Pre-Deadline Top 100 Prospects Update

Kevin McGonigle Photo: Junfu Han/USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

With the draft behind us and the trade deadline looming, I’ve made a number of updates to The Board. The signing deadline for drafted players has passed, and the 2025 class has now been ported over to the pro side of The Board. You can now see where your favorite team’s new draftees line up in their farm system, and I may yet add a few more of the very late round and/or undrafted players who signed for way over slot (looking at you, Brewers). I’ve also peeled away from the lists those players who have exceeded the rookie eligibility threshold; they’ve been moved onto the Graduates tab on The Board. This means that the farm system values have shifted, and will continue to in real time as trades are made this week.

Most importantly, however, I’ve made a sweeping update to the Top 100 Prospects list. As I noted in the spring with our last Top 100 update, there are a couple of things to keep in mind as you read, especially if you’re new to FanGraphs prospect stuff. First, the “Top 100” title is arbitrary SEO nonsense; I rank players as deep as I have them graded as 50 FV prospects or better, and as of this update, that’s 99 guys. Second, remember that Future Value is a value grade. The tools and ultimate potential upside of a player matter a lot, as does the length and consistency of a player’s performance track record and their proximity to the majors. There are players who have talent upside better than their FV grade, but if they’re risky for whatever reason, or if they’re in the low minors, I want to reflect that risk/time element in their grade.

Finally, remember that an actualized “50” is an average everyday player at a given position. Not “average” in the sense that I’m averaging every big leaguer who played that position to create a performance baseline. Rather, “average” here means that the player would fall toward the middle of the pack when we’re talking about the top 30 or so players at their position across a multi-year window. That’s a high bar. Really excellent, tenured players tend to occupy their spot on a big league roster for long periods of time. It’s hard for prospects to crack into that All-Star-caliber group, and even harder to sustain some measure of production for six-plus years of team control. Forty- and 45-grade players are good big leaguers, too, and there are many more of them across the pro baseball talent distribution than there are players who are 50s and above.

This list overwhelmingly reflects my individual evaluations and grades, with sourced opinions from scouts and executives contributing to select players where I needed to fill a gap in my viewing, or to cross-check my thinking. The in-person looks I’ve gotten at the majority of this group, plus data and video, have contributed to my conclusions here.

Below you’ll find the updated list, followed by a rundown of the clusters of players that formed around similar profiles throughout the rankings. I provide some commentary on the clusters, with a focus on players whose grades have changed on this update. If you want more information, please head over to The Board, where you can find tool grades, pitch repertoires, full scouting reports, and more. I’ll be updating the hard-hit rates (as of 7/22) of the position player prospects throughout the rest of this week, so check back to see how those have changed compared to last year.

