Postseason Managerial Report Card: Dave Roberts

Dale Zanine-Imagn Images

If grade schoolers have to come home with a report card, why shouldn’t big league managers? We at FanGraphs tend to veer towards egalitarianism, and if little Liam or Daenerys can be sent to bed without Roblox or whatever it is the kids like these days, then why can’t Big Stephen or Dodger Dave? That’s why every time a postseason manager is eliminated from contention, we run down their playoff performance and see who gets a Grape Job! sticker.

Ben Clemens already assessed the work of Will Venable and Aaron Boone, while Jon Becker broke down the October runs of Walt Weiss and Craig Stammen, as well as the losing managers from the Wild Card round. Today, it’s Dave Roberts’ turn.

Crafting these report cards can be an odd exercise. Major league managers simply don’t have as large an effect on a team’s on-field performance as, say, an NFL team’s head coach. Baseball is a game of player execution, and a manager’s job mostly comes down to making sure that the best players are on the lineup card and that everyone refrains from killing each other in August. But that doesn’t mean that managers have no effect on their team’s fortunes. Baseball is, by its very nature, a very coin-flippy, volatile game, where the fates of both teams hang on a knife’s edge. Small decisions can have a big impact. Last year, I gave Pat Murphy somewhere between an A- and a B+ overall. Let’s see how Roberts fares!

FanGraphs Playoff Coverage Is for Members
You must be a Member in order to read our postseason coverage. You can read our announcement here, but it's not the only reason you should consider becoming a Member. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage




Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Matthew SpenceMember since 2017
3 days ago

Tough but fair

rustydudeMember since 2021
2 days ago

Thought platooning Muncy was wrong. This year and career he has very small splits. In the playoffs he was arguably their 2nd best hitter behind Tucker. C+ at best

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
2 days ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

That’s an interesting point. I likened Muncy to an only slightly taller version of Matt Stairs, who was a platoon guy by this point in his career. I would have naively guessed that Muncy would then be worse than the average lefty hitter in terms of splits. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, since Muncy has also defied my expectations on defense his whole career.

Veeck as in BeckMember since 2024
2 days ago

One comment I heard after the 2016 World Series wrapped up was annoyance/concern that Joe Maddon was so jittery with his pitching staff that he darn near blew the thing. I was no complainer but yeah for the era it felt extreme. (This was a team that kept all five starters healthy all season long, and regularly had Arrieta and Lester going deep into games, including in the playoffs.) I watch the playoffs now and think he was ahead of his time.

It’s crazy how deep pitchers worked even ten years ago compared to now. Workload deescalated quickly.

norcalblueMember since 2024
2 days ago

“I especially hated the Rojas-De Paula-Enrique Hernández switcheroo in the sixth of Game 3 of the NLCS, after Abner Uribe issued three walks and allowed a double to Smith that scored two runs. De Paula was quickly announced as the pinch-hitter, but I was yelling at the screen that there was no way that Uribe was going to stay in the game even if Roberts himself had gone up to the plate. Naturally, the Brewers went to DL Hall, who was ready to go, and De Paula was out of the game without ever coming to the plate.”

This one inning should have reduced Roberts’ batting grade to a B- or lower. This was managerial malpractice. Agree though with the conclusion that as bad as Roberts was in the NLCS —Dodgers would have lost this series if the managers were flipped and Murphy was brilliant.

jordanm1031Member since 2026
2 days ago

Robert’s not burning Diaz until Game 4 is the decision I still can’t understand. Game 2 Bottom of the 8th seemed like the perfect time to use him as it was a 5-4 and the brewers had the top of the lineup almost up. Also given that Diaz didn’t pitch Game 1 and there was an upcoming off day Diaz would’ve been perfectly fine to throw again in Game 3. But Robert’s didn’t throw his Marquee Arm and the Dodgers gave up 2 huge insurance runs which effectively ended the game. This series felt like Robert’s was managing for a full 7 game series and that came back to bite him big time.

jzmaxson27Member since 2024
2 days ago
Reply to  jordanm1031

I think there was still a lack of trust with Diaz here in the postseason. He was so shaky when he came back from injury it was just hard to really believe in him as a fan. I can’t imagine Roberts and company were immune to that.

jordanm1031Member since 2026
2 days ago

Robert’s not burning Diaz until Game 4 is the decision I still can’t understand. Game 2 Bottom of the 8th seemed like the perfect time to use him as it was a 5-4 and the brewers had the top of the lineup almost up. Also given that Diaz didn’t pitch Game 1 and there was an upcoming off day Diaz would’ve been perfectly fine to throw again in Game 3. But Robert’s didn’t throw his Marquee Arm and the Dodgers gave up 2 huge insurance runs which effectively ended the game. This series felt like Robert’s was managing for a full 7 game series and that came back to bite him big time.

AlbyMember since 2017
2 days ago

I think these are lenient grades. B and C, without the plusses, seems more accurate.