Top 32 Prospects: Baltimore Orioles
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Baltimore Orioles. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
**Editor’s note** Rule 5 pick Drew Jackson was originally ranked 26th on this list but was removed after he was returned to Los Angeles.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DL Hall | 20.4 | A | LHP | 2020 | 50 |
| 2 | Yusniel Diaz | 22.3 | AA | RF | 2019 | 50 |
| 3 | Ryan Mountcastle | 21.9 | AA | LF | 2019 | 50 |
| 4 | Grayson Rodriguez | 19.2 | R | RHP | 2023 | 45 |
| 5 | Austin Hays | 23.6 | AA | RF | 2019 | 45 |
| 6 | Keegan Akin | 23.8 | AA | LHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 7 | Ryan McKenna | 22.0 | AA | CF | 2020 | 45 |
| 8 | Zac Lowther | 22.7 | A+ | LHP | 2019 | 45 |
| 9 | Dean Kremer | 23.1 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 45 |
| 10 | Brenan Hanifee | 20.7 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 11 | Adam Hall | 19.7 | A- | SS | 2022 | 40+ |
| 12 | Brett Cumberland | 23.6 | AA | C | 2019 | 40 |
| 13 | D.J. Stewart | 25.2 | MLB | LF | 2019 | 40 |
| 14 | Jean Carlos Encarnacion | 21.0 | A | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
| 15 | Cadyn Grenier | 22.2 | A | SS | 2020 | 40 |
| 16 | Richie Martin | 24.1 | AA | SS | 2019 | 40 |
| 17 | Zach Pop | 22.4 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 18 | Blaine Knight | 22.6 | A- | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Cody Carroll | 26.3 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 20 | Branden Kline | 27.3 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 21 | Lamar Sparks | 20.3 | R | CF | 2022 | 40 |
| 22 | Hunter Harvey | 24.1 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 23 | Dillon Tate | 24.7 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 24 | Evan Phillips | 24.4 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 25 | Matthias Dietz | 23.4 | A+ | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 26 | Rylan Bannon | 22.8 | AA | 3B | 2020 | 35+ |
| 27 | Michael Baumann | 23.4 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 28 | Jean Carmona | 19.2 | A- | 3B | 2022 | 35+ |
| 29 | Drew Rom | 19.1 | R | LHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 30 | Luis Ortiz | 23.3 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 35+ |
| 31 | Jake Zebron | 19.0 | R | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Lefties in Their Mid-20s
Alex Wells, LHP
Chris Lee, LHP
Luis Gonzalez, LHP
Josh Rogers, LHP
Bruce Zimmermann, LHP
Cameron Bishop, LHP
Wells is an elite strike-thrower who has walked just 52 hitters in 338 career innings, but he only sits 87-92. Proponents think his curveball (which is plus) and changeup (there’s dissent as to whether it really plays off of a 35 fastball) are good enough for Wells to lean on and pitch at the back of a rotation. Lee has shown typical lefty bullpen stuff at times (up to 97, above-average slider, cutter) but has also dealt with a myriad of injuries (shoulder, lat, oblique). He’s legally blind in his right eye but has been since birth, so it’s not really an issue. Gonzalez, 27, also has a 55 fastball/slider combination and we’re not sure why Baltimore hasn’t pushed him to the big leagues yet. His stuff ticked way up in 2017 and has been good for two years now. Rogers was part of the Britton deal and may open 2019 in the O’s rotation. He sits 88-91 and has an above-average changeup. Zimmermann has several average pitches and projects as a No. 5 to 7 starter. Bishop has been up to 94 with four average pitches in the past, but his stuff was down last year.
The One International Prospect
Edidson Rojas, 3B
Itchy Xu, DH
This is the only international player on this list who was signed by Baltimore. He’s a two-year DSL prospect who turns 20 in May. He has average bat speed, a frame that likely projects to third base, and a pretty, low-ball, left-handed swing. Xu (pronounced like ‘shoe’) isn’t really a prospect but is of note because he’s one of few players in pro ball from China. For all the flack the Orioles have rightfully received for their aloof international approach, they deserve some credit for poking around China, which due to the size of its population alone, probably has more athletes capable of baseball than are currently being developed.
