Kyle Tucker Needs a Reset

Kyle Tucker’s tenure with the Dodgers hasn’t gone as well as anyone hoped so far, and on Monday night at Target Field, things took a turn for the worse. After walking during his first plate appearance, he yielded to a pinch-runner upon reaching second base due to back spasms. While he hasn’t yet landed on the injured list, the Dodgers have set a timetable that allows for “a mental reset” — to use manager Dave Roberts’ term — as Tucker tries to end a prolonged slump.
Tucker apparently began experiencing back spasms when the Dodgers took the field in the bottom of the first inning, though he didn’t have any balls hit in his direction. When he batted with one out in the top of the second, he fouled off Zebby Matthews’ first pitch — a four-seamer just off the plate — then looked at four straight balls, three of them in similar locations to that initial offering. Tommy Edman followed with a single, at which point Roberts replaced Tucker with pinch-runner Alex Call, who took over in right field.
“Back just like lit up and [I] went out there just tried to hope that it would calm down or go away or something, I’d just keep flying through it,” said Tucker afterwards, adding that “finishing the swing hurt.”
Roberts first noticed Tucker’s discomfort when he was batting. “I saw him take his at-bat — a little bit of wincing and kind of when he was jogging to first base,” the manager said. “And then once he got to second base, I think it was just more not seeing him move the right way, and I didn’t want to put him in any more jeopardy.”
Based on Tucker’s past history with back spasms, neither he nor the Dodgers believe this is more than a day-to-day issue. The team hasn’t sent him for imaging, and while he did not play on Tuesday night, he said that he felt “pretty confident” he would avoid the injured list. With utilityman Enrique Hernández, outfielder Teoscar Hernández and catcher Will Smith already on the IL, and catcher Dalton Rushing having left Monday’s game due to concussion concerns after taking a foul ball off his mask, the Los Angeles roster is already somewhat thin, though the Dodgers did recently activate Edman, who missed the first 12 weeks of the season while recovering from right ankle surgery. Call has gone 4-for-7 with a pair of walks and his first home run of 2026 over the past two nights in place of Tucker.
Roberts said on Tuesday that the team will make a decision about Tucker’s status before Friday’s night’s game against the Padres:
“I think that the four days, with the off-day, would be a middle [route]… And so hopefully he has taken advantage of this, obviously to get right, but also kind of a mental reset… If he can swing the bat, ideally he would swing the bat tomorrow and do some type of activity to go into the off-day. But if he doesn’t, then we’ll probably have a tougher decision on Friday.”
If he does land on the IL, the Dodgers have Hyeseong Kim and Alek Thomas at Triple-A Oklahoma City; both are on the 40-man roster, so calling up either wouldn’t require additional machinations. Teoscar Hernández, who’s been out since late May due to a left hamstring strain, homered in the first game of his rehab assignment at Oklahoma City on Tuesday night. Continued results like that could prompt the Dodgers to accelerate his return ahead of their June 29 target.
Whether or not Tucker lands on the IL, some kind of reset is in order. The Dodgers signed him to a four-year, $240 million deal in mid-January, setting a record for average annual value in the process — $57.2 million, once deferrals are factored in. That salary is a tall order for any player to live up to, and so far, Tucker has not. He’s hit .234/.333/.374 with six home runs, nothing to write home about but hardly terrible. His 101 wRC+ is within five points of the marks of Fernando Tatis Jr., Matt Chapman, and Rafael Devers, and it’s higher than those of Alex Bregman, Nolan Arenado, Xander Bogaerts, Willy Adames, Bo Bichette, Dansby Swanson, Austin Riley, Manny Machado, Marcus Semien, and Trea Turner, to limit the comparison to NL batting title qualifiers currently playing out nine-figure contracts, most of which extend well past the expiration of his deal.
While Tucker said earlier this season that he wasn’t pressing despite his slow start, Roberts has suggested otherwise on multiple occasions, citing his higher swing and chase rates.
“I do think that the swing rate is higher than it has been in his career, whether it’s the first pitch, just in total,” Roberts said in late May. “I think that speaks to not being selective enough, because he is a guy that by nature can run deep counts and still be fine getting to two strikes, but it just seems like he’s much more hyper aggressive than I recall.”
The manager sounded a similar note prior to Monday’s game. “No player wants to not perform up to their capabilities,” he said. “For me, it’s just wanting him to get back to being who he is as a hitter. And who he is as a hitter is a guy that really controls the strike zone. His swing rate has been much higher, his chase rate much higher. If we can get him back to being who he is, then we’ll bet on the results.”
