Picturing a Complete Yankees Teardown

The first sure-fire sign of any good, impending mid-season selling frenzy is upper-management coming out and insisting to the public, “Who, us? No, no way. We’re definitely not selling. Which, that’s fine. Makes sense. Job of upper-management is to make money, and letting all the fans know a month in advance that the team is throwing in the weol of the now for a towel of the future isn’t a great way to keep fannies in the seats, even while the team’s still intact. Despite those claims, though, word always gets out, and the second sure-fire sign of any good, impending mid-season selling frenzy is the resignation that, “Yeah, OK, you caught us; we’re probably sellers.” The third sign is the sale itself.

The New York Yankees have exhibited the first two symptoms of fire-sale fever. After dropping the first series out of the All-Star break to the Boston Red Sox, the Yankees are now 45-46, fourth place in the American League East, and owners of a 6.1% chance to make the postseason, according to our playoff odds. The last three days have represented the club’s lowest points of the season.

And, given the unique construction of the Yankees’ roster, the club seems poised for a rare sell-off, one that, if executed to the fullest extent, could have the second-half version of the team appearing unrecognizable to the first. It seems likely that very few players of the next good Yankees team currently exist on this one. The Yankees are going to make some moves. The question is: how many? Let’s take the lever and push it all the way up. Just for fun, let’s imagine what a complete Yankees teardown looks like.

Of course, we move the obvious pieces. At this point, Aroldis Chapman seems like a near-guarantee to be traded. Carlos Beltran should be on the go, too. We’ve all heard the Andrew Miller speculation, and he’s the Yankees’ most valuable chip, so let’s call him a goner, as well. The Brett Gardner rumors started in the offseason and have persisted, so we’ll be finding him a new home, and let’s go ahead and do the same with Brian McCann, who for the sake of this exercise will agree to lift his no-trade clause. Hell, while we’re here, let’s see if we can’t find anyone interested in CC Sabathia and Mark Teixeira, too. That’s our list. Everything must go.

We’ll work our way down that last paragraph, starting with Chapman. He’s long been the most likely piece to be moved, and at this point, it seems inevitable. We begin with the asking price. Chapman was just recently acquired in a trade over the offseason from Cincinnati, which cost the Yankees a quartet of mostly insignificant prospects, but of course will now command a higher cost. The Yankees bought low on Chapman while a suspension of an undetermined length loomed, and that was before we saw how pricey relievers got over the offseason. So, the most recent Chapman trade isn’t a good example of his current value.

To get a better idea, maybe we go back a couple years to when his teammate, Andrew Miller, was dealt to the Red Sox at the deadline. That move cost Baltimore Eduardo Rodriguez, who that year was ranked as the No. 65 prospect in the game by Baseball America. Miller, like Chapman, was an impending free agent — and was putting up comparable numbers to Chapman’s typical year. The price tag for elite relievers has gone up, though Chapman’s off-field concerns likely depress his cost somewhat. A team isn’t getting Chapman without giving up a top-100-type prospect, but it might be able to hold onto its top guy.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Chapman’s suitors? Plenty. The Dodgers just went after him seven months ago, and they could still be interested now. The Cubs are looking for relief help, as are the Nationals. Texas is a contender with the American League’s worst bullpen. The Indians have been singled out as a sleeper candidate to land a Yankees reliever.

The Indians wouldn’t want to part with top prospects Clint Frazier or Bradley Zimmer for half a year of Chapman, but they’ve got more than enough guys in the Rodriguez range, like Brady Aiken (No. 59 in BA’s mid-season top-100 update), Bobby Bradley (No. 64), Justus Sheffield (69), Francisco Mejia (70), and Michael Clevinger (71), to work something out while holding onto their top chips. Maybe the Cubs build a package around Eloy Jimenez (46), the Dodgers with Grant Holmes (60), the Nationals with Erick Fedde (61), the Rangers with Luis Ortiz (74) or Dillon Tate.

Want Miller? Those same teams are likely all interested, but the prospect tier goes up a notch. Look at what Craig Kimbrel commanded over the offseason with his multiple years of control. Miller’s got even more value than Kimbrel, and the Yankees would rightfully want their own Manuel Margot and Javier Guerra. The Indians aren’t getting away without Frazier (21) or Zimmer (26). The Yankees would want a Gleyber Torres (27) or Ian Happ (37) from Chicago, a Lewis Brinson (30) from Texas, a Jose De Leon (25) or Alex Verdugo (44) from Los Angeles, a Reynaldo Lopez (48) from Washington. And then some. It’s a fool’s errand to come up with specific prospect names in fake trade proposals, but these are the tiers of guys required to land a Chapman and a Miller. Pick a name from the Miller paragraph and a name or two from the Chapman paragraph, imagine a couple low-minors prospects or near-major-league-ready fringe guys tossed in, and that’s your most likely Chapman/Miller return for New York.

