Luis Arraez Is Good at Defense Now

Apparently Luis Arraez is good at defense now. This took me by surprise, and perhaps it also took you by surprise, or perhaps it is at least taking you by surprise in this exact second, as you ingest this blog. Because if there’s one thing you know about Luis Arraez, it’s probably… well, it’s that he is incredible at contacting the baseball with a bat. But if there’s a second thing you know about Luis Arraez, it’s that he is not very good at defense.
This fact is a key totem in the still-raging Arraez Wars of the 2020s. Those who like baseball played the old-fashioned way insist that he is an MVP-level talent, enraging most contemporary baseball fans who understand that singles are only so valuable, especially for a guy who can’t run well or hold down a defensive position.
When Arraez signed with the Giants this offseason under the condition that he would only play second base, the universal reaction was something like, “OK, well, good luck with that.” Such pessimism was warranted. In 2024 — his age-27 season! — he graded out as -7 outs above average at second base in just 42 games played there; given a full season, he would’ve easily been the sport’s worst defender at the position. In 2025, the Padres punted him down the defensive spectrum to first base. But even at first, Arraez looked nearly unplayable, racking up another -7 OAA at the notoriously easy position. (It’s not that hard, tell ’em Wash, etc.) Those lacking the range to play first base often find themselves consigned to designated hitterdom sooner rather than later.
Not so fast, Arraez said. On February 13, Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle published a story with a shocking lede: “Luis Arráez’s fielding at second base is already vastly improved, at least according to San Francisco Giants infield coach Ron Washington, and Arráez agrees.” Slusser cited Arraez’s hard work over the offseason as the catalyst.
Strong claims in February have their way of softening by the time April rolls around. But here we are, a month-plus into the 2026 season, and who is it that leads all second basemen in defensive value? Yes, it is he, Luis Arraez, towering over the competition at +6 OAA. It’s not just among second basemen, either; his +5 fielding run value is tied for third among all defenders who don’t wear masks. Here is the non-catcher leaderboard: Pete Crow-Armstrong, Bobby Witt Jr., Nico Hoerner, and Arraez. In other words, the three consensus best defenders in baseball, and also a guy who looked like he couldn’t handle first base as recently as last season.
This, in my view, calls for a good old-fashioned investigation. How? Why? Through what means?
Perhaps Arraez hit the gym, injected some peptides, got swoll and speedy, and turned into a completely different athlete. But the evidence does not point in that direction. His sprint speed is virtually unchanged. His arm strength budged only a tick. He is the same guy. And so the peptides theory doesn’t hold much water.
In lieu of more invasive biodata, I figured the only other way to get to the bottom of this was by watching every play that Arraez has made (and not made) in the 2026 season. Longtime fans may remember my application of this method in the case of one Jorge Polanco upon his re-signing with the Mariners in the 2024-2025 offseason. In that article, I noted that there is no easy way to glean how much OAA a player gained or lost on any specific play. But I also mentioned a workaround in the back end of Baseball Savant, albeit a messy one. As I wrote then, the only identifying information given by Savant to conduct this analysis is the month when the ball was hit, the exit velocity, the handedness of the hitter, and whether the game was played home or away. This is not an amazing amount of information. But it is enough to narrow it down to three or four possible plays in most cases, and then common sense can be applied from that point to ascertain which of those is the relevant play.
And so I went through this process to better understand how Arraez is racking up crazy defensive numbers. Some of it was no doubt fluky, or at least suggestive of computer error. His “best” play this season looks pretty unremarkable to my eye; he crosses over the bag and then flips the ball to the shortstop. He was given nearly 0.85 OAA for this play. I’m not sure I see it.
Here’s another ostensibly quite valuable play, allegedly worth one-sixth of an OAA. I don’t see anything special in particular here, either:
But, like the best outfielders, my suspicion is that Arraez is grading out well because, by the time the camera cuts to him on the diamond, he’s done all the hard work to make a tough play look easy.
