Looking Ahead at This Offseason’s Opt-Out Candidates

It’s hard to believe, but in two months, the celebratory World Series Champagne will have dried, the beer will be gone, and free agents will hit the open markets. After the season, players and teams have only five days to make their final option decisions, a choice that can have an enormous impact on future earnings or offseason team plans. I’m not here to predict all of those options in a 40,000-word article, as you, loyal FanGrapheteer, might nod off in boredom while Meg and Matt plot my no-doubt painful demise. But we can do a subset of them, the opt-outs and player options, as many of these are the biggest decisions that will need to be made in November. Plus, it’s an excuse to run out some early projections, which is always fun.
Unless I missed one, there are 15 opt-out clauses or player-only options.
Alex Bregman, 3B, Boston Red Sox
It took until mid-February for Alex Bregman to find a new team last year, and his arrival in Boston set off an unexpected chain of events that ended with Rafael Devers getting traded to San Francisco. Bregman has a particularly interesting choice to make in that he has only two years remaining on his deal, but a pretty spicy $80 million coming to him for those two seasons if he stays. Naturally, Bregman wants a little more security that what his Red Sox deal calls for, but that might not be attainable to him at his current rate of $40 million per year. He turns 32 in March, so he won’t be able to command a lucrative long-term deal like the one that Kyle Tucker, who is still in his 20s, is expected to sign this winter.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .257 | .344 | .446 | 545 | 82 | 140 | 30 | 2 | 23 | 80 | 66 | 89 | 2 | 120 | 3.7 |
| 2027 | .248 | .335 | .419 | 499 | 72 | 124 | 26 | 1 | 19 | 69 | 59 | 83 | 2 | 111 | 2.7 |
| 2028 | .246 | .333 | .407 | 460 | 64 | 113 | 24 | 1 | 16 | 61 | 54 | 78 | 1 | 107 | 2.1 |
| 2029 | .240 | .326 | .388 | 417 | 56 | 100 | 21 | 1 | 13 | 52 | 48 | 73 | 1 | 100 | 1.4 |
| 2030 | .235 | .320 | .375 | 349 | 45 | 82 | 17 | 1 | 10 | 41 | 39 | 64 | 1 | 95 | 0.9 |
| 2031 | .224 | .310 | .341 | 255 | 31 | 57 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 28 | 29 | 49 | 1 | 83 | 0.2 |
I think Bregman will opt out, but I’m not positive he’ll get a better market this year than he did last winter. Yes, he doesn’t come with draft pick compensation stemming from his qualifying offer this time around, but he’ll be a year older, and 2025 hasn’t really changed his career trajectory. While the Sox reportedly are interested in extending him, I don’t think they’re going to be aggressive in any attempt to re-sign him — at least not at the terms he’ll be looking to net in free agency if he does indeed hit the open market again.
Trevor Story, SS, Boston Red Sox
Thanks to his first healthy season in what feels like forever, Trevor Story has at least made it a slight possibility that he could opt out of his deal with the Red Sox. He currently leads the team in both home runs (23) and stolen bases (27), and he is third on the team in position player WAR (3.0). On the down side, there is no guarantee that Story is going to remain healthy moving forward, and he is a year older than Bregman, so it would be quite risky for him to hit the open market in hopes that he would get more than the $25 million per year that he’s owed for the next two seasons. The Sox could void his 2025 opt-out by picking up his $25 million club option for 2028, but for all the reasons why it would be risky for him to exercise his option, Boston is not going to pay him $25 million for an additional season — when he’ll be 35 — just to ensure that he doesn’t leave this winter.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .246 | .297 | .419 | 499 | 69 | 123 | 26 | 0 | 20 | 72 | 32 | 155 | 17 | 98 | 2.4 |
| 2027 | .241 | .290 | .403 | 457 | 60 | 110 | 23 | 0 | 17 | 63 | 29 | 144 | 13 | 92 | 1.7 |
| 2028 | .235 | .285 | .386 | 409 | 52 | 96 | 20 | 0 | 14 | 53 | 26 | 132 | 11 | 87 | 1.1 |
| 2029 | .226 | .278 | .365 | 296 | 36 | 67 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 36 | 19 | 98 | 7 | 79 | 0.4 |
| 2030 | .220 | .273 | .353 | 173 | 20 | 38 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 11 | 60 | 4 | 74 | 0.1 |
I fully expect Story not to exercise the opt-out and remain in Boston. From there, I see the Red Sox going with some combination of Story, Marcelo Mayer, and Kristian Campbell as the left side of their infield in 2026, and then applying the money they’d previously allocated to Bregman to improve other parts of their roster.
