Rangers Get Quantity and Quality in Return for Gallo

The much anticipated Joey Gallo deal is now official. You can read my colleague Dan Szymborski’s analysis of the Yankees’ side of the trade here. The Rangers are set to acquire infielders Ezequiel Duran, Josh Smith and Trevor Hauver, as well as right-handed pitcher Glenn Otto, in exchange for Gallo and Joely RodrĆ­guez. Even if what was once a six-player return from the Yankees has fizzled down to four, make no mistake: this is a bulk deal. At the same time, there’s considerable quality to the quantity heading back to Texas; there are no throw-ins here. The Rangers were able to add a pair of players who enter their system’s top 10, while the remaining two both deserve the moniker of “prospect.” Meanwhile, the Yankees don’t just get the best left-handed power source in baseball, they also cleared much of their mild 40-man roster crunch, as Eric Longenhagen detailed on Wednesday.

The best prospect in the deal is Ezequiel Duran, a 22-year-old second baseman who was hitting .290/374/.533 at High-A Hudson Valley. His calling card is plus raw power, with maximum exit velocities pushing the 110 mph range. His plate discipline is solid, but his violent swing mechanics out of a 5-foot-11 frame produce plenty of swing-and-miss to go with the pop. He’s a fringy runner who lacks arm strength, and he’s already been moved to second base, where most scouts put a 40-45 grade on his defense. He projects as an offense-first player at the corner who can hit .250-.275 with 18-24 bombs a year to go with a decent walk rate. A more refined approach would up that projection a bit. He becomes the No. 3 prospect in the Rangers system.

While he’s not the best prospect in the deal, shortstop Josh Smith is in possession of the highest floor. A second-round pick out of Louisiana State two years ago, Smith is a scouting favorite. While his tools aren’t especially loud, evaluators struggle to find any holes in his game, and with a combined line of .324/.448/.641 in 39 games across two A-level squads, the performance has been attention-grabbing this year. At the plate, the 5-foot-11 Smith combines excellent swing decisions with plus-plus contact ability and enough sneaky pop to produce average power to the tune of 15-18 home runs per year down the road. He’s not a burner, but he has plus wheels that play up on the basepaths due to outstanding instincts. There were questions coming out of the draft as to his ability to stay at shortstop as a pro, but his fielding has grown on scouts, who now see him as an average defender at the position with enough arm to make the necessary plays. He’s the type of player who gets the most out of his tools, and those tools are at least average across the board. Barring injury, it’s hard to see Smith not making the big leagues with utility player as a floor, and a non-star everyday shortstop who doubles as a fan-favorite with his max-effort style of play the ceiling. He enters the Rangers’ top 10 at number eight.

Checking in at No. 31 in the system following the trade is Trevor Hauver, a 2020 third-round pick out of Arizona State who has taken the biggest step forward in 2021. While he’s cooled a bit since getting off to one of the hottest starts in all of the minors, he is hitting .288/.445/.498 for Low-A Tampa, though as a nearly 23-year-old coming out of a major college program, it would be expected for him to put up big numbers at this level. Hauver is a walking machine, with a 21.4% free pass rate this season. But there’s a difference between being patient and being passive, and Hauver works the count to an extreme degree, which often leaves him with only one or two swings per plate appearance; this approach has also led to an elevated strikeout rate (26.1%). His raw power falls in the average range, so the future dream for him is as an on-base machine who can pop 15-18 balls over the fence annually. The biggest questions revolve around where Hauver is going to play in the field. He’s stockily built and doesn’t ooze athleticism, with fringy run times and a slow first step that leave him a bit limited at his current position of second base. He has nowhere to go from here other than the wrong end of the defensive spectrum, which would put considerably more pressure on his bat. He looks like a potential plus contributor at the plate, but for many, the jury is still out until he gets tested at higher levels.

Finally, there is 25-year-old right-hander Glenn Otto, who enters the Rangers system in the mid-30s and is in the midst of a breakout campaign. He is also the one player in the deal who could see big league playing time for the Rangers as early as this year. Splitting time between Double- and Triple-A this season, Otto has an eye-popping 38% strikeout rate, but he’s not the kind of pure power arm you might expect from those numbers. His fastball has fringe-to-average velocity at 90-93 mph while touching 95, and it features a bit of rising action, but his out pitch is a present plus slider in the low-80s that produces some downright embarrassing swings at times. He leans on the pitch quite a bit, sometimes reaching 50% in-game usage. He controls both pitches well, but his changeup is still very much a work-in-progress, and his delivery and lack of arsenal depth have left many projecting him as a slider-heavy reliever in the end. The Rangers can (and should) use the remainder of the 2021 season to figure out just where his future lies in the big leagues.