His speciality, it seems like, is squaring himself up on groundballs to his right. Generally, players can make this play look a little flashier by backhanding the ball and throwing with their weight moving away from the bag, like a shortstop in the six hole. But in the play below, Arraez gets to the spot early, negating the need for a tough backhand pick and an even tougher throw.
These high-quality anticipation skills have been on display in situations where Arraez is pulled in close to cut off the run at home. These plays make an argument that he’s been even better than his OAA, because he received virtually zero credit for these two excellent run-saving efforts:
Arraez hasn’t done anything too highlight-reel worthy, save for an impressive play he made to his left that was spotted by Ben Clemens a couple weeks ago. But Arraez has taken care of nearly every easy play. Here’s one glaring exception, according to Savant, at least:
This graded out as 90% likely to be an out, which feels a little harsh, given Jake Cronenworth smoked it 109 mph and Arraez had to field it on a short hop.
This play is more reflective of his potential weaknesses – he was given a 68% chance to make this play, and just didn’t have the raw speed to make up for a so-so jump:
Even with below-average footspeed, Arraez appears to have become good at second base defense by just improving his reflexes. There’s no Driveline for fielding (yet); that’s probably because, unlike with pitching and hitting, there aren’t any clear training exercises to improve the key performance tool (velocity for pitching, bat speed for hitting). Perhaps as a result, and also due to defense peaking earlier than all other skills, it feels like drastic defensive improvements occur less frequently, and there is less of a blueprint for this kind of turnaround. There is no clear smoking gun for Arraez’s improvement; he’s just more frequently in spots where he used to not be.
On the offensive side of the ball, the story is much the same as always. He’s managing just-above-average production by hitting the ball very softly, mostly between the left fielder and center fielder. He hasn’t hit a single ball harder than 98.1 mph. But the defense totally changes his trajectory as a player. He’s even stealing bases! He’s not relying on super speed or physical tools to pull this off, but the changes look real, and fixing these parts of his game is the smartest thing he could’ve done to reposition himself for a multiyear deal when he once again hits the free agent market after the season.
Michael Rosen is a transportation researcher and the author of pitchplots.substack.com. He can be found on Twitter at @bymichaelrosen.
I think he has put himself in position to get a longer term contract from the Giants.
But without something much clearer than this I would be concerned that this is a story about something the Giants are specifically doing with him rather than a skillset he is going to carry over to a new team.
The Giants seem to like signing these mid level free agents anyway, and if it’s a good fit now they might as well keep it going.
Yeah any team that would want to sign him long terms other than the Giants has to factor in that they will need to poach Ron Washington from the Giants as well.
Adding two more things to this:
1) At least half of the teams that might be looking for a veteran second basemen on a multi year deal are also teams that get outsized benefit from a guy who pulls the ball in the air. And that is something Arraez doesn’t do much.
The Yankees and Pirates have a clear preference for left handed power, the Red Sox have explicitly committed themselves to finding players who can bounce hits off the wall, and the Phillies have a stadium that rewards power.
That leaves…the Mets? The Rangers? The Royals? The Padres have already tried this once and will need pitching, so they’re almost certainly out on him. I think the pool of teams that will have him on their wish list is pretty short.
2) The Giants are 13-18. They’re 5 games out of the wild card spot and it’s only April. And they’re projected to go about .500 the rest of the way. This is a team that is likely to be a seller in July. Arraez currently leads the team in fWAR (tied with Landen Roupp) and he’s an impending free agent.
I am very curious to see what happens here. Maybe the Giants just sign him to an extension. That would be very much in character for them, and maybe Arraez would be happy to not have to worry about any of this in the future.
If not, I am very curious to see who would value him with the concerns mentioned earlier about his defense and whether his lack of power / hitting balls in the air limits his impact. I think the Rangers are the most likely team to try and trade for him since they are likely to still be in the playoff hunt and they’ve been aggressive at the deadline in the past. After that it’s hard to find logical trade partners, although I’m sure someone else will emerge.
