Pete Alonso Crushes the Ball

Pete Alonso, it should first be said, really isn’t a great defender. The Mets were quick to let everyone know this throughout 2018, when they didn’t call him up early in the year, when he won Defensive Player of the Month for the Mets’ Triple-A affiliate in July, and when they didn’t make him a September call-up in a completely lost season for the big league club. Seventeen games into his major league career, however, I can say one thing with certainty: I don’t care that he’s supposedly bad at defense. Alonso’s plate appearances are turning into appointment viewing, because he flat-out crushes the ball. I’m not talking garden-variety “boy, that large man can hit,” either. Alonso might not have the best strike-zone recognition, or the best general plate discipline, but when he makes contact, he’s doing damage like almost no one else in baseball.

If you want to understand how truly incredible Alonso’s start has been, you need to look past the WAR leaderboards. Heck, you need to look past the wRC+ leaderboards — like I said, his plate discipline is a work in progress. Alonso has a near-200 wRC+ with a 31% strikeout rate — the three players at the top of the wRC+ leaderboard check in at 11.5%, 8.6%, and 15.0%, respectively. No, the magic really starts when Alonso puts the ball in play, and I do mean magic. Take a look at the top 10 players in baseball in terms of barrels (a Statcast designation that basically means a ball that is tremendously likely to be an extra-base hit) per batted ball:

Barrels/Batted Ball (min. 25 BB)
Player Barrels/Batted Ball
Pete Alonso 31.6%
Gary Sanchez 31.3%
Joey Gallo 29.6%
Mike Trout 29.0%
Christian Walker 25.0%
J.D. Davis 23.3%
Franmil Reyes 23.1%
Anthony Rendon 22.9%
Willson Contreras 21.4%
Jay Bruce 21.1%

Think of it this way: about a third of the time that Alonso puts the ball in play, he’s hitting an absolute rocket. Just being on this list, let alone at the top of it, tells us something. This isn’t a list of guys who have lucked into some game power. It’s not a list you can get on just by taking some walks, like a wRC+ leaderboard — Alex Bregman might have had a nice 2018 at the plate, but it’s hard to fake hitting the ball this hard and this optimally (Bregman ended 76th in barrels per batted ball last year). This isn’t just home run power, either, though it’s certainly that — Alonso has six homers already, including a 118.3-mph, 454-foot missile off of Jonny Venters that had SunTrust Park looking like a water hazard at the Masters:



Merely looking at barrels doesn’t describe just how well Alonso is hitting the ball. Even his outrageous rate of barrels, after all, only covers about a third of the time he puts the ball in play. That undersells what Alonso is doing, because even when he doesn’t absolutely destroy the ball, he’s hitting the ball hard and at dangerous launch angles. When I look for players who are striking the ball with authority, I like to exclude ground balls from the calculation. Then I look at the average exit velocity they’re producing. Why exclude the ground balls? Well, a 115-mph rocket on a hop to shortstop might get you a single (or not — fielders are great these days!), but it’s hard to generate extra-base power on the ground. If you want to know who has a swing that will produce extra-base hits, look to the air:

2019 Air Exit Velocity (min 25 balls)
Name EV (mph)
Cody Bellinger 99.3
Franmil Reyes 98.1
Pete Alonso 97.6
Yoan Moncada 97.4
Gary Sanchez 97.1
J.D. Martinez 96.9
Anthony Rendon 96
Paul Goldschmidt 95.5
Joc Pederson 95.5
Trey Mancini 95.2

Cody Bellinger is having a great season so far, no doubt, and Franmil Reyes has undeniable pop, but there’s Alonso again, smashing baseballs into the stratosphere.

