Minnesota Gets a Gold Glove of a Deal in Andrelton Simmons

Everybody Signs an Infielder Tuesday concluded with the Twins reaching agreement with Andrelton Simmons on a one-year contract worth $10.5 million. Originally a Brave until a 2015 trade for Erick Aybar and prospects sent him to the West Coast, Simmons hit .297/.346/.356 over 30 games for the Angels in 2020. Unless something incredibly bizarre happens, he will become Minnesota’s starting shortstop, prevent a bunch of runs, and assist the Twins in their quest to win their first playoff game in forever.

Let’s start with the least fun part of this article: the grumpy caveat. Back in May of 2019, Simmons injured his left ankle trying to beat out a grounder and, after a misstep, was unable to put weight on it. It landed him on the injured list for a month, and he missed another month later in the season with an injury to the other side of the same ankle. In the first week of 2020, he did it again, spraining his ankle in a July game against the Athletics, costing him nearly half of the abbreviated 2020 season. Leg and foot injuries are no laughing matter for a middle infielder: There have been plenty of aging second basemen and shortstops who had their careers dramatically waylaid by such injuries. Jose Offerman is the first example that comes to mind; when his legs started being an issue, he went from a .391 OBP second baseman to out of baseball in a blink of an eye.

Simmons hasn’t been fully healthy in two years, and a player with his skill set is more reliant on having healthy feet and legs than a plodding slugger at first base or DH. But $10.5 million is practically peanuts, and the Angels are getting even more of a discount than the associated risk entails. Over 2017 and ’18, he hit .285/.333/.419 to go with his typical sterling defense, enough to combine for over 10 WAR. The Twins may not get that player, but they’re also not paying for that player; if you pay 2018 Andrelton Simmons on merit, $10.5 million would be long gone before you even get to the All-Star break.

Commentators love comparing every defensive whiz that comes along to Ozzie Smith, but Simmons is the only one for whom you can say that with a straight face. There’s a great data-based argument to be made that Smith is the best defensive shortstop of all-time, but that well-earned reputation has come with the side effect that history has underrated his offensive contributions. He didn’t really hit until the trade that sent him to the Cardinals, but once he did, he was typically a better-than-average shortstop offensively; a no-hit shortstop doesn’t put up a wRC+ above 100 in seven different seasons. Simmons from 2013 to ’18 met that Ozzie ideal: an all-world defensive shortstop who hit a lot better (wRC+ of 91) than people thought. He would need to do this for another 8–10 years to be Smith, but that the comparison isn’t laughable is an impressive feat.

And that all-world defense has been pretty darn all-world. Whether by UZR or DRS, Simmons has destroyed the competition.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Top Defensive Shortstops by DRS, 2002-2020
Name DRS UZR
Andrelton Simmons 191 113.1
Adam Everett 119 77.0
Jack Wilson 116 43.7
Brendan Ryan 101 53.8
Troy Tulowitzki 94 41.4
J.J. Hardy 84 94.5
Clint Barmes 81 27.7
Brandon Crawford 80 45.5
Nick Ahmed 80 13.7
Cesar Izturis 64 48.8
Rafael Furcal 52 -20.2
Jimmy Rollins 50 48.4
Omar Vizquel 48 50.8
John McDonald 48 20.8
Zack Cozart 47 34.2
Francisco Lindor 46 54.0
Addison Russell 45 20.4
Trevor Story 45 11.8
Alex Gonzalez 42 40.3
Carlos Correa 42 -15.1

Defensive measures have their issues simply because by their very nature, you need to estimate events that didn’t happen rather than just count the events that did. But Simmons is so dominant in both measures that there’s nobody in the same fog as him. How he compares to Smith here is a bit trickier, as there’s always going to be a great deal of uncertainty about defense before we had significant, systematic tracking of defensive performance. Sean Smith’s Total Zone is a worthy estimate; it has Ozzie at +117 runs through the 1986 season, but that comes with some natural conservatism that will dampen things at the extremes. We have zone rating starting in 1987, and I get an estimate of +134 for Smith over the last decade of his career, tops in baseball (ahead of Cal Ripken Jr. at +127) and a mighty impressive showing for a defensive stat that starts counting at age 32.

Simmons may not have seemed the natural fit for a team like the Twins, who already had a perfectly competent shortstop, but the free agent market is not like a well-stocked marketplace. Great players are always available, but not great players of every type that fit every need. You can’t just ask George Springer’s agent if he has a third base version of Springer available; these are people with a wide variety of strengths and weaknesses. And then you have to get the player to agree to come to your city. So when you can close a deal with a player who can be a difference-maker, in most situations, you get the talent on the roster and then you use your creativity as to how best to deploy utilize it.

