Nathan Eovaldi Will Stay Where He Was

Some of the weakest bonds in existence are those between fans and their favorite teams’ players. Those relationships are much like the concept of momentum in sports: valid and real, until the next event. Fans love players until they dislike them, and fans hate players until they can cheer them. Everything is superficial. Teams only like fans because of their money. Fans only like players because of their success. Rare is the fan who’s willing to be patient; affection lasts only right up to a slump.

Nathan Eovaldi is a hero in Boston. He’s a hero because of what he did in the playoffs, and he was so sensational he’s remembered most fondly for how he pitched in a loss. Now, granted, the World Series is permanent, so it can never be taken away. Eovaldi was a part of that winning roster. But as the future goes, nothing’s forever. Red Sox fans could turn on Eovaldi. Any fans could turn on anyone. That’s just a part of the experience. So much of how we feel about sports carries an unwritten “for now.”

But for the next few months, there are no games. There are no opportunities for performance to slide. After the World Series, Eovaldi became a free agent, pursued by at least half the league. On Thursday, Eovaldi has agreed to re-sign with the Red Sox, for four years and $67.5 million. In so doing, Eovaldi only further lifted his local status. He was already considered a hero. Now he’s a hero who didn’t want to leave. What will happen in 2019 is very much up in the air, yet 2018 is what dreams are made of.

The first thing you learn about Eovaldi is that he starred in October. The second thing you learn about Eovaldi is that he throws super hard. The third thing you learn about Eovaldi, probably, is that he’s had Tommy John surgery on his elbow two times. There’s a short list of pitchers who’ve come back to have real, meaningful success after two Tommy Johns. Chris Capuano is one, having pitched until he was 37. Jason Frasor also pitched until he was 37. Joakim Soria is still pitching and pitching well, in his mid-30s. This isn’t the whole list, but these are some of the bigger successes.

As such, it might be surprising to see Eovaldi reach the terms he did. Last offseason, Tyler Chatwood signed for three years and $38 million as a relatively young free agent with intriguing stuff and two Tommy Johns. It wasn’t clear whether Eovaldi would receive a fourth-year guarantee, but then, compared to Chatwood, he entered free agency as the better pitcher. And his market was just so big it makes sense that at least one team would have to go the extra mile.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Eovaldi was a free agent who appealed to good teams and rebuilding teams alike. He appealed to the biggest markets, and he appealed to more modest markets. Eovaldi won’t turn 29 until the middle of next February. Because he was never going to cost nine figures, he could fit within almost any budget. Teams have been impressed by Eovaldi’s competitiveness, and he’s thought of as a clubhouse role model. And, I mean, there’s the matter of his pitches. Eovaldi’s been blessed with a superhuman arm.

It’s an arm that’s been twice damaged. That much cannot be written off. But Eovaldi routinely runs his fastball up around the triple digits. Even more impressive than that, look at this garbage:

That’s a cutter he threw at 96. Now, sure, that was in the playoffs, and maybe Eovaldi was just feeling the adrenaline. He probably wasn’t feeling so much adrenaline when he pitched for the Rays against the Marlins in July.

Cutter, 96. Eovaldi doesn’t throw *all* of his cutters at 96, but the fact that he can do it at all speaks volumes about his raw talent. It’s one thing to just be able to throw a baseball hard. It’s quite another thing to be able to make your hard pitches move. Eovaldi can throw a high-90s heater, and he can throw a low- to mid-90s cutter that breaks off of it. There’s a lot more to pitching than speed, but at a certain point, speed just becomes overwhelming. When you watch Eovaldi, you don’t really know how he ever gets hit.

I think that drove some of the market. If everything were exactly the same, but if Eovaldi threw five ticks slower, I doubt he gets four years and $67.5 million. The market, as it exists, rewards elite upside more than anything else. There’s an argument to be made teams should focus more on the results, and less on the inputs. Eovaldi hasn’t run obscene strikeout rates. But then, he did just become the best version of himself. He continues to grow, and one can only imagine what he might still become. He doesn’t give hitters that much time to think.

If you want to read more about Eovaldi’s evolution, he was written about here in July. As he’s grown older, he’s changed his fastballs, and he’s aimed his four-seam fastball higher, while incorporating a new cutter. The cutter has blossomed into his standout pitch. And just the other week, taking a look at what Eovaldi is today, I referred to him as a unicorn. I included this plot in that article:

Eovaldi throws extremely hard, and he throws an unusually high rate of strikes. If anything, you’d expect an inverse relationship, but Eovaldi stays mostly in the 90s and he’s constantly working in and around the zone. Few things delight pitching coaches more than velocity with location, and Eovaldi knows how to spot. Among his peer group of starters, he stands out in this way. It suggests that he’s good now, and it suggests he might become even better if he starts spending more time at the edges. The stuff only raises his ceiling.

