Projecting Cardinals Call-Up Alex Reyes
The St. Louis Cardinals recalled top prospect Alex Reyes yesterday and, a few hours later, the hard-throwing right-hander recorded his major-league debut, striking out one in a clean inning of relief work (box).
The book on Reyes is that his stuff is off the charts, but his control and command leave something to be desired. His numbers paint this picture vividly. His top-notch stuff enables him to miss a lot of bats, resulting in nearly unmatched strikeout rates the past couple of years. Meanwhile, his lackluster command has resulted in a concerning number of walks.
All else being equal, you’d prefer to have a pitcher that doesn’t have iffy command and an ugly walk rate. But all else isn’t equal with Reyes. His ability to generate strikeouts, especially at such a young age, is a huge point in his favor. I yanked some of those words from my recent Tyler Glasnow piece, but I’m recycling them here since they’re equally applicable to Reyes.
My KATOH projection system adores Reyes. It projects him for 7.6 WAR over his first six seasons by the traditional method and 12.6 WAR by the method that integrates Baseball America’s rankings. Reyes placed 18th and seventh overall, respectively, on KATOH’s recent top-100 lists. Among pitchers, though, he was third and first. KATOH’s lists tend to be relatively hitter-heavy — likely due to some combination of pitchers’ attrition rates and the fact that KATOH does not directly quantify “stuff.” But in terms of pitching prospects, scouting-infused KATOH thinks Reyes is the best one on the planet.
To help you visualize what his KATOH projection entails, here is a probability density function showing KATOH+’s projected distribution of outcomes for Reyes’ first six seasons in the major leagues.

To put some faces to Reyes’ statistical profile, let’s generate some statistical comps for the hard-throwing righty. I calculated a Mahalanobis distance between Reyes’ Triple-A performance this year and every Triple-A season since 1991 in which a pitcher recorded at least 350 batters faced. In the table below, you’ll find the 10 most similar seasons, ranked from most to least similar. The WAR totals refer to each player’s first six seasons in the major leagues. A lower “Mah Dist” reading indicates a closer comp.
Please note that the Mahalanobis analysis is separate from KATOH. KATOH relies on macro-level trends, rather than comps. The fates of a few statistically similar players shouldn’t be used to draw sweeping conclusions about a prospect’s future. For this reason, I recommend using a player’s KATOH forecast to assess his future potential. The comps give us some interesting names that sometimes feel spot-on, but they’re mostly just there for fun.
| Rank | Name | Mah Dist | KATOH+ Proj. WAR | Actual WAR |
| 1 | Rich Harden | 0.17 | 7.3 | 15.1 |
| 2 | Lance Dickson | 0.52 | 8.2 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Terrell Wade | 0.67 | 7.3 | 0.6 |
| 4 | Sam Militello | 1.36 | 9.6 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Matt Cain | 1.42 | 11.2 | 24.0 |
| 6 | Hayden Penn | 1.43 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Denny Neagle | 1.53 | 6.6 | 15.0 |
| 8 | Dan Reichert | 1.54 | 8.5 | 2.2 |
| 9 | Aaron Laffey | 1.68 | 6.7 | 2.1 |
| 10 | Rick Ankiel | 1.81 | 18.2 | 3.4 |
Unsurprisingly, several of Reyes’ comps also posted poor walk rates in Triple-A. Rich Harden, Lance Dickson, Terrell Wade, Matt Cain, Dan Reichert and Rick Ankiel were among the most extreme. Seeing Ankiel’s name in the above chart will understandably alarm some Cardinals fans, but the cases of Harden and Cain should serve as reminders that it’s very possible for a pitcher with iffy command to reach his top-of-the rotation upside.
A pitcher’s walk rate matters, but it isn’t nearly as predictive as his strikeout rate. Though Reyes struggles in the former category, he flourishes in the latter, which suggests a high probability of success in the big leagues. Throw in that he’s been largely successful as a 21-year-old in Triple-A this year, and Reyes is one of baseball’s most promising young arms.
As the chart above shows, KATOH thinks there’s a strong possibility that Reyes will rack up at least 16 WAR over the next six years, which essentially means he’d blossom into one of the game’s better starting pitchers. Whether he’ll be able to approximate that upside in the near term is a separate question. But the Cardinals clearly believe Reyes can help right now out of the bullpen. Given his stuff, his absurd minor league strikeout numbers and the results of his debut, it’s hard to question their assessment.
Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.
I watched his 9th inning last night. There was a FB at 101 and a CB at 79. So it seems like “stuff” definitely won’t be a problem.