And if he does get traded, I have to imagine that other teams will be watching how his defense is very closely.
Please do not speak this into existence, they already have enough problems
I don’t think they would be interested in him anyway. They’re more likely to do something like trade for Daniel Schneeman or David Hamilton to platoon with Semien and serve as a utility guy.
Although the price would be way too steep for Schneeman if he keeps running an ISO over .200 and an OBP over .350.
Signing Arraez would also feel like a very Arte Moreno thing to do.
After spending an offseason getting More Athletic and worse, maybe the Mets will course-correct this winter to become Less Athletic, and sign Arraez to a nine-figure deal.
It makes me think of Chase Utley who had a visual reputation as a poor fielder (his actions in the field looked janky) to go with data-darling run values. Over time, it came out that Utley and the Phillies just understood second base positioning much better than the rest of the league.
Many of these Arraez plays look like he was positioned in a way to make hard-to-field grounders easy. I also suspect he’s had some luck. Most of the swings highlighted above were off-balance and resulted in soft contact with friendly hops. Like Utley, Arraez’s actions looked less than smooth at times.
While I expect around 0 OAA going forward, that in itself is a win for Arraez and the Giants!
Utley really DID transform himself completely as a defender. No idea how he was able to do that (and sustainably), but he did.
This is 100% the answer. In the first clip, Arraez is positioned almost behind second base when the pitch is thrown, allowing him to a reach a ball hit on the shortstop’s side of the bag. It wasn’t a difficult play because of where he started from, but OAA is valuing the play based on how many second basemen would get to it from the average starting position.
I went back and looked through his errors from 2024 and Arraez really struggled with fielding the ball on the move. The Giants have changed his positioning not only laterally, but also much deeper than he played with the Marlins. That allows him to get in front of the ball and secure it with proper technique rather than attempting to scoop or lunge.
“OAA is valuing the play based on how many second basemen would get to it from the average starting position” Is this true? I thought it was from where the fielder started.
I’ve read conflicting reports on that, but it’s the only plausible explanation for the first video. Arraez makes five sliding steps to his right before he fields the ball. There is no way that play could be awarded 0.85 OAA if it was measuring from where Arraez started, as you would expect any second baseman to do that. But if it is measuring from an average starting position, that fielding the ball successfully on the shortstop’s side of the bag would be an incredibly rare result and giving it such an extraordinarily high score would make sense.
From Baseball Savant “The Statcast technology allows us to know exactly where each fielder stands, which is helpful in a baseball world where shifting and out-of-position defenders are commonplace. What that means is that every tracked play is accounted for, regardless of if the third baseman is standing in his regular spot, at shortstop or in short right field. It allows you to know exactly “how far” and “how much time,” regardless of shifts. It also allows for an OAA breakdown by fielder role.” (Obviously not updated when the “shift” was banned.)
It’s possible we don’t see “where Arráez started” in the video.
Maybe he recognized where the pitch was going and started moving.
This, or there might still be some hinkiness for “out-of-zone” plays. I’d like to know how often 2B field the ball at least that far on the shortstop side of the bag (and make the out) along with the average OAA assigned to those plays. Might just be a hole in the algo.
I would imagine a contributing factor could be that, even for second basemen starting nearer the bag, they’re less likely to make that play because it’s getting made by the shortstop.
I have been thinking about this and I think you are right that positioning him deeper is part of the story. That’s something that limits what they can do on defense but if it allows him to avoid doing something he was really bad at before than that could help a lot.
The other part is likely that they have taken some responsibilities off of Arraez’s plate, which allows him to move more decisively to what responsibilities he has left. This is a lot of what they did with Semien IIRC, letting Chapman take over things going to the third base side of him at shortstop.
For the specific example you reference I think my theory works a bit better if Schmitt is playing first base than Devers. Schmitt is a legitimately good defender at third base, and putting him at first base feels a bit like overkill but it could allow them to shift Arraez towards second base. They *could* do that with Devers but it doesn’t seem to be as good an idea.