Beltran seems likely to go, and a recent rumor linked the Royals to him, with Luke Hochevar’s name invoked. With the Yankees out of contention and Hochevar an impending free agent, that specific framework seems unlikely, but that’s the type of guy the Yankees are getting for Beltran. He’s rebuilt his value with a resurgent offensive performance, but it’s still three months of a 39-year-old designated hitter. That gets an MLB-ready middle reliever or a 19-year-old.

McCann and Gardner have their value, though perhaps not much in the way of surplus value; McCann is owed $34 million in 2017-18, Gardner owed $26 million over those same years with a buy-out factored in. The Yankees wouldn’t have to part with talent of their own to get teams to take these two, but they likely wouldn’t fetch much in return, other than some fringy prospects and, more importantly, the ability to more quickly rebuild themselves through free agency and the offseason trade market with some more financial freedom.

Teixeira’s just fallen too far to be anything more than an August waiver salary dump. Sabathia’s most recent starts may have done the same to his value.

But we’ve done a lot here! We’ve netted the Yankees several top-100 prospects, including a top-50 guy or two, for Chapman and Miller. We’ve got a bullpen arm or a utility bat for Beltran. We’ve cleared plenty of salary in the coming years by moving McCann and Gardner, while paving the way for top prospects Gary Sanchez and Aaron Judge in the process. And we’ve filled out the low minors with some lottery ticket 19-year-olds along the way. Masahiro Tanaka and Dellin Betances are still there. Ditto Michael Pineda and Nathan Eovaldi. Didi Gregorius and Jacoby Ellsbury are still up the middle, and Greg Bird and Luis Severino will be ready to make an impact in 2017. Plus, there’s the money. All that Yankee money.

For a complete teardown, the Yankees still have quite a bit left. And quite a bit yet to gain. It’s an unfamiliar feeling for New York, being in the position of a seller, but one that’s made itself inevitable. The fire-sale option is here for the Yankees, if they want it. Now, we just see how far they go with it.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

72 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Spa City
10 years ago

Just my $.02… The Yankees should be bold in trying to acquire 1 or 2 players who provide 2017 value with several years of team control.

As imaginary Yankees GM, I would offer Miller, Chapman, Gardner and Ellsbury plus a ton of cash (I.e. enough to make Ellsbury’s contract desirable) to the Cubs for Dan Vogelbach and Kyle Schwarber.

Schwarber’s and Vogelbach’s left-handed power in Yankee Stadium would be fun to watch.

In my view, the value of a World Series win to the Cubs is nearly immeasurable. They are not motivated to trade Schwarber, but an absurd trade like this would maximize their chances to become Chicago sports legends. The Cubs fears should be their bullpen and OF (i.e. Heyward has not hit well, Fowler is probably not going to sustain his 1st half #s, Soler seems to be a mystery).

backward galaxy
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

So you want them to trade most/all of their viable trade chips for two DHs?

Spa City
10 years ago

No. That is not what I want.

Emcee PeepantsMember since 2016
10 years ago

And also expect the Cubs to take on $132MM in guaranteed contracts for two 33 year old outfielders and a 32 year old closer? Even if the Yankees pay $60MM+ of Ellsbury and Gardner’s contracts I don’t see it being in either team’s best interests.

Spa City
10 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

I agree. That trade would be bad for both teams.

SeanMember since 2014
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

I think you’re severely overestimating Schwarber’s value. He doesn’t fit anywhere defensively, and he has almost no shot at catching coming back from a torn ACL. Plus, he still needs to make it back from the injury.

