Pete Alonso Busted His Slump
In his rookie season, Pete Alonso has already hit 27 home runs, second in baseball behind Christian Yelich. He’s sporting a .281/.371/.634 slash line that’s created a 161 wRC+, which trails only Cody Bellinger, Mike Trout, and Yelich. Even after adjusting for defense, Alonso’s 3.3 WAR is seventh among all position players. With numbers like that, it might be difficult to believe that Alonso has already gone through a prolonged slump with just half the season finished. He has, though. Behold:
| PA | HR | BB% | K% | BABIP | ISO | wRC+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/28-5/28 | 109 | 8 | 4.6% | 31.2% | .203 | .303 | 95 |
Hitting like a slightly below-average player for a month might not be classified as a slump for most, but Alonso has been one of the most productive hitters in the game, and the middle-third of his season thus far is a departure from the rest of his numbers. I could have massaged the numbers to make them slightly worse by going from April 30 to May 25, but the above sample fits neatly as the middle third of Alonso’s season so far. Earlier this season when Alonso was doing very well, Ben Clemens discussed the good and bad aspects of the first baseman’s game, though Ben’s focus was on the good as Alonso was annihilating baseballs at the time:
The two parts of this article are the Pete Alonso experience in a nutshell. The quality of contact isn’t the question — when Alonso hits something, it goes a long way. The question is always going to be whether he can make enough contact to tap into his tremendous raw power. The early returns are promising, but they’re also confusing. Alonso can hit — not that there were many questions about that before — but he’s been a pure manifestation of 80-grade power this year. He’s also struck out 30% of the time, which is, you know, not great.
What we saw from Alonso for much of May was the troublesome aspect of his profile. He was swinging and missing a lot, and not drawing walks. He was hitting home runs, but he produced such a low batting average that his hitting line was below average. We could chalk the BABIP up to bad luck, but his expected numbers from Statcast weren’t much better than what he actually produced. For a first baseman with potential fielding issues, that profile is nearly unplayable on a contending team. Alonso was experiencing his first adjustment from pitchers, and for about a month, he adjusted poorly.
Here are Alonso’s plate discipline numbers from the first few months of the season:
| O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | Zone% | F-Strike% | SwStr% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/28-4/27 | 33.0 % | 63.4 % | 44.8 % | 58.8 % | 83.1 % | 72.1 % | 38.8 % | 59.6 % | 12.5 % |
| 4/28-5/28 | 38.6 % | 69.8 % | 49.5 % | 68.9 % | 83.7 % | 76.2 % | 35.1 % | 56.9 % | 11.8 % |
Pitchers threw to Alonso more carefully and he responded in the worst way possible: swinging more. His O-Swing% numbers were already below average at the start of the season, and for a month, he got worse. In visual form, here’s Alonso’s swing percentage heatmaps from those periods:

Maybe those maps don’t look completely different, but look at the sections up and in, and low and away. On the left map from April, Alonso isn’t swinging frequently at those pitches, while in May, he offered at the same pitches more often. That he made contact more often on pitches out of the zone might have prevented even more strikeouts, but it also caused weaker contact when Alonso put the ball in play. At the height of his slump, he told Mike Puma of the New York Post about his need to focus on pitch location.
“If I am swinging at junk then they are going to keep throwing it,” he said. “If I am doing my job and swinging at strikes and taking borderline pitches or sitting on good pitchers’ pitches and being locked in on my zone then it is kind of rewarding if I get a quality pitch to hit, whether it be a breaking ball that’s over the middle of the plate or changeup over the middle or fastball.
“For me it doesn’t matter what type of pitch it is, I need something middle, because even if I expand the zone on a fastball then I am still going to get myself out or not get myself in a good count to do damage or help the team.”