Of course there are red flags. Some people were worried about Patrick Corbin because he’s had Tommy John once. Eovaldi has had it twice. Should he get injured again, well, there’s no telling if there’s any coming back from that. What’s hard, if not impossible to say, is how much greater his risk is than that of any other pitcher. It’s a terrible thing for anyone to do to their body. Perhaps it actually helps the Red Sox to remember that their payroll is well beyond the competitive-balance-tax threshold. It was beyond it before Eovaldi re-signed. Good and bad contracts only matter in the context of a limited budget, and if the Red Sox are going to out-spend everybody else, then they can afford a large amount of dead money. They can afford the Eovaldi risk more than, say, San Diego.

For now, Eovaldi is healthy, and Eovaldi is good. He’s not great — like Joe Kelly, he’s worse than you’d think anyone who throws 100 has any right to be — but hitters these days are good, too, and there’s nothing wrong with Eovaldi’s profile. He could be a No. 2 starter, but in Boston, he slots in behind Chris Sale, and he slots in behind David Price. He slots in behind Rick Porcello, and he’s there at the back of the rotation with Eduardo Rodriguez. The depth after that gets worse in a hurry — we’re looking at Steven Wright, Hector Velazquez, and Brian Johnson — but Dave Dombrowski will worry about the sixth starter if and when he needs a sixth starter. Now he’s got his five, and he’ll turn his attention to the bullpen. Things are a lot easier when you have lots of money. When you have lots of money, you can re-sign a World Series hero. Boston might not love Eovaldi forever, but few things feel better than extending a honeymoon.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
martyvan90Member since 2026
7 years ago

Red Sox pushing all in. Good for them. Evidently Cashman and the Yankees weren’t willing to go for the fourth year. Interesting and maybe a new trend?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

Ah, after some totally reasonable FA deals we get back to our regularly scheduled program: Good examples of “the winner’s curse”.

I actually think this deal will be good as long as his arm stays attached. You could probably say the same of most FA pitchers. Even before this new version of Eovaldi, he was an adequate starter. And he’s fairly young. He still scares me.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Not probably but definitely, and that applies to every pitcher, free agent or not. I tend to think all deals require the arm to stay attached to be good and there just isn’t any way of predicting who breaks down and who is Nolan Ryan .

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

No, but the guy whose arm has already fallen off twice and who throws 100 mph would seem to be a less likely candidate to stay in one piece.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The recent article in the Boston Globe quoted the surgeon as saying that, in essence, Eovaldi arm was better than OEM. It might be wishful thinking but it may be that the Eovaldi of the past has left the building and the new and improved model gives the Sox four years of dominating performance with a <3.00 FIP.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

This is the same pitcher who, post two Tommy John surgeries, had arthroscopic surgery on his right elbow about nine months ago.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

You’re looking for a sub-3 FIP?
Outside of his 54 IP with Boston, Eovaldi’s best season FIP was 3.37. And his Boston work was a subset of a 3.60 FIP year.
His career shows a 3.82 FIP, 4.30 ERA and 94 ERA+.
His last 3 seasons show 3.97 FIP, 4.27 ERA and 98 ERA+.
And even last year’s career-best K rate was just 1% better than MLB average.

“Wishful thinking” sounds about right.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Adequate” is a great word to describe what he was, as recently as July.

In a larger regular season sample size in TB than BOS in 2018, he put up an ERA of 4.26, FIP of 4.28 and ERA+ of 98. He was about league average, and the baseball community was ENCOURAGED by this.

rounders
7 years ago

If his elbow starts balking again he can do a Smoltz and close games, and his salary is in line for elite closers.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  rounders

Great point, and I heard Smoltz allude to this possibility himself on the MLB Network.

That said, he doesn’t have anything approaching Smoltz’s history as an SP, and has zero sample outside of the postseason as a reliever, and yet he’s worth “elite closer” money?

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago

Big mistake – $67 million for a guy who’s either been injured or terrible for his entire career, except the final few months of 2018? Sure, there’s a different pitch mix in there so you can dream on the better K and BB rate sticking, but that’s speculative compared to the risk of regression + the fact that you’re almost certainly not getting full seasons’ worth of innings from him. Charlie Morton would’ve come cheaper, for fewer years, and has more of a track record – Eovaldi on the other hand would’ve been at the top of my list of players I’d like to see other teams pay.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
7 years ago

This might be a little over the top, but its true. The guy has 2 MLB season of 150+IP in 8 years as a pro. This is almost certainly going to end poorly for Boston, and I love it 😉

Shalesh
7 years ago

I disagree. FA acquisitions turn out badly more often than not, but I’d prefer to give 4X$17M to Eovaldi going into his age 29 season than give James Shields 4X$18.5M going into his age 33 season 4 years ago as the Padres did or even Keuchel the same going into his age 31 season. The Crowd predicted 3X$14M and Kiley 3X$16M for Eovaldi so I think his 4X$17M reflects the demand for an <30 flamethrowing starter. (Kiley and the Crowd have Keuchel getting 4X$20-$21M. I think he'll get less than that.)

