Pre-Draft Farm System Rankings Are Now Live

© Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports

All 30 Top Prospect lists are now in the books. They spanned roughly 260,000 words of analysis and opinion regarding roughly 1,500 prospects and the systems they occupy, plus the tool grade components on The Board. Thanks to Kevin Goldstein, Brendan Gawlowski, and Tess Taruskin for their help, to Sean Dolinar for building the tools that allow me to produce these lists with such detail by removing a huge part of the technological burden, and to managing enabler editor Meg Rowley, who edited every word of every list and with whom I’m lucky to share enough pathological traits to make this all possible.

Every word of those write-ups is cemented on The Board’s 2022 Report section, which is now set in stone on the site for future reference. As players are traded and drafted over the next few weeks, or if their Future Value grade changes throughout the rest of the season, those alterations will be found in the 2022 Updated option on the dropdown menu. Players who graduate (i.e. lose rookie eligibility within this season) will move from the 2022 Updated page to the 2022 Graduates page, which already includes the players who have played enough this season to move off the prospect end of things. This is accessible through the Seasonal tab on The Board, though the default for the Seasonal tab at the moment takes you to the Futures Game rosters, so until next week you’ll have to use the dropdown to access the graduates.

That brings me to the Farm System Rankings, which are now live on the site. Readers have a couple of different options in this area. First, there are the live farm system rankings, viewable through the 2022 Updated drop down. These will fluctuate and change shortly after players are drafted, traded, or graduate, or move as they around the org lists. For instance, the Rays are currently ranked first, but they’ll drop to seventh as soon as Shane Baz graduates, which could be after his next start. This contradiction exists in farm rankings: a young player is good enough to get significant playing time at the big league level, and the result of this is the team falls in the system rankings. Folks who can feel the dissonance there should look at the farm rankings from the 2022 Report page, which includes Julio Rodríguez, Adley Rutschman, Bobby Witt Jr. and other recent graduates in the math that generates the rankings. The aim for the future is to enable you to toggle recent graduates on and off when you’re looking at the live rankings, giving you more of a “young players” ranking than one that only cares about prospect-eligible players. At some point, the calculations should be dictated by what the players are and not what I forecast them to be, and figuring out how and when to transition from one to the other in this hybridized prospect/pre-arb (maybe?) assessment is a thing we need to nail down.

Based on where they are on the current rankings, how much draft capital they have, and their pre-deadline posture as sellers, I’d guess that Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and Arizona will be the top three systems after the trade deadline, with Cincinnati a dark horse candidate to climb into that area if they get a huge haul for Luis Castillo. I’d consider some of the teams who have among the most listed prospects and who also have a strong developmental track record — such as the Dodgers, Red Sox and Guardians — to reinsert themselves into that top tier within the next year, just through the sheer volume of opportunities they have to make players better.

I’ll continue to update the pro lists over the next several weeks, with contenders and likely deadline buyers my priority, since they’re the ones most likely to move prospects. For right now though, there will be updated draft rankings and a mock draft on the site this week, followed by the migration of those players to the pro side of the lists shortly after the draft. Be on the lookout for that stuff and thanks for your continued support of FanGraphs.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
scotth855Member since 2020
4 years ago

Thanks, Eric! Congrats on getting all the prospect lists done, must be a good feeling.

raregokusMember since 2022
4 years ago

Thanks for all the hard work!

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago

Thanks, Eric!

So Detroit will drop to 27th when Riley Greene graduates in about 50-60 PA’s?

I know the “Big 5” (Mize, Manning, Skubal, Tork, Greene) have all graduated, but, that is disappointing for picking in the top 5 in 2018,19,20,21 & the top 10 in 16.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

I realize that the main alternatives to Tork and Mize aren’t necessarily doing that well either. And for Tork you’re talking about a near flawless hitting profile in college, and the book isn’t written on him yet. But it is wild that a team got to pick first twice and this is all they got.

Pachoo9Member since 2021
4 years ago

Not surprised that the Braves have the weakest system right now. The multi year international signings ban has really weakened them. They also traded away many of their top guys in the past six months (Pache, Waters, Langaliers, etc).