Pete Alonso, 1B, New York Mets
Yeah, Pete Alonso is opting out. And doing so makes a lot of sense, though not because he’s going to sign the lucrative long-term deal he was hoping for last winter; rather, it has to do with the fact that he’ll earn more than the one year and $24 million left on his current contract. Alonso looks like he has arrested his slow but steady slide this year, but as a bat-first, right-handed first baseman in his 30s, the concerns about how he’ll perform as he ages remain.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .262 | .341 | .501 | 581 | 80 | 152 | 35 | 1 | 34 | 111 | 60 | 143 | 1 | 135 | 3.4 |
| 2027 | .255 | .335 | .478 | 561 | 74 | 143 | 33 | 1 | 30 | 103 | 58 | 139 | 1 | 127 | 2.7 |
| 2028 | .246 | .327 | .451 | 528 | 67 | 130 | 30 | 0 | 26 | 91 | 54 | 133 | 1 | 118 | 1.8 |
| 2029 | .240 | .321 | .430 | 488 | 59 | 117 | 27 | 0 | 22 | 79 | 50 | 126 | 1 | 111 | 1.2 |
| 2030 | .235 | .318 | .414 | 430 | 50 | 101 | 23 | 0 | 18 | 65 | 44 | 114 | 1 | 106 | 0.7 |
After a better season, and no draft pick compensation, Alonso will do better than last year, but I’ll be surprised if he goes beyond wading depth into nine-figure territory.
Jack Flaherty, SP, Detroit Tigers
Jack Flaherty has an inflated ERA, but that isn’t going to scare off teams the way it might have 30 years ago because his peripherals are strong. Also, the back issues from last season haven’t stopped him from carrying what may end up being his heaviest workload since 2019. That being said, his player option — which doubled to $20 million when he made his 15th start — does have a lot in its favor from Flaherty’s point of view.
The sticking point here is that he is still eligible to receive a qualifying offer. It’s practically a no-brainer for the Tigers to extend him a qualifying offer if he rejects his option because it is likely going to be only a couple million more than they would owe him if he were to accept the option. Flaherty is a good starting pitcher whom many teams could use in their rotations, but he’s not at the level where teams would be willing to lose a draft pick in order to sign him. Therefore, the qualifying offer would really hamper his market. I think in his shoes, I’d turn down the option and then accept Detroit’s qualifying offer. That would put him in position to hit the open market next year without having to worry about the qualifying offer again.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 9 | 9 | 4.04 | 27 | 26 | 140.3 | 126 | 63 | 19 | 53 | 156 | 103 | 1.8 |
| 2027 | 8 | 9 | 4.18 | 25 | 24 | 131.3 | 120 | 61 | 18 | 49 | 142 | 99 | 1.6 |
| 2028 | 7 | 9 | 4.20 | 23 | 22 | 124.3 | 116 | 58 | 17 | 46 | 131 | 99 | 1.4 |
| 2029 | 6 | 9 | 4.39 | 21 | 20 | 112.7 | 108 | 55 | 16 | 42 | 116 | 94 | 1.1 |
Cody Bellinger, OF/1B, New York Yankees
It weirdly hasn’t gotten much press, but Cody Bellinger is having an excellent season with the Yankees, about as good as his comeback 2023 campaign with the Cubs. Yet even if his performance has gone a bit under the radar, major league front offices have surely noticed. They also recognize that there aren’t a lot of impact bats available in free agency, especially not ones who can play center field; Bellinger and his agent Scott Boras understand this enough to take advantage of it. He’ll opt out, and he’ll attract enough interest to absolutely crush his current $25 million price tag for 2026. I think that Bellinger is more likely to end up with a “they paid what?” reaction to his deal than either Alonso or Bregman.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .277 | .332 | .460 | 531 | 83 | 147 | 28 | 3 | 21 | 82 | 45 | 82 | 13 | 120 | 3.4 |