Corner Guys Who Must Rake
Jomar Reyes, 3B
J.C. Escarra, 1B
Robert Neustrom, RF
Jomar finally performed during an injury-shortened 2017, then struggled again in 2018. He still has monster raw power and a 70 arm, and we think he’s worth monitoring especially because he might be getting something resembling a fresh start now that the org has new leadership. Neustrom was a two-year Big Ten performer with plus raw power and a bunch of average other tools, but he has very limited bat control. Escarra missed time with a shoulder issue and 45 or 50 hit, 55 power at first doesn’t quite get there, but he also has a chance to be a plus defender at the position.
Up the Middle Depth
Martin Cervenka, C
Steve Wilkerson, UTIL
Alexis Torres, SS
Cleveland signed Cervenka, 26, out of the Czech Republic way back in 2011 and he has bounced around to a few teams on waivers and as a minor league free agent, but he’s gotten much better behind the plate and is now a 45 defender with a 45 arm and 55 raw power. He could be a third catcher. Wilkerson, 27, missed some of 2018 due to an amphetamine suspension and more of it due to oblique and hamstring issues. He has above average bat control and is a 40 defender at several positions. He may get a utility look in 2019. Alexis Torres is a 21-year-old who is a defensive fit at shortstop. His lack of physicality has been questioned, but he looked better with the bat late last summer.
System Overview
The Orioles had some pretty clear issues to sort through as the 2018 season ended. It was widely assumed that GM Dan Duquette and/or manager Buck Showalter wouldn’t be returning, and that a number of personnel and long-term organizational issues were likely to be to dealt with. But questions remained. Would the new head of baseball operations have the autonomy to kickstart the non-existent international program? Would they get to rebuild everything, from the big league roster down to the analytics, scouting, and player development staffs, or would ownership insist that the new GM make a foolhardy attempt to compete?
Ownership now appears to be driven more by Peter Angelos’ sons than by the elder Angelos himself, and answers to these questions became more clear when they hired former Astros assistant GM Mike Elias to be the new Orioles GM. Elias brought with him a new analytical chief in curiosity king Sig Mejdal, and it’s safe to assume the rebuild will have structural similarities to the Astros’, with various departments all getting facelifts as part of the effort.
Of the 32 players we’ve ranked above, 18 are either freshly drafted or were acquired from other clubs since last summer, a parting gift from the previous leadership. Before Duquette got the okay to start a sell-off, this was a big league club that had little chance to contend and also a bottom five farm system, and we think he and his staff did an admirable job restocking the farm ahead of the deadline. 12 of the 24 prospects ranked 40 FV or better (those with notably positive trade value) were in the org before this time and the system, minus the summer’s draft and trades, would’ve ranked in a tie for 27th in baseball. We haven’t ranked farm systems yet this winter, but it would appear this system is about 20th at the moment.
And there’s still plenty of upward mobility here. There are a couple more trades to be made (Mychal Givens would seem the most obvious premium talent likely to move), the O’s have the first overall pick in June’s draft, and they may add international talent with the most remaining pool space in the ’18-’19 period. Sources indicate that the hire of Koby Perez to run the international program means the Orioles are going to be immediate players for top prospects in that market, and they have the bonus hammer to wield over the next 18 months across two bonus periods as they see fit. Elias has a lot of things to do in his first year, but the main focus has to be building a data and communication infrastructure for the org while also accumulating assets, something the Astros did better than anyone during the first few years of their organizational overhaul.
I think that Zac Lowther paragraph–explaining why pitchers like Lowther sometime succeed–might be the best paragraph in this entire series. I learned a ton in that paragraph alone; hats off to you sirs.
Sounds like Tony Cingrani doing his best Joe Smith impersonation. I can’t wait to go home and watch the video.
Well, this is the most positive it has been for the O’s in years, so that’s at least good. Still though, when you are in a division with BOS and NYY and a team with the Rays’ fam system… good luck…
I have a couple of thoughts on this system aside from Zac Lowther, who Eric and Kiley have sold me on as a legitimately intriguing player…
1) It looks like the Orioles have a whole lot of viable outfielders coming up soon, and that’s really good news. With Mullins their most promising long-term young player on the roster, plus Hays, Diaz, McKenna all looking like potential contributors in the 2019-2020 range, that’s the foundation of a potentially decent outfield. I also think that Stewart might be for real too…the power is real and although he might see his K rate rise, he seems like he’s handled himself fine so far. Oh, and it sounds like Mountcastle might be in LF too, although I’d give him a shot at 2nd to see if he can stick there first. It’s better than I thought it would be. It’s surprisingly okay.