If you merely looked at Alonso’s batting line, you might be inclined to forecast some regression. He has a .424 BABIP, after all, and the highest BABIP since World War II (minimum 400 PA) is Reggie Jefferson’s .408 in 1996. I’m not here to tell you Alonso won’t regress — he probably will! I will say, though, that he’s deserved that BABIP so far. By looking at Statcast’s xBA statistic, which calculates the probability of a hit based on launch angle and exit velocity, and limiting it to only balls in play, we can calculate an xBABIP for everyone in baseball. It’s not perfect, but it’s a proxy for what you might expect someone’s BABIP to be if you stripped out the fielding luck part of it. This is an article about Pete Alonso, so you probably knew he’d do well, but jeez:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
2019 xBABIP (min. 25 BIP)
Name xBABIP
Aaron Judge 0.455
Nick Markakis 0.446
Domingo Santana 0.442
J.D. Davis 0.441
Niko Goodrum 0.440
Migeul Cabrera 0.439
Pete Alonso 0.424
Cody Bellinger 0.424
Jordy Mercer 0.421
Tyler Naquin 0.417

Now, there are more luck-based components to BABIP other than just where the fielders are standing, but this isn’t some Wee Willie Keeler “hit ‘em where they ain’t”-style BABIP — Tim Anderson and his .500 BABIP with a .365 xBABIP can’t say the same. While Alonso’s BABIP is sure to come down as the season goes along, it hasn’t been a product of fluky hits so far. He isn’t directing ground-ball singles through gaps in the defense — he’s directing line drives through outfields.

When I mention line drives, I’m not doing it out of some idle authorial reference to a well-struck ball. I’m doing it because Alonso hits line drives, and lots of them. He’s hit an above-average amount this year, a probably-not-sustainable 28.2%. That home run off of Venters that turned center field into a golf course? That was a line drive, struck at a 17.7-degree launch angle. He also avoids ground balls like the plague, a skill he’s always had but has kicked into overdrive this season.

Another test I like to use to look for hitters maximizing their contact is to check for how frequently they avoid bad batted ball types. An infield pop-up, for example, is basically as good as a strikeout. A ground ball isn’t nearly that bad, but league-wide wOBA on ground balls is .225 in 2019. Fly balls check in at .474, and line drives are at a mouth-watering .662. If you want to look for the hitters who are putting the ball in play in a useful way, then it’s best to look at the percentage of good batted ball types they generate (line drives plus fly balls minus infield fly balls), and Alonso doesn’t disappoint here either:

2019 Good Contact %
Player Good Contact %
Jay Bruce 83.4%
Jorge Polanco 76.7%
Matt Carpenter 74.5%
Pete Alonso 74.4%
Christin Stewart 73.7%
Michael Conforto 72.0%
Xander Bogaerts 70.8%
Jeimer Candelario 70.8%
Cody Bellinger 70.7%
Niko Goodrum 69.7%

This table and the exit velocity on balls in the air from earlier in the article encapsulate what’s great about Alonso. He’s one of the best in baseball at putting the ball in the air without popping up. He’s also one of the best in baseball at hitting balls in the air extremely hard. Those things go together as well as you’d expect. Alonso also has the fifth-highest xwOBA on contact in baseball this year, behind noted extremely large humans Joey Gallo, Gary Sanchez, Aaron Judge, and Cody Bellinger. That would be impressive for anybody, but it’s particularly impressive for a rookie who’s faced Max Scherzer, Patrick Corbin, and Stephen Strasburg twice each in his first seventeen games.

At this point, you should have no doubt that Pete Alonso hits the ball phenomenally hard when he hits it. Thus far in his career, that “when he hits it” looks to be the only thing holding him back. Alonso’s raw strikeout and walk numbers aren’t pretty (31% strikeouts and only 12.7% walks is not a good look). Per an equivalence formula I outlined last year, Alonso would need to produce contact 10% better than league average just to be a league-average hitter overall. He’s vastly outstripping that so far, but it’s still a bad base to start from.

It’s early in the season to trust strikeout and walk rates. Even if you look at more granular data, however, Alonso has some work to do. So far this year, he’s swung at 32.3% of pitches outside of the strike zone versus a league average of 29.1%. At the same time, he’s only swung at 63.9% of pitches in the zone, where league average is 66.8%. This combination of swinging more frequently than average at balls and less frequently than average at strikes is, as you might assume, bad.

Not only that, but Alonso makes less contact than league average when he swings — 71% against an average of 75.7%. Among qualified batters last year, only four batters met those three criteria, and they combined to average 25% strikeouts and 8.4% walks. While there are some encouraging names there (Giancarlo Stanton feels like an apt comparison), it’s definitely not a place you want to be. The mere fact that so few batters combined these traits (four out of 140 who qualified) suggests that it’s hard to get enough playing time to qualify when hitting like that.