Updated Top 100 Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
1 60 Kevin McGonigle 2B 20.9 DET
2 60 Jesús Made SS 18.2 MIL
3 60 Samuel Basallo C 21.0 BAL
4 60 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.4 TEX
5 60 Konnor Griffin SS 19.3 PIT
6 60 Chase Burns SP 22.6 CIN
7 60 Bubba Chandler SP 22.9 PIT
8 60 Andrew Painter SP 22.3 PHI
9 60 Max Clark CF 20.6 DET
10 55 Jordan Lawlar SS 23.0 ARI
11 55 Bryce Eldridge 1B 20.8 SFG
12 55 Josue De Paula RF 20.2 LAD
13 55 Liam Doyle SP 21.2 STL 🆕
14 55 Carson Williams SS 22.1 TBR
15 55 Aidan Miller SS 21.1 PHI
16 55 Alfredo Duno C 19.6 CIN
17 55 Noah Schultz SP 22.0 CHW
18 55 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.4 COL 🆕
19 55 Jarlin Susana SP 21.4 WSN
20 55 Ethan Salas C 19.2 SDP
21 50 Leo De Vries SS 18.8 SDP
22 50 Angel Genao SS 21.2 CLE
23 50 JJ Wetherholt 2B 22.9 STL
24 50 Travis Bazzana 2B 22.9 CLE
25 50 Colt Emerson SS 20.0 SEA
26 50 Franklin Arias SS 19.7 BOS
27 50 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 17.8 SFG
28 50 Walker Jenkins LF 20.4 MIN
29 50 Chase DeLauter RF 23.8 CLE
30 50 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.4 MIN
31 50 Brandon Sproat SP 24.9 NYM
32 50 Josue Briceño C 20.9 DET
33 50 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.0 CHC
34 50 Thayron Liranzo C 22.1 DET
35 50 Zyhir Hope RF 20.5 LAD
36 50 Jackson Ferris SP 21.5 LAD
37 50 Thomas White SP 20.8 MIA
38 50 Kade Anderson SP 21.1 SEA 🆕
39 50 Alex Freeland SS 23.9 LAD
40 50 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.3 CHC
41 50 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.2 NYY
42 50 Arjun Nimmala SS 19.8 TOR
43 50 Aiva Arquette SS 21.8 MIA 🆕
44 50 Eli Willits SS 17.6 WSN 🆕
45 50 Luis Peña SS 18.7 MIL
46 50 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.6 STL
47 50 Braden Montgomery RF 22.3 CHW
48 50 Cam Schlittler SP 24.5 NYY
49 50 Parker Messick SP 24.8 CLE
50 50 Rhett Lowder SP 23.4 CIN
51 50 Jonah Tong SP 22.1 NYM
52 50 Chase Petty SP 22.3 CIN
53 50 Nolan McLean SP 24.0 NYM
54 50 Cooper Pratt SS 20.9 MIL
55 50 Cooper Ingle C 23.4 CLE
56 50 Luke Keaschall 2B 23.0 MIN
57 50 Carson Benge CF 22.5 NYM
58 50 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.7 SEA
59 50 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.4 NYM
60 50 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.2 SEA
61 50 Trey Yesavage SP 22.0 TOR
62 50 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.0 BOS 🆕
63 50 Jett Williams CF 21.7 NYM
64 50 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.1 ARI 🆕
65 50 Joe Mack C 22.6 MIA
66 50 Carter Jensen C 22.1 KCR
67 50 Harry Ford C 22.4 SEA
68 50 Tyler Bremner SP 21.3 LAA 🆕
69 50 Didier Fuentes SP 20.1 ATL
70 50 Troy Melton SP 24.7 DET
71 50 Payton Tolle SP 22.7 BOS
72 50 Gage Jump SP 22.3 ATH
73 50 Jonny Farmelo CF 20.9 SEA
74 50 Xavier Isaac 1B 21.6 TBR
75 50 Felnin Celesten SS 19.9 SEA
76 50 Quinn Mathews SP 24.8 STL
77 50 Hagen Smith SP 21.9 CHW
78 50 Caden Dana SP 21.6 LAA
79 50 Logan Henderson SP 23.4 MIL
80 50 Khal Stephen SP 22.6 TOR
81 50 Jimmy Crooks C 24.0 STL
82 50 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.0 TBR
83 50 Starlyn Caba SS 19.6 MIA
84 50 Brody Hopkins SP 23.5 TBR
85 50 Jaxon Wiggins SP 23.8 CHC
86 50 Connor Prielipp SP 24.6 MIN
87 50 George Klassen SP 23.5 LAA
88 50 Carson Whisenhunt SP 24.8 SFG
89 50 Tink Hence SP 23.0 STL
90 50 Brandon Clarke SP 22.3 BOS
91 50 Luis Mey SIRP 24.1 CIN
92 50 Edgardo Henriquez SIRP 23.1 LAD
93 50 Jeferson Quero C 22.8 MIL
94 50 Ricky Tiedemann SP 22.9 TOR
95 50 River Ryan SP 27.0 LAD
96 50 Jake Bloss SP 24.1 TOR
97 50 Travis Sykora SP 21.3 WSN
98 50 Alejandro Rosario SP 23.6 TEX
99 50 Moisés Chace SP 22.1 PHI

60 FV Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
1 60 Kevin McGonigle 2B 20.9 DET
2 60 Jesús Made SS 18.2 MIL
3 60 Samuel Basallo C 21.0 BAL
4 60 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.4 TEX
5 60 Konnor Griffin SS 19.3 PIT
6 60 Chase Burns SP 22.6 CIN
7 60 Bubba Chandler SP 22.9 PIT
8 60 Andrew Painter SP 22.3 PHI
9 60 Max Clark CF 20.6 DET

