Mock Draft 1.0: The Top Ten

The June draft order, slot values, and total pool amounts are here on the site for your reference, and our ever-updating draft rankings on THE BOARD now have 314 names for this draft class, which means it’s time for our first 2019 top 10 mock draft. I think you know how this goes, but I’ll reiterate: I’m projecting what I think will happen after consulting with dozens of industry sources, not ranking these players on talent, as THE BOARD does that.

1. Orioles – Adley Rutschman, C, Oregon State
Rutschman still has a good lead here. It sounds like he had a shoulder injury in high school from football contact, but he hasn’t missed any time in college and clubs have mostly decided that even a worst case scenario for this issue still makes him the best prospect in the draft. There’s chatter Baltimore has made calls to explore backup options/bulk approach like new GM Mike Elias did while running the draft in Houston, but that’s seen as a long shot at this point. It’s also worth noting Baltimore’s history of whacking players’ medicals, but it’s unclear if the regime change alters that propensity.

2. Royals – Bobby Witt, Jr., SS, Coleyville Heritage HS (TX)
Two weeks ago, I mentioned that the early buzz was that Andrew Vaughn had the lead for this pick. Late last spring, GM Dayton Moore saw amateur games for the first time in awhile and Kansas City’s first 11 selections were college picks. This came on the heels of four of their previous six first round picks coming from the prep ranks, with their draft philosophy leaning that way as a whole.

It seemed like a philosophical shift at the beginning of a rebuild, but I’ve talked to about four times as many sources on this topic in the last two weeks as I did before, and almost everyone since then is insistent that Witt is the pick here. Vaughn and possibly Hunter Bishop have been mentioned as backup plans, but the top three picks are thought to be pretty locked in at this juncture, with a couple scouting directors guessing it’s about 90% certain to go the way I’ve outlined here.

3. White Sox – Andrew Vaughn, 1B, Cal
With a recent run in the past three drafts of safer-skewing, college hitters in Chicago’s top three round picks (Nick Madrigal, Steele Walker, Jake Burger, Gavin Sheets, Luis Gonzalez, Zack Collins, Alex Call), and a rebuild reaching the critical stages, a quick-to-the-majors prospect makes the most sense here. With Jose Abreu on the downside of his career, Vaughn even fills a need: exactly what the White Sox are looking for here. Nick Lodolo sounds like the most likely backup option if Vaughn and Rutschman go first and second. GM Rick Hahn has seen C.J. Abrams this spring and some teams think the Sox would take Witt if he slides, but none of those alternate scenarios seem likely, with almost everyone in the industry saying Chicago wants a collegiate player here and covet Vaughn.

4. Marlins – C.J. Abrams, SS, Blessed Trinity HS (GA)
This is where things start to get a little tricky. After NHSI, where new scouting director D.J. Svihlik and VP Gary Denbo were locked in on Abrams and seemingly uninterested in Riley Greene on an adjacent field, industry rumors intensified that Abrams was the preference. Earlier in the spring, most believed there was a preference for a college player here, with Lodolo the most common connection. Svihlik used to be on staff at Vanderbilt and some think J.J. Bleday also makes sense here. I’ll go with Abrams for now, but it’s pretty close between these three options and I get the impression this decision is far from made, anyway. Denbo has also seen Witt a few times.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

5. Tigers – Riley Greene, RF, Hagerty HS (FL)
The Tigers have been all over Greene all spring, and one of their scouts has a child that goes to Greene’s high school. He’s struggled a bit lately (his swing was too big when I saw him a few weeks ago and he performed just okay at NHSI) but was a strong performer all summer, so most don’t consider it a long-term concern. There isn’t much consensus on whom else Detroit would consider here as another option, though Witt has been mentioned in the event he slides. Power arms and SEC performers are historically the Tigers’ type, so Bleday and his nation-leading 20 homers also makes some sense, but Greene appears to be their preference and he’s almost certain to be available.

6. Padres – Nick Lodolo, LHP, TCU
The Padres has been heavy on Bleday and Lodolo, appearing to lean to college both because that’s what’s here and because it fits their new competitive window. Bishop just got a long look from the decision makers and appears also to be entering their mix, but is believed to be more of a third option at this point. Given GM A.J. Preller’s past decisions, this would also appear to be a spot where a sliding Witt or Abrams could get snapped up. Kentucky lefty Zack Thompson also seems to be in the mix.