The Rangers don’t have the best system in baseball, but they certainly have one of the deepest, and this deal adds to that depth considerably.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Kevin Goldstein is a National Writer at FanGraphs.

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Brian
5 years ago

Do you see any similarities between Josh Smith and Nick Solak offensively? Maybe I’m focusing too much on the Yankees/Rangers aspect.

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  Brian

They’re similar offensively in that they are from major college programs with advanced approaches at the plate except Solak is a RHH and Smith is a LHH. That’s huge. Having the platoon advantage in the majority of your at bats is obviously major. Not to mention Smith actually has defensive value.

Kevbot034
5 years ago

I think this trade was a very big win for both sides. I actually have thought that about almost all the deadline moves. Thanks for the write up, Kevin, it looks like the Rangers made a good first step in the rebuild.

TentakilRex
5 years ago

Fangraphs liking a Rangers trade that the Rangers hate?!?!?

Hold me I am scared!

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  TentakilRex

Rangers fans should be pissed. They gave up their best player and didn’t get any legit prospect. Not one.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago

I tried telling everyone gallo isn’t seen as a must have. He’s viewed as a good ballplayer. They gave up 5 prospects and not 1 of them was in the yankees top 15. Its honestly a sad return. I’d be pissed if i was a rangers fan. They gave up a bunch of minor league depth guys. This was obviously Rangers best offer if that tells you anything.

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Every fact this comment is wrong. Duran was #8 on the Yankees list earlier this year, It’s literally 1 click away? It was 4 prospects? Multiple sources, including BA, said that Smith would’ve been in their midseason top-10. Hard to take any of your opinions seriously if you’re this uninformed.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  will1331

Wrong. They were the 14,15,17,28 best prospects accoridng to MLB Piepleine. Baseballtradevaluel.com shows they should’ve received 50% more value than they did. Rangers got robbed. Gave up gallo and din’t get 1 top 100. In fact the only thing that wouldve made this remotely a fair deal was if they yankees inclueded one more prospect and it was their #2, 3 or 4 best prospects (perraza, schmidt, or garcia).

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

I think you’re also getting hung up on the ordinal ranking of players years away from the majors. At MLB pipeline, Smith and Duran are both given 50s, and only 4 players on the Yankees site got ranked higher than that. If you’ve read Eric’s writing on this (and maybe become a member at the same time?), you’d know that the grade is more important than the rank.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

Looking at Kevin’s writeup, I think that the Yankees had to make a trade like this even though they’re 4 games back from the wild-card (or something like it). None of these guys are top-end prospects (Duran’s the closest, he’s obviously performed and is the centerpiece), and Gallo’s a star who’s under control for another year.

For the Rangers…I don’t think I like particularly like this return. The prospects are all interesting, at least. It could turn out well. But I saw someone compare this to the Teixeira trade and this is not even close to that. I would definitely like the deal if Deivi Garcia was there instead of Hauver, and I think that would be a fair deal for the Yankees too. But I also don’t know what other prospects were offered by other teams so it’s hard to say whether they should have taken a different deal.

I think the reason why the Rangers like this deal is that it seems they have a real affinity for defensively fringy guys in the middle infield, so I bet they grade this higher than the public rankings would indicate. The guy they used to have at second was Odor. Then they put Solak there instead. Now that Solak’s bat is cold Foscue, Duran, and Hauver are all possible long-term replacements. And then at shortstop we have Josh Smith and Davis Wendzel. In theory, Smith would be good at second and Wendzel at third but with the Foscue / Duran / Hauver trio at second and Jung at third it looks less likely. They seem like they are absolutely committed to maximizing their offensive production at SS/2B/3B. But since these guys are all fringy runners except Smith I’m not sure they’d be great in a corner outfield, so if for some reason multiple guys can hit one of them probably winds up at DH.

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Yankees are 2.5 games out of the 2nd wild card, but just one game back in the loss column. There’s 62 games left. Plenty of time to make up these games. Especially with so many teams ahead of them playing each other (the Yankees play Oakland as well). The Yankees have another series against the Rays too as well, so they could conceivably catch them. Not very likely though. But if they win today, they’ll be 5 back with 61 games left and one series left against the Rays.

