Lance Lynn has Mastered the Multi-sided Fastball
A lot of player interviews are a waste of time. This one isn’t. This is Lance Lynn, being interviewed in early June, after shutting down the Brewers:
Lynn talks a lot about the fastball, which is appropriate, because Lynn threw 119 pitches in the game, and if his words are to be believed, exactly one of those wasn’t a heater. According to the numbers we have, it was more like three non-heaters, but there’s no point in getting too hung up on this; either way, Lynn threw a crap-ton of heaters. He used it almost exclusively to keep the Brewers quiet, and that was mostly in keeping with Lynn’s evolved pitcher profile. Earlier in the year, when Bartolo Colon was on his run, much attention was paid to his unusual and seemingly simple pitching style. Lynn has become the best Colon comparison we have. Only he’s younger, and stronger, and better. On the surface, Lynn has one of the most simple game plans imaginable. Which means he’s figured out a complicated way to make it work.
Lynn entered the Cardinals’ rotation on a regular basis in 2012. Here’s a quick glance at what he’s done differently since. You’ll see Lynn’s fastball rates, and you’ll see the league-average fastball rates for starting pitchers:
Lynn has always been fastball-first. These days, he’s also fastball-second. And it’s possible his fastball rate has actually been under-reported, because sometimes his fastball looks like a fast changeup. Note, also, this doesn’t include cut fastballs, which tend to be classified as sliders. Lynn throws most of his pitches hard, is the point.
And that’s uncommon for a starting pitcher. It’s when you put Lynn in the context of other starters that you get to better appreciate his peculiarity. Here are the highest starter fastball rates, over the last calendar year:
- Bartolo Colon, 85%
- Lance Lynn, 84%
- Justin Masterson, 77%
Here are the highest starter fastball rates, this year:
- Lance Lynn, 86%
- Bartolo Colon, 85%
- Jarred Cosart, 79%
And here are the highest starter fastball rates, over the past month:
- Lance Lynn, 90%
- Bartolo Colon, 82%
- Jesse Hahn, 79%
Lynn’s in the lead, now. If anything, he’s only throwing the fastball more and more. He’s holding lefties to a career-low wOBA, with a career-high strikeout rate. Overall, Lynn has a sub-3 ERA, a career-best FIP, and a career-best xFIP. Colon got us used to this first — a pitcher succeeding by changing speeds and movements on his heater. Now there’s Lynn, who’s kind of like Colon’s heir. I don’t know how much longer Colon’s going to pitch, but Lynn is poised to keep the style alive.
Pretty obviously, Lynn isn’t just throwing 90% four-seam fastballs. His four-seamer isn’t Aroldis Chapman‘s four-seamer, so that couldn’t work. Here’s Mike Matheny’s quick explanation:
“He’s finding a great feel for just manipulating the fastball with cuts and sink and four-seam,” Matheny said. “Just not many guys who can get away with what he’s doing, but he’s locating it so well and taking off a little bit to put more run on, putting on a little. Pretty nice job.”
Matheny said Lynn’s fastball actually works out to about four different pitches, all ranging from about 87 mph to 93 mph with significantly distinct movement.
Lynn does know how to throw a cutter. Sometimes he brings it into a game. He also knows how to throw a curveball and a changeup. Those’ll show up in games, too. Lynn has said before it’s important to have those pitches around, just in case you need them. And Lynn might find that he needs them as he gets older, and his top velocity slows down. Yet at the present point in time, Lynn is succeeding through fastball manipulation. Matheny explained it, and with some help from Baseball Savant, here you might be able to visualize it. Lynn’s fastball locations over the last three years:
This year, you can see some separation, as Lynn has worked predominantly in two areas. He’s hung around the edges, avoiding the middle, and with a straighter fastball, Lynn has worked mostly up, and to his glove-side. But he’s also demonstrated an improved ability to put run on the fastball and have it tail down and arm-side. Those fastballs will come out of the same spot, and they’ll pass through the same areas, but they’ll separate on the way to the plate, meaning a hitter doesn’t know which it is out of the hand. Then you also have a cut version of the fastball, which Lynn keeps low and glove-side. That’s not in the .gif. Nor do you get the velocity variation. Lynn does throw almost all of his pitches hard. But for a hitter, a separation of a few miles per hour, or a few inches, is everything.
It’s time for the cherry-picked Allegedly Representative At-Bat. Here, we’ve got Lance Lynn striking out Joc Pederson on five pitches. All of them were technically fastballs.
Perfectly located, down and away.
Missed, off the edge. You can see with your own eyes that Lynn took a bit off this pitch.
There’s the straighter, harder fastball, hugging the inner edge.
Just about the ideal pitch. Didn’t get the call, but, could’ve. Perfect at 1-and-2.
The harder fastball, up and inside. Borderline strike call, but then, the previous pitch got a borderline ball call, so the probability was that Lynn would get at least one of the calls in his favor.
The first fastball had some run. The second had run and drop. The third was straighter, and the fourth was more like the second. The fifth was the straightest fastball yet. Lynn worked around the edges, he varied his speeds by five miles per hour, he varied his horizontal movements by five inches, and he varied his vertical movements by seven inches. It wouldn’t be wrong to say that Lynn struck Pederson out throwing one pitch, but Pederson probably felt like it was three or four pitches, and he didn’t even see anything cut. Lynn carved him up, changing only his grips. The throwing motions were identical.