| 2027 | .273 | .329 | .455 | 512 | 79 | 140 | 27 | 3 | 20 | 76 | 44 | 80 | 11 | 118 | 3.2 |
| 2028 | .268 | .325 | .437 | 492 | 74 | 132 | 25 | 2 | 18 | 71 | 42 | 77 | 9 | 112 | 2.6 |
| 2029 | .263 | .320 | .425 | 464 | 68 | 122 | 23 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 40 | 74 | 7 | 107 | 2.1 |
| 2030 | .256 | .314 | .405 | 430 | 60 | 110 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 56 | 37 | 70 | 6 | 101 | 1.5 |
| 2031 | .253 | .311 | .394 | 388 | 53 | 98 | 18 | 2 | 11 | 48 | 34 | 65 | 5 | 97 | 1.1 |
Edwin Díaz, RP, New York Mets
Closers aren’t as sexy as they were 20 years ago, but I’d argue that this tidal shift has affected the second- and third-tier closers rather than the elite ones. And Edwin Díaz remains an elite closer, even if he’s not as lights out as he was in 2022. He will surely be the best closer available in free agency if he opts out of the two years and $37 million left on his Mets deal. It also helps him that the Red Sox recently extended closer Aroldis Chapman, removing the best short-term alternative to Díaz from the market.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 2 | 2.78 | 56 | 0 | 55.0 | 38 | 17 | 5 | 20 | 79 | 148 | 1.1 |
| 2027 | 5 | 3 | 2.96 | 57 | 0 | 54.7 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 21 | 77 | 139 | 1.0 |
| 2028 | 5 | 3 | 3.27 | 57 | 0 | 55.0 | 41 | 20 | 5 | 22 | 74 | 126 | 0.8 |
| 2029 | 5 | 3 | 3.57 | 57 | 0 | 53.0 | 42 | 21 | 6 | 23 | 69 | 115 | 0.6 |
| 2030 | 4 | 4 | 3.78 | 55 | 0 | 50.0 | 43 | 21 | 6 | 24 | 62 | 109 | 0.3 |
Shane Bieber, SP, Toronto Blue Jays
Normally, turning down a player option after two seasons of single-digit start totals would be a dangerous game for a starter. For Shane Bieber, however, I’d argue that this is the best choice because gets a $4 million buyout if he turns down the $16 million option, effectively making it a $12 million decision. He’s not going to get a Jacob deGrom contract by any stretch of the imagination, but he’s been dominant in his three starts with the Blue Jays, so unless something absolutely terrible happens to him over the last month of the season (and playoffs), he’ll comfortably do better than one year, $12 million this winter. Also, because he was traded midseason from Cleveland, he dodged the possibility of being saddled with a qualifying offer. He may still end up with a fairly short-term deal, but it’ll be far richer than his player option would be.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 4 | 3.71 | 18 | 18 | 102.0 | 98 | 42 | 12 | 25 | 94 | 111 | 1.7 |
| 2027 | 6 | 5 | 3.81 | 19 | 19 | 108.7 | 106 | 46 | 13 | 28 | 98 | 108 | 1.7 |
| 2028 | 5 | 6 | 4.02 | 19 | 19 | 109.7 | 109 | 49 | 13 | 30 | 96 | 102 | 1.5 |
| 2029 | 5 | 5 | 4.16 | 18 | 18 | 101.7 | 105 | 47 | 13 | 29 | 87 | 99 | 1.2 |
Lourdes Gurriel Jr., OF, Arizona Diamondbacks
For a while, Lourdes Gurriel Jr. could always bank on his relatively valuable floor as a safe, dependable league-average player with a solid bat, but that security has taken a big hit this season. Across 129 games and 546 plate appearances, he posted a .248/.295/.418 line with 19 home runs, a 94 wRC+, and 0.7 WAR. Notice I used the past tense there, because Gurriel tore his ACL last week, an injury that ended his season and will almost certainly cost him a good chunk of 2026. His projection below suggests opting out would be a bad choice, and ZiPS won’t even account for his knee injury in full until after the season. I suspect that I’m more likely to be the next president than Gurriel is to opt out. When he returns to Arizona at some point next year, it will likely be in a reduced role.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .259 | .309 | .418 | 509 | 57 | 132 | 26 | 2 | 17 | 67 | 33 | 88 | 8 | 102 | 1.2 |