7. Reds – J.J. Bleday, RF, Vanderbilt
It sounds like the Reds are on Greene, Abrams, and Lodolo, who are all gone in this scenario. Bleday (video) is the consensus best guy on the board and sources have indicated the preference here is college, with last year’s pick of Jonathan India serving as a template for new scouting director Brad Meador. Cincy still needs pitching and seems the most aggressive on junior college righty Jackson Rutledge, though he fits more as an overslot second pick than underslot first pick.

8. Rangers – Alek Manoah, RHP, West Virginia
Texas is the toughest club to peg in this mock. It sounds like they aren’t excited about what they think will be available to them, and clubs picking around here also don’t have much feel for where Texas leans. This appears to be the floor for Abrams and Witt if they slide, but they’re unlikely to get here. Manoah and Bishop both make sense, but the most common rumor is that the Rangers go below slot for a pitcher to set up an overslot choice with their second pick. Manoah is perceived to be an easier sign than some other options with a cleaner medical than late-rising Kentucky LHP Zack Thompson.

9. Braves – Hunter Bishop, LF, Arizona State
This pick is compensation for not signing Carter Stewart last year, and he projects to go much later this year, so the Braves appear to have come out ahead in the exchange. This pick also isn’t protected if Atlanta doesn’t sign whoever they take, so a tough sign likely isn’t an option. It appears Atlanta would take Abrams or Witt if they get here, and they’ve been scouting Lodolo, Bleday, and Bishop as primary options, with a good chance one of them gets to this pick. It’s unclear if the other prospects on the board at this point excite them, in the event that Texas takes Bishop and all the players Atlanta has been tied to are off the board.

10. Giants – Bryson Stott, SS, UNLV
This weekend, the Giants sent in their heavy hitters to see Missouri RF Kameron Misner at Georgia (his swing still needs some work). He may have the most upside on the board, but he hasn’t been good in SEC play and lacks a summer track record to fall back on. Stott could be another Brandon Crawford, though it’s unclear how the new regime will make high-profile decisions like these. The rumor is that this is another pick that will go college, and likely a college hitter, with new Giants GM Farhan Zaidi having prized versatility and defensive value when building the Dodgers.

Kentucky LHP Zack Thompson has been closing hard lately (while Lodolo has just been okay the last few weeks), so he could jump into the top 10, but some clubs are concerned about his elbow long-term, so that keeps him just out of this projection. Washington prep CF Corbin Carroll is the other prospect who has been mentioned at more than a few top 10 slots, but more as another player in the mix than a primary target. With picks 6-10 leaning college, and three prep bats in the top five, he slides just out of this projection, but could easily jump in future versions. The next two college bats (North Carolina 1B Michael Busch (vide0) and Texas Tech 3B Josh Jung) would also figure to go quickly if we had continued this exercise, but unfortunately, the information gets much spottier at this juncture of the draft.





Kiley McDaniel has worked as an executive and scout, most recently for the Atlanta Braves, also for the New York Yankees, Baltimore Orioles and Pittsburgh Pirates. He's written for ESPN, Fox Sports and Baseball Prospectus. Follow him on twitter.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
diminishedsixthsense
7 years ago

would be shocked if the rangers didn’t go bishop over manoah

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

If it plays out this way, the White Sox and Padres should be ecstatic. Regarding Texas, what about Matthew Allan or Brennan Malone? Maybe they’re tougher signs, but Texas has a history of taking prep players in the first round, and they probably would go lower otherwise.

sgp2204
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The White Sox should be ecstatic with any of the top 4.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago

just a clarification question w/r/t number 1- whacking players’ medicals means what, precisely? Like burying them? Misinterpreting them? Not doing them well?

MikeSMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

It has been rumored for a long time that the Orioles are much pickier than other teams when it comes to physicals. They have passed on players and trades because there is something in the medical report that most other teams would not be bothered by.