Spa City
10 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Agreed. Schwarber has relatively little trade value at this point. I can’t see the Yankees, or anybody else, making such an offer for him.

reggiethomaslive
10 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Schwarber is only 23 and has beaten every projection ever given him, and this years projection was 32 HR. That’s a lottery ticket the Cubs should never part with cheaply. He doesn’t have to beat projections by much to be Jim Thome.

dmgetz
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

Heyward hasn’t hit well, but he still has decent value given his defensive ability; Fowler shouldn’t be expected to be as good in the second half as in the first, but even if he is only as good as he was last year, he is probably still more valuable than Ellsbury and about as valuable as Gardner.

tekneticc
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

This is one of the most brutal proposals yet. You’re asking for two elite relievers, a valuable corner outfielder, their starting center fielder and you want them to eat a significant part of the contract for two guys who cancel each other out. Why?

Spa City
10 years ago
Reply to  tekneticc

Because why not? Nobody is harmed by my trade suggestion. And I think Yankee fans are tired of a team of guys in their 30s, and they are ready for a total “teardown.”

But who knows. Mostly I am enjoying the down vote count – I am hoping to reach 100!

Monsignor Martinez
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

With suggestions like that, we can certainly help you reach 100.

Paul22
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

Whats the urgency, they will be in the post season in years to come. They can pick up Chapman as a FA, and perhaps Miller at some point next year as the Yankees look like they will be sellers for years to come

Kyle Sharamitaro
10 years ago

Nice piece August… I would really like to see an article similar to this one, but instead dealing with the 2016 St Louis Cardinals.

mcescher
10 years ago

The idea of being able to do a full rebuild with three highly coveted bullets in the pen, that much payroll flexibility and a more than halfway decent farm system is armchair GM porn of the highest quality.

BritishCub
10 years ago

anyone else see the Yankees ownership not allowing the Yankees front office to do their job, because “they’re the Yankees” or is no team that dumb?

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  BritishCub

I agree. As someone who has been an uninvolved observer of the Yankees for many years, the entire concept of this seems completely bizarre. This just isn’t something which the Yankees do. Evaluate young talent and make decisions involving giving up prestigious personnel based on this evaluation? Even if one of them shoots off guns in his house? It’s just so un-Yankees. How could they explain this to their fans?

Alex K
10 years ago

I can’t imagine the Cubs trading any of their top 3 prospects (who were all ranked in the top 30 by Keith Law last week) for a RP. I imagine that someone like Vogelbach or Soler are the most likely players to move. If that doesn’t net them Chapman or Miller I’m cool with that.

Greg
10 years ago
Reply to  Alex K

1) Miller and Chapman have very different values. As a Cubs fan, I want Miller.

2) Soler, Vogelbach… those are spare parts. Soler hasn’t proved he’s worth anything. Cubs fans love to make these offers but the Yankees are going to want real value for Miller.

3) I think a package for Miller has to start with one of the 3 (Torres, Jimenez, Happ)

I think both the Cubs and Yankees would prefer this to be Happ. He’s almost 22 and the closest to major league ready, he definitely looks like a major league regular at a minimum. That’s what the Yankees want, a near major league ready player with upside.

Torres is nice but he’s 19 and the Yankees have Mateo and Garcia in the system at SS. Jimenez is 19 as well, so that’s why they may prefer Happ.

So now we have Happ for 2 1/2 years of Miller. Who needs to add more? That’s easy, the Cubs still need to add more.

Jeimer Candelario. He’s a potential major league regular, but not a sure thing. He’s near MLB ready.

Is Happ + Candy the best package the Yankees can receive for Miller? Not so sure, so let’s throw in Vogelbach for good measure.

Happ+ Candelario + Vogelbach for Andrew Miller.

Real Value for Real Value

The Cubs need to win a ring.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Wow, you guys are really desperate. It’s pathetic. You do realize that the Cubs will still be playing baseball after 2018, don’t you?

Garys of OldeMember since 2016
10 years ago

Yeah, I mean no playoff team has ever tried to trade prospects for pitching help before the deadline. Total desperation!

reggiethomaslive
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

The Cubs best chance at a ring is to build a powerhouse team for the next decade, not to sell out for this season.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

If they are still bidding for miller or chapman, that doesn’t seem to be the thinking of their management.

Alex K
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Of course Miller and Chapman have very different values, not sure why you felt like that needed to be explained.

Jorge Soler is 24 and while he doesn’t have the value that he had a couple years ago he’s not totally worthless. And Vogelbach is blocked in the Cubs system, but also not worthless. Are they the greatest pieces? Not at the moment, but they aren’t spare parts.

Best case scenario for Miller you get about 170 IP, I don’t see how that gets you all 3 of those guys. If that’s what it would take for the Yankees to give up Miller I think the Cubs should say no thanks and move on.