McGonigle’s BP at the Futures Game was opinion-altering. He has real juice in his hands, and he’s going to get to his power in games not only because he’s a skillful hitter, but because his swing is geared for launch. His arm isn’t a fit at shortstop. You could argue he should be the lone 65 FV prospect given the state of second base at the big league level right now, which aside from Ketel Marte and Jazz Chisholm Jr., is really light on power hitters. Basallo would have ranked first if not for his lack of plate discipline. He’s not a good catcher right now, though at his size, age, and relative inexperience due to injury, you can project he’ll stay behind the dish. But he might chase himself into a disappointing outcome. Made’s shortstop defense is getting better and might be really great at peak. He’s one of the best pure athletes in the minors, and has ridiculous range and body control. You could argue for any of Made, Griffin, and Walcott to be no. 1. Griffin has the most present power of that group (his swing looks like a righty version of Roman Anthony’s), but his length causes him to push a lot of contact the opposite way. Walcott is more often on time to pull, but he’s a lower launch guy. Neither of them has fully actualized their power yet; when they do, it’s going to be a lot of fun. Made is pretty easily the best pure hitter of the three.

55 FV Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
10 55 Jordan Lawlar SS 23.0 ARI
11 55 Bryce Eldridge 1B 20.8 SFG
12 55 Josue De Paula RF 20.2 LAD
13 55 Liam Doyle SP 21.2 STL 🆕
14 55 Carson Williams SS 22.1 TBR
15 55 Aidan Miller SS 21.1 PHI
16 55 Alfredo Duno C 19.6 CIN
17 55 Noah Schultz SP 22.0 CHW
18 55 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.4 COL 🆕
19 55 Jarlin Susana SP 21.4 WSN
20 55 Ethan Salas C 19.2 SDP

How Lawlar fills in for Eugenio Suárez at third base will be fascinating. His ability to dive or slide and then recover to throw is remarkable, but he’s also a tightly wound guy who looks uncomfortable in on the grass. He’s graded in a vacuum here, basically where he’d be were he going to play shortstop. De Paula is starting to actualize his power and is doing so without sacrificing contact. He has roughly average raw power right now and should still grow into at least one more grade as he ages into his mid-20s. Miller and Williams are having tough seasons on paper, but I’m trying not to overreact to either’s struggles. Miller still looks great both to the eye and when you look under the hood at his TrackMan data. I’ve written about Williams’ strikeout risk in the past, but even I’m surprised by how much his performance has swooned this year. He’s such a great defender that he should be a really good player anyway.

Buildaround Middle Infielders
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
21 50 Leo De Vries SS 18.8 SDP
22 50 Angel Genao SS 21.2 CLE
23 50 JJ Wetherholt 2B 22.9 STL
24 50 Travis Bazzana 2B 22.9 CLE
25 50 Colt Emerson SS 20.0 SEA
26 50 Franklin Arias SS 19.7 BOS
27 50 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 17.8 SFG
40 50 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.3 CHC

Arias moved into this group during this year’s list cycle and Gonzalez enters on this update, but the others have been here since February. Gonzalez looks incredible down in the DSL. His numbers (90% zone contact, 37% hard-hit rate, 104 mph EV90 as a 17-year-old) aren’t as bonkers as Jesús Made’s were at this time last year, but they’re approaching that. I’m not quite ready to stuff De Vries way up in the Top 10 because whether or not he’s a shortstop is still a question for me, and he doesn’t quite have the same bat speed as the 60 FV hitters. He’s more of a 50-hit/55-power combo with a swing actualized to get to it in games. He’s also the second youngest fella here, and I might be underrating his power projection. If you think so, then imagine him right behind Lawlar; I think that’s justifiable.

Oft-Injured Impact Bats
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
28 50 Walker Jenkins LF 20.4 MIN
29 50 Chase DeLauter RF 23.8 CLE
30 50 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.4 MIN

This group is pretty self-explanatory, though I’ll add that Jenkins’ raw power has not developed as hoped, and he slid out of the 55 FV tier due more to that than to injury. DeLauter (broken hamate) and Rodriguez (oblique) both got hurt again recently.

Big League-Ready Mid-Rotation Starters with Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
31 50 Brandon Sproat SP 24.9 NYM
36 50 Jackson Ferris SP 21.5 LAD
37 50 Thomas White SP 20.8 MIA
38 50 Kade Anderson SP 21.1 SEA 🆕

This contingent includes the 50 FV pitchers whose long-term ceiling could be bigger than that grade. All of these guys could move into the 55 FV tier during the next few months if they continue to throw strikes. Obviously, Anderson’s timeline for a move into the 55s is more April/May of next year, as it’s unlikely he’ll pitch again in 2025.