MLB trade rumors brought it up when they were looking to trade Machado last year:
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/07/report-orioles-working-through-medicals-on-machado-deal.html

HowBoutDemOsMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

I think “whacking” the medical just means passing on the player because of the medical (ie, not signing, or refusing to trade for, or in this case declining to draft). The Orioles have been well known for being more scrutinous on medicals than other teams (Grant Balfour got the most press, but it goes all the way back to Aaron Sele). Rumor is that it resulted from Albert Belle’s degenerative hip condition. FWIW, as much grief as they’ve taken for it, I’m unaware of any situation where they got it wrong–they certainly dodged a bullet with Balfour. Of course, there are probably far more instances of it happening than have been made public, so who knows. But regardless, as the article says, who knows if it will continue now that the Angelos sons, as opposed to Peter, appear to be in charge.

ChippersJonesing
7 years ago

I’ve seen some disagreement over this point:
“This pick also isn’t protected if Atlanta doesn’t sign whoever they take, so a tough sign likely isn’t an option.”

Can someone either confirm or dispel it?

Tiago
7 years ago

The pick isn’t protected. No way to know whether that will cause them to shy away from a tough sign they otherwise really like.

rlwhite
7 years ago

Can confirm that the pick isn’t protected. Compensation picks from failing to sign a player are never protected with subsequent compensation picks for failing to sign a player. You can’t go in an endless loop.

ChippersJonesing
7 years ago
Reply to  rlwhite

I assumed not, though I haven’t been able to find anything that confirms anything either way.

ChippersJonesing
7 years ago

But there’s this:
(C) If a Major League Club fails to sign a player who was selected with a
draft selection awarded pursuant to this Rule 4©(2) before the player is
removed from the Club’s Negotiation List pursuant to Rule 4(d) (Effect of
Selection on Player), the Club again shall receive a supplemental selection in
the next First-Year Player Draft as compensation for failing to sign its original
supplemental selection, as follows:
MLR 4(C)(i) If the unsigned supplemental selection was selected prior to the third
round, the Club shall receive a supplemental selection in the next FirstYear Player Draft at the same numbered position as its unsigned
supplemental selection. In the event that the same numbered position is
awarded to another Club as supplemental compensation pursuant to Rule
4(C)(2)(A) above, the Club awarded the supplemental selection for the
second time shall be awarded the selection following the selection
awarded to the other Club pursuant to Rule 4(C)(2)(A) above.

(ii) If the unsigned supplemental selection was selected in the third
round, the Club shall receive a supplemental selection after the
completion of the third round, and shall select after all of the Clubs
awarded selections pursuant to Rule 4(C)(2)(B) above. If more than one
Club is awarded a second supplemental selection under this paragraph,
the Clubs shall select in the same order as the original draft selections
that resulted in the Club being awarded supplemental compensation
pursuant to Rule 4(C)(2)(B) above.

It’s still not clear to me.

insertclevernamehere
7 years ago

Also worth adding that there was specifically a clause in the older versions of the rules that specifically barred this in the past that was in this section; that clause is no longer in the current version of the rules.

ChippersJonesing
7 years ago

And IANAL but this seems to be saying fairly clearly that an unsigned supplemental pick would result in receiving that same pick again next year:
“MLR 4(C)(i) If the unsigned supplemental selection was selected prior to the third round, the Club shall receive a supplemental selection in the next FirstYear Player Draft at the same numbered position as its unsigned supplemental selection.”

Also, apologies for the formatting in the previous post.

rlwhite
7 years ago
Reply to  rlwhite

I’ve since been pointed to this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CZLzyGVbElPQxrd4WVlfAqyo7fOSbcyr/view which I don’t know if it’s authentic or not but it states:
(C) If a Major League Club fails to sign a player who was selected with a
draft selection awarded pursuant to this Rule 4(c)(2) before the player is
removed from the Club’s Negotiation List pursuant to Rule 4(d) (Effect of
Selection on Player), the Club again shall receive a supplemental selection in
the next First-Year Player Draft as compensation for failing to sign its original
supplemental selection, as follows:

(i) If the unsigned supplemental selection was selected prior to the third

round, the Club shall receive a supplemental selection in the next First-
Year Player Draft at the same numbered position as its unsigned

supplemental selection. In the event that the same numbered position is
awarded to another Club as supplemental compensation pursuant to Rule
4(c)(2)(A) above, the Club awarded the supplemental selection for the
second time shall be awarded the selection following the selection
awarded to the other Club pursuant to Rule 4(c)(2)(A) above.