Lynn’s throwing some sort of heater more than ever before. He’s also sacrificed a little bit of velocity, and probably not coincidentally, the evidence suggests he’s improved his command, such that he can live around the edges. Because he can live around the edges, he’s used this fastball-heavy approach to have greater success against lefties, which used to be his only real problem. Now, it still might not be a strength, but it’s far less of a weakness, as Lynn has taken the Colon approach and made it his own. Maybe, at some point, Lynn will need those other pitches. There are reasons he continues to work on them. At this point? At this point, Lynn essentially throws one pitch. Except for the fact that he doesn’t, at all.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

Another Jeff Sullivan Cardinals puff piece.
Another excellent Sullivan piece. Period.
The Cardinals are a great team so yeah.
Not a Cards fan, btw.
Good stuff Jeff. Keep up the good work. Puff and all.
Great article expanding on such a great scrum. The only thing missing is a gif of Lynn’s hit on the non-fastball.
Well, that sounds like a challenge. I wonder what k-means (or some other clustering algorithm) has to say about his pitches that Pitch F/X classifies as a fastball.
This is a great article and the gifs had me chuckle a bit at the commentary about “perfect” location pitches and “could have gotten the call”, on pitches clearly out of the zone. I guess if we take the game of baseball as it exists at face value — where umps cheat and make up fictional strike zones, and it’s a skill for pitchers to exploit it — the commentary is spot on. But imagine if umps were honest and strike zones were real, could Lance Lynn get away with this strategy? Some baseball savant graphs follow:
1. All the fastballs Lynn threw in that Dodgers game outside the zone click here. Note that the ump was 100% correct in these calls (according to pitchf/x), not one pitch inside the zone was incorrectly called a ball (over 30 pitches, perfect accuracy).
2. All the fastballs Lynn threw in that game called a strike click here. Of 8 total pitches, 5 outside the zone were (incorrectly) called a strike. That’s pretty unbelievable error rate by the ump.
3. Here’s the season totals for fastballs for all pitchers getting strikes called out of the strike zone click here.
4. For “evening out” purposes, here’s the flipside of fastballs in the zone unfairly called a ball click here.
Maybe guys like Lynn and Keuchel are playing a different game than some other pitchers. I guess it’s the same old Tom Glavine complaint, asking really how much of this is an effective fastball versus an ump in your pocket? An argument that came up short re Glavine, see http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/tom-glavines-allegedly-generous-strike-zone/
Now we have the pitchf/x data for what it’s worth, maybe it changes the commentary on strike zones & pitchers, but likely not. Or maybe just blame Yadier.
If the umpires or even Pitch f/x called the strike zone accurately as described in the rule book, there would be a lot more high strikes called. Don’t criticize the umpires for having varied individual strike zones when nobody calls the strike zone correctly, anyway. They just need to be consistent and reasonably close.
The days of the current strike zone situation and traditionalist defense of it are numbered, I think. Instant replay already represents the slippery slope of the momentum of change. The problem is the logic defending umpires is just too downright Orwellian — “they are all wrong but it’s okay if they are consistently wrong”. Huh?
Yes we will see MLB emphasize moving up the zone to call more high strikes/less low, but eventually the cries to replace the umpire individual differences with unbiased technology will win the day. Crazy but we will end up seeing more changes to the game in our one lifetime than generations before.
Totally agree, Fatbot. I’ve never understood that argument that it’s okay for umps to be wrong when they’re consistently wrong. The good news from a competitive POV is that the ump actually gave even more calls to Greinke in that same game (5 balls off the plate called strikes), so neither team seemed to benefit much. But all that means is that the calls were screwy for both teams – not my idea of good.
“The fastball is the best pitch in baseball. It’s like having five pitches, if you move it around.”
-Luis Tiant.
Seems like he’s the heir of a long tradition here.
He was right. If you have the kind of movement on the pitch that Lynn does (or Tiant had), and you have the kind of command they both had, you could throw fastballs all day and win games, and make 119 pitches a game without hurting your arm.
However, the fact that Justin Masterson has a 77 percent fastball rate over the past year is one indication of why his career has gone south. The slider is the only good pitch he has, and his fastball is slower than some guys’ changeups. He’s got about as much business throwing that many fastballs as another Red Sox starter of a few years ago would have–Tim Wakefield.
None of those pitches are strikes. Cheating Cardinals only get balls called strikes because they bully all the umps and they’ve hacked the strike zone. If the Cubs got strikes called like that, we’d win 120 games this season.
Waaaah…
I can’t tell if this is parody or not. Either way, we have data these days to confirm whether or not you’re right. According to numbers kept by Matt Carruth, Cardinals’ catchers have received 62 +Calls over the course of the season – or 0.9% of all pitches this season. Cubs’ catchers have received 124 +Calls over the course of the season – or 1.8% – which turns out to be exactly double the rate of the Cardinals.
Obviously the Cardinals have hacked “Matt Carruth” if that indeed is his REAL NAME or maybe he is working for DeWitt openly. In any case, those numbers are FLASE just like the so-called standings.
Nicely done.