As to how the Twins plan to reshuffle their lineup, I’m less taken by that particular decision. Jorge Polanco is the veteran with the guaranteed contract, but at the end of the day, I think Luis Arraez is simply the better player. Batting average is rightfully not looked at as important the way it was 50 years ago, but it’s notable to me that literally all the projection systems housed here project Arraez as the favorite to lead the AL in that stat. When was the last time you heard of a player in that position losing their full-time job? Sure, the Twins could still find 500 at-bats for him, but given that he’s only played in the majors in chunks of seasons, I’d rather have him with a stable position as he continues to get established in the league.

Bringing back Nelson Cruz would also be terrific, and given that the Twins have a below-average payroll — some $80 million below the luxury tax threshold even after signing Simmons — this signing ought not be used as an excuse to not close one with Cruz.

ZiPS Projected Standings – AL Central
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Minnesota Twins 91 71 .562 50.4% 30.1% 80.5% 8.8%
Chicago White Sox 91 71 .562 48.4% 31.2% 79.5% 8.6%
Cleveland Indians 76 86 15 .469 1.1% 4.6% 5.7% 0.3%
Kansas City Royals 72 90 19 .444 0.1% 0.8% 0.9% 0.0%
Detroit Tigers 68 94 23 .420 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%

From a pure standpoint of wins, adding Simmons doesn’t alter the divisional projections the same way that the Mets acquiring Francisco Lindor or the Padres acquiring every available starting pitcher in the world did. But it looks to be a very close race, and in this case, that new shortstop makes Minnesota the current AL Central favorites by the smallest of margins. Winning ought to be what it’s all about, and the Twins have a better chance of writing their tale of postseason redemption than they did 24 hours ago. Who can complain about that?





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cave Dameron
5 years ago

Thank you Dan, very cool!

darkness88
5 years ago

From the article: Commentators love comparing every defensive whiz that comes along to Ozzie Smith, but Simmons is the only one for whom you can say that with a straight face.

So true. I guess I’ve really been tired of the “he was Ozzie Smith” Omar Vizquel stans in the HOF season. I don’t think Simba is Ozzie, but if it isn’t him, can’t be anyone else.

I like this deal for Minnesota, especially if he gets 95-100 WRC+/OPS+ offensive production. One day, and the middle infield market is so different.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  darkness88

It’s weird how some people can’t wait to say a subsequent player is the “the next” while others will never admit any subsequent player meets those merits.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

To be fair, I am pretty sure that Andrelton Simmons is not going to put up anywhere near as much defensive value as Ozzie did over his career. Unless Simmons stays perfectly healthy for the another 1000 games, he’ll never even get close. And on a rate basis I don’t think he’s anywhere close to Mark Belanger.

But, Andrelton Simmons is likely comparable to Ozzie on a rate basis. That doesn’t quite have the same ring to it, but it is pretty awesome. Ozzie’s at least the second greatest defensive shortstop of all time (behind maybe Belanger, who is not really on people’s radars, and who you’d only put above Ozzie if you weight the rate much more heavily than the career longevity).

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
5 years ago

Cruz and another starter would hopefully put the Twins back in pole position in the AL Central. Of course, depending on the playoff format (how can we still not know this?) it might not matter all that much which of Chicago or MN wins the division.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

I think that Paxton is the perfect fit for the Twins. He won’t be as expensive as Kluber (and doesn’t offer the same upside) but it’s the same basic theory. I suppose Odorizzi and Rich Hill are also still on the table.

Manco
5 years ago

I’m now going to be drafting Dobnak like crazy!!! He was losing a lot of value with the porous defense and now they’ve shored it up!!!!

Matan KronfeldMember since 2020
5 years ago

This may be a case where we are valuing the past rather than looking to the future. Simmons has been an excellent defender, but he is slowing down (his sprint speed is now way below average) and his defense was actually below avg in a limited sample last year. While I still would project him to be above average defensively next year, the question is how much? More strikingly, there are also huge questions about his offense. His xwobas the past few years have been around .265 and he had 0 barrels last year in 105 batted balls. I would be very nervous about him being an awful offensive player, in which case even if his DEF is +15, he’ll be barely replacement level.

Richie
5 years ago
Reply to  Matan Kronfeld

I’ll second this. And third it, too. Purely in form this is the Classic Bad Signing Bill James identified back in the 80s. Blocking a promising young player of your own – Arraez – by ponying up $$$ for a 30-something over and above what his former team thought he was worth. Quickness starts to go at this point in a player’s career, especially defensive quickness. Injuries begin lingering. Myself, I don’t like this signing at all.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Richie

Will Arraez really be blocked? Donaldson needs a lot of time off. I suspect he’ll still get 500 PA.

Richie
5 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

This assumes Polanco (I assume it’ll be him rather than Arraez) can flop between second, third and short and do so effectively. Guys like Zobrist and Wade Phillips are very much the exception rather than the norm. And even they got outfield time in order to get their at bats.

