New York and Cleveland Pay for Some of What They Need

Last Friday afternoon, Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic reported that the Mets were in agreement with 31-year-old lefty Justin Wilson, lately of the Cubs, on a two-year deal later reported to be approximately $10 million over the life of the contract. A few minutes later, the Indians announced that they’d re-signed a lefty of their own — 37-year-old Óliver Pérez — to a one-year contract worth $2.5 million, with a 2020 option worth $2.75 million that will vest if he reaches 55 appearances in 2019. With Pérez and Wilson under contract for 2019, the lefty relief market is down to Jake Diekman and a handful of folks projected for zero WAR in 2019. Let’s talk about the two that signed this week, and what we can expect from them.

Wilson is probably the higher-upside of the two, though bouts of inconsistency mean he’s not a lock to repeat the .188/.301/.342 line he held lefties to in 2018. A strong start to the 2017 season, in which he threw 40 innings for the Tigers, striking out 55 and walking just 16, led to a mid-season trade to a Cubs team hunting for a second straight division title. They didn’t quite get what they were after: Wilson walked 19 in just under 18 innings of work, struck out just 25, and visibly lost manager Joe Maddon’s confidence down the stretch — after a three-run, two-walk, one-out appearance on September 2nd, Wilson appeared just once again for the next 10 days, and was entrusted with just 5.1 more innings the rest of the season. Wilson’s wild ways continued into the early part of 2018 but seemed to improve as the season wore on, and he finished the year with a 3.41 full-season ERA, even as his Cubs mark (5.09) fell well below his then-career 3.30.

Wilson has always been a pitcher the spin rate guys love — see his acquisition by Chicago in mid-2017, for example — and nothing in his recent performance suggests the raw stuff that’s so impressed scouts and spreadsheet-wranglers alike has gone anywhere. He has, if anything, become even more reliant on his four-seam fastball than ever (he threw it nearly three-quarters of the time in 2018, mostly at the expense of his sinker) and given its 82nd-percentile spin rate that seems as reasonable a strategy as any. Batters were slightly more successful against that pitch in 2018 than they were in previous years (familiarity breeds contempt, I suppose) but much less successful against Wilson’s breaking pitches than before, suggesting a successful ability to pick his spots and disrupt timing effectively.

In New York, Wilson will join new acquisition Edwin Díaz, a re-signed Jeurys Familia, and holdovers Robert Gsellman, Seth Lugo, and Drew Smith for what should be a vastly improved Mets ‘pen. The Mets were fairly terrible in relief in 2018 — their 4.96 ERA was second only to the Marlins for worst in the National League, and their FIP was worst outright — and they were heavily right-handed, getting just 62.1 inning out of southpaws in 2018, 42.2 of which came from the departing Jerry Blevins. Whatever else can be said about Justin Wilson, I think we can fairly say he is a better relief pitcher than Jerry Blevins, and his addition will give Mickey Callaway a strong seventh-inning option before heading to Familia in the eighth and Díaz in the ninth.

Pérez, meanwhile, is back in business after it appeared, even just a year ago, that his big-league career might be over. He started 2018 on a minor-league deal with the Yankees, showed enough to sign on with Cleveland on a big-league deal after a June 1 release from Scranton, and promptly posted a 36% strikeout rate and 1.39 ERA over 32 innings for Terry Francona’s squad. Most impressively, after spending a career mostly more effective against lefties than against righties, Pérez absolutely dominated right-handed hitters in 2018, holding them to a minuscule .138 wOBA (lefties posted a .213 mark). It’s hard to say precisely what changed for Pérez, but my money would be on his increased use of a newly-improved slider (up to 49 percent usage after sitting in the low 40s for most of his career) and a move away from a fading fastball.

If Wilson is a sensible move in the middle of a somewhat puzzling offseason for the Mets, Pérez is a sensible move in the middle of a straightforward, if disappointingly stingy, offseason for Cleveland. The bullpen could certainly use some help — it was nearly as bad as the Mets’ last year — but Pérez will at best help the ‘pen stand pat in 2019 rather than move forward, and he is (somewhat incredibly) the first major-league free agent acquisition of the offseason for Mike Chernoff. Ideally, we’d see Cleveland pick up a few more relievers off the market — all they cost is money — and perhaps spin off some of the leftover pieces for replacements for the departing Michael Brantley and the traded Edwin Encarnación and Yan Gomes. The plan instead seems to be to reduce payroll while hoping the departures don’t weaken the team enough to fall behind the rest of the Central. That isn’t likely, but seize the moment this approach is not.