As for Chapman, I think Soler is actually an overpay for him. That’s a couple years of control for a guy that has shown real ability to hit MLB pitching for like 30 IP.

LilBTheBasedGod
10 years ago

I’m liking the idea of a young, high upside pitcher for Chapman. In fact I would have been more than happy if we got Chris Paddack for him. It would be nice to get someone like that to make up for the excitement James Kaprielian would be bringing if he was healthy.

fredfotch
10 years ago

As a Jay’s fan, I am glad that the Yankees aren’t very good. As a baseball fan, I hope they turn things around soon. The sport is more interesting when they are good.

Jackie T.
10 years ago
Reply to  fredfotch

In what way?

Ivdown
10 years ago
Reply to  Jackie T.

Everyone loves to hate a villain, and the Yankees at the top are Emperor Palpatine.

output gap
10 years ago

The value of Miller and, to a lesser extent, Chapman is going to be determined by how much Rizzo, Sabean and Epstein want to ensure those two aren’t facing their teams in the playoffs. In this market, given the bidders, acquiring one likely also means ensuring your competitors don’t acquire that asset, potentially raising the price.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  output gap

Don’t worry about Sabean. The Giants aren’t going to be serious bidders for Miller or Chapman. They’d have to give up too much and they aren’t that desperate for one more World Series ring. Plus Chapman’s a thug.

tekneticc
10 years ago

Right, the Giants are flush with prospects to acquire Miller. Now that I think of it, it might be why the Yankees ruled them out as trade partners. Weird.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  tekneticc

Yes, one of the consistent patterns in baseball is that the giants never have any good prospects. Another pattern is that they key to their success is home-grown talent.

dustin0224
10 years ago

They aren’t that desperate because it is an even year. Probably already cleared space in the display case for the 2016 and 2018 trophies.

Alvaro Andrés Pizza Varela
10 years ago

Shouldn’t the Yankees with all their cash, trade the players AND offer to pay the remaining money on their contracts so they acquire better prospects?

vmx
10 years ago

Takes two to tango. Some team has to want to give up better prospects for cash savings on some Yankee contracts.

Unique New York
10 years ago

As a Yankees fan, I hope that your proposals of prospects and prospect tiers come to fruition. Realistically, I don’t believe the Yankees will have enough guts to do a full team teardown. However, Chapman and Beltran should be obvious trades that need to happen. Unlike Spa City stated, this team is better off collecting pieces that will be good in 2018, not next season. This would coincide better with the other Yankees prospects that will likely make the majors next year, but then will improve in the 2018 season. The farm system, coupled with big name free agents in 2018 could make the Yankees extremely realistic contenders in just a “2 year rebuild”.

vivalajeter
10 years ago

Does it really make sense to trade Miller? He has 2 more years on his contract. Unless the Yankees are going to punt next season – and I can’t imagine they would – then they should be keeping Miller to have a dominant 1-2 punch in the bullpen for next season. That would also help in keeping Betances’ arbitration numbers down, not that that’s a big deal for the team.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Yes, it isn’t just punting two months. It doesn’t make sense for them unless they get more than anyone is going to be willing to give.

tekneticc
10 years ago

They’re not contending next year either. Miller does nothing for them going forward.

amdennis1990
10 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Yes it can. Look at it from a supply and demand perspective. Right now there really aren’t many relievers of Miller’s quality available and the Yankee’s hold one of the other major relief assets, Chapman. During the off season, there will be comparable relievers available (Chapman and Jansen come to mind first). The idea, at least from the Yankees’ perspective, is to take advantage of the low supply of relievers in the trade market and then replace what they lost when the supply is relatively high during the off season.

MikeySymington
10 years ago
Reply to  amdennis1990

It’s also worth bearing in mind that Miller’s trade value is probably never going to be higher than it is right now, not just because of the current market but because he’s already 31. Relievers are notoriously volatile and it’s not ludicrous to imagine Miller’s performance dropping off some next year. He’d likely still be excellent, but he’s been elite this season and will bring back a much higher return now than he will in future.

Even if he remained elite, his value would diminish next year because of his age. As much as I enjoy watching him pitch for the Yankees, now is the time to sell.

vivalajeter
10 years ago
Reply to  MikeySymington

But the Yankees have never been a team that trades a great player away for prospects, simply because their trade value is high. Miller has 2 more years on his contract, at less than $10MM/year. If the Yankees want to contend in 2017 and 2018, he’s going to be a useful part of those teams.