Now, the one guy who might be a better buy is 27-yo Yusei Kikuchi, but Boston knows and likes Eovaldi, so why wait?

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

The Red Sox don’t have an awesome farm system to fill in gaps and stand to lose guys outright or have to pay them big bucks very soon. In that situation why would you throw a 4 year deal at what amounts to a three month track record of success when you could get a similar (or arguably better) guy in Morton or Cahill w/ the same or less AAV for half the number of years? Cahill is a massive steal waiting to happen yet the Sox are throwing money elsewhere instead.

Maybe I’m just pessimistic because Eovaldi has had a couple ‘breakouts’ in the past that have proven to be false starts. Maybe it’s really different this time and the team that knows him best and most recently can see that for themselves, sure, but color me a skeptical armchair GM.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
7 years ago

Eovaldi is 28. A ton of pitchers figure it out later in their career and had he not missed 2 years with TJ we’d probably be saying, this 26 year old could be a potential ace etc. Morton is 35 and was considering retirement. Those 7 years are absolutely huge.

Shalesh
7 years ago

Cahill produced 2 war last year and hadn’t reached that mark since 2013. May be a fun bargain-basement guy, but a joke for a Super-Team. Morton and Happ fit the Red Sox 2-year window better, perhaps, but they’re not that much cheaper and the BoSox will need someone to tow the rubber in 2021 & 2022 anyway, might as well be a 31- and 32-yo Eovaldi.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

Eovaldi produced 2.2 fWAR and 1.5bWAR last year, and hadn’t reached that mark since 2015.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago

I completely agree, and only would have gone beyond two years if there was a team option after Year 2. There’s recency bias written all over this.

Would much rather see the Yankees pay Happ or Morton, even for higher AAV, to avoid going beyond 2-3 years.

JamesFanMember since 2018
7 years ago

Sox fan here. Like the signing, but it was a steep price to pay. I consider it paying in arrears for his performance in the 2nd half and the playoffs. No problems.

As for what’s available, Eovaldi was my first choice (would have preferred 3 years), but Morton was a close 2nd because the commitment would have been less years and money and Happ wouldn’t have been bad either (lesser years and lesser money). With Sale an FA after 2019, and with Betts and Bogey the year after, not crazy about committing tons of money beyond a couple of years. Drastically reduces flexibility.

caponehollywood
7 years ago

I remember when he pitched for the Yanks.. he had an absolute clunker of a game against the Marlins (something like .2 IP, 8 ER, 9 H), but after that he really seemed to figure something out. It’s a shame injuries kept limiting him, but unfortunately (as a Yankees fan) as long as he’s healthy he really has the makings of a mid-top of the rotation guy.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago

Just put up his best season since 2013, and cumulatively, in a best-case, it looks like he’s a mid-to-high 3’s ERA with an okay K% who goes less than 5.3 IPS.

If he “could be a No. 2 starter”, you’re banking on even more improvement. I get he’s throwing the cutter more, but was he not in his first 57.0 IP in TB this year? Did he unlock something sustainable after that? Because that sample was not overly impressive.

Maybe a mid-rotation starter on a bad team, but he’s no better than No. 4 on any of the contenders specifically in the AL.

czelasko
7 years ago

I’m wondering if they could possibly utilize him as a reliever. Don’t get me wrong. With the way the roster is currently constructed, he’s going to be best utilized as a starter. And the terms of the deal are for a starter. But, if the Red Sox are concerned about his arm, I can see them utilizing him as the multi-inning fireman reliever.

rhswanzey
7 years ago
Reply to  czelasko

Not sure it’s clear a multi inning relief ace role is less taxing on an arm. Something that’s been overlooked a little bit about the game 4 WS appearance was that it was on one day rest following a back to back. I was very surprised he went more than two in that game, and stunned that he was warming up in game 5.

Barnes pitched in all four of the first games and warmed up in the fifth. There was a stretch in early August when the Sox had a bunch of games in a row with a doubleheader in the mix. Brasier and Barnes worked 4 of 5 days, and both Brasier and Workman went 3 in a row (this is also when both Vazquez and Swihart were hurt and basically marks when Leon’s bat went from bad to horrible).

