Mets Plug Leaky Bullpen with Submariner

Darren Yamashita-Imagn Images

Having just added Gregory Soto to the bullpen, the Mets are at it again. Less than 90 minutes after his identical twin went to Pittsburgh in the Ke’Bryan Hayes trade, Tyler Rogers is also on the move.

Rogers, with his 1.80 ERA and 2.59 FIP in 50 innings this year for the Giants, has been one of the best relief pitchers in baseball. Still, he’s 34, and a rental, and a major departure from the hard-throwing Adonises the Mets might otherwise have pursued. And yet, David Stearns saw fit to give up Drew Gilbert, Blade Tidwell, and José Buttó — two big-name prospects and a guy who’s been decent in the majors this year — for two months of a guy who throws underhand. Maybe up to three months, if the Mets make the playoffs and stay there for a couple rounds.

It’s not quite that simple. Rogers is good, relievers are expensive now, and fame does not always equal value in the prospect world.

Rogers is the most inimitable pitcher in the majors. This season, 489 pitchers have thrown at least 250 pitches. Rogers’ vertical release point, 1.38 feet, is the lowest out of those pitchers by more than 20 inches. The second-lowest arm angle in the league belongs to Tim Hill, who lets go of the ball more than twice as far from the ground as Rogers does.

Rogers throws two pitches: The slowest sinker in the league (83.3 mph), and the slowest slider in the league. Brent Suter throws the second-slowest pitch in both categories, outracing Rogers’ slider by four ticks and his sinker by five and a half. Try to picture someone who throws five miles an hour slower than Brent Suter. And not, like, a child.

There’s a widget on Baseball Savant’s player pages that shows how much a player’s various pitches move in two dimensions, both in absolute terms and relative to comparable pitches. That relative movement figure isn’t the be-all, end-all — more movement isn’t always better, for one thing — but it’s a nice thing to be able to see at a glance.

Here’s a fun thing I learned today: All of Rogers’ “vs. Comparable” movement numbers are blank. “Comparable pitches” include offerings of the same type, within two miles an hour of velocity and six inches of extension, either way. And simply put: Rogers throws so slowly that there’s nobody to compare him to.

The flip side of this — literally, with Rogers’ -60 degree arm angle — is that his slider moves up, not down, relative to his sinker. An opponent who faces Rogers for one at-bat in a series, once or twice a year, will have to recalibrate his timing for the slowest primary fastball in the majors. Not only that, he’ll have to deal with a release point and movement profile he won’t see anywhere else in the league.

Making contact isn’t impossible, but good luck hitting it hard:

Rogers has the lowest EV90, the second-lowest barrel rate, and the highest groundball rate among qualified relievers this year. Hitters don’t like ankle-high sinkers or pitches that pop out of the dirt and zoom in on their wrists.

It’s not easy to beat Rogers, but it can be done. What he’s not going to do is beat himself. His walk rate is 2.1% this year, by far the best mark in baseball, and he’s only allowed three home runs in 2025. Just like Soto’s left-handedness filled a need particular to the Mets’ bullpen makeup, Rogers is a good add for a bullpen that — while talented — tends to treat the strike zone like a suggestion.

On the RosterResource depth chart for the Mets, the four relievers immediately following Rogers in the bullpen hierarchy are Ryne Stanek, Brooks Raley, Reed Garrett, and Soto. Soto has a walk rate of 10.7%, making him the only one of those four who’s under 11.0%. Closer Edwin Díaz is only at 9.5%, but during last year’s playoffs, he looked so tired he could barely see the plate, and he walked seven batters in his six postseason appearances. After landing Rogers, the Mets also added Cardinals closer Ryan Helsley, whose 8.9% walk rate looks positively frugal next to his new teammates’, but he too was in double digits as recently as 2023.

When I was on Effectively Wild last week, I said the worst way to lose a baseball game is when a pitcher suddenly cannot find the strike zone and gives up the game without his opponents having to do more than stand there. In Rogers, the Mets have a high-leverage reliever with whom the odds of that happening are practically zero. That was not the case this morning.

Now, on to those big-name prospects.

Gilbert and Tidwell are both products of the much-heralded University of Tennessee pipeline. Gilbert, an outfielder, was a superstar in college and the exemplar of an all-gas-no-brakes-hair-on-fire style of play that made him every opposing fan’s least favorite player. When he came to the Mets in the Justin Verlander trade of 2023, I was ecstatic, because if he’d lived up to his full potential in that market, he would’ve been a generationally gifted pest.

Tidwell, the Mets’ second-round pick in 2022, has prototypical mid-rotation starter physicality, velocity, and stuff. He can hit 99 mph and his name is Blade, for God’s sake, what more do you want?

If casual fans know any Mets prospects, they probably know Gilbert and Tidwell. But it’s often the case that by the time prospects poke into the wider public consciousness, the shine has come off them a little.

Gilbert has dealt with nagging hamstring injuries since graduating to the pros, but worse than that, the bat just hasn’t been there. He doesn’t have the power to do much more than punish mistakes, and even in his second go-around in Triple-A, he’s only doing that enough to be a slightly above-average hitter. He can run a little, and play center field well enough not to embarrass himself, but this isn’t Jacob Young or Victor Scott II. If Gilbert wants to play, he’s going to have to hit, and he just hasn’t.

Tidwell, meanwhile, has a messy delivery and problematic command. If he could locate better, the Mets wouldn’t be trading him for Rogers, probably because Tidwell himself would be playing a prominent role on their pitching staff now.

This is the last chance the Mets had to offload Gilbert and Tidwell, not only because they might not have much shine on them for very long. The Mets are also running into the kind of roster crunch that troubles every good, rich team. Tidwell made his major league debut in May, which required him to be put on the 40-man roster. Gilbert has to go on there this offseason, or he’ll be eligible for the Rule 5 draft.