| 2027 | .255 | .304 | .406 | 466 | 51 | 119 | 23 | 1 | 15 | 59 | 30 | 82 | 6 | 98 | 0.7 |
| 2028 | .248 | .300 | .387 | 419 | 44 | 104 | 20 | 1 | 12 | 51 | 28 | 76 | 5 | 92 | 0.3 |
| 2029 | .246 | .296 | .382 | 293 | 30 | 72 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 19 | 55 | 3 | 89 | 0.1 |
Robert Suarez, RP, San Diego Padres
Díaz is obviously preferable to Robert Suarez, but I think there’s room in free agency wallets for a second excellent closer. It may feel like Suarez is still relatively new to the league, but remember, he’ll be 35 for the 2026 season after spending most of his career overseas. Suarez’s options, which both have to be decided after the World Series, are only for two years and $16 million, and I think he can do comfortably better that. And if he doesn’t bet on himself now, he might never get a chance to hit major league free agency at the height of his value.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 3 | 3.38 | 57 | 0 | 56.0 | 47 | 21 | 4 | 18 | 56 | 119 | 0.7 |
| 2027 | 5 | 4 | 3.54 | 55 | 0 | 53.3 | 47 | 21 | 5 | 19 | 51 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 2028 | 5 | 3 | 3.91 | 53 | 0 | 50.7 | 48 | 22 | 5 | 20 | 46 | 103 | 0.2 |
Ha-Seong Kim, SS, Atlanta Braves
The Ha-Seong Kim era for the Rays didn’t last long. A shoulder injury kept him from making his season debut until July, and after a poor six weeks with the team, he returned to the IL with a back injury. His time with Tampa Bay ended with an event that would have seemed surprising a year before; he was placed on waivers and claimed by the Braves, who picked up his leftover salary. Kim has a $16 million player option for 2026, and after a miserable season, that’s probably a better pillow contract than he’d get elsewhere. Simply put, he has a better chance of getting a lucrative deal after a healthy comeback season at age 31 than a lousy, injured one at 30. It’s a good gamble for the Braves, and I’d be really surprised if Kim doesn’t return to Atlanta.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .239 | .331 | .360 | 381 | 49 | 91 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 43 | 50 | 76 | 19 | 95 | 2.2 |
| 2027 | .238 | .330 | .352 | 366 | 47 | 87 | 16 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 48 | 74 | 17 | 93 | 1.9 |
| 2028 | .236 | .328 | .345 | 348 | 43 | 82 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 38 | 46 | 71 | 15 | 90 | 1.6 |
| 2029 | .235 | .324 | .348 | 328 | 40 | 77 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 34 | 42 | 68 | 13 | 90 | 1.4 |
Tyler O’Neill, OF, Baltimore Orioles
Tyler O’Neill’s 2025 peaked in the first game of the season, when he went 3-for-3 with a homer on Opening Day. After battling knee, back, shoulder, and wrist injuries, and a .210/.293/.434 line, he’s likely not matching the two years and $33 million the Orioles still owe him. And remember, ZiPS has generally been the most positive projection system on O’Neill’s future.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .239 | .321 | .441 | 401 | 60 | 96 | 16 | 1 | 21 | 63 | 45 | 130 | 6 | 117 | 1.6 |
