Neil Walker Needs a Job

(Photo: Keith Allison)
Like dozens of other players, Neil Walker is an established free agent still looking for work as the second week of March approaches. Given his solid track record of production and lack of attachment to a qualifying offer, that would normally rate as a surprise, but he’s just one of several middle-class free agents left out in the cold this winter. Despite being linked to a handful of teams, the 32-year-old switch-hitter hasn’t found a deal to his liking. If this report from the Boston Globe’s Nick Cafardo is accurate, it’s tough to blame Walker, whom the Royals allegedly sought to bring into camp on a minor-league deal with a non-roster invitation.
It would be inaccurate to call Walker a star: he’s never, for example, made an All-Star team in his nine-year major-league career, which began with the Pirates in September 2009. But Walker has been quite consistent, producing an average of 2.7 WAR over the past eight seasons, with very little variance. His low of 1.9 WAR was compiled in 110 games in 2010 after being recalled on May 25. His high of 3.7 was set in 2016, his lone full season with the Mets — that, despite missing all of September due to a herniated disc that required season-ending surgery. Though he missed five weeks with a hamstring strain in 2017 and was traded from the Mets to the Brewers on August 12, Walker turned in a typical Neil Walker season: 2.1 WAR in 111 games with a .265/.362/.439 batting line and 114 wRC+.
Indeed, Walker is a career .272/.341/.437/115 wRC+ hitter who’s been strong against righties (122 wRC+) and subpar but still playable against lefties (91 wRC+), with his recent season splits against southpaws all over the place amid smaller sample sizes. While never a threat to win a Gold Glove, he’s been only slightly below average at second base over the course of his career (-4 UZR/150, -3 DRS/150), sure-handed but a bit lacking in range. He was pretty typical at the keystone in 2017 (-2 UZR, -5 DRS) and branched out to gain experience at the infield corners, starting eight games at first base (which he’d never played in the majors) and four at third (which he last played in 2010, after spending 2007-09 there in the minors).
Walker doesn’t have the strongest track record of durability, having topped 140 games just twice (2011 and -15) in the past seven years and playing just 224 games over the past two seasons. That said, his 2013 and -14 disabled-list stints were for nonrecurring ailments (a right hand laceration and appendectomy, respectively) and shouldn’t be viewed through the same lens as his more recent back and hamstring injuries. Even if those latter-day injuries are giving teams pause, it’s clear that he can help somebody as an above-average hitter who can hold down second base and help out at a couple of other positions. Via both Steamer and ZiPS, he projects to produce 1.8 WAR in less than a full complement of playing time (100 games in the former, 119 in the latter) with corresponding wRC+ marks of 111 and 108, respectively.
After making $17.2 million in 2017 as one of the rare players to accept a qualifying offer, Walker reportedly discussed a multiyear extension with the Mets for three years and $40 million according to Marc Carig (though it’s not clear which side proposed those terms). Via FanRag Sports’ Jon Heyman, Walker entered the offseason in search of a four-year deal, while Dave Cameron estimated that he’d get a three-year, $33 million contract and ranked him 11th among this year’s crop of free agents. Our crowdsourced figure even topped that slightly at $35.7 million. Both marks are more or less in line with our in-house contract estimator widget using that 1.8 WAR forecast and fairly standard estimates of $9 million per win with a 5% rate of inflation:
| Year | Age | WAR | $/WAR | Est. Contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 32 | 1.8 | $9.0 M | $16.2 M |
| 2019 | 33 | 1.3 | $9.5 M | $12.3 M |
| 2020 | 34 | 0.8 | $9.9 M | $7.9 M |
| Totals | 3.9 | $36.4 M |
Assumptions
Value: $9M/WAR with 5.0% inflation (for first 5 years)
Aging Curve: +0.25 WAR/yr (18-27), 0 WAR/yr (28-30),-0.5 WAR/yr (31-37),-0.75 WAR/yr (> 37)
Even using Tom Tango’s more conservative WARcel-based projection instead (based on a 6/3/1 weighting of the last three seasons’ WARs, with a 20% regression in the first year, a baseline decline of 0.4 WAR per year, and an additional decline of 0.1 WAR for every year over 30) yields an estimated value of $28.5 million for 3.0 WAR over three years.
Of course, Walker now appears unlikely to approach that figure because many of the teams to whom he’d previously been linked have made other plans. The Angels, who appeared to be an option in November, signed Zack Cozart to play third base and traded for Ian Kinsler to play second. The Mets considered bringing back Walker, but after re-signing Jose Reyes and Jay Bruce from last year’s underachieving squad, found a bargain in third baseman Todd Frazier, which pushed Asdrubal Cabrera back to second. The Yankees, who traded away Starlin Castro, dealt for Brandon Drury to provide some insurance if Gleyber Torres and Miguel Andujar aren’t ready.
