Matt Carpenter and a Most Amazing Strike

I want to assure you right away that what follows isn’t sour grapes. I don’t have a dog in this fight. Even if I did, I’d complain on my own time, and not on the job in front of everyone (probably). What follows is about a call, and a controversial one at that, early in Monday’s Game. But I’m not here to talk about  various implications. I’m here to talk about the call’s significance, relative to others, and about the process that contributed to the call. It was, in the end, a call most extraordinary that went Boston’s way.

The Red Sox went ahead 1-0 in the first, as you recall. The score remained the same into the bottom of the third, when David Freese led off with a single. Pete Kozma bunted Freese to second, and Adam Wainwright advanced Freese to nowhere with a strikeout. Matt Carpenter came up with two down, and he worked the count full. In that full count, Jon Lester threw a cutter inside. Carpenter started to first, assuming he’d drawn a two-out walk. Bill Miller, however, called him out, and Carpenter expressed his disagreement. That went about as well as most fairly cordial expressions of disagreement on a baseball field. That is, nothing changed, and the game moved on to the top of the fourth, with Carpenter having struck out looking.

From a straightaway angle, here’s the pitch that Carpenter took, right around when it crossed the front plane of the plate:

lestercarpenterfull

There’s really no controversy here, at least in terms of what should’ve happened. The pitch was over the edge — not of home plate — but of the batter’s box. That means the ball was inches out of the zone. Vertically, the pitch was fine. Laterally, the pitch missed. It doesn’t even fit in a gray area. That pitch unquestionably should’ve been ball four, and Carpenter  should’ve advanced to first, which would have brought up Shane Robinson with two down and two on. Miller just got it wrong. OK.

But it isn’t just that the call was wrong. I wouldn’t be writing on FanGraphs about some ordinary wrong ball/strike call. Below is a plot of all called strikes thrown to lefties by lefties in 2013. Both Carpenter and Lester are left-handed, as I didn’t need to write, and every pitcher/batter combination gets its own strike zone for whatever reasons. Anyway:

lhplhbadjust

You can already guess what the big red dot is. That’s the call that went in Lester’s favor on Monday. Among all pitches thrown by lefties to lefties this season, Lester got the most inside called strike. It was 16 inches inside from the center of the plate, with the runner-up one full inch less inside. In third was a pitch 1.5 less inside than the runner-up. You can ignore those weird blue dots down and to the left — those are PITCHf/x glitches I forgot to eliminate before saving the image file. Cameras. They lie, rarely.

Let’s look at another plot. This is Jon Lester pitching to lefties during the PITCHf/x era, going back to 2008:

lesterlhbpitchfx

Again, you should recognize the big red dot. This was by far the most inside called strike Lester has gotten against a lefty since at least 2007. Probably, it’s the most inside called strike against a lefty of his career. Previously, his most inside called strike against a lefty was 12.5 inches inside from the center of the plate. As a reminder, Monday’s strike was 16 inches inside from the center. That’s a difference of more than a quarter of a foot. And it’s not like the count was 3-and-0, when umpires tend to be forgiving. There were two strikes. This call was the difference between a walk and a strikeout in a close World Series game.

So how did this happen? We can go beyond just calling the umpire an idiot because it’s pretty much never that simple. I think we’re looking at three factors, ignoring any influence of Carpenter assuming the walk before it was granted. I’d like to think umpires aren’t quite that spiteful. First, here’s the third pitch of the plate appearance:

LesterCarpenterNull.gif.opt

That’s another inside cutter, which was Lester either trying to get ahead in the count or get Carpenter jammed. David Ross set up inside, but he had to receive the ball a little more inside, and Miller identified it correctly. Here, Miller called the inside cutter a ball, but he was probably conditioned: If Ross set up inside again, and if Lester were to hit his spot, then Miller might be more likely to call that a strike. This demonstrated command, on Lester’s part. The next two pitches were away, and then Lester came back in.

Another factor is David Ross. Lester likes pitching to Ross, and Ross has been a highly effective pitch-receiver. Or framer. Whatever. Call it what you want to call it. Among the catchers who caught at least 1,000 called pitches this season, Ross was baseball’s sixth-best receiver. He was fifth-best at getting balls called strikes. Here he is, receiving the full-count cutter:

LesterCarpenterStrike.gif.opt

Ross is quiet, firm and comfortable. He catches the ball with his glove moving back toward the zone. Just watch the pitch and you kind of ignore how far inside Ross is set up. He just makes the pitch look a lot better. That is, except to Carpenter, who had a pretty good view himself. Carpenter wasn’t wrong in his assumption, but Ross made everything cloudy for everyone else.