The two parts of this article are the Pete Alonso experience in a nutshell. The quality of contact isn’t the question — when Alonso hits something, it goes a long way. The question is always going to be whether he can make enough contact to tap into his tremendous raw power. The early returns are promising, but they’re also confusing. Alonso can hit — not that there were many questions about that before — but he’s been a pure manifestation of 80-grade power this year. He’s also struck out 30% of the time, which is, you know, not great.

Will the strikeouts hold him back? Will he be the next Joey Gallo, comic-book strong but held back by a video-game strikeout rate? Only time will tell. There’s good news on one front, however. Despite his defensive shortcomings and the handicap of playing first base, Alonso has put up 1 WAR already. He’s the Mets’ most valuable player by both fWAR and bWAR. It looks like the defense wasn’t bad enough to hold him back from the majors after all.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

Alonso is an elite power hitter and will regularly hit 40 bombs, I think he can become a Khris davis or Nelson cruz caliber power hitter.

However he is not going to hit 300+ with a 25+% K rate, his babip is currently 430.

I don’t think he will remain at 31% Ks but 26-28 is probably realistic and then he probably is a 260/350/500 hitter with 35+ homers which is great.

But don’t fall for the “he hits the ball so hard that he beats the BABIP and hits 300 despite a high 20s K rate”. We fell for this already a few times for example when sano had his hot streak couple years ago or even judge.

And it is not about deserving either. Sano also had a 400 xBABIP but it still isn’t sustainable, maybe the pitcher finds a little hole or the player just regresses a little in his skill. Nobody sustains a 400 babip even if his xstats say he deserves it for a couple months.

Here is the “sano defies the babip odds with otherworldly contact quality” article
https://community.fangraphs.com/miguel-sano-is-the-three-true-outcomes-hitter-weve-been-waiting-for/

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Yeah the EV is rare. The list of guys who even hit only two balls at 115+ isn’t all that long. But I think his babip will regrees especially when teams start to get batted ball tendencies.

AnonMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

There is no doubt that his BABIP is going to tumble. In the divisional era since 1969, there have only been 3 qualified seasons over .400 – 1977 Rod Carew, 2002 Jose Hernandez and 2000 ManRam – and Carew is the only player to maintain a BABIP over .360 over 2000+ PA since then.

That said, Aaron Judge is on year 3 of maintaining a BABIP over .360. Now Alonso isn’t as fast as Judge so he might lose a few hits that way, but if he keeps hitting the ball the way he has, there is no reason he couldn’t maintain a BABIP north of .340.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Quick tangent on context …
Overall BAbip in recent years is the highest it’s been since the mid-1930s.

— From 1940 through 1992, the 5-year BAbip never got as high as .286.
— Since the start of the PED era, 5-year BAbip has been at least .295.
— BAbip for the previous 5 years was .299.

There are 25 guys who debuted since WWII with at least a .343 BAbip and 1,500 PAs. Fifteen of them have played this year, and three more entirely within the past 10 years.

Alonso’s BAbip will surely tumble, but I don’t think we’re far enough into this particular era of MLB to have a good idea of upper bounds for individuals.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Babip certainly went up over the years but the last 20 years it was pretty stagnant. Power increased but so did defensive positioning due to analytics.

metsies
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I think he hits closer to 40+ HRs than 30+ HRs, and ultimately finishes with a BA closer to .280-.290 then .260, but I do agree that he’s unlikely to finish the season with a .300 BA as a rookie.

TulkasMember since 2024
7 years ago

Also very interesting to see J.D. Davis on a few of those leaderboards. This Mets team has made a few very shrewd moves over the offseason.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Tulkas

Also, those people who wanted to give up on Gary Sanchez are idiots. His health will probably hold him back, but he has a ceiling on par with Mike Piazza.

TulkasMember since 2024
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oh yeah. Sanchez just oozes potential, and even if he never taps into it fully, just getting a piece of it would be incredible from a catcher. This is a guy you give a LOT of chances to at literally every other position. But catcher? Yes, just let the kid play.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Hoo boy, I’m a Gary fan, but that’s some lofty comparison. Gary crushes, but his contact skills (or lack thereof) seem to eliminate that kind of ceiling as a realistic possibility. In Gary’s monster 2017, he ran a 129 wRC+. Piazza had 10 straight seasons above that (often substantially above that) from 1993-2002.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I should have been more careful. This is likely true; the contact is not on the same level as Piazza. Let me clarify.