If that’s authentic, then they would get a 3rd shot at picking and signing someone. Maybe this changed with the CBA at the end of 2016, but I couldn’t find any announcement of a change.

ChippersJonesing
7 years ago
Reply to  rlwhite

Yeah, that’s what I posted with terrible formatting above. Would be nice to get some confirmation, though that sure seems like they’d received another supplemental pick next year.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  rlwhite

I remember this changing with the new CBA. Will look for confirmation later.

insertclevernamehere
7 years ago

It is. Rule 4c(2)(c) in the 2019 rules, which can be found here: https://registration.mlbpa.org/pdf/MajorLeagueRules.pdf

ShauncoreMember since 2019
7 years ago

While reasoning would stand that a team couldn’t just have unlimited cracks at it, it would also stand to reason that whoever is selected there wouldn’t be given the full leverage of saying “you either sign me for this or you lose the pick”.

If the pick wasn’t protected, then whoever was signed there could put out some unreasonable amount (say $1M overslot) and tell the team to take it or leave it, knowing that if the team didn’t want to lose that pick/money, they’d have to take it.

It would make sense for to be continually protected.

TKDCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

This is why you pick a college player. Then there is a much higher incentive for the player, too. Also, the player really can only ask for so much. In order to go over slot, you’d have to go under in other places, and if the player springs this as a ploy, the whole thing is likely to crash and burn.

baseballmom123
7 years ago

At this point serious concerns on Misner. There are about 6 college outfielders I would choose over him. No history in summer or with wood. 60+ at bats in the SEC hitting .162 with 28 ks. 2 doubles only 1 homer.

lil jimmy
7 years ago

For 30 years the White Sox have had Right Handed First Basemen.
I really hope you are wrong.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  lil jimmy

That’s no problem, since Vaughn will be DHing.

Latch-Key Kid
7 years ago
Reply to  lil jimmy

Yeah, it’s been completely awful going from Frank Thomas to Paul Konerko to Jose Abreu. Right handed first basemen have definitely been the problem all these years. If only they’d been lefties instead maybe they’d have won more than 1 World Series.

lil jimmy
7 years ago
Reply to  Latch-Key Kid

The problem is not the player, as we all know. The problem is having to scramble to balance a line up. Which has been the case. It was the reason they got quickly bounced in 2000. If I thought Thomas, Koneko, and Abreu were the problem, I would have said as much.

HowBoutDemOsMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  lil jimmy

You don’t have to scramble to balance the lineup. Just write out the lineup with your stud RH first baseman and proceed about your day.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  lil jimmy

Generally speaking, you should draft the best player available. If you do draft on fit, drafting a guy who fits your contention window is probably good. Drafting based on position is bad. Drafting based on HANDEDNESS is a terrible idea. There are many opportunities to balance a lineup later on.

Soxfan2
7 years ago
Reply to  lil jimmy

Lil Jimmy, I couldn’t agree more with you. I would hate getting the guy Eric/Kiley would place #48 on their top 100 list, with a future hit of 65 and 60 power. (sarcasm)

lil jimmy
7 years ago
Reply to  Soxfan2

Well, He can hit, and he’s kind to children, and small animals.
One of the guys that rank #78 and #93 who can also chew gum would be fine with me.

KingSupreme
7 years ago

Can’t wait to see the next 10 picks. My buddy Will Wilson from NC State is projected to go pretty high, I played high school ball with him — kid can rake.

runningfrog
7 years ago

Extremely minor point, but it’s “Colleyville”

Erik.T
7 years ago

No, Bobby Witt Jr is supposed to make it to the Jays at 11. He isn’t a fit for any other team

Latch-Key Kid
7 years ago
Reply to  Erik.T

I don’t know, he might fit in alright with San Diego.

FightingAmish
7 years ago

Oh yeah Mauer with Power coming back to Baltimore.

Sonny Price
7 years ago

JJ Bleday is the best hitter in Vanderbilt history. Just a total joy to watch each game. His power explosion this year has been absolutely amazing to witness.