Manny Margot and the Stickiness of a Launch-Angle Breakout
Manny Margot had a breakout within a breakout last year. After accounting for his offensive and defensive contributions, the Padres’ rookie center fielder was worth roughly two wins in slightly less than a full season’s worth of plate appearances. Even for a player who was highly touted as a prospect, producing league-average work at 22 years old represents, in itself, a kind of breakout.
Hidden within that strong end-of-year line was a drastic change in the second half, though. Margot started hitting the ball in the air. That’s a change that has powered many other breakouts. But before we book the skinny center fielder for all of the homers next year, we have to ask: what’s happened with launch-angle surgers in the past?
Last year, there wasn’t another player who upped his launch angle more in the second half than Margot.
| Player | 1st Half LA | 2nd Half LA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Margot | 4.5 | 14.3 | 9.8 |
| Trevor Plouffe | 8.7 | 18.5 | 9.8 |
| Brian McCann | 9.9 | 19.3 | 9.4 |
| Ezequiel Carrera | -0.8 | 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Ichiro Suzuki | -0.4 | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Jacoby Ellsbury | 4.3 | 12.8 | 8.5 |
| Didi Gregorius | 12.7 | 21.0 | 8.3 |
| Maikel Franco | 7.4 | 15.7 | 8.3 |
| Brandon Belt | 19.3 | 27.5 | 8.2 |
| Tommy Joseph | 10.4 | 17.7 | 7.3 |
| Hunter Renfroe | 13.0 | 20.0 | 7.0 |
| Eddie Rosario | 8.8 | 15.8 | 7.0 |
| Tyler Moore | 13.4 | 20.4 | 7.0 |
| Bryce Harper | 11.2 | 18.0 | 6.8 |
| Bradley Zimmer | 1.7 | 8.4 | 6.7 |
It didn’t turn him into a slugger, necessarily: Margot didn’t quite push his launch angle into Yonder Alonso territory. He did produce a .161 isolated slugging percentage in the second half, however, which is more power than he showed at most stops in the minors. It’s also more power than he’s projected to put up next year.
Could Margot keep up the new launch angle next year and better his projections? We know that launch angle gets “sticky” quickly and has decent year-to-year correlations. What has actually happened, though, with the players who have surged like this in the past.
There are only three years of Statcast data, and that means only two testable seasons. But if we limit our pool to those batters who recorded 50 balls in play in the first and second halves of both 2015 and 2016 — launch angle tends to become stable in that sort of sample — we find 34 players who saw a second-half surge of more than six degrees.
Here’s how they fared, as a group, in the first half, the second half, and in the season after their surge.
| 1st Half | 2nd Half | Next Year | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch Angle | 7.8 | 15.7 | 12.5 |
There was regression to the mean, of course. Only five players — Didi Gregorius, John Jaso, Starling Marte, Jose Ramirez, and Ichiro Suzuki — continued to push their launch angle even higher the year after they first surged, and all of them save Jaso recorded an angle within one degree of their second-half surge.
But look past that regression, and you’ll see that, as a group, they kept most of their gains. While they collectively lost three degrees from their second-half launch angle, they also still gained nearly five degrees over their original first-half launch angle.
Take a look at Anthony Rendon. He boosted his average launch angle from a 2016 first-half mark of 13.2 degrees to 20.7 degrees in the second half. He lost 2.6 degrees moving to 2017, but his resulting 18.1 figure was still significantly higher than his 2016 first-half number.
Now, back to Margot. It’s likely that he’ll take a slight step back and won’t join Rendon with a slugger’s launch angle in 2018. But he’s also not likely to drop all the way back to the first half of 2017, when he had a 4.5-degree average launch angle and hit 1.5 grounders for every fly ball. The group suggests he’ll keep 60% of his gains and have something like a 10.3 degree launch angle next year. That’s between Lorenzo Cain (10.2) and Yasiel Puig (10.6) and absolutely sounds like someone who could put up better-than-average power numbers in 2018.
The next time you hear about a launch-angle surge like this, particularly one that happened in-season, you have more context. Manny Margot may not be everything he showed in the second half last year, but he’s going to keep more than half of those gains, and he’ll be better than he was in the first half last year.
That’s how you regress to the mean and also keep much of your gains.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.
Good stuff, thanks Eno!
Eno – first, as always, great question, information and analysis. it looks like, on average, the year following a significant 2nd half launch angle increase has a launch angle roughly equal to the entire previous year where the surge occurred. if that is the case, can one use the total launch angle and related data from the previous year as an expectation for this year? in other words, can i use Margot’s whole 2017 as a good proxy for 2018?
This is good to know. The annoying thing is how much everyone has bought in – there’s basically no fantasy angle here, because IMO he has to keep the ~.160 ISO just to match his ADP..!
Nice article Eno. Btw if you look at the leaderboards the top hitters usually have like a 11-17 degree launch angle or so.
Single digit guys definitely benefit from elevating but are the 20+ guys really a good thing?
The average LA of the top20 woba hitters last year was 13 degrees, a few of them where at 17, none was at 20 (400 ab min).
Above 20 power is good but when you average there it likely means you hit a lot of pop ups but also high outfield flies above 35 degrees (which doesn’t show up in pop up stats but is still bad) and low babips.
So if a guy goes from 14 to 21 it might not be as good as a guy going from 8 to 14. The former just might go full odor/story/schimpf.
Sure for a guy like gallo it might make sense but then we should probaby assume that a 250 babip is more normal than bad luck.
Each player, depending on his bat speed/strength/exit velo and spray angles has optimal launch angles.
It’s interesting studying a player in depth – because it’s really about which launch angles does he have to hit in to maximize his outcomes (which are traditionally being measured in wOBA).
Margot doesn’t have strong pull power and uses center and the opposite field quite a bit. Because he lacks this high end exit velo he’s gotta live more in the line drive range or else he will fall victim to worse batted ball outcomes than when he was hitting 50% of his balls on the ground.
It’s a tightrope for him.
Eno,
Another nice research article. I was thinking of barrels as I read the article, and it’s higher degree of launch angle, 26-30. Of course, exit velocity makes the picture much more complicated.
I did miss seeing fingers in your article.