If you’re a GM would you rather have Glasnow or Reyes?
Definitively Reyes now that Glasnow’s injured (even though its minor). It’s very close though, as they have similarly great profiles.
“Throw in that he’s been largely successful as a 21-year-old in Triple-A this year”
At what point would you consider him not successful? 4.96 ERA, 1.45 WHIP, 3.76 FIP and a hit an inning against.
I wouldn’t consider that largely successful.
His FIP is 11th best out of 75 PCL pitchers with >60 innings. This includes relievers, a few of whom are ahead of Reyes. http://www.fangraphs.com/minorleaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=4&qual=60&type=1&season=2016&team=0&players=0&sort=16,a
Fair enough. While his FIP certainly grades out well, his actual results weren’t all that great and he was also the beneficiary of averaging less than 5 IP per start; so we never got to see him deep in a game. His endurance wasn’t really tested, and he never went through a lineup three times.
I think Reyes has a lot to prove. As to the point below you, in regards to being the youngest player there, well… he’s going to be one of the youngest players at the MLB level as well and it won’t be an excuse. It certainly matters when evaluting and projecting a player going forward, but in the here and now – given that he was called up – it means nothing.
I’d like to see him prove he can throw strikes, get deeper into games and actually prevent runs at a high level.
PCL, where everything and their mother is inflated. You also have to realize he’s REALLY young for AAA.
The .365 BABIP is insanely high and would come down. The 67% LOB is also quite low and would go up.
Man, Rick Ankiel’s KATOH projection is off the charts. Is 18 a typo or does the system really love his track record when he was coming up that much?
Not a typo. Ankiel was basically a younger version of Reyes. Both had crazy strikeout numbers and iffy walk numbers in Triple-A, only Ankiel was 19 rather than 21. Ankiel was an amazing prospect.
… and won rookie of the year with 10 K/9, to go along with a 4.5 BB/9 … leading to 3.4 WAR in 175 IP.
He had normal HR/9, BABIP, etc.
The next year (after his playoff debut yips), he still had a 10 K/9, but also a 9.6 BB/9 and 2.6 HR/9.
It was basically a one in a million situation … so I don;’t think we should be too worried about it happening again.
How do you compute that probability density? The extreme multimodality seems odd
KATOH calculates a probability for each WAR total (ie 1 WAR, 2 WAR, 3 WAR, etc.) and uses those percentages to arrive at a point estimate (12.7 WAR in Reyes’ case). I use those probabilities to make the probability density chart. KATOH happened to give roughly the same probabilities in the 13-16 WAR range, which resulted in the gap (prob(WAR>13) = prob(WAR>16)).
I wouldn’t put too much thought into it, as its probably just a weird fluke in the way KATOH fit the historical data. Obviously, there’s a possibility that Reyes ends up with 13-16 WAR.
I’m well aware that there is positive probability there, I was just questioning the method used. Seems like your system could use some smoothing over the different WAR totals
Yeah, that’s something I want to look at. It doesn’t happen particularly often, but I want to at least get a sense of why it happens sometimes.
Mahalnobis gives him about a 20% chance of a 13-16 WAR. 😉
It is like the annual running of the bulls, another year, another hyped Cardinal pitching phenom.
Looks like a reliever long term to me with the short arm action. Kid had a 4.96 ERA with a 1.45 Whip in AAA ball this season. Young flamethrowing pitchers continue to be fools gold.
He had that ERA in the PCL which means he was pretty much pitching at a Coors like hitter friendly yard every game
The implication here seems to be that the Cardinals have had a lot of hyped pitching prospects the last few years who have not panned out. Here are their most hyped recent pitching prospects:
2015-2016: Alex Reyes
2014: Carlos Martinez
2013: Michael Wacha, Shelby Miller
2012: Lance Lynn
2010: Jaime Garcia
So which of these guys would you consider “fool’s gold”?
Which of these guys does he consider “flamethrowers”? Rosenthal, martinez, and Reyes are the only ones throwing 98+.
A lot of these guys have panned out quite well..
WTF kinda comment is this? I WISH the Cardinals had a prospect like this every year!
Young flamethrowers like Carlos Martinez? Who’s been worth 6 FWAR over his 1st 400 IP? I’ll take it.
You mean flamethrowers like Matt Harvey, Noah Syndergaard, Stephen Strasburg, Carlos Martinez, Roberto Osuna, Edwin Diaz, Chris Archer, Jose Fernandez? Those are certainly fools gold, aren’t they.