The Rangers return wasn’t great, but I think we’ve been conditioned to believe that if a trade isn’t an overpay in prospects, it’s not a great deal, like in the Starling Marte deal. Though if you don’t think Luzardo is a starter, is it really an overpay? Even if one of Smith or Duran are 2-3 WAR guys this is a win for the Rangers in terms of surplus value. Throw in Otto and Hauver, and I can see how the Rangers are thinking about this. Teams are holding onto their prospects tighter than ever.

I agree though, if Deivi Garcia is in this it looks a lot better for them. But I’m glad the Yankees didn’t sell low on Garcia. Apparently they’ve been tinkering his mechanics to help his control but it’s made him go backwards. At this point he might need to go back to what made him successful even if he ends up walking a bit too many guys.

jdtTX
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

The problem is the Rangers didn’t HAVE to make this trade. Gallo wanted to stay. He begged them to let him stay. Publicly. Over and over. He’s not 36 or refusing to sign an extension. Terrible haul for a team that wasn’t being held at gunpoint to move him.

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  jdtTX

Meh. He’s a Boras client so he’s not signing an extension unless it’s just absurd. The Rangers aren’t close to competing. So.. just keep him and get a pick back when he walks as a FA? I guess you can just offer him the most money when he’s a FA.. but they can just do that anyways?

Prospects are more valuable than ever. Teams aren’t giving up their best prospects for a year and a half of a player, even one as good as Gallo. Even if one of these guys ends up being a 2-3 WAR player, it’s a win in terms of surplus value. Yeah, they didn’t get one of the Yankees top guys like Oswald Peraza, Dominguez, or Volpe, but no team was offering that kind of player or else he’d be traded elsewhere.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I don’t get it. Gallo publicly stated recently that he wanted to sign an extension with the Rangers. If he wasn’t keen on staying, why would he say that when he was clearly on the block? It makes them look bad for trading him. What does he stand to gain by doing that?

steveo
5 years ago

It’s mostly PR. What else is he gonna say? Trade me? He’s likely hitting free agency unless the Rangers (or Yankees now, I guess) offer him an above market deal. I’m assuming the Rangers didn’t do that, or else he’d probably have signed an extension.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

He could just say nothing about it. Most players on my favorite team haven’t made any statement in favor of or against an extension.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I think the Rangers think one of those guys is a consistent 2-3 win player. I’m not so sure. And in any case, the way we think about surplus value is a bit inconsistent with the reality that a 3-4 win player (or a 4-5 win player if you’re high on Gallo) is much, much more valuable than a 2-3 win one. A lot.

But Gallo’s performance now won’t help them three years from now when they might actually be good if he isn’t in a Rangers uniform.

chris44
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Or you simply resign him down the road when he is a FA. If Gallo really did like Texas this doesn’t really damage your chances to bring him back.

dl80Member since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Since when is a 3-4 win player a star?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

This is fair. If you think that the changes at the plate aren’t going to stick, then yes, he’s a 3-4 win player. About 1.2 wins in ~200 PAs.

If you think the changes do stick then he’s a 3-4 win player in ~400 PAs instead. I’d call a guy in the 4.5-6 win range a star for sure.

But that does mean you think the changes stick. And that’s not a given. I don’t think he’s necessarily in the same class as Trea Turner as a player, since Turner’s performance this year and projection going forward are both way better.

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agree w/your take on the Rangers’ views. As Eric put it in the top prospects write-up:

“Have you ever had a band or musical artist you liked whose style shifted pretty dramatically from one album to the next, but that shift mirrored your own changing tastes? That’s how I feel about the Rangers’ newfound approach to building their farm system during the first extended rebuilding period of the Jon Daniels era.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  will1331

Yeah, I don’t like this return but that’s because the “slow-second baseman” archetype is pretty low on the defensive spectrum. If they don’t work out at second they either flail around in left field or you decide don’t need a tall guy at first and play them there. And if the bat doesn’t play there are no secondary skills to fall back on.