Catchers
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
32 50 Josue Briceño C 20.9 DET
34 50 Thayron Liranzo C 22.1 DET
65 50 Joe Mack C 22.6 MIA
66 50 Carter Jensen C 22.1 KCR
67 50 Harry Ford C 22.4 SEA

Briceño is the best pure hitter of this group and also the youngest, but the others have better chance to be a good defensive catchers. Liranzo’s freaky switch-hitting pop creates some distance from the rest of this group, and if you wanted to argue that Macks’ defense is special enough to pull him up into that range I think you could, he’s just going to strike out a ton. Ford might be a trade candidate due to the presence of Cal Raleigh ahead of him. Jensen is again on here while Blake Mitchell is not (yet), because Jensen has better plate discipline and is a level closer to the majors than Mitchell is.

Power Bats with Hit Tool Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
33 50 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.0 CHC
35 50 Zyhir Hope RF 20.5 LAD
39 50 Alex Freeland SS 23.9 LAD
41 50 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.2 NYY
42 50 Arjun Nimmala SS 19.8 TOR
43 50 Aiva Arquette SS 21.8 MIA 🆕
47 50 Braden Montgomery RF 22.3 CHW
73 50 Jonny Farmelo CF 20.9 SEA
74 50 Xavier Isaac 1B 21.6 TBR

This group is structured prioritizing proximity and positional value. Alcántara is a prime trade candidate because he’s running out of option years and needs to be given a prolonged big league opportunity soon. His size and length mean he’s going to need a longer runway to adjust, and the Cubs’ timeline doesn’t really align with that. Hope’s contact rate is in the mid-60s this year, which is a bit of a concern. You could pull Lazaro Montes up from the 45+ FV tier and into this group if you wish. Mid-season swoons by Lombard and Nimmala kept them from the group headed by De Vries above. Isaac has some of the best raw power in all of pro baseball, but he was striking out at a 30% clip again when he was shut down with injury last month. Farmelo (rib stress fracture) has also dealt with yet another injury this season. You could slide those two all the way to the back with the injured pitchers if you like, and if they don’t play again this summer, that’s what I’ll end up doing in the offseason.

High-Floored No. 3/4 Starters
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
48 50 Cam Schlittler SP 24.5 NYY
49 50 Parker Messick SP 24.8 CLE
50 50 Rhett Lowder SP 23.4 CIN
51 50 Jonah Tong SP 22.1 NYM
52 50 Chase Petty SP 22.3 CIN
53 50 Nolan McLean SP 24.0 NYM
62 50 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.0 BOS 🆕
68 50 Tyler Bremner SP 21.3 LAA 🆕
79 50 Logan Henderson SP 23.4 MIL
80 50 Khal Stephen SP 22.6 TOR

Schlittler was a 45 FV prospect during the offseason, but his velocity kept climbing this year and it’s rare to find guys his size who also throw strikes in the upper-90s. Note the gap between most of these names and the Witherspoon/Bremner duo, which is due entirely to proximity rather than talent. Though, because Bremner is an Angel, he’ll probably close that gap pretty quickly. Stephen is now in his second consecutive year of working nearly 100 (or more) innings and has shown special command. All three of his pitches are playing like above-average weapons. It was only a couple of years ago when he was struggling at Purdue; now he’s on the doorstep of the majors.

Dudes Who Rake
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
44 50 Eli Willits SS 17.6 WSN 🆕
45 50 Luis Peña SS 18.7 MIL
46 50 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.6 STL
54 50 Cooper Pratt SS 20.9 MIL
55 50 Cooper Ingle C 23.4 CLE
56 50 Luke Keaschall 2B 23.0 MIN
57 50 Carson Benge CF 22.5 NYM
58 50 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.7 SEA
59 50 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.4 NYM
75 50 Felnin Celesten SS 19.9 SEA

Players in this cluster either have great feel for contact but only fair power (Willits for now, Pratt, Ingle, Keaschall, Benge), or are more balanced hitters with issues on defense (Arroyo, Reimer, also Keaschall). Peña’s underlying hit data is exceptional, but his defense has regressed compared to his spring look. I had been skeptical of Arroyo due to his swing path, which leaves him vulnerable to elevated fastballs, but he’s gotten better and better at laying off the pitches he can’t handle, and his ability to do damage to all fields against basically every other pitch type has held up even as he’s been exposed to Double-A pitching. He’s still a bad defender, but I buy that he’ll hit enough to be good anyway. Celesten’s risk is less about excessive strikeouts and more about whether or not he can polish his swings to the point where he can access his power in games.