Still, Pérez is a good pitcher and Cleveland needs a few of those. He had a terrific season in 2018 and there is reason to believe, despite his 16 seasons in the major leagues, that he has more left in the tank. He’ll be best served if the front office goes out and gets more arms to take some of the strain off of, say, him and Brad Hand, but if he pitches like he did last year, he’ll be useful anyway. Wilson, too, will probably be in the best position to succeed if the Mets go out and find another lefty reliever to take some of the load off (Diekman is of course still available) but has enough of an ability to get righties out that he should be a contributor. In an offseason that has been remarkably bereft of teams going out and getting players they need by paying money for their services, Cleveland and New York have done just that, even if these signings would ideally be part of a larger plan to spend money on good players at positions of need.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage




Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David Klein
7 years ago

Wilson has always had issues throwing strikes but I wonder how much Wilson’s walk rate spiking up a bit has to do with Contreras, who is rated as a hideous pitch framer. I think you can also question Maddon’s usage of Wilson too. I think Wilson is a solid signing and likely the Mets fourth best reliever behind Lugo, Diaz and Familia.

I gotta ask what do you find somewhat puzzling about the Mets offseason? Did you think they should have rebuilt or not like the Cano deal or that they should’ve been after Harper or Machado? I would love to have seen them after one or both guys but the Wilpons wouldn’t allow that. I don’t love the Cano deal and don’t like the Davis trade but I like the other moves.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

They perhaps could use one more depth piece in the OF, but their corners were always locked in with Conforto and Nimmo, which I think is a sensible reason not to pursue Harper. They already made the mistake of crippling their CF defense when they signed Jay Bruce two years ago to an OF that already had Cespedes and Conforto written in to it.

I actually like what they did in acquiring Keon Broxton, who would seem to have some actual upside. They also still have Juan Lagares who is competent if unspectacular (and a health risk). I might look into resigning Austin Jackson if I were them, but whoever they bring in will need to be on a minor league deal, and unclear if Jackson is open to that at this point (although I’d guess he would be, ultimately).

So, the “sexy” option which they passed up was AJ Pollock, who I would not have touched if I were them given his injury history and their track record in that department. Guys like McCutchen, Brantley and Adam Jones probably weren’t realistic options given their inability to play CF effectively, which BVW seems to value, and I happen to agree with that, especially given that their biggest strength remains in their starting rotation.

ScottyBMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  oozyalbies1

I agree with you oozy. Just wanted to point out they signed Gregor Blanco and Rajai Davis to minor league deals (GREAT depth moves), so no need for Austin Jackson.
“puzzing” = the Mets are doing good things but, LOL Mets, so U have to denigrate them somehow (even if Rian’s was mild in this case)

LongTimeFan
7 years ago
Reply to  oozyalbies1

I like the outfield – Nimmo, Conforto, Lagares, Broxton, and McNeil. All athletic and hungry.

There’s also Cespedes working his way back from very serious heel surgery, both feet. There’s just no room for another free agent outfield starter when Cespedes returns and Mets have logjam of starting outfielders.

We don’t need Jackson when we also have Rajai Davis and Blanco signed to minor league deals with spring invite. As it is, there’s no room for them to open the season unless there’s an injury to the aforementioned 5.I have no idea whether Davis and Blanco have opt outs if they don’t make the team but am hoping they stick around in the minors especially Davis who still has very impressive speed and significant outfield veteran presence.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  LongTimeFan

Good call out by you both. I recalled the Davis signing, and wasn’t sure if he could be counted on as CF insurance, but had forgotten about Blanco.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  oozyalbies1

Yeah, I would have liked it better if they landed Pillar or Mallex Smith but Broxton was probably their next best move. Especially since they didn’t really give up anything for him.

emh1969
7 years ago

For anyone who missed it, here’s what Chris Antonetti said last week:

“We had franchise-record payrolls the last few seasons and ownership invested a lot in the team and the path we were on was unsustainable. So we did need to reposition ourselves financially, which we were able to do with a series of moves earlier in the offseason and provide ourselves that necessary financial flexibility that we needed.”

He did note that they will be open to deals at the trade deadline. But otherwise, this is it…the Indians big free agent signing of 2019 is…Oliver Perez!!!

Meanwhile, Cleveland is worse at catcher, worse in left field, and the bullpen remains a mess. Thankfully the AL Central will be bad once again….

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

I did miss that, and thank you.

I do find his comments a little difficult to square with the revenue records the sport is breaking though. The new national TV contracts have provided >$30M (IIRC) in margin free revenue, and MLBAM has been an enormous windfall as well.