At the same time, their farm has really made the team what it is, from Austin Riley and Dansby Swanson emerging as top players, Contreras looking more like his older brother, Minter turning into a stud reliever, Strider and Harris leading the NL rookie of the year race, and Kyle Wright finally looking like the pitcher he was projected to be, the Braves are stacked with talent on the major league club from their farm.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Pachoo9

Swanson this year is the only really key player the Braves could lose in the next two off seasons. If Harris II, Contrares, and Strider are really even close to as good as they’ve shown, the Braves window is basically the rest of the decade. They’ll obviously need something from the farm down the road, but they are so stacked right now with long-term valuable assets, it’s impossible to worry about that now.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Pachoo9

Insane to think Riley, Acuna, Albies, Olson, Contreras, Harris, Minter, and potentially Strider, Anderson, and Wright will all be Braves for like $75M combined and what? 17-20 WAR per year?

Ask any team if they want a bottom tier farm in exchange for 6 starters on offense and 4 pitchers for $75M and 17-20 WAR. They’d all take it.

It really only hurts mid season upgrades. But even then, AA has proven to be a wizard at finding value there on a budget.

Wegandi727
4 years ago

Only 17-20 WAR for 75 mil? Stu hangs up on you so fast. If youre not coming with at least 40 WAR for 75 Mil local stingray is in terrible mood.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

To be fair, I think 30-35 WAR is a better prediction for those guys. The first four listed alone probably will project for about 20 WAR next season, or at least close to it (largely depends on Acuña getting his world-beater groove back).

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
4 years ago

It helps that Acuna and Albies were scammed by their agents…

mersilis
4 years ago

Great work, Eric! Has FG (or anyone else) put together a “Team Value” rankings, combining the value of farm systems and the surplus value of their existing MLB contracts? Seems like that could be interesting–both combined and broken out–to see teams’ value and where that value lies.

mikejuntMember
4 years ago
Reply to  mersilis

Its not quite the same, but one of the highlights of the Baseball Prospectus prospect reporting, should you subscribe, is that they end each team report with an organizational top 10 under 25, which captures the young, high-end talent that’s already graduated and gives you a pretty good sense of their future outlook and recent player development performance.

ballskwokMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  mersilis

I was thinking of something that combines the farm system ranking with the next 3 year ZiPS projection for year 1-6 players (or maybe just pre-arb players).

JoserMember since 2021
4 years ago

Eric, just want to thank you for all the hard work you put into these. From your conversations on the podcasts I’ve gotten a sense of just how much time you put into scouting every year, all the travel, all the sitting around, and all the talking to people who have seen players you may have missed or have a different perspective. And that’s all before you actually produce the words. Obviously you love doing it; but still. So. Much. Work.

mike sixelMember since 2016
4 years ago

Great stuff as always. Thank you.

Dingbat CharlieMember since 2018
4 years ago

Seriously man, you are a super hero. Fangraphs readers are lucky and spoiled to have you.

BubbaMember since 2016
4 years ago

Thanks! Nitpicky question – Should Brett Baty be a 50? All the players on the Board above and below him are 50s.

Meg RowleyFanGraphs Staff
4 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

Nope, just a backend rank (vs. FV) goof. Should be updated now.

Tyler Norton
4 years ago

Just in time to update them in 4 days when the draft happens!

GoatHerderMember since 2016
4 years ago

Thank you for all the amazing work! So much amazing information and having it dynamically update as players graduate or have ranking changes is awesome.

Question, how is the level of risk of the prospect factored into this scoring model? It would seem to me that a low risk 50 FV prospect who is 22 years old and playing in AAA would be more valuable than a high risk 50 FV prospect who is 18 years old and still in instructs. However, if I’m following correctly, these two very different prospects would have the same $ value assigned to them due to sharing the same FV.

Would the next level of refinement be to not only subdivide a FV group by hitter vs pitcher but too also then further break those out with different values to high, medium and low risk profiles.

baycommuterMember since 2016
4 years ago

Thanks for the tables. As a college baseball fan, I wonder if there’s any way of making “Signed From” searchable?