Let’s Watch Bryce Harper Face Aroldis Chapman

Sometimes, I feel like I have to set these things up. This isn’t one of those times. The other day, Bryce Harper batted against Aroldis Chapman. Who wouldn’t want to examine that plate appearance in detail? We’re talking about the game’s premier one-inning pitcher, a guy who does something that might never have been done before, and then you’ve got the hottest hitter on the planet, a guy whose at-bats are worth setting alerts for if you’re not already tuned the hell in. Yeah, they’ve matched up before. Yeah, Chapman struck Harper out all three times, on a combined 10 pitches. That was that Bryce Harper. This is this Bryce Harper. Or, as you might know him, Bryce Harper.

The evening: Friday, May 29. The setting: nobody cares. This is about the individuals, not the circumstance, and while the leverage could’ve been higher, the game was close enough everyone was trying their hardest. This was about something other than deciding the score. This was arguably the game’s most watchable hitter and arguably the game’s most watchable pitcher. So you know they had to combine for a watchable matchup.

Pitch No. 1

harper-vs-chapman (1)

Just your standard triple-digit fastball at the letters. Hell of a way to introduce yourself to someone. But it wasn’t just a fastball at the letters — it was a fastball at the letters, that Harper swung at. Now, Harper does swing at the first pitch fairly often. And Chapman doesn’t have an unusually low first-pitch-swing rate, himself. But I can’t imagine putting myself in that situation. You’re a left-handed batter, and you’re standing in against someone you see once a year, and he throws 100 with the flu. Who has the balls to try to hit the first pitch? And Harper took a good and mighty cut. At least, that’s what they said, because he didn’t embarrass himself flailing. And he didn’t make no contact. Some guys get their timing by watching. Harper gets his timing by swinging.

The previous batter, incidentally, struck out swinging at consecutive high fastballs. That’s what Chapman does. Maybe Harper thought he could get ahead of the at-bat. Also, I want to point something out. From earlier in the game, against Anthony DeSclafani, who has a pretty good fastball himself:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

harper-desclafani

Look at Harper’s right leg. It’s up, like normal. You know about his aggressive leg kick. Now look at the same leg as Harper sees the first pitch from Chapman:

harper-chapman(1)

The kick’s not totally gone, but it’s nearly eliminated, with Harper instead putting his toe down and keeping his heel up. It’s all in the interest of trying to simplify and be quicker to the ball. With his regular swing mechanics, Harper might not be able to connect. This way, he might buy himself milliseconds. For a hitter, few things are more precious than extra milliseconds.

Harper, in the playoffs, used his regular swing mechanics against the flame-throwing Hunter Strickland.

Pitch No. 2

harper-vs-chapman (2)

Here we have a not-very-good elevated slider, but it’s too elevated to really do anything with, and plus, with Chapman and his margin of error, there might not be any such thing as a bad slider. There are just better sliders and worse sliders. Harper ends up sort of fighting the pitch off. He uses the same muted right-leg mechanics. If you break it down frame by frame, you see evidence that Harper got his foot down a split-second earlier than on the first pitch, which would’ve just been a response to finding timing, having seen a pitch go by. This is the danger of those other pitches. With Chapman, hitters get so geared up for the impossible velocity, they can end up in front of ordinary velocity. After 101, 91 looks like 71. (This is an exaggeration.)

Pitch No. 3

harper-vs-chapman (3)

And, why not go back to the well? Harper swung at one high fastball he was never going to hit. Then he swung at a high slider he was never going to hit. So why not go for the letters again? Harper recognized this one — it’s like he was expecting the high fastball. Which, granted, isn’t the toughest thing to see coming given the circumstances. The slider had just missed badly. Wouldn’t want to risk a miss again at 0-and-2. The heat’s there; Chapman trusts the heat. On the other hand, bases empty, three-run game. Lots of wiggle room. The argument for a slider here is, what’s the harm, really? The argument for a fastball is, this is Bryce Harper, and testosterone comes into play. As a pitcher, you want to get rid of him. Chapman had lots of count to play with. Just had to put one high enough the only downside would be a ball. Based on the catcher’s body language, he knew exactly where this pitch was going to go. Imagine looking that casual, catching Aroldis Chapman.

Pitch No. 4

harper-vs-chapman (4)

By showing the pitches right away, it kind of ruins the surprise, but this was a fastball that didn’t get up enough, or that didn’t hug the outside edge enough. You pick. Whatever the case, Harper hit the ball back up the middle, and maybe that’s when you notice the little “102” reading. That’s why you don’t want to be too critical about the pitch location — this was a fastball at 102 miles per hour. Actually, a few tenths above that, even. Over Chapman’s career, when hitters have swung at fastballs at least 102 miles per hour, they’ve whiffed more than 40% of the time. At that speed, any fastball is a good fastball. Harper just caught up to it, enough. He didn’t even hit it the other way.