Mold Breakers
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
60 50 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.2 SEA
61 50 Trey Yesavage SP 22.0 TOR
63 50 Jett Williams CF 21.7 NYM
64 50 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.1 ARI 🆕

Each of these players brings something unique to the table. Yesavage has three plus pitches, but his delivery requires a ton of effort; there really isn’t anyone else in the game whose mechanics look like this, certainly not among the starting pitchers. Williams and Cunningham lack the size of most successful everyday big leaguers.

Monster Fastballs
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
69 50 Didier Fuentes SP 20.1 ATL
70 50 Troy Melton SP 24.7 DET
71 50 Payton Tolle SP 22.7 BOS
72 50 Gage Jump SP 22.3 ATH

All of these pitchers command mid-90s fastballs that also feature nasty uphill angle, which hitters struggle to match. They also tend to have shallow, inconsistent secondary pitches that are difficult to control. Jump moves into this area after struggling to throw strikes for basically his entire lifetime as a prospect until his draft spring at LSU. He’s now had two consecutive seasons with walk rates under 8% and he’s sustaining mid-90s velocity this year even though he’s on pace to double his previous high in innings. The Athletics’ pitching development, overall, seems to have taken a step forward.

Having A Rough Year
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
76 50 Quinn Mathews SP 24.8 STL
77 50 Hagen Smith SP 21.9 CHW
78 50 Caden Dana SP 21.6 LAA

Some combination of injury and wildness has plagued this trio all year. Matthews is walking 8 per 9 IP as of this update; Smith has 29 walks in 40.2 innings but has also struck out 62 guys. Part of Dana’s appeal as a prospect entering the 2025 season was his size/control combo, which theoretically should allow him to eat a ton of innings. Instead, he has struggled to pitch enough in the bigs to graduate.

Glove-First Profiles
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
81 50 Jimmy Crooks C 24.0 STL
82 50 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.0 TBR
83 50 Starlyn Caba SS 19.6 MIA

All three of these hitters have lower-impact offensive ability, but all three are premium, top-of-the-scale defenders who do enough at the plate to be considered an everyday player in the aggregate.

Relief Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
84 50 Brody Hopkins SP 23.5 TBR
85 50 Jaxon Wiggins SP 23.8 CHC
86 50 Connor Prielipp SP 24.6 MIN
87 50 George Klassen SP 23.5 LAA
88 50 Carson Whisenhunt SP 24.8 SFG
89 50 Tink Hence SP 23.0 STL
90 50 Brandon Clarke SP 22.3 BOS
91 50 Luis Mey SIRP 24.1 CIN
92 50 Edgardo Henriquez SIRP 23.1 LAD

The Cubs have shockingly helped Wiggins throw strikes with basically his entire repertoire, and his arm action looks much more fluid and natural now than it did when he was in college. He and Hopkins (who, remember, was mostly a hitter in college and is still developing as a pitcher) are the two from this group most likely to remain starters long-term.

Injured
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
93 50 Jeferson Quero C 22.8 MIL
94 50 Ricky Tiedemann SP 22.9 TOR
95 50 River Ryan SP 27.0 LAD
96 50 Jake Bloss SP 24.1 TOR
97 50 Travis Sykora SP 21.3 WSN
98 50 Alejandro Rosario SP 23.6 TEX
99 50 Moisés Chace SP 22.1 PHI

Quero is dealing with more shoulder trouble after missing last year recovering from labrum surgery. Sykora’s TJ was announced yesterday and the timing of it will likely cost him all of next year, too.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

81 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric MartellMember since 2025
13 hours ago

Okay, I have to ask – no Owen Caissie or Moises Ballesteros surprised me, given their placement on other lists. Just missed or overvalued by others?

tdmocMember since 2023
13 hours ago
Reply to  Eric Martell

They show up as 45s in the December report, so still good players, just not average (or better) every day regulars. From a quick skim it looks like Ballesteros isn’t a good enough defender and Caissie seems to lack the hit tool (or rather he lacks the compensating power).

