Noah Syndergaard’s Comeback Season Is Complicated

Noah Syndergaard
Wendell Cruz-USA TODAY Sports

Faced with a middling rotation on a middling roster, the Angels took a risk this winter when they made Noah Syndergaard their big free-agent pitcher signing over any of the marquee names available. Syndergaard was once one of those dazzling names, but injuries haven taken away three of his most recent seasons (most of 2017, all of 2020, and all but two innings in 2021) and, eventually, the final gear of a fastball and sinker that both tangled with triple digits on the radar gun. It’s difficult for a one-year deal to end too badly, but at $21 million for 2022, the Angels clearly thought of this as more than a pillow contract or a lottery ticket. So has it worked? Sort of.

To get one thing out of the way: Syndergaard is not the pitcher he once was. As Jay Jaffe wrote earlier this month, he’s lost about four miles per hour on his fastball, forcing him to reconfigure his pitch mix. He’s not exactly Jered Weaver or Zack Greinke, let alone Frank Schwindel throwing 35-mph rainbows to the Yankees, but throwing 93 or 94 mph is quite different than throwing 99 or 100. That said, he’s still gotten decent results, at least in bottom-line numbers, and his ERA stands at 3.69, with his FIP barely behind at 3.81. His strikeout rate has plummeted to just 15.4%, or 5.83 K/9, numbers that barely match up to his 26.4% and 9.74 through 2019. But the lack of strikeouts is partially mitigated by the fact that his control remains excellent, and he’s still effective at preventing hitters from making good contact.

Pitchers have been successful with meager strikeout rates, even in today’s game. However, it leaves little margin for error, and when pitchers like Kirk Rueter or Chien-Ming Wang finally hit a bump, they didn’t just get a flat; the wheels fell completely off. Even with more reason to hope for his health than before the season and after some perfectly respectable performances, ZiPS is actually less confident about Syndergaard’s future than before:

ZiPS Projection – Noah Syndergaard
Year W L S ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2023 9 8 0 4.08 24 24 132.3 134 60 16 33 110 106 2.0
2024 8 7 0 4.09 23 23 123.3 125 56 15 30 101 106 1.9
2025 8 7 0 4.18 22 22 118.3 121 55 15 29 97 103 1.7
2026 7 6 0 4.19 20 20 109.7 112 51 14 27 90 103 1.5
2027 7 6 0 4.30 19 19 102.7 106 49 13 26 84 101 1.3

While we can be a little more confident now about playing time, we should also be less bullish about the chances of Syndergaard recapturing his pre-injury form. Even with more innings now projected than at the start of 2022, ZiPS has knocked his rest-of-career mean projection from 19.1 WAR to 13.7. Every game of a decidedly mortal Syndergaard takes us a little farther from the thunder god.

Syndergaard’s inability to finish off batters is probably the most concerning part of his profile in 2022. Hitters are making frequent contact, and what’s more, they’re getting steadily better at it as the year has gone on:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

After only allowing a 71% contact rate against the Astros in his season debut and 74% against the Rangers, that number has steadily ballooned. It’s been a month since he’s had a game with it below 80%, and it peaked at 94% in a disastrous short outing against the Yankees, in which they made contact with every single out-of-zone pitch he threw.

Two-strike counts have been particularly problematic. Syndergaard’s strikeout rates for his fastball and sinker are actually unchanged from his more explosive days, but neither the slider nor changeup actually finish off batters anymore. Before 2022, 28% of sliders and changeups thrown with two strikes resulted in a strikeout; this year, that number is only 9%. Almost a quarter of his non-fastball strikeouts have been on curves, and he rarely tries to use that as an out pitcher, throwing only 12 all season in two-strike counts. It’s not that those pitches are drastically different than in the past — the movement data are similar — but for whatever reason, he can no longer punch out batters with two of his formerly most-potent swing-and-miss tools.