I do think that if he stays healthy enough (which I am getting less optimistic about) he’s going to put up Piazza-level power numbers–quite frequently landing in the 40 homer range. But his OBP is probably going to be 50 points lower. I’m thinking more in the range of Piazza’s 1999 as his standard (which is similar to what Sanchez did in 2017), but occasionally reaching back for even more.

metsies
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

There will NEVER be another Mike Piazza. You find a catcher that hits like Piazza and he will be converted to another position to play 155 games a year.

metsies
7 years ago
Reply to  Tulkas

I had a feeling that JD Davis had potential when they traded for him. Granted, his track record in Houston was abysmal, but he was still young and crushing the ball in AAA.

The thing that is doing him in right now is that his defense is very sub-par. However, I loathe the day that Frazier comes back because I know that the Mets have $9M reasons to put him into the lineup.

I also don’t understand the Lowrie signing because his primary position is 2B, and at the time of the signing you had Cano and McNeil who could both play that position. Assuming McNeil was 1st on the depth chart for 3B, then if Cano goes down or needs a rest you slide McNeil to 2B and put JD Davis at 3B.

mrdog61Member since 2017
7 years ago

Jordy Mercer among leaders in xBABIP is what has me shook from this article.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

There’s something to be said about a guy who has so much power and who makes such good contact that the strikeouts don’t matter as much. This makes him a bit different from a guy like Judge, who is the 80-iest 80-grade raw power out there, who literally just has to make enough contact to be a star (“quality” of contact doesn’t matter quite so much; although he did have a top-of-the-line barrel % last year, but I suspect that’s because literally every ball he hits is crushing the ball). And it separates him from Gallo, who is a 3-true-outcomes monster with a low BABIP.

I like these guys with 80-grade power on a personal level, because despite the superficial similarities of their batting lines, they’re really kind of different under the surface. Stanton, Franmil Reyes, and Khris Davis have their own little weird quirks too. It’s kind of the reverse of the “unhappy families are all unhappy in their own way” quote; 80-grade raw power gives you the ability to succeed despite serious flaws.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

Also, I just want to give a big thumbs up to Ben for this article (among several other great articles recently). There isn’t a whole lot we can learn from the top-line stats this early in the season, but Statcast data, pitch mix, swing changes, plate discipline, etc…those things are a lot more interesting this early. Many of them won’t hold either, but they’ve got a better shot. And even better, they’re the kinds of things that you don’t get from looking at the FG leaderboard.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

A lot of his babip will also depend on his pull rate. Pulling helps power but is negatively correlated with babip. Hitting the ball hard helps babip but if you have a very polarized batted ball profile mlb defenses will make you pay. Many hard hitting pull hitters had high babips in the minors because they just hammered the balls through the fielders but in mlb they are analysing you and putting the shift on which they don’t do much in the minors because it is not about winning but player development.

Schwarber is a good example, mid 300s in the minors, 270s in the majors.

Alonso isn’t a pure pull guy like bautista (who always had low babips) but last year in AAA he pulled way more than he does now and also had a sub 300 babip.

If he can continue to hit the ball that hard and maintain such a high up the middle percentage he probably can sustain a babip well over 300.

But if he goes back to pulling the ball 45+% teams will probably eat some of his babip away with the shift.

insidb
7 years ago

“extremely large humans Joey Gallo, Gary Sanchez, Aaron Judge, and Cody Bellinger…HEY!”
-Gary Sanchez-

scrap1ron
7 years ago

Watching Alonso stretch and dig out bad throws from his fellow infielders, he plays a very acceptable 1B. Save the “style points” criticisms for ballet, he gets the job done.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  scrap1ron

A couple years ago there was an article stating that only like 10% of a first baseman’s defensive value is catching a ball and scooping bad throws, most of it is fielding and especially range. Hosmer is great at scooping but still not a great defender because his range isn’t great.

John Autin
7 years ago

Good column! I have a sincere question about this statement:
“31% strikeouts and only 12.7% walks is not a good look”

What do we know about the relationship between K% and BB% that would make an otherwise good BB% into a point of concern?