Donaldson could certainly miss substantial time, and of course Polanco and Arraez always could, too. But imo the Twins are paying $10.5 mill to turn Arraez into a more-heavily-used-than-usual backup infielder. And replacing him with a guy the Angels decided they liked less than Jose Iglesias.

dbminnMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Matan Kronfeld

The ankle is a concern. But 90 WRC+ and +15 DEF with about 520 PA puts him at around 2.7 WAR.

Richie
5 years ago
Reply to  dbminn

90 WRC+ is hardly the “awful offensive player” that Matty is nervous about.

dbminnMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Richie

I looked at projections. He’s just nervous.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

Historically, Simmons has not had big platoon splits. But it seems to me that the best thing the Twins could do is (1) play Simmons all the time against left handed pitchers at shortstop, and at least some of the time against right-handed pitchers (2) let Polanco shore up the rest of the PAs against right-handed pitchers at SS, and then (3) turn Polanco into the primary backup at both third and second. Arraez and Donaldson are too good to platoon in the normal sense, but at some point they will need a break or will get injured. I think you could give Polanco 300 PAs at SS and another 200 PAs between 2nd and 3rd pretty easily and without artificially reducing the Arraez/Donaldson playing time.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

ZiPS sees all four of them as basically identical from a WAR standpoint – right in the 2.7 range. Arraez is the youngest, the other three all have recent 4+ WAR seasons. Whichever ends up being the super sub will be a pretty substantial upgrade on Marwin Gonzalez, and there’s plenty of PA to go around.

TonyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They aren’t paying Simmons 10.5 million to play part time.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Tony

Based on his injury history, he’s probably playing part-time no matter what the plan is for him.

OddBall Herrera
5 years ago

I understand the upside here if he’s healthy but I wish the Twins had spent money on a guy whose ankles don’t look like they got a visit from Annie Wilkes.

It’s like watching the Twins’ competitive windows from the past 25 years on repeat – put a good team together, then treat water until it’s rebuild time. They’ve at periods been very good, but only good enough to make the playoffs and never really in a place to threaten whoever the top 1 or 2 teams in the league were. I personally was pulling for them to go to the Rockies with an offer of Royce Lewis as a headliner for Story. That’s the kind of thing that puts you over the top, not hail marys on guys returning to the form they last had 2+ years ago.

Ok, /twinsgripe

OddBall Herrera
5 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

True – I guess this is just me expressing my frustration that the Twins never seem to push their chips in. The last time they made a true go-for-the-throat move was Jack Morris, which (not) coincidentally is the last time they did anything in the playoffs.

AndyMember since 2026
5 years ago

Phillies phan… ‘whew’.

paul ehrlich
5 years ago

Despite his age, Arraez has already had his share of leg problems himself (last year it was a knee), so this gives them another option to mix and match. IIRC, Arraez also played some outfield in 2019 and he’s nothing special with the glove at 2nd. If he doesn’t play full time in 2021, I would expect that has more to do with his health/hitting performance than the addition of Simmons.

kylerkelton
5 years ago

Something I noticed…Simmons has always played a deep SS. I always heard it was to allow him to have more range, which makes sense. His arm is his greatest asset so he can get to more balls and allow his cannon to do the work for him. Well last year he played much more shallow. I’m a Braves fan so I didn’t catch many Angels games last year so I can’t tell you what the reason was for the change in positioning but it’s just something I noticed on Savant. That plus the injuries could explain why his defensive numbers were down last year.

docgooden85Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

The best 2 infield arms I’ve seen with my own eyeballs, by far, is a tie between Shawon Dunston & Andrelton Simmons. Total LASER show.

Richie
5 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

Do you have a data source for this, Kyler, or is it just something you’ve noticed? Not trying to toss shade on you even if it is the latter, mind you. Also not versed on Savant.

If come spring training you can establish how shallow/deep Simmons is playing vis-a-vis ’19 and ’20, that should tell a whole lot about how much defensive value Simmons has at this point.

kylerkelton
5 years ago
Reply to  Richie

It’s according to Savant! I remember it being talked about when he came up with the Braves and Savant confirms what was observed. It could be nothing (Simmons himself and his team knows much more about where he needs to play than I do haha) but I thought it was interesting.

Richie
5 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

It is very interesting, Kyler, thank you. 🙂

Myself, I can’t think of any reason to start playing a shallower shortstop other than you’ve lost some velocity on your throws. That would also explain the Angels suddenly deciding they like the mighty Jose Iglesias more.

Does Savant measure at spring training games, Kyler? If so and they show Simmons still playing shallower, methinks that will indicate this’ll wind up as Exhibit #297 in Matt Schartz’s brief about being very, very careful when signing another team’s free agent.

Tel
5 years ago

“there’s nobody in the same fog as him.” This is my new favorite expression. Even though I would have no idea what the hell it meant if not for the context.

hombremomento
5 years ago

Simmons has seen his offensive performance increase ever since he joined the pull wave. I could see him going .270/.310/.340 with some homeruns and steals, plus his defense makes him very valuable at a premier position

Spin
5 years ago

This is a big piece for a contending team. I hope the ankle holds.