| 2027 | .234 | .316 | .427 | 363 | 53 | 85 | 14 | 1 | 18 | 54 | 40 | 117 | 5 | 112 | 1.2 |
| 2028 | .226 | .308 | .396 | 341 | 47 | 77 | 13 | 0 | 15 | 48 | 37 | 112 | 4 | 101 | 0.6 |
| 2029 | .221 | .305 | .379 | 280 | 37 | 62 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 37 | 31 | 95 | 3 | 96 | 0.3 |
Joc Pederson, DH/OF, Texas Rangers
The Rangers’ recent surge has left open the possibility of Joctoberfest 2025 taking place, though at 14.9% playoff odds, a lot would still have to go the team’s way. The good news is ZiPS sees a good chance that Joc Pederson will have a sunnier 2026 campaign, even if this projection is that of a really solid role player rather than that of a starter who gets top dollar in free agency. As with the Red Sox and Story, the Rangers aren’t going to buy out Pederson’s opt-out by picking up his 2027 club option, so he will certainly be wearing the same jersey next season.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .232 | .340 | .430 | 298 | 43 | 69 | 12 | 1 | 15 | 43 | 42 | 80 | 3 | 115 | 1.1 |
| 2027 | .228 | .336 | .417 | 276 | 39 | 63 | 11 | 1 | 13 | 37 | 38 | 77 | 2 | 111 | 0.9 |
| 2028 | .224 | .331 | .400 | 255 | 34 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 32 | 35 | 73 | 2 | 105 | 0.6 |
| 2029 | .216 | .324 | .378 | 185 | 23 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 25 | 56 | 1 | 97 | 0.3 |
The Others: Frankie Montas, SP, New York Mets; A.J. Minter, RP, New York Mets; Wandy Peralta, RP, San Diego Padres
The last three are especially low impact, so I’ve lumped them all together.
A.J. Minter looked to be upgrading to A.J. Mintest during an especially hot April, but after suffering a pretty gruesome lat tear that saw his muscle ripped entirely off the bone, he is pretty much guaranteed to pick up his $11 million player option with the Mets. Wandy Peralta is probably a coin flip, as he might do better in free agency than the two years and $9.8 million remaining on his deal with the Padres, but despite a good ERA this season, he’s generally been an unexciting mid-bullpen option, so not returning comes with some risk. Frankie Montas will likely miss most or all of 2026 after elbow surgery for a torn UCL, so there is no scenario in which he turns down the ability to be paid $17 million for the year.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 | 2 | 4.04 | 57 | 0 | 55.7 | 49 | 25 | 5 | 26 | 46 | 100 | 0.2 |
| 2027 | 2 | 3 | 4.26 | 53 | 0 | 50.7 | 46 | 24 | 5 | 25 | 41 | 94 | 0.0 |
| 2028 | 2 | 3 | 4.60 | 49 | 0 | 47.0 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 26 | 37 | 88 | -0.2 |
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Jorge Polanco also just vested a $6MM player option for 2025 by hitting 450 PA. It’s hard to say because last year was so rough and he’s been injury-prone; I could see it going either way — he could definitely get more than $6MM guaranteed but I’m not sure how high of an AAV we’re talking since his ability to play the field is questionable at this point.
I wonder how he would do as a first baseman? Teams are more open to short guys as a first baseman now than they were in the past. Or maybe that would just mean he would get hurt even more often.
Why would he get hurt more at 1st base?
Compared with playing DH, I mean.
“He had threatened to kill me in public”
“Why would he kill you in public?”
I think she means “he threatened, in public, to kill her” *eye roll*
(I love that movie)
Local media reports that Polanco worked at 1B on Saturday with Perry Hill, infield coach extraordinaire.