I feel a lot better about keeping Eovaldi healthy by giving him the Sale treatment and not trying to get one more inning out of him in an early May start. Bullpen usage means at some point he’s going to go three in a row, three of four, maybe four of five. That’s one thing in the postseason but reliever usage scares me more with an injury prone arm.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  rhswanzey

I mentioned above that what Eovaldi did hasn’t been seen since the days of Allie Reynolds in the 1952 WS. I am excited to see him return and fully anticipate more solid starting from him but even if he never throws another pitch he will forever evoke precious memories and be a hero in Boston. .

Michaer
7 years ago

If’n I were the Red Sox, and I’m not, I think I’d want to use him similar to how the Brewers use Hader instead of as a starter.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago

He’s a pretty average pitcher without much real potential for more. I mean, if his improved K and BB rates stick, he’s a 2/3 starter if you squint. But that’s assuming he doesn’t get injured.

He’s just nothing special, but he’s also not being paid like anything more than an average pitcher. Given his age, this seems ok. But it’s not like the Sox got some great deal here.

He seems like a Rick Porcello clone but with added injury potential.

rhswanzey
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Steamer projects slight regression on both BB and K rates, but projects for 3:0 anyway, or only slightly below what it projects Corbin for (which feels low to me but also makes sense because the 2016-2017 version was a much different pitcher).

yellowpineapple
7 years ago

“few things feel better than extending a honeymoon.”
And, like a real honeymoon, extending it can be quite expensive.

edgcarMember since 2025
7 years ago

If you are rich, this is not a problem. As long as this doesn’t impair the team in going after other FA’s or retaining future ones, there’s no issue!

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago

There is no way of predicting the health status of any pitcher beyond his next pitch but It is possible to see hope in the stress that Eovaldi was placed under in this season’s post- season. He pitched often and in various types of situations, everything from starting to short relief to long relief on short rest, which could hint that he might be able to shoulder a big load, which today is only 160 innings for a #4 starter

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

160 innings would certainly be a big load. For Eovaldi. Who has only reached that threshold once in his career.

Outside of two TJ’s, he also had arthroscopic elbow surgery in March, which everyone seems to have forgotten.

kevinthecomic
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I disagree with your statement “there is no way of predicting the health status of any pitcher beyond his next pitch”. There’s actually a pretty high correlation between past injuries and future injuries. In other words, the best predictor of a future injury is a past injury.

Johnnie TMember since 2024
7 years ago

I have always thought that players whose teams tried and succeeded in re-signing them were better bets than guys signed as pure free agents because the original teams have seen this guy for a bit and have a staff of professionals who have more and better information than us fans do.

In other words, I suspect that the Sox management is pretty smart and probably had good reasons for this signing, reasons that I do not see. Because as a Sox fan, this signing scares me a little bit…

murphyluke
7 years ago

I really don’t get the negativity I see in a lot of comments on this deal.

Yeah, there are obvious risks here, but what about the upside? This seems like an obvious high-risk high-reward decision, which a team with tons of money and in competition with the Yankees basically has to go for.

How often do you EVER see an opportunity to sign a guy who throws 100, with control, and is under 30? How often is that kind of upside ever available for just 4 years of commitment?

His K-BB% was about 10% from 13-16. Last year it jumped to 18%. Obviously those previous years matter but it wouldn’t be the first time that a guy who had his development stunted by injuries has finally put it together now that he’s healthy. Maybe they know something about how their pitching coaches have been able to help him make certain adjustments to unlock that talent as well.

Lastly, his 2013-16 production, missed time and all, was worth about exactly $68MM, so exactly how risky is this deal anyway?

John Autin
7 years ago

I don’t see a real high reward here, nor a high chance of reaching a satisfactory floor.

What’s the lowest bWAR production that would make this deal satisfactory for Boston? For the sake of argument, let’s say it’s 6 bWAR.

I found 29 active SP who totaled at least 6 bWAR across ages 29-32 *and* were in MLB at least 2 of the prior 4 years (age 25-28).
— The median production of that group for ages 25-28 was 11.7 bWAR and 677 IP.
— Eovaldi had 5.3 bWAR and 390 IP.
— Placed in that pool, he’d rank 24th of 30 in bWAR, 27th in IP and 24th in ERA+, for ages 25-28.

The only guys in that pool with less than 450 IP ages 25-28 were Carlos Carrasco, Tanner Roark and Marco Estrada. The first two were far more productive than Eovaldi over 27-28 specifically, while Estrada had just become a SP at 28 and outpaced Eovaldi’s same age in FIP, ERA+ and K-BB%.

Eovaldi clearly has some positive markers, and I’m sure Boston’s analytics are better than mine. But I’m glad it wasn’t my team giving this deal.

rounders
7 years ago

This team has a one year window before major rebuild. If Eovaldi has a break out year his contract will be a positive in trade. If they let everybody go other than Devers and Benentendi the only contract they will be stuck with is Price, and they can become competitive again in 2022. Or they can try and hang on and suffer a dive anyway, examples abound.