The Rangers clearly do not agree! Smith, Duran, and Hauver have all performed so far with the bat and I suspect that matters more to them than it would to others who are worried about “what if” scenarios.

chris44
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I assume you are refencing Duran here? Smith isn’t slow, all the stuff I can find on him indicates he is a well rounded type guy. The Rangers tastes have shifted mostly in the hitted department, they have targeted hit tool guys instead of homerun guys, hence Foscoe and Jung

TentakilRex
5 years ago
Reply to  will1331

Should we consider this the Chris Young era, he is the GM

chris44
5 years ago
Reply to  TentakilRex

I think you should checkout JD’s interview after the Gallo trade, sounds like they make decisions as a group, but I also believe it is telling that JD gave that interview. I think for good or ill JD is the head guy for now.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago

Yankees just gave up their #14, 15, 17, 23, 28 prospects according to MLB Pipeline. They robbed the rangers and i don’t even think gallo is that good. Not even 1 top 100 guy.

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Search for @ SethDRothman: “With thanks to @jjcoop36 and the hard-working team at Baseball America, the Yankees’ team prospect rankings (mid-season update) of players reportedly traded for Gallo:

Ezequiel Duran 6
Josh Smith 8
Glenn Otto 20
Trevor Hauver 22”

You’re looking at all of these lists that were put together in the offseason, in a year where we had less info on young players than usual. We get that you think Gallo isn’t good. You’re wrong, but using outdated prospect info to try to prop up that opinion isn’t helpful.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  will1331

Gallos value was 42.8, they received 29.8 in return. No one thinks this was fair deal. Rangers shouldve recieved Perraza, Deivi Garcia, or Schmidt as well for this to be a fair deal on paper.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

If you’re relying on baseball trade values, you probably shouldn’t. It’s a nice idea but some of the specific values they stick in don’t make a lot of sense.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Whether you agree with their exact numbers or not doesn’t matter, its still in that vicinity give or take 10%, and this trade was no where close to being fair, it was 50% off.

Also there are no values they “stick In”. Its not a “feel” thing, its algorithmic driven. If you believe in FG numbers, then you believe in their numbers because thats where they get them.

Prospect values are awarded based on aggregate prospect ranking for that said prospect and whether theyre a 45 grade player or 50,55+ etc. Same way FG has done in past when trying to award values to prospects in the top 100.

The MLB player values are actually derived from modeled stats here at FG and taking into account their contracts to come up with surplus values. Its not some black box theyre creating behind the scenes.

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

JFC, it’s clear that those prospects values are from rankings published at the beginning of the season. Do you know how often they update prospect values? A lot has changed since then.

From Jarrett Seidler at BP (where they had Duran at 9 in the NYY system): “Duran was in peripheral consideration for our recent midseason 50…”

“A top 20-caliber prospect entering the season due to strong bat-to-ball skills, Smith has shown off surprising game power and crushed both A-ball levels to the tune of a 1.000+ OPS… He probably would’ve ranked within a revised Yankees top 10 before the deal.”

“Pitcher Glenn Otto is this year’s Yankees college pitcher who reached Double-A and suddenly acquired a really good slider out of nowhere to go with his mid-90s fastball… The big righty was one of the best pitchers in Double-A until his recent promotion to Triple-A, and he’s currently carrying a 115/17 K/BB ratio for the season. He’d have also been a strong candidate for a pre-trade Yankees top 10.”

@JJCoop36 (Exec Editor at BA) tweeted yesterday: “I am trying to make sure everyone understands that the Yankees did trade away Top 10 Prospects in this deal. If you’re argument is you don’t like Duran/Smith and have info, let’s discuss. If it’s because you cite preseason rankings (ours included) that’s outdated info.”

It’s called adjusting to new information. Try it sometime.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Yeah, well, teams are precious with their prospects now. Nobody gives up top prospects anymore. Every single one of these trades involving someone who is under team control for more than one year is dramatically slanted

This is why it’s generally better to buy than to sell, but if you’re going to sell you need some more realistic expectations. I don’t like this return either but it’s not *that* far off of what they should have gotten.

But the numbers just don’t make any sense. Whatever values the site your’re using are pretty questionable. Let’s calculate the actual trade value, according to FG grades and Craig’s work on prospect valuation.
FV50 bat: $28M
FV45 bat: $6M
FV40 bat: $2M
FV40 pitcher: $1M
So, about $37M.

Gallo’s salary is paid for the rest of the year; next year he’s looking at a pretty big raise in arbitration, but not enormous. $11M salary next year, let’s say.

Both ZiPs and Steamer suggest he’s worth about 1.2 fWAR over 200 PAs. That’s very good. 200 PAs this year and 600 PAs next year would put him about 4.8 fWAR. 4.8*9M is $43.2M. Subtract 11, you get $32.2M in surplus value.

