense to me. Think of how much work every team does to max guys out during a season- but that doesn’t actually count as “trying” a team can only “try” by signing a specific mid-tier free agent.

I also don’t understand how this “all in or trade Skubal” plan is supposed to work: Ranger Suarez signed in what late January? So, if they missed out on him, they should have THEN tried to trade Skubal? After they had already signed other vets? I just don’t think it actually works like this

Last edited 6 months ago by robert james
VinnieDaGooch
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Do you honestly think those relievers you mentioned are significantly different from Jansen, Drew Anderson, and Kyle Finnegan(who already showed he can be succesful in Detroit btw)? Like I said just seems like you prefer other guys in the same tier.

As far as the OF that is definitely a weakness but I don’t think Wenceel being a full time starter is plan A. Riley Greene is the only full time guy and then they have Wenceel, Vierling, Carpenter, Jahmai Jones, Parker Meadows, Baez and Max Clark to fill the other two spots. It isn’t ideal but each of those guys has some type of upside or past performance and they have enough options to bet they can hit on two of them. And if that doesn’t work out they can alway add a bat at the deadline.

Last edited 6 months ago by VinnieDaGooch
jason shureMember since 2017
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

As a lifelong Tiger fan I feel the same. Unless we are true insiders we are stuck interpreting the behavior/performance of the GM and ownership based on sketchy data. They seem “smart”, and focused on long term organizational growth, and they weren’t swept up in thinking that fabulous pitching chaos September meant they were ready for prime time. But I sense a hesitancy to how they move. In generous terms it’s being deliberate, but you are right that some other players would have been better than the ones they actually signed.

They are loading up on some depth, which is the behavior of a playoff minded team, for instance Keider M got reassigned already, which never would have happened under that middle tier mindset.

Skubal’s contracted merited a binary approach, going all-in, and they were slow to pull that trigger. I suspect they will need a star to get over the hump, not all these 110RC+ players, but frankly McGonigle has as good a chance as anyone to be that.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  jason shure

I think Tigers fans should be thrilled with their front office and the team in general. It’s a fantastic group, and last year’s team was super exciting because the team arrived two years ahead of schedule. It looked like their big move was going to happen in 2027 when McGonigle and Clark were ready to go, with the actual championship window starting around 2028 when Briceno was ready to slug. But they made the playoffs last year with a whole bunch of guys unexpectedly becoming useful like Torkelson, McKinstry and Wenzeel Perez.

I think it’s totally fine if the Tigers don’t want to go all-in right now. It’s better for them long term that they don’t do that. But if they think that they can count on any player on that roster aside from Skubal, Framber, Vest, or Riley Greene they are going to be in for a rude surprise. One thing the Rays and the Brewers do well is they don’t get sucked into the trap of thinking that a guy is going to repeat what he did last year. I think they take it much too far, but I don’t think the Tigers are thinking about this enough. The Finnegan deal is the most obvious example of this because they went out of their way to bring him back, but there are a lot of other players who fit it as well.

They’re still favorites to win the division by default but they are going to be screaming for reliever help at the deadline this year, and for someone who can both hit and field in at least one of three corner spots. And between that and the lack of movement on extensions for any of their players except Colt Keith there is a decent chance they get stuck in “the middle,” both now and in the future.

Maybe they can’t get Skubal to sign an extension but I would be furiously trying to lock up Riley Greene. Cal Raleigh signed for 6 years, $105M before his big breakout last year and Will Smith signed for 10 years, $140M. This seems like a reasonable framework for them to start with.

gettwobrute79Member since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They did choose a direction by keeping Skubal. The entire organization won’t fall apart if he leaves after this season. Holding Skubal is a big go-for-it move for 2026, but also signing Valdez indicates they’ll have a good arm up top when Skubal leaves.

Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean it’s not a direction.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

That’s the thing. It’s not a direction! It’s the status quo! They decided that things were good enough.

This organization’s front office might be the best in baseball at scouting / development but there is definitely some paralysis by overanalysis going on here. It will probably serve them well in the long run but for this year it makes no sense.

bada87bingMember since 2020
6 months ago

Great article. I have also been banging on this drum since last year. The only valid argument to him not being on the opening day roster is the extra year of control on the backend. And if this service time manipulation is the Tigers reasoning for keeping him off the opening day roster – then he still should get around 600 plate appearances.