At this late date, a few teams previously connected to Walker during the offseason stand out as potential landing spots, as follow.
Brewers
After surprising the league by winning 86 games last year, they upgraded their outfield with the additions of Lorenzo Cain and Christian Yelich. Despite that, they’re projected to win just 78 games, with second base (0.8 WAR between Villar, Eric Sogard and Hernan Perez) the weakest link in their lineup according to our depth charts.
Orioles
Now in bargain-shopping mode — they’ve recently added Colby Rasmus, Pedro Alvarez and Danny Valencia to the fold via minor-league contracts with NRIs — they’re said to be “intrigued” by Walker. They have Jonathan Schoop at second base, and their current plan calls for Tim Beckham at third. The former 1/1 pick, who’s coming off a breakout 3.5 WAR season, has just 52 big-league innings at the position. But if the O’s plan to use him as the short half of a platoon with Walker, it’s not clear why they’d want to take much playing time away from Schoop and Manny Machado, who play the two positions with which Beckham is more acquainted.
Pirates
In November, they expressed some interest in a reunion, in part because they don’t expect Jung-Ho Kang to get a work visa. Between that and the possibility that they deal Josh Harrison, who wants out and is making $10 million this year, they could have an opening.
Royals
Whit Merrifield is a thoroughly acceptable second baseman who produced 3.1 WAR last year and is forecast for 2.1 in 2018, but third base, where Cheslor Cuthbert and company are projected for 0.8 WAR (29th in MLB), could use Walker, as could their DH spot, where Jorge Soler and friends are projected for just 0.5 WAR. Obviously, they’ll have to make Walker a better offer than a minor-league contract with an NRI.
Adding a few more to the mix…
Diamondbacks
With Drury gone, the outlook is dreary, in that Chris Owings, Daniel Descalso and Nick Ahmed are forecast for an MLB-worst 0.3 WAR at second base. Owings owns a lifetime 77 wRC+, Descalso an 80, and neither will do enough to offset that with his glove. For a team with aspirations to contend again, that won’t do; the 1.5- to 2.0-game improvement Walker offers could be the difference between making the playoffs and missing them.
Rays
They’re amid a fire sale, having parted ways with Evan Longoria, Corey Dickerson, Jake Odorizzi and Steven Souza Jr., so it’s not like Walker would be joining a contender, but with Joey Wendle and Daniel Robertson owning fewer than 400 plate appearances between them and projected for a combined 0.7 WAR, they could certainly improve their on-field product. The DH slot, where C.J. Cron, Brad Miller, and Denard Span are projected to combined for a sizzling 0.5 WAR, could use help as well.
Tigers
Another rebuilding team that won’t be much fun this year, the Tigers are dreadful at second base, where the presence of Dixon Machado (-0.1 career WAR, projected for 0.6 in 2018) will remind everyone that he’s not related to Manny.
Twins
If MLB does levy a significant suspension on Miguel Sano in connection with his alleged assault of a photographer — an incident that the league has been investigating since late December — Walker could fit into a platoon with Eduardo Escobar, who hits lefties much better than righties. Though Sano recently spoke to MLB investigators, there’s no timetable for when the league will make a ruling.
Barring a sudden change elsewhere — somebody’s regular second or third baseman breaks a hamate or tears an ACL in the next few weeks — the options for Walker don’t look great unless Milwaukee or Arizona suddenly become motivated to spend money (which they probably should, given their playoff aspirations). Most likely, Walker will have to settle for a one-year deal with a base salary and incentive bonuses, and he might have to weigh the possibility of a full-time job with a bad ballclub that will allow him to show he’s still worthy of a larger investment against the chance to play a part-time role for a contender. If there’s any comfort to be taken from his situation, it’s in the fact that he’s hardly the only player in such a bind at this point.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
If a team is going to spend more than one year on Walker I bet you’re looking for 1B openings, not MI.
I wonder how he’d look at 3B these days? He spent three years playing there in the minors before the Bucs drafted Alvarez.
At any rate, its sad to see this happen to a by all accounts good guy. Whomever takes the leap will get a good one.
The Mets played him there a couple of times last year. I don’t remember him totally embarrassing himself or anything, but the team quickly gave up on the idea. The arm is the problem.
“The arm is the thing.”
all the more reason I wish the Mets had re-signed him. Dominic Smith and AGonz aren’t exactly inspiring, you know?