Chapman thought the heat would suffice. The first signal was for a changeup.

clip2082

We don’t know why he shook it off. We could come up with a million reasons. Maybe it was about ego. Maybe it was about trying to think two steps ahead. Maybe it’s just that, when you’re Aroldis Chapman, and you have your fastball, sometimes you wonder why you even bother with anything else. It’s as close to unhittable as any pitch in the game. For all I know, it’s the most famous pitch in the world.

Tweeted the creator of Baseball Savant:

That’s not a totally true fact. It’s true for the regular season, but in October 2010, this happened:

PITCHf/x put that one at 103.5. Without question, a faster pitch than the one hit by Harper. But there’s no point in dwelling on that. Even the 50th-fastest pitch struck for a hit is a blessing. At those velocities, the primary goal for any hitter is to survive long enough to see another sleep. And also, Carlos Ruiz’s double looks almost accidental. It’s like he put that bat out there, and the ball did the rest of the work. Harper went back through the box. It’s something. His advice for hitting Chapman, after the game:

How do you hit a 102-mph fastball?

“Close your eyes and swing,” Nationals outfielder Bryce Harper said.

It’s funny Harper should say that. His eyes were wide open.

harper-chapman

And he missed squaring the ball up by that much. Not that Harper isn’t more than happy to take the single. But you look at that image, and then you can mentally move the baseball or the bat just a matter of millimeters. Suddenly, instead of a grounder through the middle, you have a line drive. You have a fly ball. You might have a home run.

All because Harper found his timing, and didn’t try to match power with power. This is a very much non-Harper-like follow-through:

harper-chapman(4)

You can picture how Harper usually finishes. That’s not it. You can build a maturity narrative around this if you want. Or you can stop short of that and just recognize that Harper made an adjustment because he didn’t want to humiliate himself. Avoiding humiliation is a powerful motivator.

Ultimately, Chapman got a taste of his own medicine — 102 out, 103 back. And Chapman, like many of the hitters he pitches to, couldn’t catch up to the speed.

harper-vs-chapman (6)

Noted the Reds’ broadcast as Harper removed his batting gloves at first:

Jeff Brantley: I think if you’re a left-handed batter facing Chapman in this kind of situation, you gotta reach down deep in your belly to hang in there.

Thom Brennaman: No doubt about it. That’s pretty impressive.

What you can’t get from the text is Brennaman’s tone. He didn’t sound awestruck. He didn’t even sound just matter-of-fact. There was resignation in his voice. Surrender. A very much reluctant admission that Harper had faced the best, and Harper was better. In that moment, Brennaman conceded that maybe Bryce Harper just can’t be stopped. He’s not the only one who’s thinking it. He’s not the only one surrendering.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tz
11 years ago

Triple Crown of clickbait in one great article:

#3 Bryce Harper
#2 Aroldis Chapman
#1 Jeff Sullivan

Brian Kenny
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

The Triple Crown is a meaningless statistic! Look at the underlying numbers sheeple!!

#KillTheWin

Aaron (UK)
11 years ago
Reply to  Brian Kenny

But even using Writing Above Replacement this would be a contender for Most Valuable Piece.

Bryce Harper
11 years ago
Reply to  Brian Kenny

That’s a clown troll, bro.

John Elway
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

Talking about the Triple Crown this week is also clickbait.

Just neighing.

Joe Montana
11 years ago
Reply to  John Elway

I haven’t seen you in a while, John. I guess what I’m trying to say is way to

Comeback Kid.

Pig.Pen
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

Meh, for me it’s probably:
3. Aroldis Chapman
2. Bruce Harper
1. Grant Brisbee…….’s lama.

Jimbo
11 years ago

To remove the leg kick is more to remove one variable and make timing less complex than it is to speed up and be quicker to the ball. Kind of like increasing the margin of error like in a traditional two-strike approach. Harper’s approach looked like a two-strike approach from the first pitch.

TKDC
11 years ago

The high 91 MPH slider that didn’t really slide at all is functionally a high (and inside) 91 MPH fastball. which is a pitch that many pitchers throw on purpose and with good results.

Also, Harper was clearly joking about closing your eyes and swinging. That would be a really stupid thing to do.

Teach me
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Harper was joking? You don’t say.

TKDC
11 years ago
Reply to  Teach me

No, I did say.

Christian
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Thanks, John Madden.