His contract for this year was for $7 million plus the option that just vested and he’s been much better this year than last. He’s also played more games than he has since 2021 and is rocking a career high in wRC+ at the moment. Even with his checked recent injury history and rapidly declining defense, he can definitely do better than 1 year/$6 million on the open market and I don’t think he’d be in a substantially better position if he stuck around and hit free agency a year older next year, unless he just had a monster year.
He’s not going to get a huge AAV or a long contract, not as a 32-year-old who only provides value while hitting and is more a good than great hitter, but 1 year/$6 million is like, Justin Turner or Andrew McCutchen money, and Polanco’s several years younger and better than that.
I don’t think any of these are going to be especially interesting free agencies. Alonso, Bregman, and Bellinger probably all opt out and re-sign with their current teams for low nine figures. I think all three of them are more valuable to their current clubs than to anyone else, be that because of a favorable home park (Bregman and Bellinger) or sentimental value (Alonso).
IMO, it would seem like a fair deal if the Red Sox negotiated a similar deal to what Bregman got this offseason, except with no opt-outs. But I could also see Bregman deciding to hold out for four years at that rate and the Red Sox decide to fill that spot with a different player. Or Red Sox ownership overruling Breslow and giving him the deal he asks for. I have no idea what the Red Sox’s front office is going to do. There are too many cooks in the kitchen over there.
Other than the Red Sox, I really would not give Bregman more than $100M unless I played in a stadium that rewarded guys with warning track power, like the Astros or Phillies. He could still be a good player for the Angels, Mets, or Dodgers but I don’t see how he would be worth that much. That doesn’t mean someone won’t do that, though.
Bregman has made a huge impression in Boston. He quickly took over the clubhouse and seems to enjoy playing there. Chapman indicated that the atmosphere was very good and was a reason he accepted an extension despite probably getting more in free agency. The park is a perfect fit for Bregman and he has injury risk. I could see him resigning for a slightly longer term for more overall money but less AAV. 4 for 120 seems reasonable.
Their biggest need is obviously pitching, but with Westburg making public comments about the team wanting a veteran leader in the clubhouse for a young team without a stand-out voice, Bregman could be a good fit in Baltimore.
I think the O’s have to open the pocketbook wide this winter, and a good rotation with Bregman leading all of those talented young stars could lead to a real bounce back.
Is there an obvious hole at third on the Orioles? absolutely not, but you have all off-season to figure out where to move Westburg/Holliday and adding his presence to that clubhouse is worth having young Jackson learn CF or something.
There has got to be a better approach than spending $150M for a guy on the decline who will block your young guys.
Given the large number of position players and few pitchers, the obvious solution is to sign a pitcher who will lead, like Chris Bassitt.
Or sign a guy or trade for a veteran leader who serves as the 4th outfielder or utility infielder. Veteran leadership is cheap. If they are going to open up the pocketbook for a free agent–which I think is still in question–someone like Imai would make a lot of sense, as would Shane Bieber
I take statements like Chapman’s with a grain of salt, but I think you’ve got about the right numbers with Bregman getting around 4/120.
Not sure what you mean about the parks–do you think Bregman has lost some of his power?
It is funny that coming in to the season that Bregman had one the best (the best?) OPS in history at Fenway, albeit is limited at-bats. Naturally, he has put up a .785 home OPS to an .882 road OPS.
It would be interesting to see ownership forcing Breslow to spend more money, given their recent cheapness. My guess is that he gets something like 4/120 but I guess maybe that’s a little high. Passan, I think, recently wrote something about him getting 5/175, and that seems to be the talking point among Sox fans. That seems wild to me for a guy who topped out around 5/160 last year, is a year older, and missed 40+ games.
His EV hasn’t changed much if at all. I just don’t think Bregman is going to give you elite production much longer unless he can take advantage of a short left field. If you take a look at his statcast page he hits a ton of balls in the air to left and his power is only average. He can still be a good player if he plays half his games in LAA or DET or TEX but he’s going to be a whole lot closer to average there than in Philadelphia, Boston, or Houston.