Nice analysis. I just don’t understand why Walker doesn’t have a team yet, he didn’t even have a draft pick attached. As you wrote, Arizona and Milwaukee seem like the best options, particularly if he is platooned.
I agree that those are the most likely landing spots. The reason he likely doesn’t have a team is because teams are leery of anyone with any history of serious back injuries. But as the big side of a platoon you could rest him regularly anyway.
Because 69% of the league is okay with not winning more games this year. The other 31% have a full roster.
Might be time to update the $9 million/win assumption, given that teams no longer seem to value wins on the open market quite that highly.
The $million/win assumption that is cited has *never* been how teams value players. It is maddening that writers keep using that number as how much a team values a player.
That number is actually the cost efficiency of buying players in free agency. It essentially just takes the amount of money teams spent on free agents, and divides it by the amount of WAR. So when a Logan Morrison breaks out, $/win goes down, and when a Jason Heyward busts, $/win goes up. (not by that much in either case because the sample size is relatively big, but it gives you the point)
This is something that economists have started struggling with: How do we measure expectations? In some cases, expectations are easy to measure. You go to the supermarket and purchase a box of Cheerios, and you pretty much get what you expected every time…so you can look at the “revealed preference” and assume it is similar to what you expected. On the other hand, if someone goes and buys $10,000 worth of stock in Microsoft, and then Microsoft stock tanks, does it make sense that the person expected Microsoft stock to go down? Of course not.
The way to capture expectations and valuation regimes is to model how a teams think a player will perform (say, using the Depth Charts average here) and use that instead of the player’s actual performance (which is not that closely related to what teams expect them to do).
“It essentially just takes the amount of money teams spent on free agents, and divides it by the amount of WAR. So when a Logan Morrison breaks out, $/win goes down, and when a Jason Heyward busts, $/win goes up.”
I don’t believe that’s true. It takes each offseason’s signings with projected WAR. The following offseason, it look at only at signings and projected War again. In which case actual performance mid-contract shouldn’t influence free agent contract WAR prices.
It varies, Dave originally used projections, Matt Swartz of Hardball Times uses retrospective.
https://www.fangraphs.com/community/on-war-its-linearity-and-efficient-free-agent-contracts/
There are three major places those $/WAR numbers come from. One is from Matt Swartz’s work, published here, and which I think is a really good bit of analysis for examining the efficiency of free agent spending (but not what it is used for most commonly). ThomServo has a link above.
The second is Dave Cameron’s work (which ThomServo also mentions), which is somewhat less “rigorous” but is much better suited for the task at hand (see: https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/win-values-explained-part-six/). If you have to pick one of those two, you definitely need to go with the latter…the problem is that to look at valuation in the current market (as opposed to past markets) the $/win will change depending on who signs over the course of the offseason, so you can’t use a static measure (which makes armchair calculations for the commentariat more difficult). I suppose you could always just use last year’s calculations on the idea that it doesn’t change that much year to year, but I don’t actually believe that it is that stable and even so I don’t think anyone ever does (has anyone even calculated it out and published it for each individual year?).
The third comes from a slightly different source:
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/valuing-the-2017-top-100-prospects/
http://www.thepointofpittsburgh.com/mlb-prospect-surplus-values-2016-updated-edition/
The biggest advantage to me with using that number is that it is pegged to the prospect valuation framework. So if you’re trying to figure out a player’s “surplus value” in a trade it makes sense to use Kevin and Steve’s number. However, the number itself seems pretty arbitrary and is less useful when trying to identify what teams are actually expecting to get out of their money. I am sure Kevin and Steve have a good reason for picking $8million/win, but it doesn’t make a ton of sense to me.
Notably, Fangraphs doesn’t actually take an official position on what the current $/win is. The contract estimator tool allows you to estimate it based on all kinds of numbers, all the way from 5.5 to 10.
Finally, I think that in while $/win is an incredibly useful tool, I also get the sense that we use it too mechanically here. Teams want to improve by a certain number of wins in an offseason, they have budgets to do it, and (at least the good ones) weigh several different routes to use their budget to get as much WAR as they can (so there’s an “opportunity cost” aspect to it as well). On top of that, free agent pricing often gets decided more by contracts for comparable players (the “benchmark” method, similar to how executive pay is determined) rather than the actual supply of wins. I don’t know exactly how to balance all those things, but they are worth thinking about.
Especially not for <2 WAR players.
The problem with FA WAR valuations is that teams have other options. Most teams can probably come up with 1 WAR with $5M or less, so you're actually paying at least a $20M premium for 0.9 WAR according to the table in the article.