Tucker is swinging at 48.6% of all pitches, just an eyelash above his career mark but his highest rate since 2022; he was at 45.1% last year. Meanwhile, he’s chasing 25.6% of pitches outside the zone, 2.7 points above his career mark and again his highest since 2022, well above last year’s 17.5%. His 64.2% first-pitch strike rate is a career high and 8.3 points above last year’s rate, which is to say that he’s falling behind in the count more often. To Roberts’ point, Tucker’s rate of swinging at the first pitch (44.3%) is higher than his career norm (41.4%) as well, and ahead of last year’s first-pitch swing rate (36.2%). Using our new Heat Maps Pivot tool, here’s a year-to-year comparison of his first-pitch swing rate:

Translating the visuals into numbers, Tucker has chased 19.9% of first pitches outside the zone this year, up from just 11.6% last year and 9.5% in 2024, his two seasons with very low swing and chase rates and very high walk rates (16.5% in 2024, 14.6% in ’25). But in terms of his actual results on first pitches, they’re in line with his recent performances in that context:
| Season | PA | EV | LA | Brl% | HH% | AVG | xBA | SLG | xSLG | wOBA | xwOBA | Whiff% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 105 | 89.3 | 13 | 8.8% | 42.2% | .374 | .358 | .596 | .615 | .402 | .412 | 21.4% |
| 2024 | 42 | 90.8 | 23 | 17.9% | 43.6% | .231 | .336 | .564 | .725 | .333 | .452 | 19.3% |
| 2025 | 73 | 90.0 | 15 | 12.5% | 45.8% | .333 | .378 | .597 | .672 | .399 | .449 | 20.1% |
| 2026 | 39 | 93.2 | 23 | 10.3% | 53.8% | .333 | .387 | .564 | .656 | .386 | .443 | 25.5% |
Tucker’s whiff rate when swinging at the first pitch is higher than in any season since 2020 (29.1%), but his average exit velocity in that context is a career high, and his hard-hit rate is his highest since 2019, when he merely had a September cup of coffee with the Astros. So while I do think the elevated swing and chase rates that Roberts has mentioned aren’t a good sign, and that his elevated first-pitch whiff rate means starting more plate appearances down 0-1, the bigger problem is his declining two-strike performance:
| Season | PA | BBE | EV | LA | Brl% | HH% | AVG | xBA | SLG | xSLG | wOBA | xwOBA | Whiff% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 313 | 174 | 89.9 | 13 | 8.6% | 44.8% | .236 | .230 | .418 | .415 | .332 | .331 | 17.4% |
| 2024 | 157 | 70 | 88.7 | 24 | 5.8% | 37.7% | .211 | .158 | .431 | .291 | .356 | .293 | 18.7% |
| 2025 | 278 | 145 | 88.4 | 18 | 11.7% | 35.2% | .167 | .160 | .322 | .313 | .285 | .279 | 20.4% |
| 2026 | 164 | 78 | 87.6 | 14 | 1.3% | 38.5% | .155 | .155 | .218 | .205 | .230 | .227 | 22.0% |
That performance helps to explain why Tucker has struck out in 20.4% of his plate appearances, his highest mark since his aforementioned 2019 cup of coffee and 5.7 points higher than last season. That anemic two-strike production is at least somewhat weighing down his overall contact profile:
| Season | BBE | EV | LA | Brl% | HH% | AVG | xBA | SLG | xSLG | wOBA | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 499 | 90.2 | 14.8 | 10.4% | 45.3% | .284 | .287 | .517 | .533 | .372 | .386 |
| 2024 | 228 | 91.1 | 21.2 | 12.7% | 44.3% | .289 | .275 | .585 | .546 | .419 | .402 |
| 2025 | 418 | 90.1 | 17.2 | 10.8% | 40.2% | .266 | .270 | .464 | .483 | .363 | .372 |
| 2026 | 211 | 88.9 | 15.6 | 5.2% | 39.3% | .234 | .248 | .374 | .367 | .317 | .323 |
Tucker didn’t have enough batted ball events to qualify in 2024 due to injuries — more on that in a moment — but otherwise, from 2022–25, he ranked in the 65th-to-70th percentile in barrel rate; he’s down in the 24th percentile now. Meanwhile, from 2025 to ’26, he’s fallen from the 53rd percentile to the 43rd in exit velocity and from the 85th to the 27th in xSLG.
As for injuries, Tucker played just 78 games for the Astros in 2024 due to a fractured right shin; he fouled a ball off his leg on June 3 of that season, and only three months later revealed that continued imaging eventually showed a fracture. Last season, when he played in 136 games with the Cubs, he endured a 39-game slump during which he hit.184/.321/.228 with just one homer. On August 21, the Cubs divulged that Tucker had played through a hairline fracture in his right ring finger, suffered during a June 1 slide. The injury didn’t entirely align with his offensive woes, but it couldn’t have helped. After a brief benching for three games from August 19-20 to provide a reset, he tore the cover off the ball for two weeks, but a left calf strain limited him to five games in September.
All of which has made it a little difficult to figure out how good Tucker really is when healthy, but it has to be better than this. While his hard-hit rate is only down about one point from last year, his barrel rate is less than half of what it was, and his expected slugging percentage is down 106 points. The disconnect owes to his hitting more groundballs; his 39.3% rate is still pretty low, but it’s his highest mark since his initial big league stint in 2018, and up 5.4 points relative to last season. What’s more, that rate is up to 53.2% this month, while his pulled-air rate is down to 10.2%, less than half of his full-season mark of 22.3%.