2) The pitching here is a little deeper than I expected, with a few guys who might be real live starters (Rodriguez, Hall, Lowther), and lots of possible relievers in there. I do worry a little bit about what looks like an organizational philosophy towards fly-ball pitchers; take a look at the GB% rates on a guy like Keegan Akin. He’s a bit of an outlier, but a cursory look over this list does seem to reveal a bunch of guys who put the ball in the air a lot.
3) Richie Martin got a lot of the press, but I have a strong suspicion that Drew Jackson might be the better player. For a guy who supposedly doesn’t have a feel to hit, he’s done pretty well, and his arm gives him a lot of leeway in the field.
Finally, some much-needed optimism and new life in the organization. The past few years have been brutal, and even though the MLB team will struggle mightily, I’m excited to monitor the progress of all of these guys. Agree with the other commenters; your Lowther analysis was fantastic. Especially with the way that MLBers are now being (somewhat) encouraged to throw up in the zone. I’m hopeful that the O’s organizational leadership will be on top of implementing the analytically-driven adjustments that other clubs are making.
This is less terrible than I anticipated. I like DL Hall, but I fear he won’t get to reach much potential with the Orioles history of turning arms into valuable players. Though I guess the new regime could fix that.
If I’m not mistaken, Hunter Harvey is not out of options, as is stated in the writeup. He was only added to the 40 man after the 2017 season.
You’d think his work for the Ringer would have been mentioned in Baumann’s write-up.
This may be a stupid question, but how do you get to an overall FV grade from the individual grades? I’m looking at Mountcastle that has individual grades averaging out to ~45 but is a 50FV. Compared to Austin Hays who has individual grades averaging out to 55 but is 45FV. Looking at individual grades Hays trails only in Hit tool 55-50 and is equal or far better in other tools and would seem like the stronger prospect. Does the overall grade factor in the likelihood of reaching those levels? Or some other gestalt that looks at the overall picture?
the FV factors in the tool grades along with other things we reference in the report or directly grade, like variance/risk, distance to majors, health, options status, etc. Also, each tool is of different value to each position so, for instance, a 55 glove factors move into a catcher’s FV than a 55 run grade. more info here and at the articles linked from this primer: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-new-fangraphs-scouting-primer/
Itchy Xu is an 80 grade name.
Someone had a lot of fun writing this sentence: “Though he’ll occasionally snap off a plus slider, a crackling, upper-90s two-seamer is Pop’s best pitch, and he milks it for all it’s worth, throwing it nearly 70% of the time.”
With the arm troubles he had in college, you would have thought he pitched for Rice. Too bad he won’t get a chance to face Coco Crisp.
Quality work, as expected. One thing I’ve been mulling over as an O’s fan that doesn’t have a ton else to think about going into 2019 is how the utter lack of talent on the big league roster actually plays into the type of depth that they have in their system now. There are no blue chip prospects here, and it seems like maybe only DL Hall has the (reasonable) potential to become that type of prospect given his best case outcome. This is obviously not ideal for a team beginning a full on rebuild. However, what the system does have is a handful of interesting arms and OF prospects outside of the top 100 that have a pretty good shot of being ready at some point in 2019. These guys (particularly the pitchers) will have avenues to playing time given the dearth of talent on the 25-man roster, and at the same time you don’t really need to agonize over burning their service time on a crappy team as most of of them are not expected to turn into anything special (read: expensive arb. years) anyway. If everything goes well you might see a third of this list in the majors in 2019, and if nothing else it will give fans something interesting to watch.
Does Cisco have a Chance to shine this season?
No. Wasted pick. His defense was acceptable if he hit well. Instead he had a 40+% K rate. Maybe the new brains can fix whatever ails him, but…
Brett Cumberland fell to 12th and a FV of 40 from 4th overall in the organization and a 45+ FV top 150 prospect in the final rendition of the 2018 BOARD (September 17th). I appreciated the explanation in the write up. But, it still seems like a lot of volatility for a 23 year old catching prospect in AA to happen over the winter. Sigh…catching prospects.
I just want to say thank you very much for all this work! I really appreciate it.
Also thank you for not Mentioning that Phillips and Carroll were absolutely BLASTED last summer.
I understand Moon Mullins was brought up late last year, but if he was’nt where would he rank? Would he be an overall 45.