For example, the Pirates have Adam Frazier, who's a 1 WAR player who will make maybe $5M over the next 3 years. If they pay Neil Walker $36M and he puts up 6 WAR over the next 3 years (likely optimistic at his age), then it comes out to a net premium of $10.3M/WAR. If Walker puts up just 4 WAR over 3 years, well, they just spent $31M/WAR, not to mention the potential upside/downside to the two players.
For small market teams, paying market value for an FA is always a losing proposition. Let's say the Pirates need to come up with 30 WAR with a $100M payroll. That's a budget of $3.3M per WAR. Adding a $12M, 2 WAR player means that they now have to find a way to get an additional 28 WAR, but with a reduced budget of $3.14M per WAR. From a purely economic standpoint, signing this supposedly below-market deal puts the Pirates in a worse position.
Also especially for >4 WAR players . Has any player ever gotten a $36 million AAV? No. Has any player ever recorded 4+ WAR? Only 55 of them in 2017 alone.
You’re right. When a team signs a player to a multi year contract with an even salary every year, they expect the exact same production every year with no decline. You’ve cracked the code.
Cool sarcasm, but I never asserted any of that.
Coming up with 1 WAR is not nearly as easy as you think. If it was, replacement level would be very poorly defined. There’s a reason there were 163 negative-WAR position players who managed to get called on for 50+ plate appearances last year.
As for the Pirates, or any other small market team, example, the reason dollars per win appears so inflated is due to the incredible discount teams get on their younger players. The fact is, after all that immediate surplus production teams get from pre-arb and arb players, there is plenty of money left over to throw around 9 million dollars per win. If those pre-arb and arb players had any leverage to increase their salary, there would be an immediate deflationary effect on free agent contracts due to supply and demand.
the reason dollars per win appears so inflated is due to the incredible discount teams get on their younger players.
That’s what I said. Free agents are competing with cheaper substitute products.
If it was, replacement level would be very poorly defined.
What makes you think replacement level is very well defined?
Last year, there were 33 players who saw time at 2B and put up at least 1 WAR. 19 of them made less than $5M.
15 teams did not have any below-replacement position group.
Replacement level is a theoretical concept. Teams do not put “replacement” players on the field expecting 0 WAR; they actively try to identify freely available players who have the potential to be more, and they can rotate out players who fail. The dices are loaded towards the positive side.
The fact is, after all that immediate surplus production teams get from pre-arb and arb players, there is plenty of money left over to throw around 9 million dollars per win.
Creating a deficit just because you can looks like a great way to run a business.
If those pre-arb and arb players had any leverage to increase their salary, there would be an immediate deflationary effect on free agent contracts due to supply and demand.
So wake me up when that actually happens, because we’re not talking about imaginary scenarios here.
Last week’s rumours about the Royals offering him a minor league deal with ST invite were shocking to me. I can’t wrap my head around proprietary data that could exist, be common to all teams that could feasibly use a league average 2B, and indicate that Walker isn’t worth at least something like 2/15, on the very low end. His apparent lack of market is just completely irrational to me.
That rumour has to be taken with a grain of salt. It was in a ‘collusion’ article (though in post script), and there is no evidence at all that Walker is looking only at a ST invite. It would be unprecidented if he had no serious offer- and as we’ve seen with almost all these ‘collusion’ talking points, nearly all the free agents mentioned (Darvish, Martinez, Arrieta, Lynn, etc) have been sitting on big offers but simply refusing them.
There is a PR campaign going on to pretend that these players have no market. Most likely what happened with Walker and KC is the same as what happened with Napoli and the Indians: a minor league deal with a ST invite so that the player gets up to speed and doesn’t have to miss ST simply because he is still negotiating a deal.
Other than Arrieta, Lucroy, Moustakas and Cobb- Walker is the only 2 WAR player on the market (though Lynn is close). Almost certainly these players have been sitting on market deals but holding out for money and years- we know that Arrieta, Cobb & Lynn are.
The writeup from that same article on Cobb could be said for nearly all the much-publicized ‘why is so and so unsigned’ candidates from this offseason:
“.. while [FA] is a desirable commodity, his agents haven’t come down enough in asking price for a deal to make sense…Teams are looking at a three-year deal, but players of [FA]’s caliber and age want more.”
your analysis in the comments has been spot on, Thom. Thanks.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/03/the-lack-of-a-market-for-neil-walker-doesnt-make-sense.html
I’m sure they won’t but I think the Cardinals could use the upgrade, might mess up their bench construction but a peek around MLB says that becoming less important. Wong is still far from a sure thing….
Kolten Wong is the Tyrod Taylor of the MLB. I just don’t understand why his team hates him so much.