Last year I thought the Nats would take a big swing at Pete if any team would but nope Pete only drew interest from the Mets and Toronto and I just don’t see him drawing much interest this offseason either. I think he’ll last into the new year if he looks for a 5-6 year deal.
I think Alonso’s free agency this offseason will look a lot like the one he had last year. I am pretty sure most teams see him as a DH in the near future, and he’s not getting a $100M+ deal when teams think he will be a DH in year 2 or 3.
He will play the waiting game until it becomes clear nobody is giving him a $100M deal, and then someone will offer something that is a lot like the deal he got this past offseason, with the package sweetened a little bit. I would expect that team to be the Mets because it’s clear he would rather not move if the deals are similar. But I suppose it’s plausible a team like the Rangers would check in on him.
Alonso is definitely the dude I think most likely to end up with his current team.
This seems like a slam dunk. He has risen to iconic heights and Cohen will match any offer. He would be crazy to leave.
I agree with you, but if we want to be FunGraphs for a sec, there’s a non-zero chance he ends up in the Bronx!
I would say the former Met most likely to become a Yankee is Diaz. It is so hard for me to see a situation where the Yankees bother to outbid the Mets for Alonso when they have Stanton and Rice. But they have traditionally put a huge premium on having a fireballing closer.
I am guessing the Yankees priority order is Bellinger and / or Grisham in the outfield, followed by one of Diaz or Suarez, and then bringing back Weaver or finding someone else like him to pitch in the 7th inning.
They’ll still have Bednar for another year.
Bellinger for sure. The home/road splits make him more valuable to NYY than any other team. They also would need a CF, and his ability to play 1B is gravy with Rice likely catching 60 or so games next year.
What would ZiPs offer Bregman in his next free agency if he opted in and hit his current projections?
So what does Boston do if Bregman and Story both opt in?
They should be thrilled. The Red Sox do not have a problem of having too many infielders.
Story is a weird one, because he basically had two lost seasons. Then he came out the gates this year playing BAD. 91 wRC in April, ok, not unusual for him. 13 wRC+ in May. 158/200/232 slash, striking out 35% of the time. He looked like he was finished, I remember seeing the Red Sox fan base tweets at that time, iirc he was batting near the bottom of the line up. He has been great since, posting between a 121 and 189wRC+ per month since. You certainly cannot eliminate May, but his overall season and WAR is much better if you could.
I’m guilty of saying it was time to move him to the bench and that the contract was a sunj cost. I don’t tweet though lol
The lesson here, as always: never, ever tweet
Have a dance party! Bregman has been amazing on and OFF the field! Every player cites a conversation with Bregman for improving a piece of their game.
Stick them in the heart of their lineup and reap the benefits of having two very good players (when healthy) playing right next to each other!
There isn’t a Red Sox fan who wouldn’t welcome that outcome any more than me. This Trevor Story is close to being the Rockies version. Excellent defense, 30 HR’s, 30 steals and a lot of strikeouts. I was one of very few who stood up and said a healthy Story was still a good player and Bregman has been better than expected. This team is fun. The farm keeps producing and these two veterans are the rudder that keeps them moving forward.
Celebrate and mourn at the same time. 🙂 Bregman at 2/63 against the cap is great, even if he can opt out after next season. Story might be okay on 2/55 (including the buyout), but I don’t feel really confident that he can a) stay healthy and b) maintain his offense given his approach. Not a nightmare if he opts in, but it would be great to be free of it.
I have a hard time believing that someone will give Bellinger a huge deal this offseason when he was in basically the same boat two years ago and he signed a 3 year, $80M deal with an opt out and a player option. He’s only 30, but he will need a team looking to make a huge splash.
Maybe the Phillies would do it, he would work in that home park, but if they re-sign Schwarber their two best hitters will be left handed already, plus Brandon Marsh.
Maybe the Angels and Rockies are tired of being ignored, I thought they would go hard after him the last time. But it would be very hard to justify from an on-field perspective.