The biggest change seems to be how he’s actually using these pitches. In 2015 and 2016, at the height of his abilities, Syndergaard would dangle these pitches just out of reach like one of those fishing pole cat toys:

In 2022 so far, he almost throws them as if he hopes that they don’t swing at them for strike three:

Whether it’s an actual plan or not, it’s not working. On 109 two-strike pitches, Syndergaard has allowed 14 hits, half for extra bases, against just 10 strikeouts. All told, his sliders and changeups on strike two have resulted in a .326 batting average and a .535 slugging percentage. To contextualize this, the league in 2022 has hit .168 with two strikes and slugged .263. Is it a lack of command? A lack of confidence? That’s out of my jurisdiction, but whatever the root cause for these issues, something’s not working.

Other pitchers have gotten their careers back on track after losing their fastball. One of the most successful examples is another former Angel, Frank Tanana. For those like me who came into age watching baseball in the 1980s, the first time you learn that Tanana was one of the hardest throwing pitchers in baseball was a shocking moment. His fastball in his early 20s casually hit the upper-90s, and this at a time where that was considerably more of a novelty. The Angels used him as hard as he threw, giving him just under 260 innings a year from ages 20 to 24. Then his shoulder started giving him problems, and he had to reinvent himself, developing a changeup and adding a forkball to his repertoire. And while Tanana didn’t put up elite strikeout numbers, he at least maintained an average strikeout rate and sometimes even better.

Velocity isn’t the be-all, end-all here. Nestor Cortes, Aaron Nola, Pablo López, and Shane Bieber are all in the top 20 in strikeout rate with slower fastballs than Syndergaard’s. Thor’s strikeouts never were just about the radar gun, so there’s still hope. But it may require him becoming less like Thor and more like Loki. When lightning fails, there’s always deception.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jon L.Member since 2016
4 years ago

I’m not betting against Syndergaard making these adjustments. Thanks for the article and a pretty great pair of closing lines!

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago

if syndergaard put up 13.7 war for the rest of his career i think that would be… a pretty good outcome! that would be an incredibly solid career. Three years of injury aside, he had just one dominant season prior to all that. the production wasn’t exactly mythological leading up to those injuries

Last edited 4 years ago by joe_schlabotnik
BurleighGrimesMember since 2020
4 years ago

I think you’re underselling Syndergaard’s pre-2020 career just a tiny bit. In terms of his peripherals and rate stats, he was dominant from 2016 through 2018, though merely excellent in 2019. The injury in 2017 hurts the total WAR, but on a per inning level, he was one of the best starters in the game for a 3-year period. But yeah, injuries have taken their toll. Obviously if you tell people at the end of 2019 that he’d put up only 14-15 more WAR in his career, that would be considered a totally outcome, since he’d put up close to 20 WAR in the 5 years prior, with a year of that practically being wiped out to injury (and his rookie year just a partial year). So yeah, an absolutely solid career, and a decent outcome at this point (or at any point, really, for a pitcher), but somehow an overall disappointing arc imo, given expectations and that tantalizing moment in the sun when he had it all working.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I would say the outcome projected by ZiPs is about as likely as him continuing to return to who he was another year removed from injury. In that case, next year the velocity comes back, he returns to being a 4-win starter, then he blows out his arm either in 2023 or 2024 and it’s all over.

Of course, there’s also a third scenario, which I would judge as equally likely as either him muddling along as a 4th starter or flashing his old form before burning out. Which is that he muddles along as a 4th starter and blows out his arm anyway.