Finally, and probably most importantly, a big part of pitch-receiving is command. Good framers generally can’t save pitchers who miss their targets, even if they still miss in or near the zone. Pitchers who locate make catching a whole lot easier, and Lester nailed his target dead-on. You can see that in the .gif above, or you can see that in the screenshot down below:

lestercarpentertarget

You see the target, and the yellow dot represents where the ball was caught. In a full count, it looks like Ross wanted Lester to throw a ball. Lester threw that ball, and he threw it perfectly. In fact, he threw it so perfectly it wasn’t actually a ball to the one guy whose opinion mattered. Lester couldn’t have located that pitch better. Lester was rewarded, on one hand, for throwing a ball. On the other hand, he was rewarded for flawless execution. The strike zone should still be the strike zone, but you can’t say Lester didn’t do what he wanted.

In all, we have an extremely inside called strike to a lefty from a lefty. It’s the most inside such called strike this season, and maybe the most inside called strike of Lester’s big-league career. It was set up, in part, by an earlier inside cutter that just missed a little more in. The pitch was located perfectly by Lester, and it was received well by Ross, and when you put everything together, Bill Miller saw enough to call Carpenter out. Carpenter couldn’t believe it, and he was correct, but the Red Sox had Miller convinced. Forward moved the baseball game.

It’s too bad for the Cardinals. The right call would’ve extended the inning, putting two on for a righty. That righty, however, was Shane Robinson… so, yeah. In rough win-expectancy terms, the call reduced the Cardinals’ odds of winning by about 5%. That’s important, and I don’t know what would’ve happened had Carpenter reached. Then again, I’m not here to complain. Lots of things could’ve gone differently. Everything could’ve gone differently. Things went how they went, and this particular called strikeout gave us something remarkable. Even at the end of October, Jon Lester accomplished a season-first. There’s nothing I can do to change the way you feel about that. I can just try to explain how something happened.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

116 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fardbart
10 years ago

One of the things I noticed was Wainwright’s seeming inability to adjust to what was a wide strike zone. Lester took advantage, obviously. The big thing was the ump was consistent (to my eyes)

NS
10 years ago
Reply to  Fardbart

I don’t have the data so I can’t say whether he was generally consistent or not, but don’t we have two gifs in this very article – from the say at bat, even – in which the umpire calls the same pitch two different things?

Ryan
10 years ago
Reply to  NS

‘consistent’ is code for ‘bad’ when talking about strike zones.

Patrick
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Well how can the umpire see anything with that view? It sure looks like he was blocked by Carpenter’s arms and he was left with watching where the catcher had his glove at.

TKDC
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Well at no point does Carpenter impede the view of the actual strike zone, so if the umpire can’t see the ball because of Carpenter’s arms, he should perform what must be considered a very simple mental task and call it a ball.

Cus
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Also, Ross visibly tried to slide the first one, but stuck the second, which probably made it look even more like a strike than the first if only for the umpire reading Ross’ confidence in that.

Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  Fardbart

Wainright adjusted….. check out the first 4 innings and Wainright having 3-4 pitches hitting the outside corner and not getting the call. The thing is these pitches were going over the plate…. Lester pitches were not going over the plate but still getting called balls. Ask Matt Carpenter about it— called out twice by the home plate ump on 2 pitches that were way out of the strike zone. How many games this year has Matt Carpenter been caught looking twice in the same game…. it just does not happen.

Antonio Bananas
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Oh please, call me when an infield fly is called at the last second in the outfield. Way wah wah, Phillips was right.

Eric
10 years ago

You still whining about that?

Bushman212
10 years ago
Reply to  Fardbart

The issue here is umpire position. Regardless of where the catcher sets up, the umpire still needs to be square, and center to the plate. Deviation left or right is what causes 99% of missed pitch calls. The ump needs to take advantage of his own protective equipment and stay square to be able to actually see the strikezone. At this point its obvious the ump paid no attention to his position relative to the plate. If the catcher wasn’t set up to the inside of the batter that pitch would be down the middle. If the ump was where he needed to be this would be a non issue because he would have gotten the call right.

Bring on instant replay. It can do nothing but make the game better. Because obviously the human element is failing the game terribly.

Ump Shizzle
10 years ago
Reply to  Fardbart

If you actually look at the data, STL threw only 3 pitches on that side of the plate that missed by less than 3.5 inches and were not swung at, but all were called balls. Boston on the othe hand got 5 total called strikes technically out of the zone to that side. Yadi is no slouch when it comes to pitch framing, he got 23 balls called as strikes in the series with LA, so that wasn’t the problem either.

Koji threw 12/15 of his pitches on the outer part of that side of the plate. The rest of the series he threw 10/26.

Terrible, inconsistent strike zone.