And by keeping him, that lowers the supply of great relievers and drives up the price of Chapman.

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016
10 years ago

I don’t think teams are going to pay that much for a reliever, but then again I always think that and yet teams keeping doing it.

That said, I think you’re undervaluing Brett Gardner. He’s on pace for a 3-win season, and according to Cot’s his contract is VERY friendly even if expecting a decline:

17:$12M, 18:$11M, 19:$12.5M club option ($2M buyout)
Assignment bonus: $1M if traded

If he’s even a 1.5 win OF in 2018, that’s probably going to be better than the going rate for a FA if payrolls keep surging. I think he fits the mold of a lot of OF on good teams: undervalued because he’s neither super cheap nor super good.

Don't talk to me in the Uber pool, I dont know you
10 years ago

I’ve been hearing the Yankees are asking for Gallo and Profar for Miller and Nova, any chance the Rangers eventually fold and give in to this price. A Bird, Profar, Didi, Gallo infield with Sanchez behind the plate and Judge in right next year would be exciting to watch.

Joey Butts
10 years ago

This sounds like something the Rangers “leaked” to justify why they’re not trading for Miller, even though they arguably need him.

Dooduh
10 years ago

The Yankees aren’t purging as long as they have a shot at the WC. And they may not deal any more than Chapman and Beltran either way.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

You’re right. And at this point, because they have about as much a chance as Lloyd did with Mary in Dumb and Dumber, I’d say they can finally move on from their “shot”.

Joey Butts
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

That’s tough but fair. By the way, thank you for putting us out of our misery this weekend.

Dooduh
10 years ago

They can hold onto Miller now and still make a killing in the winter.

amdennis1990
10 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

Teams will pay more at the deadline, they always do.

Matt
10 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

“They can hold onto Miller now and still make a killing in the winter.”

The Reds thought that with Chapman last year and look what happened. Obviously Chapman’s off-field issues may have helped diminish his value a little bit more, but the Reds could have cleaned up had they traded Chapman in July. Instead, they got fringy prospects. Miller is arguably better and with one more year of control than Chapman had so he should get even more than Chapman would have this time last year.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt

I think that was kind of special circumstances with chapman losing value last year. Miller doesn’t look like the domestic violence type.

Matt
10 years ago

There are some selective memories regarding Aroldis Chapman’s trade in December. Remember, *prior* to Chapman’s off-field issues becoming public, a trade had been agreed upon that would have sent him to Los Angeles for what was reported to be two mid-level prospects likely headlined by Jose Peraza. No other names were given, but all of LA’s “top” prospects were ruled out by multiple media outlets. The Reds subsequently acquired Peraza a week later in a different trade, which would seem to back up the Peraza rumor.

It was only *after* Chapman’s off-field issues became known (in part because of the trade announcement), that the Dodgers backed out, Chapman’s value began to plummet further and the number of suitors willing to take on the baggage was limited to 1.

Of course his “special circumstances” diminished his value *more*, but “special circumstances” do not change the fact that the Reds very clearly lost a ton of value by trading him in December rather than July. That is just common sense. Basic supply and demand. In December, if you need relief help, you can go out and buy it via free agency or look to develop it from within. Supply is up, demand is down. In July, you have no option but to trade to get quality relief pitching and to do so you need to compete with a dozen (or more) contending teams with similar needs for relievers from a finite number of sellers.

Don’t forget how sparse the 2015 relief market was. Cishek, Soria and Papelbon were the best relievers traded last summer. The relief market is even more sparse this year, with Chapman (and potentially Miller) headlining an otherwise unspectacular group of relievers. The Reds got greedy, the rest of the league called their bluff and they ended up losing a ton of value. The exact same thing will happen to the Yankees with both Chapman and Miller. Miller’s trade value will never be higher than it is this very second, not trading him would be foolish at best.

Dooduh
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt

In fact, more RPs flood the market at the trade deadline than do in the winter. Andrew Miller will be a hot commodity as much (or more) in December as he may be now.

Thinking that the Yankees are considering to bail on this season and purge lots of players is just silly when their division is the most winnable in baseball, which is to say that if they play well over the next 10 days, they may not do anything more than a Chapman trade.

Mallow
10 years ago

“To use a pilot analogy, I get to look at things as director of baseball operations at 5,000 feet and only focus on the baseball side of things,” Cashman said. “But from an owner’s perspective, or a president’s perspective, they gotta look at things from 30,000 feet, and whether it’s ticket sales, and advertising, and sponsorships, and there’s a whole bunch of global initiatives on the business side that I’m certainly not involved with.”