Obviously, that report is now 8 months old, so it’s worth asking him in his next chat what he considers their lumps to be. But he never comments on other publications for obvious reasons.

Eric MartellMember since 2025
13 hours ago
Reply to  tdmoc

Thanks!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
13 hours ago
Reply to  Eric Martell

I think he explained pretty well his concerns with Ballestreros on the list, but I think Caissie’s raw power is back up? It’s possible that he hasn’t seen that yet, or that he has but whatever he is doing in his swing to get it he thinks will be exploited a lot in MLB.

Ryan TuresMember since 2017
9 hours ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Maybe I’m just a rube, but maybe I didn’t read the methodology, but how are two guys that are both in the top 60 in both MLB pipeline and baseball America not even in the top 100 on this one??

I believe Caissie is in the 30s on MLB pipeline and Ballesteros

Last edited 9 hours ago by Ryan Tures
Ryan TuresMember since 2017
9 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

I believe Caissie is in the 30s on MLB pipeline and Ballesteros is in the 30s on baseball America

bubblesMember since 2024
9 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

Different evaluators have different opinions. Eric is a lot more critical of prospects and there are flaws to both of those guys in his eyes. What makes Eric the best in my eyes in his willingness to form his own thoughts on players rather than just parroting what MLB Pipeline and BA have.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 hours ago
Reply to  bubbles

I don’t know that Eric is better than Baseball America / MLB Pipeline / whoever at predicting prospect outcomes, but I do know that Eric is far better at avoiding groupthink. And that he explains why far, far better than those other places do.

Last edited 8 hours ago by sadtrombone
sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

You can read the same thing I did if you like. But I promise you I don’t have access to anything you don’t have, just some experience reading Eric’s scouting reports.

For Ballestreros, Eric thinks there’s a good chance he is not a catcher, in which case he is almost certainly a DH. And a roughly league average hitter as a DH is not really rosterable, even as a league-average catcher with fringy defense is in all-star consideration.

His receiving has improved to a place of viability, but his ball-blocking, especially to his left, mostly has not. Though this problem was much more pronounced during the 2024 Arizona Fall League than it was during the regular season, it’s an issue that might prevent him from catching pitchers whose stuff is apt to expose his issues, and in his particular case that means guys whose stuff tends to finish in the dirt.

Eric has been pessimistic about defense in the past that hasn’t panned out, and others don’t seem to be bothered by it.

For Caissie, he strikes out a lot, which Eric was willing to overlook as long as his peak exit velocities were absurd, but then last season they backed up. I think Kiley said his exit velocity is back up though, in which case he will likely return to being an FV50 as a Joey Gallo-ish right fielder. So either Eric doesn’t have that information yet, or Caissie is doing something with his swing that is going to leave him super exposed to good pitching in MLB that he hasn’t told us about yet. Ask him about it in the chat.

Caissie’s power output exploded in 2023 and held firm in 2024 even though his underlying power data backed up quite a bit. He still generated plus raw pop, but Caissie’s peak exit velocities were below the elite numbers he posted in 2023. It’s important for Caissie to get to big power because he has other limitations as a hitter. For instance, he is very vulnerable to fastballs located at the top of the zone. His contact rates are near the bottom of what is usually acceptable from a good big league corner outfielder. With elite power, that’s okay. With plus power, Caissie looks more like a platoon option that an everyday cleanup hitter.

Last edited 9 hours ago by sadtrombone
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
8 hours ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m still higher on Caissie than that – being from a small school in Canada, plus COVID, earns him plenty of slack in my eyes when it comes to present skills.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 hours ago

I think this is probably who he is? Maybe he gets better when he is facing down MLB pitching and he decides he needs to reevaluate how he is doing things but he’s been running K rates between 28% and 32% every year, walking a ton, and hitting an enormous number of homers. This TTO thing seems to be working out for him very well in the minors and either he can’t change or he / his coaches don’t think he needs to. It might play against MLB pitching too, especially in a platoon role, but I don’t think his profile is going to change at all while he is in the minors.

But if the raw power is back, he’s a 50 purely on the “never give up on 80 raw power” and the track record.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
6 hours ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oh, I just expect him to maintain that High 20s K% in the majors rather than seeing it skyrocket, as he continues to adjust and get better.