Maybe they still hold a grudge for this:
https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SLN/SLN201310270.shtml
Not related to Wong, but have you watched Tyrod play much? He is terribly inaccurate., reminds me of a less talented Kordell Stewart.
This is a solid player who would probably be a help to several teams. His first ask, if accurate, was too much. But this is a little wild. He can contribute on the field, and then be flipped in June/July if there’s a need among the contenders. Hard to believe that no one sees him as an asset.
There has never been a modern FA projected for 2 WAR that hasn’t received roughly market offers- and there is no reason to think that this has happened to Walker.
There are simply a lot of articles pushing half information over hyping the lack of FA offers- that’s partly what agents do.
Todd Frazier?
Why would Arizona trade Drury without a ready replacement?
https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=13613&position=SS forgot about Marte?
The AZ depth chart 2B was just updated this morning given the latest news about Marte (who has 4 MLB games at 2B, all in 2015 for SEA) being anointed the favorite in the 2B battle.
Because they like Souza?
MLBTR, MLB.com, and Fangraphs all with a post on Neil Walker on the same day. Can MLB move up opening day?
Makes one wonder if Neil’s agent isn’t planting a seed or three.
Exactly, 4 weeks to go until opening day.
All remaining FAs of note have offers and are just holding out for more years generally. To avoid Morales/Drew situations, agents have lined up minor league deals with spring training invites- but those aren’t the highest offers these FAs have received.
only 3 weeks to go, not 4
Neil Walker is a good case for waiting the market out until later in the year, I think.
There’s a small possibility that he can get a $2 million contract (on the basis of being a 2 WAR player, so what does that mean these days?) right now.
There’s a bigger possibility that a contending team, even a marginally contending team, has an infielder blow out a knee and land on the 60 day list, at which point his value should jump up in any FO’s view.
He might actually be a poster child for the future: sod you, I know what I’m worth.
walker is a stopgap…it makes sense for a team like the brewers to pass because they have the high variance option in villar which still carries some upside –they’ll need special performances from question marks like villar to really be able to make a splash anyway.
sogard is a heavy fan favorite and craig counsell analogue…would be surprised to see him dropped for walker even with walker being by all accounts the superior player.
Braves could makes sense, they could use him at 3b, 2b (move Albies to 3b) or 1b if Freemen gets injured. If Swanson washes out move Albies back to short and walker at 2b. Likely Walker could play passable LF so in a best case scenario he or Albies could play all over. they only spend 2/22mil to sign him on the high side and maybe a Todd Frazier like deal of 17mil.
problem is all the teams you listed are apart of the sad race to the bottom. none of them are looking to improve outside of the brewers.
Arizona? Minnesota?
Angels could use a 1B
no doubt. i look at them signing a pitcher though. need pitching badly. need to go trade for michael fulmer. hes pretty much the only young guy available with 5 years of control with over 3 war projections/yr. Yankees might beat them to the punch trying to top the stros for ws. angels prolly don’t have the prospects though.
Yeah, they sure could! Too bad they gave away Cron for free!
That Pujols contract is a great example of the sunk cost fallacy.
But but… he used to be good 5 years ago!!!
He’s not going back to Pittsburgh after his: “I never got a fair shot because the new GM didn’t draft me” lamentations, imo.
That and being blocked at 1B, 2B, and 3B. They aren’t going to take atbats away from Moran after him being a marquee part of the Cole trade.
Dollars per win should be adjusted for players over 30 to account for increased injury risk. The steroid era is (largely) over. The contract estimates in the article are pure idiocy.
I wouldn’t write off those 2013 and -14 DL stints. Everybody knows that a past appendectomy is the best predictor of future appendectomies.
At this point there’s enough evidence that could lead one to conclude the owners are colluding.
If that were true, do you think one major incentive for them to do this would be to encourage more younger players to sign extensions?
This would change the whole upward-trending FA market and save them millions.
The Rays have shed some players but are hardly going full Marlin. This is probably the best fit of the bunch. The DBacks just traded Drury so they are probably happy with their infielders. The non-contenders have zero use for such a player unless they have a total disaster at 2b, which is pretty rare because it a common destination for meh shortstops and athletic third basemen in addition to its native population.
Neil Walker accepted a qualifying offer and made plenty of money before then that he never has to worry about money for himself or the next few generations of Walkers. When his salary offers are going to drop 80% or more in a year, teams may be concerned about his motivation in addition to his injury history.
Blue Jays. Trade Morales to free up a roster spot.
I feel like the Jays could’ve waited out the infield market instead of signing Diaz and Solarte and gotten Walker for a steal
I can see projections as a starting point in an evaluation, but they are woeful alone.