Looking at the Tigers roster and projections they have a glaring hole at SS. It just so happens that they have a top prospect that plays this position *and* this prospect is projected to be their best player by a considerable margin at this position. This should be an incredibly easy decision for the Tigers to make – McGonigle needs to be an every day player.

I’ll be disappointed if he doesn’t make the opening day roster. But the real crime here would be if they don’t call him as soon as possible and/or they treat him like a platoon player.

maguroMember since 2016
6 months ago
Reply to  bada87bing

They might not even get the extra year of control if they call him up midseason and he finishes in the top two in RoY voting.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  maguro

Beats only getting 5 if he finishes Top Two…

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
6 months ago

Regarding Skubal, I wouldn’t be surprised if part of the calculus here for Detroit revolves around the uncertain labor situation for ’27. You might as well go as all-in as you can without sacrificing too much of your immediate future if the game’s economic model is about to get re-shaped (I expect it will to some extent, the question is how drastically).

nad_kratsMember since 2016
6 months ago

Ah McGonigle eases the pain. What does that even mean? It means he gets results, you stupid chief.

shandykoufaxMember since 2024
6 months ago
Reply to  nad_krats

“I hope you’re happy Mcgonigle! They DFA’d Javy Baez for your roster spot”
“I’m trying to eat lunch here”

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
6 months ago
Reply to  nad_krats

C’mon, Tigers. Do it for McGonigle.

JustinMember since 2025
6 months ago
Reply to  nad_krats

I can’t believe Dan wrote a McGonigle article without a McGarnagle reference. Sort of defeats the whole point.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
6 months ago

The AL Rookie of the Year race this year looks absolutely stacked aside from McGonigle:

the three NPB imports (Murakami, Okamoto, Imai)
Yesavage
Basallo
Carter Jensen
Tolle
Early
DeLauter
Carson Williams
Colt Emerson
Bazzana
Beavers

Most of the AL seems to also have some guy or guys in the high minors who could pop and make an impact even though they don’t have a clear lane right now.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 months ago

They need to put the best team on the field in the last Skubal year and not worry about future McGonigle salaries. McGonigle gives them the best chance to win the World Series.

wallyworld2199
6 months ago

Tigers are a fun team this year. Them, Red Sox and Orioles feel like they should be able to really turn the corner with some of the young talent they have developing. I think McGonigles ability to play SS is the big thing.

Tigers gave Keith the pre arb extension so obviously they have some desire to keep him playing and he definitely cannot play SS. His bat seems to keep moving forward/developing. Torres can’t play SS but there’s a lot of salary to eat there. I just don’t think they can defend McKinstrys D over the upside McGonigle has. Especially if you only have 1 year of Skubal, 30-40 extra games makes a difference, especially if they are “favored” by ZIPS to grab an extra pick

tigerfannky
6 months ago

The front office has been all in on letting the kids play since the trade deadline in 24 and it’s worked so far.

I think they hoped one of McGonigle or Clark, or both, would play well and win a job out of spring training to cover at least one of the two biggest holes in CF and SS. Clark has struggled and looks like he’ll need some AAA ball and that’s ok.

I think the 50 percentile projection is a reasonable expectation for a 21 year old player and if he can handle it to at least that level, it allows our depth pieces, McKinstry and Baez, to play elsewhere.

The question will be how McGonigle will do against the middle and bottom tier LH pitching. If he can hold his own or better, it will be a nice year for him. The good lefties are tough for everybody, which is why they’re good, so if you have to sit him or expect someone else to carry the load in those games that’s not a concern.

That HR against Severino was a thing of beauty though.

carterMember since 2020
6 months ago

Usually I can understand not rushing people, but there is nothing about his performance that doesn’t make me think he doesn’t have an incredibly high floor now

baseballfan115Member since 2020
6 months ago

The ai style title hurt
Great article though!

Barbaro GarbeyMember since 2024
6 months ago

In case Benetti is reading the comments: “He really got a hold of that one – it’s Mc-GONE-igle. Another 3 runs for the Tigers and 50 points for Gryffindor”

maumanntsMember since 2022
6 months ago

I’ve noticed he already has “Magoo” as his nickname. For those of us of a certain age, a Jim Backus voiceover comes immediately to mind: “Oh, Magoo! You’ve done it again!”