As for Buttó, he’s out of minor league options. I have no doubt that, if the Mets had their way, they’d love to keep Buttó in the organization. He’s been a serviceable medium-leverage guy this year, and he appeared in six of the Mets’ 13 postseason games in 2024. If the Giants make the playoffs (which is still not out of the realm of possibility), I see no reason why Buttó wouldn’t pitch then as well.

But a no. 5 or no. 6 reliever who can’t be optioned is a tough thing to live with. At that point in the bullpen, the flexibility to move a pitcher to and from the minors is worth trading a little quality for.

Getting Gilbert, Tidwell, and Buttó for Rogers — a 34-year-old reliever who is a free agent-to-be, it bears repeating — is still a fine pickup for the Giants. All three either can be useful major leaguers, or already are. But the likelihood is that there is not a good starting pitcher, or a high-leverage reliever, or an above-average starting position player, in this package, even if the name value says otherwise.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David KleinMember since 2024
18 hours ago

I don’t get the freak out by Mets fans claiming the Mets got fleeced. I think Tidwell and Butto are middle relievers and Gilbert is a future fourth OFer imo. I guess because Gilbert is a brand name guy that the Mets got Verlander for? I’m a big Rogers fan not just because he’s a submariner(I love submariners!), but because he’s an excellent reliever. I really like the Helsley pick up too.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
18 hours ago
Reply to  David Klein

And Soto. Those 3 with Diaz is a really good pen

96mncMember since 2020
18 hours ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Diaz Helsley Garrett Soto Rogers Raley is an elite pen.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
4 hours ago
Reply to  96mnc

Yeah. I like Rogers and I like Soto, but I feel like they are both role players best used for specific situations rather than simply as late inning shut downs.

Helsley is the rug that really tied the room together. As the 1B closer he gives the Mets the easy late game script such that all of the other relievers can be deployed situationally without having to worry about needing someone later. He’s also a terrific insurance policy if something happens to Diaz

hebrewMember since 2016
1 hour ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

the ability to actually give Diaz rest even if a high leverage situation comes up is going to be paying dividends in September

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
17 hours ago
Reply to  David Klein

I’m down on all the guys in the Mets’ package individually, but I still think they’re an awful lot to give up for a single stretch run of a non-superstar reliever. This trade feels to me like the Mets decided all these dudes were surplus to requirements, but even if they just went out looking to see what they could shop them for, IMO it should’ve been more than this.

stkahlaMember since 2019
16 hours ago

Non superstar because he doesn’t throw hard and strike people out. He has gotten elite results over the last few years.

David KleinMember since 2024
15 hours ago
Reply to  stkahla

Yeah he’s had six or seven years of really good production he just doesn’t get enough attention and credit because he’s a soft tossed.

Sonny LMember since 2017
15 hours ago
Reply to  David Klein

The prospects are more famous than they are exciting (maybe Tidwell thrives and becomes a high-end #3 in this org. Wouldn’t rule it out) but im taking my brain for a better RP they could have gotten for them?

Love this trade. For all sides. For baseball. For America.

carterMember since 2020
14 hours ago

Felt like a roster crunch sort of deal

Thatguy47
9 hours ago
Reply to  David Klein

Gilbert and Tidwell are both 45 grade prospects, maybe not bluechips but legit guys who have a chance to be something. Butto’s also capable. Mets gave up almost as much for .5 years of Rogers as Phillies did for 2.5 years of Duran.

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
4 hours ago
Reply to  Thatguy47

No they didn’t. Potentially outgraded prospect grades on guys like Gilbert make him look better than he is. He needs to be added to a roster after this year because he’s rule 5 eligible. He’s not good enough defensively to carry CF for a contending team, and he’s not going to hit enough to carry a corner OF spot. So he’s a 4th or 5th OF’er, which the Mets have no need for.

Butto has no options left, walks too many guys to be reliable, can’t work back to back days, and is pushed out by the subsequent trade for Helsley.

Tidewell is literally 9th or 10th on the Mets SP depth chart, and has been bypassed by Tong, Sproat, and McLean. He’s not good enough for a team trying to win the division to give big innings to.

This package is nowhere near what the current industry concensus is on Tait and Abel.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 hours ago

4th outfielders who are close to major league ready typically get FV45s. I’m not sure I agree, but that’s usually what Eric does.

From the outside it looks like Gilbert would be good in a platoon, but if they haven’t platooned him with Tyrone Taylor yet then they don’t believe in him in that role.

I still think the story is that the Mets don’t have faith in any of those three guys they traded, even though I (and Eric) think they could turn into solid contributors.

hebrewMember since 2016
1 hour ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d argue the story is that the Mets had surplus in these places. Benge is Gilbert but younger and better, and Tidwell was what? The 5th or 6th best pitching prospect in the org at this point?

They gave up a lot in terms of quantity, but not quality. And it’s even less so when you consider none of these guys had much place in the big league organization

hebrewMember since 2016
1 hour ago
Reply to  Thatguy47

went scrolling to see who the first person to say this would be lol

the phillies gave up WAY more especially when you consider age/playing time situations

ShaleshMember since 2025
1 minute ago
Reply to  hebrew

The Phillies got WAY, WAY more though. Other outlets have Tait as something like the 55th best prospect in baseball, but that’s not nearly enough for 2.5 years of one of the best closers in Duran.

Fair point though that Butto and Gilbert are essentially out of options this year. The Giants may not have a roster crunch issue.

And Longenhagen’s Top 100 may need substantial revisions after we see the realized value of prospects in these trades.

Last edited 19 seconds ago by Shalesh