I’ve never really studied this question, but here’s a very rough go at it:
I took the top 200 batters by most total PAs since the start of 2015 (all at least 1,383 PAs).
For each, I calculated his K%, BB%, and K/BB ratio.

Then I made groups based on each of those rates, grouping by highest-50, middle-100, and lowest-50.
And I took the unweighted average OPS+ of each group.
The results:

Grouped by K%
106.4 OPS+ for highest 50
108.4 for middle 100
106.5 for lowest 50

Grouped by BB%
119.9 OPS+ for highest 50
106.9 for middle 100
95.9 for lowest 50

Grouped by K/BB ratio
95.5 OPS+ for highest 50
108.6 for middle 100
117.1 for lowest 50

By this rough thumbnail, K% alone doesn’t tell much; I know I’ve “selected out” those who whiffed too much to keep a regular job, but that’s not close to an issue for Alonso.

BB% and K/BB both say a lot — but for Alonso, they tell different stories.
Alonso’s BB% of 12.7% would rank top-20, a very good indicator for his OPS+.
His K/BB ratio of 2.44 would fall well within the middle of this pack (91st); the top 50 are all well over 3 K/BB.

Even with the obvious limitations of my study, it doesn’t suggest that Alonso’s K/BB _ratio_ is anything like a problem. His walk rate is good, and that shouldn’t have to be qualified in terms of his K%. I’d love to hear other views on this.

rosen380
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Is it a factor that as far as OPS+ is concerned a strikeout is the same as a ground out?

OPS+ doesn’t care if you have 100 SO and 100 GB outs or 50 SO and 150 GB outs. But OPS+ does positively value BB, so the two buckets that include BB as a factor show something more because more BB means something in OPS+?

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

K/BB is pretty useless, you have to use K%-BB% which is one of the best predictors of pitching success, for hitters of course it is not as easy because the power component is added while pitchers face a good mix of different power guys so it should cancel each other out.

K-BB works for hitters too but you have to consider power too.

With k-bb it doesn’t matter
If you are at 15-10 or 10-5 because as I wrote below the linear weights are pretty similar. The notion that a K is not worse than a groundout is correct but of course a K could also have turned into a double or homer so a k doesn’t just replace a random groundout but the whole range of outcomes. Because of that it is not quite correct to compare that value of a K with an out in play, you have to compare it with the value of a ball in play which can turn into anything from a double play (worse than a K) to a homer (of course way better than a K).

More Ks simply mean you have to produce the same in less chances since a k can’t turn into anything.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Thanks for the input!

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Thanks for the in-depth reply!

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You are welcome if you meant my reply:)

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I did, Dom. 🙂

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I found it is almost a direct linear relationship between k, bb and power
https://community.fangraphs.com/introducing-k-bb-iso/

A k and a bb almost have the same value, a bb is slightly worth more though. I think linear weights are k=-.28 and bb=+.31 or so. Because of this K-BB works so well for pitchers, it is not quite perfect but almost.

Going by k-bb he is at 18% which is somewhat worse than the league average of around 13%.

However there of course is a third component which is power and Alonso obviously is great at that.

K rate does correlate well with performance but only if you normalize for bb and iso. The reason why low k rate doesn’t correlate with success is a selection bias: high K hitters without power don’t make the majors while some low k guys without power do make the majors. If you normalize for walks and power there is a strong positive effect of K avoidance but in practice you don’t always get the full package.

The very best mlb players mostly have single digit K-bb rates whether it is 20/15 guys like trout or 13/8 guys like altuve but there are a few exceptions.

EltnegMember since 2020
7 years ago

“Lucked into some game power” is a weird phrase given that the whole thing with the Ramirez/Hoskins/Bregman types is that they have elite contact skills that let them get as much as possible out of their average raw power. I guess they’re lucky to be playing today and not 30 years ago, but the skill’s very much there.

arrantjudgement
7 years ago

Is there a leaderboard on fangraphs / another source for xBABIP. Baseball Savant has a leaderboard for xwoba but not xBABIP from what I can tell. Thanks!

nixsee
7 years ago

I think the small sample period for writing articles is over by now and can confidently say that Ben Clemens is just Jeff Sullivan getting around his allegiance to the Rays

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago

The Frananimal has gotten so unlucky to start this season. When you couple that with above average contact ability, he should be an absolute monster.