Does Montfort even return Boras’ calls after the Kris Bryant disastrous deal?
It was just a joke not blaming Boras or Bryant just pointing out how Montfort thinks.
The underlying numbers look a lot better than last time, no? I think the Yankees just re-sign him, it’s a perfect fit for both sides
His previous three years in 2023 looked like this: great, bad, terrible. His previous three years now will be great, good, great.
He’s now a long way from the completely lost offensive player he looked like before.
There’s probably no more risk of him turning into a pumpkin than any other similar player at his age.
I think he will go for the largest total contract this time, though. The baseline won’t get better barring something shocking. He should see who will give him the most over 5-6 years and just take it.
Yep. Bellinger has a 152/102 home/away wrc+ including 7 more HRs at home.
His track record looks a lot better to me.
Going to 2024, he was coming off -1.0 WAR, 1.5 WAR, 4.4 WAR
Going to 2026, he’s coming off 4.4 WAR, 2.6 WAR, ~4.8 WAR
In 2024, I’d be worried that that 2023 was a fluke (as statcast data suggests it could be), and that Bellinger would be an albatross. Today, I’d be reasonably confident signing him that I’m getting a reliably good player, with the possibility that he might just be a little above average.
As long as the rest of the lineup has enough right-handed talent, does it really matter if a team’s two best hitters are both lefties?
I missed that Montas tore his UCL
Money is no object for Cohen so he’ll take a mulligan on that one since he’s no longer taking up a roster spot, nor can he play badly and hurt the team
Interesting to compare ZIPS projections here to compare to their preseason 3-year projections:
Alonso: Preseason – 6.7 WAR; Now – 7.9 WAR
Bregman: Preseason – 7.7 WAR; Now – 8.5 WAR
These numbers point toward both guys doing better than they did last year. For Alonso, that seems very likely, since he ended up signing a pillow contract. For Bregman’s was a sort of pillow as well, but his situation looks a little more complicated. ZIPS projects him for almost the same playing time as it did last year, despite his missing 40+ games to injury this year. I’m not sure teams will be as optimistic on that front. In the end, though, I think he’ll top the 3/93 (after deferrals) + opt outs he got last time, getting something like 4/120.
Story has a chance to beat the record of most stolen bases in a season without being caught stealing even once, which is currently 30 by Trea Turner in 2023. I guess the disengagement limit really has helped these guys out.
What would that do for Story’s potential earnings this offseason?
Going 31/31 instead of 27/27 or even like 30/32 will not impact a potential contract.
Not to be a buzzkill, but I wonder if the almost-certain lockout after the 2026 season will impact any decisions made by these candidates.
Was leafing through the payroll pages and found this amusing opt-out: Ryan McMahon can opt out after 2026 if he finishes top-5 in the MVP voting in 2025. 🙂
Actually, there is one additional potential opt-out out there. Shota Imanaga’s contract (assuming I understand it correctly) was set up as 2 guaranteed years (2024-2025) but after 2025, the Cubs have to decide whether to exercise the 2028 option they have which will lock him in at $20M, $20M and $17M over the next 3 years. If they do not exercise that option, Imanaga gets a player option of $15M for 2026. They then go through the same process next year if Imanaga takes the $15M 2026 player option.
“A.J. Minter looked to be upgrading to A.J. Mintest” dammit. I’ve been a Braves fan his entire career and I never thought of that.
Bellinger is obviously opting out but his home/road splits will have to scare teams off I’d think. With his swing, those drastic splits were predictable, which would mean he’d predictably take a step back with a home park not as tailored to him.
I think he will sign a contract very similar to his last contract. Maybe an extra year or 2. Definitely with opt outs. Potentially front-loaded a bit to incentivize the opt outs. And definitely with the Yankees. Hard to imagine a team would value him as much with the expected production dip elsewhere. Additionally, with Rice’s ability to catch Bellinger’s OF/1B flex is very valuable for NY.