So according to this, the Rangers are actually getting about $4.5M in value more than they’re giving up. I, personally, think that this analysis is probably wrong because ZiPs and Steamer seem a little down on Gallo’s production. If you take his current production this year as the baseline, you’re looking at 8.8*9M-$11M, or about $68M in value instead of $32.2M. But the idea that he’s going to just keep doing what he’s doing and not do the ZiPs or Steamer projection is not by any means settled.

I hope this clears some things up.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Nobody gives up top prospects now”

Austin Martin?

brunoMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Go cry on MLB pipeline then. No one cares about their rankings here. Sorry the FG rankings don’t support your complaint as well.

The GuruMember since 2026
5 years ago

Numbers are showing that the Rangers shouldve received 50% more value than they did according to trade values i’m seeing across mult sites.

CC AFCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

I’m not sure. Do you think this is a good deal for the Rangers or no? Please clarify

brunoMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

“The numbers” think its a bad deal for them. He’s only reporting the numbers.

brunoMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Go cry about it repeatedly on those other sites then. This site is saying they did fine.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
5 years ago

I like the return. The prospects are old for A ball (22-23) but really covid has changed timelines so you can’t compare a 23 yo in A ball to a 23 yo before covid.

Neither is probably going to be a star but really gallo hasn’t been a star before this season either and you might get two league average infielders and a major league reliever out of those prospects if everything goes well.

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

The average age for high A is 23. So Duran is actually young for the level and Josh Smith is a little old for the level. But yeah, covid really screwed up timelines and appropriate ages for prospects.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I’m not really a huge fan of the average age thing because the majority of minor league players are not real prospects.

For the two college players the age is fine but for an international or HS prospect like Duran being 22+ in A ball is pretty old, Duran is rule 5 eligible in December which means he really should be in AAA at that age so he can come up before he is rule 5 eligible.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I had made a lazyish comment on the earlier post that this reminded me of the Teixiera deal. Actually, this is a lot like a lower-level version of that deal – I love Gallo but he’s not Teixiera. And none of the prospects fall into the Andrus/Feliz class, but they all look to have some level of potential to contribute at the MLB level.

will1331Member since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I’d argue Teixeira and Gallo were pretty similar at the times of their respective trades. Tex had 15 career WAR in 4 full seasons (615 games); Joey had 10 career WAR in 473 games coming into this year (and had is best season in ’19 cut in half by a HBP if I remember correctly).

Tex was good for 4.4 WAR the season he was traded, Joey on pace for 5 wins this year. The shape of their contributions is a little different, but holds up. The big difference is that Joey hasn’t had that big 6-win season, but he was on pace for that (or more) in ’19.

The respective trade returns are a reflection of the growing value the industry places on prospects, nothing more.

BigDaddy
5 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I think that’s the win-win (and possibly the most likely) outcome and interpretation of this deal in the end. Rangers get a couple of controllable cheap, league-average contributors and NYY get 1.5 years of above average (potentially star) level production. And it’s win-win because the NYY have enough money where they shouldn’t need to rely on cost-controlled, league-average guys. Whereas the Rangers (sadly) are highly valuing the cost savings.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Gallo was a “star” before he got hurt in 2019, too. He mostly just had a poor 2020.

BigDaddy
5 years ago

Very Yankees trade. Adding a big LH bat with that RF porch and one of the top exit velo guys in MLB that wasn’t already on their roster seems like a match made in heaven. Gallo is as Yankees as Yankees get.

I’ll take it at face value that this is fair value, but trading guys with potential but lower ceilings is the exact type of thing a big market team like the NYY needs to do. Keep the Volpes, deal the Durans.

chris44
5 years ago
Reply to  BigDaddy

I agree. Not sure it changes my opinion that the Yankees are in trouble, but Joey is a good player that can help anyone.

alisterfiend38501
5 years ago

The rangers screwed themselves. They got nothing in return. And they are paying the yanks for Gallo and Joely. How stupid can Chris Young be? 4 single A prospects. Who in all likelyhood will never make it past AAA. Odds are that 1 will be a back up. And that’s about it.

johndarc
5 years ago

Otto is in triple a already

chris44
5 years ago

Good players start out in A ball man, are you going to remember this comment in 3 years when Smith or Duran is starting in Arlington?