Couple this with the reports we’re seeing of teams spending a lower percentage of revenues on payroll, and I’m struggling to see how this was necessary.

fjtorres
7 years ago

Cleveland ‘s TV deal is…somewhat… smaller than the Dodgers’…

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Of course it is. Not sure what that has to do with the price of butter though. I’m interested in Cleveland’s revenue today compared to Cleveland’s revenue a few years back.
The national TV contracts are ~$750M larger, and 31% of all local revenues are put into a pool to distribute evenly. With MLB overall revenues being a couple billion up, while we can quibble about the exact number I think it’s same to say that Cleveland is up ~$40M (again before any local increases, or MLBAM money).
While it may very well be true, their crying poor is tough to take at face value.

EDIT: And if they really are having financial troubles, I think we need to be able to explain why the Forbes valuation for the team has *doubled* over the last 4 years. Not that Forbes is unassailable, but it’s a curious situation, yes?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

So I don’t like how Cleveland is approaching this offseason either, but they have done a really good job with their self-imposed constraints. Losing Brantley hurts, but they’re not that much worse off at catcher, they’re better at first base, and they have a guy in Bauers who could potentially play LF. I don’t like the overall strategy, but this was a good set of moves.

Turkle
7 years ago

Indians fan here. While the team’s offseason has so far been extremely disappointing, I can’t help but be thrilled by the Perez signing. I love the way he pitches – at least three different windup/deliveries (including the one where he turns his whole body to face center field) and a max intent approach makes him a total joy to watch. (Why don’t more pitchers mess with their timing and windup more?)

He was shockingly awesome out of nowhere last year after the rest of the Cleveland bullpen more or less forgot how to pitch entirely.

Hoping for another successful season, Oliver. Get in there.

LongTimeFan
7 years ago
Reply to  Turkle

Few pitchers are skilled enough to deliberately alter their mechanics and not screw up their performance and/or health. Ollie Perez has really transformed his career after it fell apart in New York in a rather ugly manner – looking like he might never pitch again in the majors.

Kudos to him and his resiliency – along with developed pitching smarts.

Fredchuckdave
7 years ago

Is Oliver Perez a loogy now? Interesting career path.

emh1969
7 years ago
Reply to  Fredchuckdave

I think the Indians are hoping that he can be more than a LOOGY, based on how he dominated righties last year. Of course, they had the same hope for Tyler Olson heading into last season and that didn’t work out so well.

TulkasMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Fredchuckdave

Perez became a pretty good loogy right after he failed as a starter with NYM. He rebuilt a lot of his value with Seattle so it was easy to miss that be he became quite good again lefties.

DBA455Member since 2016
7 years ago

I don’t follow why Cleveland’s offseason is “disappointingly stingy”.

Extending Carrasco was attractive, and I personally liked the Santana and (especially) Bauers deals for them.

More pointedly, I don’t think I could name 4 teams more likely to make a Division Series than Cleveland.

Resources are finite. The goal *shouldn’t* be to use them to pad the AL Central lead, in my view.

You’d like to see them (a) be well-positioned to succeed in the post season (you can argue that they could use more bullpen help – but that’s not a change that needs to be made in January. There will be opportunities right up to the trade deadline) and (b) most importantly, to extend this playoff window as long as possible.

I think they are doing exactly that, which is something for Indians fans to be very happy about.

bigchuck
7 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

I agree with your assessment DBA455 except the Tribe front office hasn’t brought in the players we needed to make a playoff run in the past 2 July’s. Last year we were a spring training warm-up team for the Astros. Our front office did nothing to improve our chances to make us better in the post-season.

So we have heard this song before. Forgive us if we don’t trust them. We would rather have someone now who can play and make us a better team than wait until July and hear some story about this guy we just signed had a great year in 2017 and we feel he has a lot left in his tank, even though he has hit only 2 home runs so far this season!

Dolan is not a great owner. We need an owner for whom a baseball team is his hobby. If the front office doesn’t do anything else to really improve this team and get us some professional outfielders Dolan will not see a million people in the stands in 2019. It would be great to see Dan Gilbert sell his gambling interests and buy the Tribe. It would take him about two weeks to be a World Series favorite.

dodgerbleu
7 years ago
Reply to  bigchuck

Not sure I agree.

Last year the Tribe traded Mejia for Hand/Cimber. Arguably the biggest non-Machado move of the summer. I’d say that qualifies. They signed the subject of this article on 6/2. Traded DeJuneas for Hoyt in July. Trade Castro to the Tigers for Martin and Dowdy. Picked up Field, Brantly, Melky, and others as FA mid-season. And, oh yeah, traded for some guy named Josh Donaldson.