How much do teams really believe in the upside? IDK.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

dan should do a zips time warp series where young flamethrowers choose to not throw 100+ and instead hover at 95 and never blow out their arms. amazes me how many young guys insist on doing this. no one can sustain it, and i can’t really think of any pitcher that willingly keeps their foot off the gas

EasyenoughMember since 2016
4 years ago

Max Scherzer, in his Nats years, seemed to occasionally find 5 MPH on his fastball. Baseball savant has him averaging 95 MPH in 2019 on his four seam but maxing at 100mph. This year it was 94 avg but “Maxing” at 98. Seems like he keeps his foot off the gas most of the time… Though I agree with your point in general.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

he crossed my mind as I was typing that! and thats pretty much the perfect illustration of my point: he has generally stayed healthier than any other dominant pitcher of his era

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Scherzer seems like a least likely case for taking the gas off the pedal, ever, for anything. I would attribute any loss of velocity on his part to reduced ability to maintain, than him dialing it back…

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago

I agree here, I feel like you can quantify “easy” versus “effortful” heat, and that is worth looking at. My take is that 95% of your velocity is in your body and the last 5% is in the arm, and the guys we see breaking down are leaning on their arms harder than they should.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

And with the availability and good success rate of TJ surgery in the last decade or so, there’s almost too much pressure to dial up the pitching effort to 11 on a scale where 10 is optimal….if you blow your arm out, wait 12-18 months after TJ and you’re back to bringing filthy stuff.

The generation of Verlander and Scherzer is probably the last (barring some new fundamental change in MLB) where pitchers held back to 5 or more MPH below max and saved their peak velocity gusts for key spots.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I think many starting pitchers still hold back to some degree. It’s why you see swingmen throw harder as relievers than as starters, and some pitchers (even some relievers) need to hold back a little to maintain command.

Still, I agree that it’s a bigger problem than it used to be.

Last edited 4 years ago by Lanidrac
Santos L. Halper
4 years ago

It could be argued that Ohtani does this. He regularly sits in the mid 90s with his FB. But when he wants to, he’ll reach back and put one in there at triple digits

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago

I can’t believe they gave you a credit card

marianosz
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Oh very good catch my friend

Mahoney
4 years ago

For a good lunchtime read, look at Frank Tanana’s Wikipedia bio. His career was roughly the equivalent of Shane McClanahan going through bouts of forearm tendinitis, and then shoulder tendinitis, and then making a conscious decision in his third or fourth season to completely remake himself into the second coming of Jamie Moyer so he didn’t finish off the destruction of his left arm.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Wouldn’t Jamie Moyer be the second coming of Frank Tanana? Unless you go through time backwards.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

In any case, a few years ago I went to go look up guys who struck out a lot of guys in the 1970s because I always remembered this timeline:
1) MLB lowers the mound
2) Strikeouts drop
3) JR Richard and Nolan Ryan “brought strikeouts back” in the 1970s
4) Some more strikeouts in the 80s from Gooden and Clemens
5) K’s explode in the 90s

I don’t think I was that far off–I guess you could make an argument for Sam McDowell continuing to have some success in the 70s but he was clearly less of a strikeout pitcher than the 60s.

But: What really surprised me was Frank Tanana in 1975 leading the league in strikeouts (by a fair amount too). I remember him from his Tigers years where he was very much not that guy.

Last edited 4 years ago by sadtrombone
anjichpa
4 years ago

I think it’s simply that pitching in the majors is really damn difficult. Velocity is correlated with pretty much every other measure of success when measuring pitch/repertoire performance. Throwing at sub-maximal velocities generally means you’re not maximizing your odds of short-term success, and what competitor is going to go out there and say “I didn’t give it my all today.”

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

I think the reports of Thor’s mortality are greatly exaggerated. His return reminds me of Lance Lynn’s return from Tommy John. It took Lynn about a year to regain his control and velocity. But after two years Lynn was throwing harder than he was pre surgery. Everyone expects players to come back from Tommy John and immediately start pitching how they did prior to the surgery and that’s really the exception rather than the rule. If Syndergaard’s velocity doesn’t start to return next year of be much more concerned.

Lanidrac
4 years ago

Well, his TJS was over two years ago. Most patients are back at full strength by that point.

Although, Thor kept having setbacks trying to rehab last season, so I can see your point on how this is his first year back truly pitching after having had the surgery. We’ll see if he picks up any velocity as the season continues.

jwblue
4 years ago

CliffsNotes : He lost his premium velocity.

Last edited 4 years ago by jwblue