Sounds like Cashman is just blowing smoke to please the Steinbrenner’s and Levine who would rather not have the Yankees miss out on a couple extra weeks of ticket sales by throwing a mediocre product out on the field even with their ever-slimming chances of a playoff berth.

reggiethomaslive
10 years ago
Reply to  Mallow

That’s a real bad thing for a GM to say. Teams fill seats by winning first and foremost. The Yankees have allowed their team to age and decay to the point that winning this year is now impossible (outscored by nearly half a run per game so far this year), and winning next year is going to be very difficult. Giving up opportunities to improve future teams to try to maintain a mediocre win pace this season is short-sighted at best.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

The entire yankees plan of focusing on spending huge amounts of money to give long-term contracts to aging veterans with name recognition is short-sighted and based on catering to an impatient and unsophisticated fanbase.

Eskuire
10 years ago

I always leaned towards :

Miller for Soler
Chapman to the Giants for Kyle Crick
McCann to Indians (now without Gomes) for Adam Plutko
Beltran and Gardner to LA Dodgers for Angel German and Kyle Farmer

None of them are top 10 prospects in any system, mostly mid tier 15-25 guys (with the exception of Krick who I think is…11th? there).

One can dream, right?

Joey Butts
10 years ago
Reply to  Eskuire

And Didi Gregorius for a bag of balls.

Eskuire
10 years ago
Reply to  Joey Butts

I’ve always liked Didi. Good attitude, plays hard, plus he makes shitty commercials with Starlin Castro, so he’s automatically worth keeping.

Joey Butts
10 years ago
Reply to  Eskuire

Are you missing the sarcasm, or am I?

Eskuire
10 years ago
Reply to  Joey Butts

There was sarcasm there? By the gods I’ve been had, damn you internet.

E-Dog
10 years ago
Reply to  Eskuire

Crick’s control is a mess and he’s stalled out at AA. The Giants would probably trade him for Rex Chapman right now.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  E-Dog

No they wouldn’t.

redsoxu571
10 years ago

A correction: Chapman wasn’t dealt to New York BEFORE the RP market blew up. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the two huge RP trades (Kimbrel, Giles) had already occurred, and plenty of RPs had signed for hefty contracts.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
10 years ago

I wonder if the Yankees will be motivated to clear money in advance of the enormous Machado and Harper free agencies. The Yankees could really use an outfielder and a third baseman, and with so few players to spend money on with these days of extensions…

The Yankees might be willing to accept crappy prospects to clear payroll by not eating too much Gardner or McCann money so they can afford 800 million for the pair.

Clutch Narrative
10 years ago
Reply to  phoenix2042

Isn’t it completely obvious that this is exactly what they have been doing for the past couple of years?

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

It is completely obvious but people don’t seem to realize it. Their problem is that although to the Yankees it may look like that can ditch the Gardner and McCann contracts (and others for that matter) because they themselves think in terms of getting name-recognition players even if they’re over the hill and overpriced, very few other teams follow this thinking.

Joey Butts
10 years ago

This is why Brett Gardner hasn’t been traded, even though he’s been available for 8 months. Everyone estimates his value way too low. He’s easily worth a top 100 prospect, but people seem to think he should be available for cheap. Cashman should hold onto him if the other option is to give him up for a couple of fringy guys.

reggiethomaslive
10 years ago
Reply to  Joey Butts

Gardner has always been under-rated, because baseball always under-rates speed and defense.

Paul22
10 years ago

Chapman is going either way, he was always a luxury. Beltran should go since he is due for heavy regression in the 2nd half

The Yankees should sell these 2 to buy and salvage this season. They are only 5 games behind in the 2nd WC race. They need a bat who can play RF after dealing Beltran (should have called up Judge earlier but now he is on DL), and a DH (DFA Arod). They also need to DL Teixeira and get Refsnyder more AB there, or move McCann to 1B and call up Sanchez, or move Headley to 1B and deal for a 3Bman.
Bats are available via trade

The also need a SP’er, plus they have to call up Severino. Do all that and they will be poised for a run. Trading for a SP’er might be tough though, but they should be all over Hill, perhaps in an expanded Reddick and Hill deal

terry mesmer
10 years ago

And DFA A-Rod.