I’d say the Indians were more active reinforcing their team last year than anyone besides the Dodgers. And the Indians moves may have moved the needle more as they were actually filling holes/voids, not trading for redundant guys like the Dodgers were.

I don’t follow Cleveland THAT closely, but I’d say they’ve earned the benefit of the doubt. At least mine!

DBA455Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Thanks for the responses. I am more sympathetic to the latter, I think.

The Meija deal is exactly what I thought of – it’s not specific to the offseason, of course, but it speaks to a management that’s been willing to push chips in when they are getting an ROI. (And Donaldson is another good example).

The way I see it, they have a great window through at least 2021, and maybe out to 2023. As a fan, you want them to maximize their post season opportunities during that window (Kluber through 21, Lindor through 2022, Bauer 2020, Carrasco 2023, Hand 2021, Ramirez 2023 – before FA for any of them).

This is not a NY/LA market than can have their pedal all the way down every year. I think being prudent to keep this team a long-term contender, with flexibility, isn’t stingy at all.

bigchuck
7 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

Appreciate both your perspectives. As always, time will tell what the best move is. Donaldson was a bust but Hand will be solid. Jury is still out on Cimber. Minor league help should be on the way in a few years. I just don’t see it happening with our current lineup, especially with the outfield. I do believe the Chisox and Twinks have closed the gap significantly. Not sure they are there yet but it should be a better division.

ScottyBMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

I think many of us think teams should “go for it” when they have the opportunity to do so. They were one inning away from winning the WS, and have since done little to improve. Flags fly forever, and all that (especially when the last championship was in the 40’s).

DBA455Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  ScottyB

And I guess my view is that they are “going for it” – but in a way that keeps that momentum sustainable for the next 3 or so seasons.

Why pile in resources now that potentially make 2021 harder to hold together? I still think the marginal utility of changing their 2019 AL central odds from 90% to 94% is really low.

As noted above, the have shown a willingness to go for it with the Meija and Donaldson deals.

How many deals can you point to that, even with the benefit of hindsight, look like big misses on their part?

Even the Santana deal, which was hailed as a relative bargain at the time the Phillies signed it, has been something they were demonstrably smart not to have done.

Should they have QO’d Brantley? Maybe. But it’s worth noting that this offseason isn’t over yet. Those dollars may go farther elsewhere.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

Justin Wilson was actually the sort of guy Cleveland should have been going after. I think it’s fair to think that this team has enough of a good enough shot of winning the division, but they really are not in great shape to go toe-to-toe with the superteams at this point. Exactly how they get there is kind of a mystery, and hopefully they do.

GoNYGoNYGoGo
7 years ago

Hoping that the second lefty in the Mets pen will be Daniel Zamora who debuted last season and in a brief 16 games and 9 innings had 16 strikeouts, a 128 ERA+ and a 2.38 FIP. Only 26 this season, he could be a very reliable, and cheap, young arm and second lefty in the pen for the Mets.

David Klein
7 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Thing with Zamora is he’s had reverse platoon splits in his minor league career and his very short mlb career, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Avilan makes the team over Zamora. I do like Zamora and think he’ll get in a bunch of games, but I expect him to start the season in Syracuse.

LongTimeFan
7 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Brodie Van Wagenen has said he expects Avilan to make the opening day roster. The author of this article, Rian Watt, didn’t fully do his homework.

jpgMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Yeah I love the Avilan signing. The one big wart is that his BB numbers are high but honestly, I’m he couldn’t get a big league deal.

2017 vs L – .195/.270/.280
2018 vs L – .217/.304/.341

Seems like an excellent second lefty.

Trotter76Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  jpg

Agreed about Avilan and Zamora (and possibly Hector Santiago, signed to a minors deal) being the other lefties in the bullpen. No need to get a fifth on the open market. Also, I was surprised he mentioned Drew Smith among the top 6 when he appears to be on the outside looking in to start ST. My expectation is he will start in AAA, with Diaz, Familia, Lugo, Wilson, Gsellman, Avilan and/or Zamora, Rule 5 pick Kyle Dowdy (unless they plan to return him), and Tylor Bashlor ahead of him.

Kevbot034
7 years ago

That Oliver Perez is still a relevant MLB player all these years later makes me so happy. He was one of my favorite players to draft in the fantasy league of MVP Baseball 2004 when I was a kid lol

bjsguess
7 years ago

How anyone can complain about signing Sandy Koufax (aka Oliver Perez) to such a small deal is crazy.

LeiterWagnerFasterStronger
7 years ago

Lefty-wise, the Mets did snag Luis Avilan on a minor-league contract (an underrated get), and Daniel Zamora was damn fine in limited use last year.