John Madden
11 years ago
Reply to  Christian

When the ball crosses the goal line, that’s a touchdown, and that’s what the offense wants to do here.

Los
11 years ago
Reply to  John Madden

9/10…needed to mention Brett Favre.

Kevin Goldstein's dumb fedora
11 years ago

Looking like a prime Chase Utley in that ab

mch38
11 years ago

I’m really glad you said that because when I watched the gif from behind the batters box that’s what I thought too.

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago
Reply to  mch38

When Harper dials it back, he looks like the tenth best offensive 2B in history.

Moustard
11 years ago

That was crazy-entertaining!

t
11 years ago

“Carlos Ruiz‘s double looks almost accidental. It’s like he put that bat out there, and the ball did the rest of the work.”

Don’t Phillies fans have it hard enough right now? You have to go back and take shots at a Phillie doing something good during a playoff series they won? That hurts. That level-headed take on Ryan Howard was all a setup I bet.

Dave
11 years ago

I wonder what’s a tougher pitch to hit: Chapman’s heater or Kenley Jansen’s cutter?

Either one, when executed as well as the pitcher is capable, is basically untouchable.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Probably, in absolute terms, Chapman’s fastball. What I mean by that is, not matter the circumstances, Chapman’s is probably harder to hit. Jansen’s cutter probably relies partially on the fact that basically no other pitch has that combination of angle, movement, and velocity. But, if hitters we given a chance to see it over and over, they would probably get used to it and be able to hit it a little better.

While hitters could learn the timing of Chapman’s fastball, there’s no changing the fact that the simply have less time to decide where the pitch is going and where to swing.

Wally
11 years ago

Articles like this is why I read fangraphs and why I love baseball.

Justin
11 years ago

*applause*

RMR
11 years ago

That Harper follow-through looks an awful lot like a Joey Votto two-strike follow-through.

Pig.Pen
11 years ago
Reply to  RMR

Harper looks a lot like Votto in the same way Cingrani looks a lot like Chapman: They’re both left handed.

Db
11 years ago

Love it. As much as we all love the numbers, everyone still appreciates watching the great matchups that happen of really amazing athletic human beings. More of this stuff please.

Whirling Darvish
11 years ago

Thanks Jeff for another great article. I recall Joe Mauer had a similar at bat against Chapman a fee years’ back with similar results. Match ups like these are so much fun to watch.

Whirling Darvish
11 years ago

It was June 24, 2012. Double.

Darkstone42
11 years ago

I came looking for .gifs, and I was not disappointed.

Shirtless George Brett
11 years ago

I know that as sports fans we tend to take the more mundane things for granted because they are so common place. But every now and then something comes along that reminds you that what these guys do on a daily basis is pretty godddamn amazing.

The fact that there are humans out there that can actually hit a ball travelling at that speed from 60′ away, and make it look easy, is some super human level stuff.

TKDC
11 years ago

Agree with everything except making it looks easy. It looks really, really hard to me.

Phillies113
11 years ago

This article was good, but it needed more gifs.

Mike Green
11 years ago

In understanding the aging curve for batters, you can add maturity to greater strength as the positive things that happen between 20 and 27 to more than offset loss of speed, quickness with the bat and hand-eye co-ordination.

It’s a nice example (thanks, Jeff). Somehow, I can’t see Harper making these kinds of adjustments when facing Chapman a couple of years ago.

Pig.Pen
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike Green

I dunno, as a Nats fan who has probably seen–without exageration and being conservative–65% of Harper’s MLB PA’s (yes, I have a problem), I don’t think most people realize how much the hand and knee injuries bothered him. When he first came up, what I–and many others–marveled at was his ability to make in AB and in game adjustments. I remember he hit a homerun off of Halladay and talked after the game about how he’d been watching him on TV 3-4 years earlier and noticed a pattern. I mean, who does that as a teenager? I know people hate Harper because he was on the cover of SI at 16 and blew a kiss to some pitcher who’d been swearing at him all game, but he’s a real student of the game who absorbs stuff like a sponge. I think what we’re seeing isn’t a maturation as much as it is a healthy Harper.

John
11 years ago

Great article and great use of Gifs. Love the attention to detail. Jeff, you are one of the best out there

Mike13
11 years ago

I love the individual matchup stuff

Pig.Pen
11 years ago

Mr. Sullivan, this was perhaps one of your best. Outstanding and right up there with the Lookout Landing piece in the postseason of 2010.

Pig.Pen
11 years ago

Mr. Sullivan, this was perhaps one of your best. Outstanding and right up there with the Lookout Landing piece in the postseason of 2010.