Alonso identified and understood his weakness. Making a demonstrable change against the best pitchers in the world can be difficult. Here’s his swing map over roughly the last month:

That area down and in is still the place to throw it if you want to try to get it by Alonso, but he’s pretty clearly swung less in an effort to avoid chasing bad pitches. That up and in area, and the low and away area look even better than they did the first month of the season. The lack of swings on the outside of the zone isn’t an indication it is a safe place to throw there, though, as Cole Hamels recently found out:
This is what Alonso’s plate discipline numbers have looked like over the past month compared to the first two we saw above:
| O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | Zone% | F-Strike% | SwStr% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/28-4/27 | 33.0 % | 63.4 % | 44.8 % | 58.8 % | 83.1 % | 72.1 % | 38.8 % | 59.6 % | 12.5 % |
| 4/28-5/28 | 38.6 % | 69.8 % | 49.5 % | 68.9 % | 83.7 % | 76.2 % | 35.1 % | 56.9 % | 11.8 % |
| 5/29-6/25 | 29.8 % | 59.9 % | 39.9 % | 66.3 % | 84.1 % | 75.3 % | 33.7 % | 59.7 % | 9.9 % |
I highlighted the O-Swing% and Zone% because those stats show the changes pitchers have made against Alonso and how Alonso has responded. Pitchers continue to hope Alonso chases, and are hopeful to avoid the strike zone. The Mets’ slugger initially responded with poor plate discipline but has since responded with fewer swings. As a result, Alonso has been better lately than he was in April when he took the league by storm:
| PA | HR | BB% | K% | BABIP | ISO | wRC+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/28-4/27 | 109 | 9 | 11.9% | 27.5% | .364 | .372 | 182 |
| 4/28-5/28 | 109 | 8 | 4.6% | 31.2% | .203 | .303 | 95 |
| 5/29-6/25 | 114 | 10 | 13.2% | 17.5% | .328 | .394 | 204 |
Alonso has seen a massive decrease in his strikeout rate as pitchers have opted to avoid the strike zone. It’s possible his passivity could be exploited, but that’s a dangerous game given his ability to punish strikes. For good measure, here’s how his Statcast statistics during the same time periods measure up:
| xwOBA | MLB Rank (75 PA) | xwOBACON | MLB Rank (50 BB) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/28-4/27 | .407 | 18 | .530 | 10 |
| 4/28-5/28 | .336 | 107 | .464 | 34 |
| 5/29-6/25 | .472 | 2 | .539 | 3 |
Since the end of May, only Mike Trout and Jorge Soler have been hitting the ball with more authority when contact is made. Factoring in walks and strikeouts, only Trout has exceeded Alonso by Statcast’s metrics over that span. Statcast’s numbers align with our own, as Mike Trout has a 227 wRC+ since May 29, with Alonso second to Trout with a 204 mark just besting Christian Yelich. He’s made some of my skepticism at his pace seem foolish, but at least I’m in good company along with a lot of the game’s best pitchers.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
If he keeps up anything close to those strikeout to walk numbers he’s going to be incredible
He already is.
I mean he’ll have an incredible career long term, not just a flash in the pan incredible rookie season
I suspect that if the season ended today, Soroka would win rookie of the year. And I think he deserves some consideration, but Alonso is just tearing the cover off the ball. He’s the fourth-best hitter in MLB by wRC+, and if he keeps this up he’s going to lead the league in home runs.
This is what a nice 80-grade raw power guy will get you when he’s making enough contact.
Why soroka as of today? Alonso has him by about 1 WAR by both fangraphs and bbref. Soroka’s got the nice W-L and ERA that traditional voters might like but Pete’s got the dingers and RBIz that those same voters dig, so that seems like a wash.
That’s exactly it. Soroka’s ERA and W-L are both really shiny but even if you try and adjust his RA9 for defense he comes out well behind Alonso. You have to really slice and dice at an offensive performance like Alonso to make him anything other than an offensive juggernaut.
I just said “as of today” because that’s all we have to go off of.
Alonso is on pace to hit more than 50 home runs. Zero percent chance the traditional voters would ignore that and they would be joined by the more statistically inclined crowd in voting for Alonso.
Anyone know why Alonso and Stanton are 80 power grade hitters, but Judge and Alvarez are 70 and 65, respectively?
Do they get modified via statcast data, or are these fixed, scouting determinations?
Different scouts have different thresholds for what counts as 80-grade raw power, and before Eric and Kiley teamed up they were coming up with the grades themselves.
My guess is that most people would put Stanton, Judge, and Gallo as having 80-grade raw power, and many would put Alonso up there too but it’s not quite as much a slam-dunk. Not sure about Alvarez, but he sure seems like he’s getting to it in games.
Anyone who doesn’t think Alonso has slam dunk 80 grade power hasn’t seen him play enough. He’s without question up there with Stanton, Judge, and Gallo.