The numbers suggest Tucker has lost some bat speed, and in the aggregate that’s true — he’s dipped from an average swing speed of 72 mph last year to 71.2 this year — but that may in part be a response to his subpar results. He averaged 72.2 mph in March/April before dipping to 70.6 in May and 70.3 this month as he’s sought a combination of stance and swing path that has worked. Check out the monthly fluctuations in his swing path tilt, attack angle, stance angle, and position in the batter’s box dating back to late 2023:

“I think it’s more just me trying to find my swing, and trying to find the consistency in it more than anything,” Tucker said in late April. “I’ve had some good swings. Sometimes, I just get a hit because I just happened to get a hit. But just trying to find the consistency with my swing and do it day in, day out.”
For whatever the reason, the bottom line is that Tucker’s contact has become less efficient. His squared-up rate has fallen from 29.7% last year (84th percentile) to 25.8% this year (56th percentile), and his blast rate from 12.5% (58th percentile) to 8.2% (20th percentile). Perhaps his back spasms are a sign of a larger physical issue that needs addressing, but regardless of whether that’s the case, his mechanics and approach aren’t the ones that earned him this big contract. The Dodgers have enough production up and down their lineup to offset his struggles or even his absence, but he and the team have work to do to find out how to get the old Kyle Tucker back.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Hi home/road splits are strangely wide too, 71 wRC+ at home vs 129 on the road
I am following Tucker closely this year because I am still flabbergasted by the contract he signed. Tucker is a good player, a star, but he is not a superstar. His 2025 did not strike me as the foundation for the huge contract. Looking ahead, I don’t see any position players that are worth a lot of money or will simply being the best available, as was the case with Tucker, be enough to get someone far more than seems reasonable?
Totally agree. I was amazed that Tucker received $60 million a year after hitting 266 with 22 HRs in 2025. He is far and away the highest paid position player and not even close to a top player in MLB. And defensively he is a pretty average corner outfielder who is getting older with a history of injuries. He is also relatively unknown and does not bring additional fans to Dodger Stadium which already mostly sells out. The deal didn’t make sense to me, but the Dodgers have endless money so they can justify the move as an upgrade to Conforto and pat themselves on the back.
At the end of June last year Tucker had a 150 wRC+ with 17 bombs and 20 steals, more walks than K’s. Already had 3.8 fwar. He had set a baseline of 4.5 for the previous 4 seasons, with 2024 being a 8 win pace beset by injury. There was every reason to believe he was taking the next step forward. Alas the injury bug struck again.
The Dodgers bet on the profile. His was about as solid as you’re gonna find. There was little reason to believe that the player the Cubs got in the 2nd half of the season was going to be what you could expect moving forward. You could probably expect injuries but the on-field performance was definitely elite for half of the season.
Yeah, but the non-elite half of the season was the more recent of the two halves, and counts every bit as much as the elite half did, regardless. Paying players on their best couple months or half a season is a sure way to overpay (which the Dodgers can certainly afford to do, it’s not my money. Nevertheless.)
There’s no reason for LA to not do stuff like this, though. They’ll continue throwing pissloads of money at every free agent and it doesn’t matter whether they stink or not.
Eh, what is the downside in LAD removing the best FA from other teams? And does anyone expect him to remain this bad going fwd?
Inflation is a helluva drug, but also, it ain’t my money, and he ain’t the only one underperforming as was noted. (now, if you wanna argue about LAD’s responsibility to build mass transit options to the ballpark, i’ve got my pitchfork ready).
His contract says more about the Dodgers’ and the Mets’ front offices than Tucker himself. There’s this idea out there that they both champion that you should limit your liability to the downside of contracts by not giving out deals that stretch past a certain amount of time. They’re willing to pay more AAV to get it.
But that only works when you have one team in the bidding with the same strategy.
If you do that while getting into a bidding war with another team who has the same strategy you wind up paying a crazy amount. The Blue Jays’ offer to Kyle Tucker was $350M for 10 years, and the Dodgers went to $240M over 4. If you do the math, you can see that the Dodgers are paying over two-thirds of the Blue Jays’ offer and getting 40% of the years.
I think you can make an argument for the Dodgers’ side of this over the Blue Jays, especially since he seems to be struggling. The flaws in the Dodgers’ (and Mets’) logic is they’re so fixated on the negative value of years 5-10 that they’re missing the fact that they’re already paying for the equivalent of him being on the roster in years 8-10, except they’re doing it sooner (how much sooner depends on the deferrals). Even if he would have given the Blue Jays’ 0.0 WAR during that time, paying more sooner kind of undoes a lot of the benefits of having him for a shorter contract given that the value of the dollar is going to be worth a lot less in 2033-2035 than 2026-2029.
As long as the player performs to expectations its not an overpay on a premium short term deal even taking TVM into account. Tucker just needs to perform as a 4.65 WAR or greater player each to justify his 60m AAV. They won’t be getting any surplus value but I’d much rather have that than have guaranteed negative value on the back end of a 10 year deal.
Acuna will be a free agent after his age 30 season in 2028. What he gets I don’t know.
Good player, bad contract. Yanks made the smarter mover by re-signing Bellinger.
It’s hard to project what guys don’t really care. But there was rumblings about him w Chicago too.